SEMINARIE MIDDENKADER VLAAMSE OVERHEID

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Giving Feedback. The right and the wrong. >> giving feedback
Advertisements

Sensitivity Analysis Consider the CrossChek hockey stick production problem: Management believes that CrossChek might only receive $120 profit from the.
How can monitoring & evaluating improve customer service for the staff, the zoo and the customer M3 & D2.
Why Wellness Works! Improve employee engagement and wellbeing. Build a better workplace.
Hamtramck Employee Engagement Leadership Initiative.
Boosting Employee Morale While Maintaining Superior Customer Relations Chris Rossi.
Talent Management: Performance and Learning. Member of South Carolina Federal Credit Union’s family of credit union service organizations (CUSO): Indirect.
Current Trends in Workforce and Succession Planning IPMA – HR Training Conference Seattle, Washington October 5, 2010 Eva Santos, Director Department of.
1 Test Overview & Interpretation - Derailers. A leading provider of assessments used for employee selection & development Assessed over 3.5 million working.
Wellness In The Workplace Internal Affairs ©All rights reserved to Joan Jacobs.
CREATING TRANSFERRABLE WEALTH THROUGH STRENGTHS AND ENGAGED MANAGEMENT Jim Downing, PhD Executive Leadership Resources, Inc. January 2, 2013.
Arousal Theories of arousal and the consequences.
Page 1 Delivering Progress, Passion & Peace: An Evidence-Based Model Dr Peter Langford Voice Project Macquarie University Sydney, Australia CSR Summit,
THE COMING BEHAVIORAL REVOLUTION IN LEADERSHIP ECU Hong Kong, June 2012.
Employee engagement Guide Global Human Resources June 2014.
Helping Managers Better Engage Employees Steve Kessel MRA.
Wellness In The Workplace Internal Affairs ©All rights reserved to Joan Jacobs.
Promoting Employee Health and Well-Being
T HE G ALLUP O RGANIZATION 1 Managing Employee Engagement in this Crisis Copyright © 2009 The Gallup Organization, Princeton, NJ. All rights reserved.
Teri Ridler Hands On Leaderhip. Engagement = Success Gallup Data: Companies with Engaged Employees: o Have 50% lower turnover o Experience 56% higher.
The Inspiration Triangle Teri Ridler Director of Human Resources SeaWorld Orlando.
Creating success through wellbeing in higher education Kim Shutler-Jones Project Manager for Wellbeing in Higher Education 2nd Sep 2009.
Engagement ‘War Cry’ Go for Gold! Dare to WIN.. Unleashing 100% Potential… Must WIN Battles…. The Next Big Leap.
Aon Hewitt | Communication 1 Better Health = Better Business Results Presented by: Robin Bouvier, Vice President – Health Transformation June 12, 2015.
The Gallup Management Journal's semi-annual Employee Engagement Index puts the current percentage of employees who are.
Chapter 6 Jobs & the Design of Work. Job Compared to Work Job - a set of specified work and task activities that engage an individual in an organization.
Employee Engagement Deep Dive. Types of Employees.
LEARN YOUR STRENGTHS AND HOW TO USE THEM Lindsey Daniel, PE Process Engineer, CRB Ashley Harp, PE Lead Process Engineer, CRB March 31, 2016.
It has in impact on the following:  Customer Service  Productivity  Employee turnover  Safety incidents or accidents  Theft (shoplifting and employee.
53% of employers do not track employee performance What if managers had a tool that was easy to use and helped them with their employee one-on-ones? Try Align for free:
Engagement Matters: How Engaged Is Your Team & Why Knowing is Critical to Your Success? OSIYO GROUP: LEIGH A. MCGEE, CO-FOUNDER & PRINCIPAL 2016 NATIONAL.
The Hard Truth About the Soft Stuff AGA Professional Development Training Conference October 26, 2016 Janine Moon / COPEC / Workforce Change.
Discovering your role as a leader
Well-being Initiative
Performance Management and Employee Development
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT Gordy Griller Ray Billotte
MORE THAN MEETS THE ROI The Value of Investing in a Healthy Workforce
Cardinal Stritch University
Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage
LEADS Impact: CADTH’s Case Study
Authors: Tom Rath & Donald Clifton, Ph.D.
David G. Myers and C. Nathan DeWall
Key Decision Makers Track
Exercise Physiologist
Curing Disengagement? 1 in 100
Curing Disengagement? 1 in 100
Goalsharing Scores HRMagazine April 2000.
Hire Tough, Manage Easy Attitude vs. Skill
The Job Characteristics Theory of Work Motivation
Theories of arousal and the consequences
Curing Disengagement? 1 in 100
Monitoring and Evaluating Customer Service
Wellness to well-being and beyond
Improve Employee Engagement by Growing Your Managers!
The Power of Employee Engagement
Curing Disengagement? 1 in 100
HOPE AS A THEORY OF CHANGE
Curing Disengagement? 1 in 100
Curing Disengagement? 1 in 100
Curing Disengagement? 1 in 100
Curing Disengagement? 1 in 100
HR for Digital Millennials
Curing Disengagement? 1 in 100
Curing Disengagement? 1 in 100
Lecture Enhancers Chapter One. Lecture Enhancers Chapter One.
Curing Disengagement? 1 in 100
Curing Disengagement? 1 in 100
Curing Disengagement? 1 in 100
Curing Disengagement? 1 in 100
Michael Harkness & Marybeth McMenemon
Presentation transcript:

SEMINARIE MIDDENKADER VLAAMSE OVERHEID OOSTENDE 17 NOVEMBER 2016

95%

Kopman 7.0 Result Results Networks Exploitation Position Mandate Makes people better Result Connection Mandate Results Networks Exploitation Position 5

Gallup estimates that only about one in 10 people naturally possess high talent to manage Organizations name the wrong person as manager about 80% of the time One in two employees have left a job to get away from a manager and improve their overall life at some point in their carreer

How to motivate people

90% ? 100%? 110%? 90% 100% 110%

Ideal stress intensity zone Stress Model performance Positive stress Negative stress Stress Intensity No stress No performance Ideal stress intensity zone OPTIMAL PERFORMANCE Very high stress No performance Yerkes & Dodson

IMPACT OF FEEDBACK

DISENGAGEMENT OF THE EMPLOYEES Positive feedback: 1% Negative feedback: 22% No feedback: 40% Source: Gallup

TURNOVER OF THE EMPLOYEES PRODUCTIVITY OF THE EMPLOYEES Strengths feedback: -14,9% compared with no FB PRODUCTIVITY OF THE EMPLOYEES Strengths feedback: + 12,5% compared with no FB Source: Gallup

American Psychological Association 2014

Focus on strengths

STRENGTHS-BASED EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT Performance increases within the following ranges: 10% to 19% increased sales 14% to 29% increased profit 3% to 7% higher customer engagement 6% to 16% lower turnover (low-turnover organizations) 26% to 72% lower turnover (high-turnover organizations) 9% to 15% increase in engaged employees 22% to 59% fewer safety incidents Source: Gallup

Coaching is fighting for the hearts and souls of men and getting them to believe in you. (Eddie Robinson)