Rita Hvistendahl and Astrid Roe

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Individual, Home, and Community Factors PISA/PIRLS Task Force International Reading Association January 2005.
Advertisements

Grading and Reporting Grades K-3. Purpose of Grading and Reporting Our primary purposes of grading and reporting include: Report student progress toward.
Programme for International Student Assessment PISA 2009 Competences of Portuguese students Warsaw, February 10, 2011 Carlos Pinto-Ferreira, Anabela Serrão.
What can we learn from the international PISA study about improving reading at age 15? February 2011.
24 July 2014 PISA 2012 Financial Literacy results – New Zealand in an international context.
TM Confidential and Proprietary. Copyright © 2007 by Educational Testing Service. 1.
Hacettepe University Usluel, Y. K., Kelecioğlu, H. & Mazman, S.G. COMPARATIVE EXAMINATION OF COMPUTER AND INTERNET USAGE OF PISA BALKAN COUNTRIES 2010.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
Education for a Democratic, Pluralistic Society EDU: 251 By: Joanna Daehling-Nelson.
 Welcome to Braeside PS  Parent Information Session  Thursday 11 th June 2015.
Accelerated Reader at Starcross Primary School What is Accelerated Reader? How does it work? How can I help my child?
Computer in Education Jiaying Zhao CSE 610 Western Oregon University.
The “Digital Divide” is the gap between those who have proper and appropriate access to and benefit from digital technology and those who do not. “Technology.
The Reality Our current education and exam system is heavily reliant on literacy. This means that successful learning and exam performance depend to a.
UNESCO MOBILE LEARNING WEEK RESEARCH SEMINAR Keynote Address by Andreas Schleicher Director for Education and Skills, and Special Advisor on Education.
UNESCO INSTITUTE for STATISTICS Access to & use of ICT in education: A few results from a school survey Yanhong Zhang.
Raising the Quality of Educational Outcomes and Improving E-learning: Cross-national Evidence on Challenges and Opportunities Judit Kádár-Fülöp Indicators.
Education and ICT: Documenting the relationship Victor Thiessen Dalhousie University E. Dianne Looker Acadia University.
The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system Claudio QUINTANO, Rosalia CASTELLANO, Sergio LONGOBARDI University of Naples.
HKPISA Reading habit, reading attitude and reading literacy performance in Hong Kong and Finland Presented by Paul Sze and Esther Ho PISA International.
Social Implications of ICT HIGHER INFORMATION SYSTEMS.
Growing Up In Ireland Research Conference The Education of 9-Year-Olds.
Granite School District. Reading is a natural process. Reading includes at least three parts of your brain at a time. Good readers do not need to read.
PISA: Behind the headlines and past the rankings Sue Thomson Director, Educational Monitoring and Research, ACER National Project Manager PISA National.
The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, Overview for Parents and the difference they.
Education and educational policy in the enlarged EU – the case of the Czech Republic NATIONAL CONTEXT New school act equity as a priority self evaluation.
1 The Impact of Computer Use on Reading Achievement of 15-year-olds Patrick Bussière and Tomasz Gluszynski Child, Youth and Social Development Studies.
Improving Equity & Quality of Education in Thailand Using the results from International and National Assessments [PISA, TIMSS, & National Test]
Talbot Primary School. Year 2 SATs Presentation..
1 United Kingdom Education at a Glance 2015 Andreas Schleicher Director for Education and Skills Release date: 24 November 2015.
What is reading literacy? Curriculum in mother tongue Core skills at the initial stage Cultural identity Strongly integrated Active learner Pragmatic.
1 United States Education at a Glance 2015 Andreas Schleicher Director for Education and Skills Release date: 24 November 2015.
 Engage in targeted, research-based, small group instruction addressing the needs of our students.  Create a school culture that promotes goal setting.
SATS 2016 What’s new?.  Your children will be in the first year group to take tests based on the new National Curriculum (2014).  Schools only began.
Helping ELL Learners Advance To the Next Level: Teaching Through Video Games By: Colleen Hart.
ELA/READING WORKSHOP STOCKBRIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL TITLE I PROGRAM.
UAE National Agenda – A World Class Education
Edina Kovács Characteristics of education system of V4 countries (Hungary, Poland, Czech Republic and Slovakia)
The Enlaces Network Chile’s ICT for Schools Policy.
Pierre Brochu, CMEC Welcome to Kindergarten™ Early Years Family and Community Engagement Symposium May 15, 2014 Does Parental Engagement in Early Literacy.
1 Perspectives on the Achievements of Irish 15-Year-Olds in the OECD PISA Assessment
Factors associated with achievement in PISA 2006 Why? Why? –Establishing links –Identifying things we can change –Valuable data in its own right E.g. bullying,
1 PISA 2006 Main achievement outcomes and factors associated with performance on science Eemer Eivers, Gerry Shiel & Rachel Cunningham Educational Research.
Mathematics Education:
Key Stage One National Curriculum Assessments
PISA 2015 results in England
World Beaters or Underachievers
Together Everyone Achieves More!
Self-Efficacy and Participation in A-level Mathematics
What do the data and research really tell us?
PISA 2015 Excellence and Equity in Education Peter Adams
Rita Hvistendahl og Astrid Roe
The Whartons Parent Forum
Off to a Good Start? Primary School Experiences and the Transition to Second-Level Education Emer Smyth.
PCAP for Grade 8 Canadians
The digital divide: the special case of gender
Francesc Pedró Katerina Ananiadou Seoul, 9 – 11 November 2009
Year 9 & 10 Parents’ Welcome Evening
Mathematics Lesson 2: Dual bar charts
Between-school Variance in Achievement
Sabine Wollscheid, Senior Researcher, Dr. phil.
Accelerated Reader at Starcross Primary School
Education Policy Leadership Conference March 14, 2008
Japan Measuring Innovation in Education 2019:
Ontario (Canada) Measuring Innovation in Education 2019:
Russian Federation Measuring Innovation in Education 2019:
UAE National Agenda – A World Class Education
Year 6 Sats Meeting for Parents Thursday 28th February 2019
ICILS 2013 International Computer and Information Literacy Study
Parent Information Evening
Presentation transcript:

Rita Hvistendahl and Astrid Roe Reading habits and ICT use among language minority students Based on PISA data from 2000 and 2006 Rita Hvistendahl and Astrid Roe Department of teacher education and school development, University of Oslo

Research questions How are the reading habits and attitudes towards reading among language minority boys and girls compared to majority students? For what activities and how frequently do boys and girls from language minorities use computers? How do the students assess their own ICT skills? Is there a connection between ICT use and PISA scores for scholastic achievement? Has there been a development over time with regard to ICT use, reading scores and reading habits?

Language minority students in PISA Students with both parents born abroad Students born in the country Students born abroad

Number of students in the different groups PISA 2000 Majority =3870 Minority born in Norway N=74 Minority born abroad N=143 PISA 2006 Majority N=4279 Minority born in Norway N=140 Minority born in Norway N 142

Results 2006 OECD-average = 500 points (average std. deviation =100) Reading Math Science Majority 491 (100) 495 (80) 493 (93) Minority born in Norway 456 (98) 448 (93) 437 (95) Minority born abroad 427 (120) 439 (98) 434 (108)

Results in 2000 and 2006 2000 2006

Scholastic achievement The mean scores for the language minority students are lower than those of other pupils in all three areas. In 2000 the gender differences among minority students were low. For majority students however, there were large differences in the reading scores. This changed in 2006. Minority girls have significantly higher reading scores than do boys due to improved performance among the girls and a decline for the boys. The higher percentage of poor readers among minority boys is a serious challenge for Norwegian schools.

Percentage of students who NEVER read for pleasure 2000 og 2006

Changes in the percentage of students who read at least once a week -10 10 20 30 40 Newspapers E-mail and Internet Other books Fiction Cartoons Magazines Prosent Min.girls Maj.girls Min.boys Maj.boys

Reading habits The frequency of reading activities has increased, in particular with digital texts. Gender differences in reading habits have increased among minority students, and are approaching those of majority students.

Students’ daily use of ICT in 2000 and 2006

Norwegian students’ use of ICT compared to the OECD-average

Students’ use of ICT in 2000 and 2006 The percentage of students who use computers on a daily basis has increased among all groups from 2000 to 2006, in particular for minority girls. Gender differences in use have evened out – but boys still play more computer games than girls. Internet use has increased among all students, and computer use at home is higher than at school. Norwegian students score above the OECD average, but with high variance between genders and student groups.

Norwegian students’ self-confidence in their use of ICT compared to the OECD-average

Correlation between ICT use and scolastic achievement Math. maj. Math. min. Read. maj. Read. min. Sc. maj. Sc.min. Selfconf. advanc. ICT . 0,00 0,08 - 0,06 0,03 0,02 0,10 Selvf Internet 0,14 0,22 0,23 0,12 Use of comp.games or Internet 0,07 Use of software 0,17 0,11 Correlation between “Selfconfidence Internet” and scolastic achievement between girls and boys Maj.girls Min.girls Maj.boys Min.boys Math 0,06 0,19 0,26 Reading 0,07 0,09 0,21 0,29 Science 0,04 0,13

Implications for Norwegian schools The development from 2000 to 2006 shows that language minority students are becoming more “alike” the majority students. On the positive side reading frequency has increased. On the negative gender differences in the boys’ disfavour have increased. It is disturbing that the minority boys’ reading scores have declined from 2000 to 2006, and that it is those with the lowest scores who find Internet use difficult. Digital competence requires advanced reading skills – and this is a serious challenge for Norwegian schools.

Literature Hvistendahl, R. og Roe, A. 2009. Leseprestasjoner, lesevaner og holdninger til lesing blant elever fra språklige minoriteter. Norsk Pedagogisk Tidsskrift 4/2009, s 250-263. Roe, A. og Hvistendahl, R. 2009. Bruk av IKT blant elever fra språklige minoriteter. Norsk Pedagogisk Tidsskrift 5/2009, s 368-385. Hvistendahl, Rita and Astrid Roe, 2004. The Literacy Achievement of Norwegian Minority Students. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research Vol. 48 Issue 3/2004, pp 307-324. Roe, Astrid and Rita Hvistendahl, 2006. Nordic Minority Students Literacy Achievement and Home Background. I: Nordic Lights on PISA 2003 – a reflection from the Nordic Countries. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers 2006, s 113-128.