Persuasive Appeals AP LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION Logos

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Basics of Logical Argument Two Kinds of Argument The Deductive argument: true premises guarantee a true conclusion. e.g. All men are mortal. Socrates.
Advertisements

AP Vocabulary 5 L.J. Perales ©
Argumentation.
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: The Classical and Toulmin, Models Junior AP English September 23, 2008.
{ Introduction to Logic The two types of logos. Induction  Definition: compiling of evidence/reasons/ examples that support an argument  Example: “Wow!
OCTOBER 25, 2010 PLEASE TAKE YOUR PAPERS FROM THE FOLDERS. (DO NOT LEAVE THEM, TAKE THEM WITH YOU.) YOUR MIDTERM WILL BE RETURNED TO YOU ON WEDNESDAY.
Debate. Inductive Reasoning When you start with a probable truth, and seek evidence to support it. Most scientific theories are inductive. Evidence is.
Logic. To Think Clearly Use reason, instead of relying on instinct alone What is Logic? – “the art of reasoning” – The study of truth – The ethics of.
Logos Formal Logic.
Debate. Inductive Reasoning When you start with a probable truth, and seek evidence to support it. Most scientific theories are inductive. Evidence is.
Persuasive Strategies Copyright 2006 IRA/NCTE. All rights reserved. ReadWriteThink.org materials may be reproduced for educational purposes. Images ©2006.
The Logical Structure of Arguments (WA Chapter 4)
Rhetoric: The Art of Persuasion.
Material taken from the following source: p/tools/argument.htm p/tools/argument.htm.
Argument Unit AP Language and Composition. Deductive Reasoning General Particular.
English 100 Tuesday, On a sheet of paper, write about the following prompt… you will keep this in your notebook: “I don’t regret the things I’ve.
The Logical Structure of Argument
Three Modes of Persuasion Qualitative/Quantitative September 2011 Rhetoric: Communication Techniques.
Thinkin’ about Logic Using the Toulmin system to evaluate arguments.
Reason “Crime is common, logic is rare” - Sherlock Holmes.
Who Defined the Study of Philosophy and Logic? ________,___________,__________ These three philosophers form the basis of what is known as__________________.
Reasoning Critically about Argument and Evidence Solid versus Sloppy Thinking.
Terms of Logic and Types of Argument AP English Language and Composition.
Persuasive Appeals Logos AP LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION.
Mike McGuire MV Community College COM 101 A Closer Look at Logos Syllogism, Enthymeme, and Logical Fallacies ENGL102 Ordover Fall 2008.
Review from Yesterday…. Rhetoric vs. Dialectic Deduction : conclusion is necessitated by, or reached from the previously stated facts (premises). Remember.
Chapter 3: MAKING SENSE OF ARGUMENTS
Introduction to Toulmin Logic Scott Hale English
BBI 3420 Critical Reading and Thinking Critical Reading Strategies: Identifying Arguments.
Deductive vs. Inductive Arguments
CS 4001Mary Jean Harrold 1 Logical Structure of Arguments.
Academic Vocabulary Unit 7 Cite: To give evidence for or justification of an argument or statement.
Deductive Reasoning. Deductive reasoning The process of logical reasoning from general principles to specific instances based on the assumed truth of.
Rhetoric of Argument. Rhetorical Situation Image from Exigence Purpose.
Introduction to Argument Chapter 2 (Pgs ) AP Language Demi Greiner | Arlyn Rodriguez Period 4.
Do now Can you make sure that you have finished your Venn diagrams from last lesson. Can you name 5 famous mathematicians (including one that is still.
Did not. Did too. Ways to argue…….in writing!. How do you get someone else to accept your point of view? Appeal to reason Appeal to emotions Appeal to.
SYLLOGISM - FORM & LOGICAL REASONING. WHAT IS A SYLLOGISM? Syllogism – the formal structure of logical argument. Three statements - Major Premise, Minor.
Arguments, deduction, fallacies, and definitions
Class 16 Midterm exam—10/25—discussion on 10/18 Final exam—discuss
Lecture 10 - ARGUMENT.
What makes a Good Argument?
Three Methods for Building Arguments
Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant.
Reading Arguments Critically
Errors in Reasoning.
Chapter 3: Reality Assumptions
Chapter 8: Recognizing Arguments
Critical thinking 11th Meeting.
Syllogism, Enthymeme, and Logical Fallacies
Formulating a logical argument using Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
Critical Reading: Getting Deeper into Arguments
Reasoning, Logic, and Position Statements
Building Argument and Integrating Evidence
Practicing with Persuasion
Visual Argumentation.
Argumentation Strategies
…or, “Stop your lippy attitude.”
Principles of Argument
THE BASIC PRINCIPLES OF ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING
Constructing a Logical Argument
Introduction to Logos Logos as Reasoning.
The Persuasive Speech Ch. 24.
“Still I Look to Find a Reason to Believe”
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: The Toulmin Model
Key Terms: Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning
Key Terms: Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: The Toulmin Model
ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
Basic Errors in Logic Featured in “Love is a Fallacy” By Max Shulman
Presentation transcript:

Persuasive Appeals AP LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION Logos Logos includes data, statistics, proven facts. It also includes logical arguments… Arguments that make sense! Reasoning!

Logos = Logic Reason (objective proof) is used to spell out claims that are logically sound and supported by reliable evidence. Logic can be either deductive, inductive, or both

Premise vs. Conclusion Ask yourself what you are trying to prove. What is your conclusion? The statements that give your reasons are your premises. I am an optimist. It does not seem to be much use being anything else. (Churchill) “I am an optimist” is the conclusion “It does not seem to be much use being anything else” is the premise or reason for the conclusion

Premises vs Conclusion A dog was kept in the stalls, and yet, though someone had been in and fetched out a horse, [the dog] had not barked. . . . Obviously the . . . visitor was someone whom the dog knew well. (Sherlock Holmes in “The Adventure of Silver Blaze” Explicit Premise: the dog didn’t bark General fact premise: he assumes we know that all dogs bark at strangers Conclusion: The visitor wasn’t a stranger.

Distinguishing the Difference What is the author trying to convince you to believe? This is the claim/conclusion Conclusion indicators: therefore, thus, hence, so, consequently, this shows that Then ask what reasons the author gives to convince you. These are the premises. Premise indicators: because, since, given that, for, on the grounds that, this follows from

Inductive Reasoning Particular to the general Generalizations are made on an observed fact (often used in scientific experimentation). Easiest for the audience to accept because evidence is provided Example: Every patient suffering from flu that the doctor examined had a fever. Therefore, fever must be a symptom of flu.

Deductive Reasoning - Syllogism moving from the general belief to the particular every syllogism contains at least three parts: a major premise (global assumption) a minor premise (specific claim) a conclusion

An example of a syllogism all men are mortal (major premise) Socrates is a man (minor premise) (conclusion) Socrates is mortal

A visual representation all things mortal all men are mortal men Socrates is a man Socrates Socrates is mortal

An example of a syllogism all mammals have hair fish do not have hair (major premise) (minor premise) (conclusion) fish are not mammals

A visual representation all things with hair all mammals have hair mammals fish do not have hair fish fish are not mammals

A visual representation bad drivers All women are bad drivers. woman Jean is a woman. Jean Jean is a bad driver.

Simple Syllogism Practice

What is an enthymeme? sometimes called a “truncated syllogism” a syllogism without stating either the major or minor premise (it is implied) less formal than the syllogism sometimes more persuasive

An example of an enthymeme We cannot trust this man because he has perjured himself in the past. Enthymemes are often “because” statements.

The syllogism behind this enthymeme… Those who perjure themselves cannot be trusted. This man perjured himself in the past. This man cannot be trusted. (major premise) (minor premise) (conclusion)

Find it and challenge it. Beware. Think Critically. Enthymemes are sometimes used to hide the underlying assumption upon which an argument is based. Find it and challenge it.

What are the unstated assumptions? I failed that course because the instructor didn’t like me. Assumption: The instructor fails students he doesn’t like. I’m not surprised he made the team. After all, his father is the superintendent of schools. Assumption: The superintendent gives special favors to his family If I’d only taken my boss to lunch more often, I could have gotten that raise. Assumption: The boss denies raises to people who don’t take him to lunch very often.

Practice

We shouldn't elect Joe as committee chair because he is too bossy Claim: We shouldn't elect Joe as committee chair Data: because he is too bossy Warrant:

BOSSY PEOPLE MAKE BAD COMMITTEE CHAIRS. Warrant

Buy this stereo system because it has a powerful amplifier Claim: Buy this stereo system Data: because it has a powerful amplifier Warrant:

STEREO SYSTEMS WITH POWERFUL AMPLIFIERS ARE WORTH BUYING. Warant

Drugs should not be legalized because legalization would greatly increase the number of drug addicts. Claim: Drugs should not be legalized Data: because legalization would greatly increase the number of drug addicts. Warrant:

INCREASED ACCESS TO DRUGS WILL LEAD TO MORE ADDICTS. Warrant

Practicing the piano is good for kids because it teaches discipline Claim: Practicing the piano is good for kids Data: because it teaches discipline Warrant:

KIDS NEED TO BE TAUGHT DISCIPLINE. Warrant

Welfare benefits for unwed mothers should be eliminated because doing so will greatly reduce the nation's illegitimacy rate. Claim: Welfare benefits for unwed mothers should be eliminated Data: because doing so will greatly reduce the nation's illegitimacy rate. Warrant:

WELFARE BENEFITS ENCOURAGE ILLEGITIMACY. Warrant

Welfare benefits for unwed mothers should not be eliminated because these benefits are needed to prevent unbearable poverty among our nation's most helpless citizens. Claim: Welfare benefits for unwed mothers should not be eliminated Data: because these benefits are needed to prevent unbearable poverty among our nation's most helpless citizens. Warrant:

UNWED MOTHERS ARE HELPLESS AND POVERTY-STRICKEN WITHOUT WELFARE BENEFITS. Warrant

We should strengthen the Endangered Species Act because doing so will preserve genetic diversity on the planet. Claim: We should strengthen the Endangered Species Act Data: because doing so will preserve genetic diversity on the planet. Warrant:

THE ENGDANGERED SPECIES ACT PRESERVES GENETIC DIVERSITY. Warrant

The Endangered Species Act is too stringent because it severely damages the economy. Claim: The Endangered Species Act is too stringent Data: because it severely damages the economy. Warrant:

OVERLY STRINGENT ACTS DAMAGE THE ECONOMY. Warrant