Communities In Schools MOSPA Conference May 2017

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Advertisements

Response to Intervention: School-Wide Multi-Level Prevention Carriage Crest Elementary.
Parents as Partners in Education
Setting the Pace to Graduate Date1 Parent Mentor Partnership September 2013.
Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health
Communities In Schools of Delaware Empowering students to stay in school and achieve in life.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Parent Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Supports (SW-PBS)
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
The CIS Model Research, Rationale, & a Business Plan.
1 Mental Health as a Public Health Issue Daniel Reimer, MPH, Principal Investigator Sherwin Daryani, MPH, Project Director.
Intro to Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports (PBiS)
Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Celeste Rossetto Dickey PBIS/MTSS Coordinator
Intro to Positive Behavior Supports (PBiS) Vermont Family Network March 2010.
Anderson County Schools. 1. Providing technology to support instruction and to assist with stakeholder communication. 2. Identifying and providing new.
: The National Center at EDC
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
Northern Health Strategic Plan – 2009 to Slogan “The Northern way of caring”
PLEASANTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL CLIMATE TRANSFORMATION GRANT.
Developed by: July 15,  Mission: To connect family strengthening networks across California to promote quality practice, peer learning and mutual.
RE-AIM Framework. RE-AIM: A Framework for Health Promotion Planning, Implementation and Evaluation Are we reaching the intended audience? Is the program.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction March 5, 2015 California County Offices of Education Attendance.
PARTNERS IN SCHOOL TRANSFORMATION™ Pamela Cantor, MD Turnaround for Children ERS School Transformation Summit Working Session 6 Inside and out: reengineering.
SAM (Self-Assessment of MTSS Implementation) ADMINISTRATION TRAINING
Response to Instruction and Intervention for Behavior (RTI2-B)
Integrating AWARE, SCT and PBIS at the District and State Levels
Account Management Overview
Coaching for Impact Susan Barrett
Division of Student Support Services
Systematic Support for Students
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child
OACCA Residential Transformation Conference
Healthy Families VA Multi-Site System
Healthy Families VA Multi-Site System
District Leadership Team Sustainability Susan Barrett Director, Mid-Atlantic PBIS Network Sheppard Pratt Health.
Dropout Prevention Begins Early
What is the role of a school psychologist?
Comprehensive Planning
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Year 1 Results May 2012 NDPC SD and WVDE
Experience of the Lions Quest school-based prevention program
Menus of Best Practices and Strategies
Livingston County Children’s Network: Community Scorecard
Unlocking Student Potential
PBIS PRACTICES.
Vermont SSIP Theory of Action
Response To Instruction
Integrated Student Supports
Thank you for coming. Introduction of myself.
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Gifted Education Integrated in RtI Instruction Systems
The Opportunity for Community Schools
Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports.
DSUSD MTSS Implementation (Multi-Tiered System of Supports)
Tiered Instruction and Interventions
Dave Scott – Middle School Principal – Kristin School
Welcome to the NJTSS Early Reading Project!
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS)
Safe Schools and Bullying Prevention
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
Australia Local Mission Delivery and the National Strategy
Thomasville City Schools
Model of Comprehensive and Integrated School Psychological Services (NASP, 2010) The NASP Practice Model 4340 East West Highway, Suite 402 Bethesda, Maryland.
Tracie Wills Senior Commissioning Officer
From Cradle to Career: Pennsylvania’s Community of Practice
District Mission & Vision Cluster Mission & Vision
Dave Scott – Middle School Principal – Kristin School
Presentation transcript:

Communities In Schools MOSPA Conference May 2017

Mission Communities In Schools surrounds students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.

Every child needs and deserves The Five Basics Every child needs and deserves A one-on-one relationship with a caring adult A safe place to learn and grow A healthy start and a healthy future A marketable skill to use upon graduation A chance to give back to peers and community

Communities In Schools across the nation The largest and most effective dropout prevention program in the United States. A network of nearly 200 non-profit organizations in 26 States and the District of Columbia. Serving 1.4 million students annually in 2,200 public schools in urban, suburban and rural communities. Focused on the lowest performing schools and the students most vulnerable to dropping out.

CHILDTRENDS REPORT First synthesis of the evidence-base for ISS KEY FINDINGS Child Trends Study of Integrated Student Supports (ISS) First synthesis of the evidence-base for ISS Provided common definition for ISS Identified common components (Needs assessment, coordination/integration of services/supports, community partnerships, and data collection and tracking) Identified positive outcomes associated with ISS; informed standard metrics

A Community of Support

Academic Supports Extra academic support---individual, classroom Enrichment, homework help

A wide variety of Student Supports Basic physical needs Hunger Clothing, hygiene, school supplies Vision exams and eyeglasses Dental hygiene and treatment School-based health Social-emotional learning Mental Health Chronic absenteeism

Our Foundation: A Positive Data Culture An organization that asks ‘what does the data say?’ and then acts on the results even when convention or tradition may disagree. It is using an analytic process to leverage relevant data insights to transform the way business is done internally and externally. The culture depends on staff at all levels to measure outcomes, act based on available data, and build on existing knowledge over time.

CIS Model of Integrated Student Supports Affiliate’s role to bring resources, including the Site Coordinator and partners INTO the school. The Site Coordinator manages a set of processes to ensure the CIS Model is implemented with fidelity Monitoring and Adjusting and Evaluation are core elements of our model and are part of an on-going, fluid process. Tiers of Support are brokered or delivered within the implementation of the full CIS Model

Building a Case Management Continuum Three Tiers of Support and a Case Management Continuum Three Tiers of Support Building a Case Management Continuum

Three Tiers of Support Tier I Tier II Intensity Tier III Widely available services designed to foster a positive school climate and address school-level risk factors. Tier II Tier I Tier III Intensity Low Targeted services typically provided in a group setting to students with a common need. Intensive, individualized services typically provided in a one-on-one setting to students with highly specific needs.

Site Coordination Establishing and implementing a process within a school to effectively deliver or broker integrated student supports. This include the actions associated with: Needs Assessment Support Planning Coordinating Three Tiers of Support Monitoring, Adjusting and Reporting Evaluating Progress Against Goals

Defining Case Management for CIS A collaborative process to 1.) Establish a system of services provided to individual students; and 2.) Identify and partner with individual students who are at risk of dropping out of school to: Assess needs and assets Create individualized plans Provide/coordinate and monitor and adjust service delivery Evaluate student progress against established goals

CIS Site Coordinator Communicates the vision and mission of CIS Supports/participates in a multi-disciplinary team approach Facilitates assessment of student and family needs Collaborates with school leadership and staff to address needs Coordinates services and service providers at the site Manages data and documentation at the site Reports activities and results to school principal, CIS leadership, and other stakeholders

2015-16 Michigan Affiliates CIS of Metropolitan Detroit CIS of Kalamazoo CIS of Lenawee County CIS of Northwest Michigan CIS of Tecumseh CIS pilot Lansing * * began in 2015

2015-16 Michigan Outcomes 24,754students served in 9 Districts at 58 Schools 90% of seniors with targeted services graduated 98% of students with targeted services were promoted to the next grade 83% of students with targeted services met attendance goals 87% of students with targeted services met academic goals 82% of students with targeted services met behavioral goals

Communities In Schools of Michigan CIS Michigan Contact Information Communities In Schools of Michigan Executive Director/CIS state Director: Jeff Brown Email: director@cismichigan.org Phone: 517-487-1548 Ext 13 www.cismichigan.org