NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN SPECIAL EDUCATION LAW

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What Every Principal Needs to Know About Special Education
Advertisements

Procedural Safeguards
IDEA 2004 and Section 504: Key Differences Wayne County Public Schools Exceptional Children Program Teresa Smith, EC Transition Coordinator Rhonda Wiggins,
Legal Update. 2 Overview Federal & State Law – Parental Revocation of Consent, CAHSEE, CDE Oversight Federal Court Cases – Private School Reimbursement,
New Developments in Special Education Law Mark C. Weber DePaul Univ. College of Law May 28, /20/2015 (c) Mark C. Weber 1.
Section 504 Lessons Learned
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy IEP vs Section 504 is the part of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 that applies to persons (including students) with.
The Role of the Educator in the IEP Process. A Little History… The 70’s 1. Public Law : Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
What are my child’s rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Randy Chapman The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older.
School Leadership for Response to Intervention Learning Forward Summer Conference July 25, 2012 Allison Hertog, M.A., J.D.
Procedural Safeguards Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
1 Procedural Safeguards Yell / The Law and Special Education, Second Edition Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Current Challenges in Special Education Law Mark C. Weber DePaul University College of Law June 25, /12/2015 (c) Mark C. Weber 1.
1 Quick Summary Student with a disability may be removed for no more than 10 consecutive school days for a disciplinary violation (unless exception applies).
Placement and LRE for Children with Disabilities Kristin E. Hildebrant Ohio Legal Rights Service
Seattle School District v B.S. 82 F.3d 1493 (9th Cir. 1996)
Surrogate Parent Training Presenter: Title: District: Date: Presented by:
FAPE, LRE and Inclusion Patrick Long. FAPE Free Appropriate Public Education means special education and related services that are provided at public.
Brandy Chance Marcella Helgeson Joe King Michael A MacKinnon Jennifer Andrea Trujillo Seattle S.D. vs. B.S.
The ADA in the Classroom: Of Reasonable Accommodations and Gross Misjudgments Mark C. Weber DePaul University College of Law June, 2015 (c) Mark C. Weber.
The SOPM Standard Operating Procedures Manual Highlights.
Rights for for Dads A Non Emotional Outcome Based Approach To Collaborative Business.
Chapter 5 Section 504 and the Americans with Disabilities Act Jacob, Decker, & Hartshorne 1.
Ken Chackes, Thomas E. Kennedy, III, Heather B. Navarro November 22, 2011.
african-american-students-in-special-education/
Text, Chapter 11, Pages and Indiana’s Procedural Safeguards MEAGHAN WHEDON, KATIE SMITH, & RACHEL COHEN Procedural Safeguards Part 1.
The 411 on IEPs and Section 504s Claudia Otto, Ph.D. Oklahoma Department of Career & Technology Education March 10, 2015.
Group Presentation EDSPE 504 Samia Ahmed Ashley Berger Lindsey Clodfelter Mariam El-Kalay Lorenzo Jarin Emily Johnson.
Schools, Families, Communities and Disabilities Rebecca Durban and Jessica Martin.
Five Tips for Avoiding Procedural Violations within Tennessee’s RTI² Framework Theresa Nicholls, Director of Special Education Eligibility July 21, 2015.
Procedural Safeguards. Purpose Guarantee parents both an opportunity for meaningful input into all decisions affecting their child’s education and the.
1 Welcomes You To It’s Those Wonderful Rights! Welcome To read the script that goes with each slide, click on the Notes tab (to the left of this screen).
EDSE 539 Special Education Leadership in Schools Parent Rights and Relationships Dispute Resolution Remedies.
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11 Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11.
Complaints Information Santina Thibedeau March 5, 2009.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 17, 2010 Margaret.
1 IDEA REAUTHORIZATION PRESENTATION OF COMPLAINT A district must have a procedure that gives any party the opportunity to present a complaint.
Special Education Law Developments Every Board Member Should Know Karen Haase Steve Williams Harding & Shultz (402)
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Litigating ADA Title II Meaningful Access Claims Mark C. Weber Disability Rights Consortium at Equip for Equality (c) 2016 Mark C. Weber.
CASE LAW COMPLIANCE REFRESHER 2016 What would you do?
Welcome to Parent’s Rights SEPAC Meeting September 26, 2016.
Procedural Safeguards
Due Process and State Complaints
Tomball Independent School District Annual Confidentiality Training
Student Data Privacy and Security
Special Education Law: Practical Tips to Guide Decision-making
Understanding the Section 504 Process
What To Do When The School Says No
MAASE Winter Conference resolving IDEA disputes Presenter: Robert A
Special Education: Evaluations, IEPs, Transition
Department of Exceptional Student Education
Understanding the Section 504 Process
Legislation Review IDEA ADA Section 504.
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act
Case Briefs by Sherrie…
Downingtown Area School District Central Office April 4, 2018
Sacramento City Unified School District V. Rachel H U. S
SPECIAL EDUCATION legal remedies
Section 504 Lessons Learned Oregon Department of Education Office of Educational Improvement & Innovation Winston Cornwall, Education Program Specialist.
IEP Basics for Parents and Families
Free and Appropriate Public Education
Resolving Issues ADR, Due Process and CDE Complaints
MADISON CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION JANUARY 18, 2019
Civil Rights in Schools: A Litigation Update
Presented By Dina C. Kaplan, Esq.
Case Law Review: Legal Decisions with Impact for OT Rebecca E
Framing Deaf Special Education in Due Process
Presentation transcript:

NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN SPECIAL EDUCATION LAW (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN SPECIAL EDUCATION LAW EQUIP FOR EQUALITY CONSORTIUM PROGRAM MAY 31, 2017 MARK C. WEBER DEPAUL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW

Two Earth-Shattering (Maybe?) Developments (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Two Earth-Shattering (Maybe?) Developments Fry v. Napoleon Cmty. Schs. (exhaustion of Section 504-ADA claims) Endrew F. v. Douglas Cnty. Sch. Dist. RE-1 (IDEA appropriate education standard)

Child Find, Evaluation, and Eligibility (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Child Find, Evaluation, and Eligibility Illinois Authority Jason O. v. Manhattan Sch. Dist. No. 114 – Ostby (adequate response to behavior problems without formal assessment) Non-Illinois Authority L.J. v. Pittsburg Unified Sch. Dist. (accommodations were special education, so student met eligibility standard with average performance) Doe v. Cape Elizabeth Sch. Dist. (reading fluency deficit) Timothy O. v. Paso Robles Unified Sch. Dist. (autism assessment)

Response to Intervention (RTI) (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Response to Intervention (RTI) Non-Illinois Authority Greenwich Bd. of Educ. v. G.M. (school should have evaluated child despite her progress under RTI)

Independent Evaluation (IEE) (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Independent Evaluation (IEE) Illinois Authority B.G. v. City of Chicago Sch. Dist. 299 (district assessment was adequate) Jason O. v. Manhattan Sch. Dist. No. 114 – Ostby (IEE reimbursement for full cost, not net after insurance) Federal Guidance Savit (access to classroom for parent’s evaluator) Non-Illinois Authority Seth B. v. Orleans Parish Sch. Bd. (substantial compliance with agency criteria is enough for funding claim)

IEP Process, Implementation, and Related Issues (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 IEP Process, Implementation, and Related Issues Federal Guidance Andel (no requirement to warn of attorney presence at IEP) Non-Illinois Authority M.C. v. Antelope Valley Union High Sch. Dist. (unilateral amendment and inadequate specificity of IEP) A.M. v. New York City Dep’t of Educ. (failure to follow IEP team consensus) L.O. v. New York City Dep’t of Educ. (IEP must be aligned with evaluation)

Appropriate Education in General (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Appropriate Education in General Illinois Authority Endrew F. v. Douglas Cnty. Sch. Dist. RE-1 Federal Guidance Dear Colleague (behavioral services) Non-Illinois Authority A.M. v. New York City Dep’t of Educ. (continued need for ABA) L.O. v. New York City Dep’t of Educ. (behavior plan, speech, etc.)

Peer Harassment and Bullying (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Peer Harassment and Bullying Non-Illinois Authority Doe v. Columbia-Brazoria Indep. Sch. Dist. (insufficient allegation of actual knowledge for Section 504-ADA and Title IX claims) T.K. v. New York City Dep’t of Educ. (IDEA violation from failure even to discuss bullying in IEP meetings)

Related Services and Assistive Technology (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Related Services and Assistive Technology Non-Illinois Authority L.M.H. v. Arizona Dep’t of Educ. (peer-reviewed research) School Dist. of Phila. v. Williams (iPad)

Least Restrictive Environment (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Least Restrictive Environment Illinois Authority Jason O. v. Manhattan Sch. Dist. No. 114 – Ostby (approving self-contained class) Case No. 2017-0193 (rejecting school district’s proposal of therapeutic day school) Non-Illinois Authority L.H. v. Hamilton Cnty. Dep’t of Educ. (student need not achieve at grade level to be mainstreamed) Brown v. District of Columbia (IEP team has to discuss LRE)

Parental Status Illinois Authority (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Parental Status Illinois Authority Smith v. Meeks (noncustodial parent gets notice but can’t demand due process hearing)

Records Access and Privacy (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Records Access and Privacy Illinois Authority Allison W. v. Oak Park & River Forest High Sch. Dist. No. 200 (June 14, 2016) (no dismissal of educational records claims under preclusion doctrine); also May 27, 2016 (denying motion to dismiss claim, not specified in opinion, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for alleged violation of rights provided by IDEA)

Dispute Mediation, Resolution, and Settlement (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Dispute Mediation, Resolution, and Settlement Illinois Authority Campbell-Ewald v. Gomez (not moot when offer not accepted) Miksis v. Evanston Twp. High Sch. Dist. No. 202 (jurisdiction in action alleging breach of settlement agreement) Jeffries v. City of Chicago School District #299 – Foster (finding that settlement embraced Section 1983 claim)

Due Process Hearing Complaints & Related (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Due Process Hearing Complaints & Related Illinois Authority Nardella v. Leyden High Sch. Dist. 212 (June 22 & Aug. 11, 2016) (in appeal of due process proceeding, dismissing defendants not parties below) Non-Illinois Authority M.C. v. Antelope Valley Union High Sch. Dist. (hearing officer should not restate issues; issues are not waived if tried by consent)

Due Process Hearing Limitations (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Due Process Hearing Limitations Non-Illinois Authority G.L. v. Ligonier Valley Sch. Dist. Auth. (no limit on remedy if known-or-should-have-known date met) Avila v. Spokane Sch. Dist. 81 (adopting G.L.) Damarcus S. v. District of Columbia (adopting G.L.)

Conduct of Due Process Hearing (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Conduct of Due Process Hearing Illinois Authority Jason O. v. Manhattan Sch. Dist. No. 114 – Ostby (no prejudicial error in restrictions on evidence, etc.) Raglin v. Board of Educ. of Bloom Twp. High Sch. Dist. (striking of claim for compensatory education) B.G. v. City of Chicago Sch. Dist. 299 (time limits on witnesses, expert qualifications okay)

Maintenance of Placement (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Maintenance of Placement Illinois Authority Board of Educ. of Jacksonville Sch. Dist. v. C.P. (hearing officer decision was new status quo) Non-Illinois Authority N.E. v. Seattle Sch. Dist. (first stage of multi-stage IEP was not status quo) Dervishi v. Stamford Bd. of Educ. (time-limited IEP was status quo)

Class Actions Non-Illinois Authority (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Class Actions Non-Illinois Authority Smith v. Los Angeles Unified Sch. Dist. (allowing intervention in class action concerning least restrictive environment) T.R. v. School Dist. of Phila. (refusing to dismiss class complaint on translation for limited English proficient families) DL v. District of Columbia (class action on IDEA Part C)

Mootness Doctrine Illinois Authority (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Mootness Doctrine Illinois Authority Campbell-Ewald v. Gomez (unaccepted settlement offer does not moot case) Ostby v. Manhattan Sch. Dist. No. 114 (case moot when there’s no current intention to move child to disputed placement)

Administrative Exhaustion (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Administrative Exhaustion Illinois Authority Fry v. Napoleon Cmty. Schs. Miksis v. Evanston Twp. High Sch. Dist. No. 202 (not requiring exhaustion in action over alleged settlement violation) Kuhner v. Highland Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. No. 5 (must exhaust due process and Section 504-ADA bullying claims) B.G. v. Claypool (exhaustion is affirmative defense) Non-Illinois Authority J.M. v. Francis Howell Sch. Dist. (exhaustion required) Reyes v. Manor Indep. Sch. Dist. (exhaustion required)

Judicial Limitations Illinois Authority (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Judicial Limitations Illinois Authority Stanek v. Saint Charles Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. No. 303 (N.D. Ill. 2017) (applying two-year statute for non-administrative appeal IDEA actions and relation-back doctrine) Board of Educ. of the Vandalia Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. No. 203 v. K.S. (hearing decision clarification tolls limitation but does not reset accrual date)

Injunctions Illinois Authority (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Injunctions Illinois Authority Board of Educ. of Jacksonville Sch. Dist. v. C.P. (denying injunction that would stay hearing officer’s reimbursement order)

Compensatory Education (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Compensatory Education Illinois Authority Case No. 2016-0152 (compensatory education for student who graduated without receiving adequate transition services) Non-Illinois Authority M.S. v. Utah Sch. for the Deaf & Blind (don’t remand to IEP team) B.D. v. District of Columbia (compensatory education must compensate)

Tuition Reimbursement Issues (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Tuition Reimbursement Issues Illinois Authority Case No. 2016-0445 (reimbursement for non-special education placement) Non-Illinois Authority L.H. v. Hamilton Cnty. Dep’t of Educ. (no reimbursement for Montessori school)

Section 504-ADA Developments (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Section 504-ADA Developments Illinois Authority Nardella v. Leyden High Sch. Dist. 212 (May 5, 2017) (private school; no substantial modifications required) Thurmon v. Mount Carmel High Sch. (no disability causation, etc.) Martin v. East St. Louis Sch. Dist. (no deliberate indifference) Non-Illinois Authority B.C. v. Mount Vernon City Sch. Dist. (IDEA-Section 504 eligibility) Gohl v. Livonia Pub. Schs. Sch. Dist. (mistreatment by teacher) A.G. v. Paradise Valley Unified Sch. Dist. No. 69 (Section 504 FAPE, reasonable accommodation) Bowe v. Eau Claire Area Sch. Dist. (peer harassment) Santa Fe (NM) Pub. Schs. (web page) Ladue (MO) Pub. Sch. Dist. (CART)

Fees Developments Illinois Authority Non-Illinois Authority (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Fees Developments Illinois Authority Raglin v. Board of Educ. of Bloom Twp. High Sch. Dist. (finding fees claim to be timely) Non-Illinois Authority M.S. v. Utah Sch. for the Deaf & Blind (don’t give fractional award based on which claims prevailed when common core of facts and related legal theories applied to multiple claims) M.W. v. School Dist. of Phila. (expert fees under Section 504-ADA)

Citations (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 A.G. v. Paradise Valley Unified Sch. Dist. No. 69, 815 F.3d 1195 (9th Cir. 2016) A.M. v. New York City Dep’t of Educ., 845 F.3d 523 (2d Cir. 2017) Allison W. v. Oak Park & River Forest High Sch. Dist. No. 200, 193 F. Supp. 3d 894 (N.D. Ill. June 14, 2016) (Shadur) Allison W. v. Oak Park & River Forest High Sch. Dist. No. 200, 188 F. Supp. 3d 796 (N.D. Ill. May 27, 2016) (Shadur) Andel, 67 IDELR 156 (OSEP Feb. 17, 2016) Avila v. Spokane Sch. Dist. 81, 852 F. 3d 936 (9th Cir. 2017) B.C. v. Mount Vernon City Sch. Dist., 837 F.3d 152 (2d Cir. 2016) B.D. v. District of Columbia, 817 F.3d 792 (D.C. Cir. 2016) B.G. v. City of Chicago Sch. Dist. 299, No. 15 C 6372, 2017 WL 1049466 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 20, 2017) (Kendall), appeal filed, No. 17-1806 (7th Cir. Apr. 18, 2017) B.G. v. Claypool, No. 15 C 6372, 2016 WL 8711589 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 12, 2016) (Kendall) Board of Educ. of Jacksonville Sch. Dist. v. C.P., No. 3:15-CV-3228, 2016 WL 164987 (C.D. Ill. Jan. 14, 2016) (Meyerscough) Board of Educ. of the Vandalia Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. No. 203 v. K.S., No. 15-CV-1048-NJR-DGW, 2016 WL 5341238 (S.D. Ill. Sept. 23, 2016) (Rosenstengel) Bowe v. Eau Claire Area Sch. Dist., No. 16-CV-746-JDP, 2017 WL 1458822 (W.D. Wis. Apr. 24, 2017) Brown v. District of Columbia, 179 F. Supp. 3d 15 (D.D.C. 2016) Campbell-Ewald v. Gomez, 136 S. Ct. 663 (Jan. 20, 2016) Case No. 2016-0152 (SEA Ill. Mar. 28, 2017) (Maxwell-Wickett) Case No. 2017-0193 (SEA Ill. Mar. 17, 2017) (Strusz) Case No. 2016-0445 (SEA Ill. Feb. 16, 2017) (Leisner)

More Citations (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Damarcus S. v. District of Columbia, 190 F. Supp. 3d 35 (D.D.C. 2016) Dear Colleague, 68 IDELR 76 (OSERS & OSEP Aug. 1, 2016) Dervishi v. Stamford Bd. of Educ., 653 F. App’x 55 (2d Cir. 2016 DL v. District of Columbia, 194 F. Supp. 3d 30 (D.D.C. 2016), appeal filed, No. 16-7076 (D.C. Cir. June 27, 2016) Doe v. Cape Elizabeth Sch. Dist., 832 F.3d 69 (1st Cir. 2016) Doe v. Columbia-Brazoria Indep. Sch. Dist., No. 16-40882, 2017 WL 1661416 (5th Cir. May 3, 2017) Endrew F. v. Douglas Cnty. Sch. Dist. RE-1, 137 S. Ct. 988 (Mar. 22, 2017) Fry v. Napoleon Cmty. Schs., 137 S. Ct. 743 (Feb. 22, 2017) G.L. v. Ligonier Valley Sch. Dist. Auth., 802 F.3d 601 (3d Cir. 2015) Gohl v. Livonia Pub. Schs. Sch. Dist., 836 F.3d 672 (6th Cir. 2016), petition for cert. filed, No. 16-1001 (U.S. Feb. 13, 2017) Greenwich Bd. of Educ. v. G.M., No. 3:13-CV-00235, 2016 WL 3512120 (D. Conn. June 22, 2016) J.M. v. Francis Howell Sch. Dist., 850 F.3d 944 (8th Cir. 2017) Jason O. v. Manhattan Sch. Dist. No. 114, 173 F. Supp. 3d 744 (N.D. Ill. 2016) (Blakey), vacated as moot sub nom. Ostby v. Manhattan Sch. Dist. No. 114, 851 F.3d 677 (7th Cir. 2017) (Rovner) Jeffries v. City of Chicago School District #299, No. 13 C 3427, 2016 WL 909354 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 10, 2016) (Kennelly), aff’d sub nom. Foster v. Board of Educ., No. 16-1885, 2017 WL 1166870 (7th Cir. Mar. 29, 2017) Kuhner v. Highland Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. No. 5, No. 15-cv-00107-JPG-DGW, 2016 WL 3254487 (S.D. Ill. June 14, 2016) L.H. v. Hamilton Cnty. Dep’t of Educ., No. 1:14-CV-00126, 2016 WL 6581235 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 4, 2016) L.J. v. Pittsburg Unified Sch. Dist., 850 F.3d 996 (9th Cir. 2017) L.M.H. v. Arizona Dep’t of Educ., No. CV-14-02212-PHX-JJT, 2016 WL 3910940 (D. Ariz. July 19, 2016), appeal filed, No. 16-16467 (9th Cir. Aug. 19, 2016)

Still More Citations (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 L.O. v. New York City Dep’t of Educ., 822 F.3d 95 (2d Cir. 2016) Ladue (MO) Pub. Sch. Dist., 68 IDELR 255 (OCR May 2, 2016) M.C. v. Antelope Valley Union High Sch. Dist., 852 F.3d 840 (9th Cir. 2017) M.S. v. Utah Sch. for the Deaf & Blind, 822 F.3d 1128 (10th Cir. 2016) M.W. v. School Dist. of Phila., No. CV 15-5586, 2016 WL 3959073 (E.D. Pa. July 22, 2016) Martin v. East St. Louis Sch. Dist. No. 189, No. 14-CV-1393-MJR-SCW, 2016 WL 1718332 (S.D. Ill. Apr. 29, 2016) (Reagan) Miksis v. Evanston Twp. High Sch. Dist. No. 202, No. 12 C 8497, 2017 WL 386652 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 2, 2017) (Durkin) N.E. v. Seattle Sch. Dist., 842 F.3d 1093 (9th Cir. 2016), petition for cert. filed, No. 16-1285 (U.S. Apr. 27, 2017) Nardella v. Leyden High Sch. Dist. 212, No. 15-CV-4885, 2017 WL 1806589 (N.D. Ill. May 5, 2017) (Coleman) Nardella v. Leyden High Sch. Dist. 212, No. 15-CV-4885, 2016 WL 4245528 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 11, 2016) (Coleman) Nardella v. Leyden High Sch. Dist. 212, No. 15-CV-4885, 2016 WL 3418571 (N.D. Ill. June 22, 2016) (Coleman) Ostby v. Manhattan Sch. Dist. No. 114, 851 F.3d 677 (7th Cir. 2017) (Rovner) Raglin v. Board of Educ. of Bloom Twp. High Sch. Dist., No. 15 C 4476, 2016 WL 772848 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 29, 2016) (Alonso) Reyes v. Manor Indep. Sch. Dist., 850 F.3d 251 (5th Cir. 2017) Santa Fe (NM) Pub. Schs., 69 IDELR 44 (OCR June 29, 2016) Savit, 64 IDELR 250 (OSEP Feb. 10, 2014) School Dist. of Phila. v. Williams, No. CV 14-6238, 2016 WL 877841 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 7, 2016) Seth B. v. Orleans Parish Sch. Bd., 810 F.3d 961 (5th Cir. 2016) Smith v. Los Angeles Unified Sch. Dist., 830 F.3d 843 (9th Cir. 2016) Smith v. Meeks, No. 15 C 10250, 2016 WL 7049057 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 5, 2016) (Alonso)

Yet More Citations (c) Mark C. Weber 2017 Stanek v. Saint Charles Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. No. 303, No. 13-CV-3106, 2017 WL 782993 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 28, 2017) (Darrah) T.K. v. New York City Dep’t of Educ., 810 F.3d 869 (2d Cir. 2016) T.R. v. School Dist. of Phila., No. CV 15-4782, 2016 WL 6994973 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 30, 2016) Thurmon v. Mount Carmel High Sch., 191 F. Supp. 3d 894 (N.D. Ill. 2016) (Zagel) Timothy O. v. Paso Robles Unified Sch. Dist., 822 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir. 2016), cert. denied, No. 16-672, 2017 WL 1366731 (U.S. Apr. 17, 2017) Weber, Mark C., Special Education Law and Litigation Treatise (LRP Pubs. 4th ed. 2017)