Refresher Course on Assessment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Embedding Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes in Regularly Scheduled Assignments Dr. Larry H. Kelley Auburn, Alabama
Advertisements

Degree SLO Workshop 17 Sept Workshop Learning Outcomes Faculty who participate in the Workshop will: – Know the accreditation requirements and timeline.
Assessment Report Biology School of Science and Mathematics Rey Sia, Chair Laurie B. Cook, Assessment Coordinator.
THIS WORKSHOP WILL ADDRESS WHY THE FOLLOWING ARE IMPORTANT: 1. A comprehensive rationale for funding; 2. Measurable objectives and performance indicators/performance.
Best Practices in Assessment, Workshop 2 December 1, 2011.
Assessment Report School of TAHSS Department: History Chair: Dr. Owen Ireland Assessment Coordinator: Date of Presentation: 10/1/2013.
FAMU ASSESSMENT PLAN PhD Degree Program in Entomology Dr. Lambert Kanga / CESTA.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
Computer Science ABET Visit Update November 8, 2003.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
Assessment Assessment Planning Assessment Improvements Assessment Data Dialogue & Reflection.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Helping Your Department Advance and Implement Effective Assessment Plans Presented by: Karen Froslid Jones Director, Institutional Research.
University Assessment Committee Comprehensive Standard (CS) The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves.
Assessment 101 Center for Analytics, Research and Data (CARD) United Church of Christ.
Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research 2010 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research Assessment Review Committee Report Brody School of Medicine.
Note: Because of slide animation, this ppt is intended to be viewed as a slide show.  While viewing the ppt, it may be helpful to obtain a sample Core.
Student Learning Outcome Assessment: A Program’s Perspective Ling Hwey Jeng, Director School of Library and Information Studies June 27,
Closing the Loop: The Assessment Process from Outcomes to Academic Excellence, Budgetary Competence and Community Engagement January 2012.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Richard Beinecke, Professor and Chair Suffolk University Institute for Public Service.
Assessing Your Assessments: The Authentic Assessment Challenge Dr. Diane King Director, Curriculum Development School of Computer & Engineering Technologies.
Assessment Plan Department of Biology, Queens College 12/10/2012 Assessment Forum Cathy Savage-Dunn.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
A Basic Guide to Academic Assessment Presented by Darby Kaikkonen Director of Institutional Research.
A Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Process at the Academic Program Level Christina Horne, Nita Paris, & Valerie Whittlesey Kennesaw State University-
Introduction to Academic Assessment John Duffield Office of Academic Assessment Georgia State University September 2013.
What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors January 9, 2007.
Assessment Plan Workshop Series Part 1: Writing Program-Level Student Learning Outcomes and Determining Measures September 3, 2015 Drs. Summer DeProw and.
Refresher Course on Assessment A Workshop for Department Chairs, Program Directors, and Others January 22, 2016.
Assessment 101: What do you (really) need to know? Melinda Jackson, SJSU Assessment Director October
Institutional Effectiveness at MVCC Institutional Effectiveness at MVCC.
325K: COMBINED PRIORITY FOR PERSONNEL PREPARATION Webinar on the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding Office of Special Education Programs.
Assessment and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Dr. Anne Marchant, Director Center for Teaching and Learning.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
CIAS Program Level Assessment Office of Educational Effectiveness Assessment September 6, 2016.
Making assessment in PhD programs more useful for faculty and students
The assessment process For Administrative units
Consider Your Audience
The assessment process
Lisa Brun Western Kentucky University
Developing a Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Plan and Report
Finding/Creating Meaning in SLO Assessment
Director of Policy Analysis and Research
Student Learning outcomes assessment
Closing the Loop: The Assessment Process from Outcomes to Academic Excellence, Budgetary Competence and Community Engagement January 2012.
PowerSchool for Parents
لقاء تعريفي بنظام تقييم مخرجات تعلم البرنامج
Institutional Effectiveness USF System Office of Decision Support
Introductions Institutional Effectiveness,
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Presented to: Chemical Engineering Department SPRING 2018
Assessment and Program Review Learning Centers
Functional Area Assessment Process
Jo Lynn Autry Digranes Coordinator for Assessment Updated 10/2017
Program Assessment Processes for Developing and Strengthening
Randy Beach, South Representative Marie Boyd, Chaffey College
Assessing Your Assessment Plan
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
What to do with your data?
Assessment of GE Synthesis
Department Chair: Liz Brown Date of Presentation: 01/20/17
Opportunities to Enhance Quality at EKU
Michelle Cox, Nursing Emily Garber, PTA.
Atmospheric Sciences On the Journey to Assessing Learning Outcomes
Department Chair: Liz Brown Date of Presentation: 01/19/18
Curriculum Coordinator: Rosemary Philips
Closing the Loop: The Assessment Process from Outcomes to Academic Excellence, Budgetary Competence and Community Engagement January 2012.
Presentation transcript:

Refresher Course on Assessment February 2017 A Workshop for Department Chairs, Program Directors, and Others

Why do I have to turn in an assessment report? Middle States We do annual assessment each year in order to meet the accreditation standards set forth by the Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE). The assessment process at Rutgers is organized at the University level for all academic unist by the Executive Council on Assessment (ECA). The ECA ensures compliance with standards set by MSCHE. ECA Nursing CCAS Business Law Graduate Undergrad Reporting Unit Reporting Unit

What is assessment? According to Barbara Walvoord: “Assessment is the “systematic collection of information, using the time, knowledge, expertise, and resources available, about student learning to inform decisions that affect student learning.” (Assessment Clear and Simple, 2010)

Where do I begin with assessment? Before you can submit an assessment report, you’ll need a current assessment plan.

3. Standards, Benchmarks, and Tools 4. Timetable An assessment plan is comprised of five parts: 1. Learning Goals 2. Methods 3. Standards, Benchmarks, and Tools 4. Timetable 5. “Closing the Feedback Loop”

Learning goals must be Learning goals must also be measurable, manageable, meaningful. student-centered. grounded in continuous improvement. comprised of three categories: knowledge, skills, and habits of mind. Learning goals must also be publically accessible online. on all course syllabi (which should also be publically accessible online).

Learning goals are also hierarchically aligned. Rutgers College Reporting Unit Course

Sample Learning Goals: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology  Upon completion of the major, we intend that a BCMB student will... Possess a broad and fundamental understanding of biology and chemistry with particular focus on how molecules found in biological systems confer the properties of living organisms. 2. Be able to perform the common methods and use the tools of the field including laboratory and computational techniques. 3. Have the ability to conduct independent scientific investigation and scientific inquiry. 4. Be able to locate, evaluate, and communicate scientific information effectively both by written and oral presentation.

The two basic methods of assessment are Direct assessment, meaning they look at actual student work (papers, tests, portfolios, presentations, licensure exams, etc.) and Indirect assessment, meaning they look at anything that is not direct (surveys, exit interviews, placement rates, etc.). Both direct and indirect methods and tools are detailed in terms of reporting unit, not course level.

We expect 85% of students to do well on the final exam = benchmark. Standards and benchmarks measure to see if learning goals are being met appropriately. do not always appear in assessment plans. Standards show the level in which students are meeting or exceeding expectations. Benchmarks quantify the standards: 80% of students exceeded our expectations on the final exam = standard. We expect 85% of students to do well on the final exam = benchmark.

Fails to meet expectations A rubric is helpful tool to apply the standards. Fails to meet expectations Meets expectations Exceeds expectations The work is well organized   The work uses appropriate analytic techniques. The work shows clear understanding of basic concepts. The application of basic concepts is sensible and reasonable.

2015 2016 2017 2018 Learning goals 1 and 2 Learning goals 3 and 4 Your timetable should be cyclical, assessing all learning goals every 2-4 years, instead of trying to address them all at once. 2015 Learning goals 1 and 2 2016 Learning goals 3 and 4 2017 Learning goal 5 2018 Learning goals 1 and 2 You are required to do at least one form of direct assessment each year.

“Closing the feedback loop” means acting on the results of your assessment to foster improvement. It involves looking at your data in relation to your learning goals. Ask yourself: to what degree do we meet these goals? identifying and stating ways to address the gaps. looking at new data to see if you have addressed the problem. If you identified a problem in 2012 and made a plan to fix it, have you analyzed the outcomes in 2015? If not, you still have not “closed the loop.” Example: We noticed last year that students were not performing well on their final papers, so we implemented a two draft policy to check their progress before they turned in their final drafts. Students did better overall after turning in two drafts.

Who will do this assessment? Assessment is a shared responsibility. As such, each reporting unit must establish an assessment committee to ensure that all yearly requirements of assessment are met.

When does all of this happen? All reporting units should review and revise their assessment plans by mid-March. Keep in mind that all assessment plans should be periodically revised. TMAC is available to provide feedback. At the end of spring semester, you’ll submit your assessment report.

So I need an updated plan by mid-March and a report by spring? That’s correct. The assessment report is what gets submitted to TMAC by the end of the year. This gets compiled into a larger CCAS report, which then gets sent up the hierarchy chain all the way until it gets to MSCHE.

Okay, but what’s in the assessment report? The assessment report is actually quite simple. It’s a standardized form that you fill out based on your assessment plan, your analysis of the plan, and your actions to close the feedback loop. And don’t worry, TMAC is here and happy to help you if you’re stuck or if you just want some feedback on your plan, report, or both!

So let me get this straight… Each year I have to A So let me get this straight… Each year I have to A. Form an assessment committee B. Create or revise a current assessment plan C. Ensure we are analyzing and acting on the plan D. Solicit feedback on the plan F. Report our findings each year in spring and that’s it? That’s it! Except it’ll actually be your assessment committee that shares the responsibility of letters B-F!