Project Proposal to IHE IHE ITI Representational State Transfer (REST) Transport Implementation Guide for Data Segmentation for Privacy (DS4P) Submitted.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Legal Work Group Developing a Uniform EHR/HIE Patient Consent Form.
Advertisements

1 Patients’ Rights and Responsibilities. PATIENT RIGHTS 2 Every healthcare facility is mandated to display the following Rights and Responsibilities:
Confidentiality and HIPAA
P E N N S Y L V A N I A C O A L I T I O N A G A I N S T D O M E S T I C V I O L E N C E P E N N S Y L V A N I A C O A L I T I O N A G A I N S T RAPE HIPAA.
National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) presents: How to Obtain Protected Health Information (PHI) from an Outside Healthcare.
Ethics, Confidentiality, and HIPAA! 2006 ASAC Drug Court Confidentiality FMJ Multi- County November 8, 2006.
ONC Privacy and Security Update May 7, 2013 Joy Pritts, JD Chief Privacy Officer.
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Non-HIPAA Governmental Regulation of Healthcare Privacy and Security Sixteenth HIPAA Summit/The Privacy Symposium August 21,
THE FOLLOWING SLIDES EXPLAIN THE REQUIRED ELEMENTS THAT MUST BE INCLUDED FOR A HIPAA AUTHORIZATION TO BE VALID HIPAA Authorizations.
Are you ready for HIPPO??? Welcome to HIPAA
HIPAA HIPAA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
Objectives  Review federal statutes (HIPAA, FERPA)  Discuss state guidelines  Review local procedures
Health Insurance Portability Accountability Act of 1996 HIPAA for Researchers: IRB Related Issues HSC USC IRB.
Project Proposal to IHE: Implementation Guide for Data Segmentation For Privacy (DS4P) over REST Submitted by S&I Framework Data Segmentation for Privacy.
Beth DeLair, JD, RN DeLair Consulting, LLC. Discussion Topics Background Existing WI Requirements State Efforts to Change Law Senate Bill 487 Changes.
BH07 - Protecting Privacy in an Interoperable World John Leipold, DBA, MBA, COO Valley Hope Association, SATVA Board Member, Former Chair Frances Loshin-Turso,
Connecting Health and Care for the Nation: A Shared Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap – DRAFT Version 1.0 Joint FACA Meeting Chartese February 10, 2015.
Report to the HITSC Privacy and Security Work Group S&I Framework Data Segmentation for Privacy Initiative 3/20/
EsMD Background Phase I of esMD was implemented in September of It enabled Providers to send Medical Documentation electronically Review Contractor.
1 VUMC Confidentiality Policy and HIPAA Implications for Clinical Research General Clinical Research Center Skills Workshop March 2, 2007 Gaye Smith Privacy.
Presentation to HL7 S&I Framework Data Segmentation for Privacy Initiative 9/25/2013 Johnathan Coleman, CISSP Initiative Coordinator, Data Segmentation.
1 Health Information Security and Privacy Collaboration (HISPC) National Conference HISPC Contributions to Massachusetts HIE Privacy and Security Progress:
Colorado Children and Youth Information Sharing (CCYIS) Educational Stability Summit April 10, 2015.
Data Segmentation for Privacy Initiative All-Hands Meeting 2 May
Confidentiality and Drug Courts Carson Fox Esq. Steve Hanson M.S. Ed.
State Alliance for e-Health Conference Meeting January 26, 2007.
The PRISM Privacy Tool: A User’s Guide PHDSC Home Page  PRISM Web Page 
Chapter 6 – Data Handling and EPR. Electronic Health Record Systems: Government Initiatives and Public/Private Partnerships EHR is systematic collection.
Interoperability Framework Overview Health Information Technology (HIT) Standards Committee June 24, 2010 Presented by: Douglas Fridsma, MD, PhD Acting.
Data Segmentation for Privacy Agenda All-hands Workgroup Meeting May 9, 2012.
Understanding HIPAA (Health Insurandce Portability and Accountability Act)
HIPAA THE PRIVACY RULE. 2 HISTORY In 2000, many patients that were newly diagnosed with depression received free samples of anti- depressant medications.
Data Segmentation for Privacy November 16 th, 2011.
Testing Procedures for DS4P Summary testing approach, addressing requirements traceability, and Scenario 4 update.
Data Access Framework (DAF) Relationship to Other ONC Initiatives 1.
Discussion - HITSC / HITPC Joint Meeting Transport & Security Standards Workgroup October 22, 2014.
“ Jericho / UT Austin Pilot” Privacy with Dynamic Patient Review April 30, 2013 Presented by: David Staggs, JD, CISSP Jericho Systems Corporation.
California Department of Public Health / 1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH Standards and Guidelines for Healthcare Surge during Emergencies How.
Board of Directors – March 24, 2016 Denise Mannon, AHFI, CHPC Corporate Compliance Officer.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) © 2013 Project Lead The Way, Inc.Principles of Biomedical Science.
Data Access Framework All Hands Community Meeting 1 March 23, 2016.
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidential Records and Protected Disclosures.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Our pledge: reliability, integrity and trust
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
HITECH Modifications to HIPAA
HIPAA PRIVACY & SECURITY TRAINING
eHealth Standards and Profiles in Action for Europe and Beyond
Structured Data Capture (SDC)
STATE HEALTH INFORMATION GUIDANCE
Protecting “High Stakes” PHI
HIPAA and 42 C.F.R. Part 2 Confidentiality
SAN DIEGO HOUSING FEDERATION WEAVING TOGETHER A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO WELLNESS October 13, 2016.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Refuah Community Health Collaborative (RCHC) PPS
Confidential Records and Protected Disclosures
Structured Data Capture (SDC)
Informed Consent (SBER)
manatt | phelps | phillips
Making Your IRBs and Clinical Investigators HIPAA-Ready
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
ETHICAL PRINCIPLES IN RECORD KEEPING
Non-HIPAA Governmental Regulation of Healthcare Privacy and Security
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Basic Data Provenance April 22, 2019
US Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI): Data Provenance IG
Health Information Exchange for Eligible Clinicians 2019
Part 1: Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)
Presentation transcript:

Project Proposal to IHE IHE ITI Representational State Transfer (REST) Transport Implementation Guide for Data Segmentation for Privacy (DS4P) Submitted by S&I Framework Data Segmentation for Privacy Initiative 10/12/2013 Detailed Proposal Presentation 11/12/2013 Johnathan Coleman, CISSP Initiative Coordinator, Data Segmentation for Privacy OCPO/ONC/HHS (CTR) Tel: (843) 647-1556  jc@securityrs.com

Why Segment Data? The Need for Data Segmentation Some healthcare information requires special handling that goes beyond the protection already provided through the HIPAA Privacy rule, which allows health care providers to disclose protected health information without patient consent for treatment, payment and health care operations purposes. Protection through the use of data segmentation emerged in part through state and federal privacy laws which address social hostility and stigma associated with certain medical conditions.* According to recent estimates posted on healthit.gov: An estimated 26% of Americans age 18 and older are living with a mental health disorder in any given year. 46% will have a mental health disorder over the course of their lifetime. An estimated 8% of Americans are in need of drug or alcohol abuse treatment. Patients suffering from serious mental illness have increased rates of co-occurring conditions, which results in a reduced life expectancy of 8-17 years. * The confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse Patient records regulation and the HIPAA privacy rule: Implications for alcohol and substance abuse programs; June 2004, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

Why Segment Data? Examples of Legal Privacy Protections : 42 CFR Part 2: Federal Confidentiality of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Patient Records regulations protect specific health information from exchange without patient consent. Title 38, Section 7332, USC : Laws protecting certain types of health data coming from covered Department of Veterans Affairs facilities and programs. Types of data include sickle cell anemia, HIV, and substance abuse information. PIPEDA: Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (Canada) requires consent of the individual for collection, use, or disclosure (with some exceptions). Other State and Federal laws relating to certain conditions or types of data, including: Mental Health - Data Regarding Minors Intimate Partner Violence/Sexual Violence - Genetic Information HIV Related Information.

Supporting Material Data Segmentation for Privacy Use Case document. HL7 DS4P Implementation Guide (going through ballot reconciliation) describes standards for privacy metadata for use over eHealth Exchange and DIRECT. Analysis of HITSC recommendations for privacy metadata supporting the PCAST vision for tagged data elements. DS4P IG Test Procedures Strong Community Participation: Over 300 Participating Individuals, 98 Committed Members, 92 Organizations 6 Pilots (1 Federal, 5 Industry): VA/SAMHSA (Demonstrated at HIMSS 2013 Interoperability Showcase) NETSMART (Demonstrated at HIMSS 2013 Interoperability Showcase) Software and Technology Vendors' Association (SATVA) Jericho / University of Texas Greater New Orleans Health Information Exchange (GNOHIE) TeraDact

Technical Approach We look forward to feedback and IHE guidance regarding the technical approach for development of this supplement. Possibilities include development of a RESTful guide for the secure exchange of privacy-annotated documents, JSON (JavaScript Object Notation)/ Extensible Markup Language (XML) resources, or other types, in collaboration with S&I community and pilot participants. The technical approach will leverage existing efforts with RESTful standards development and utilization of common/reusable components from ongoing standards development efforts. FHIR may be considered a potential consumer of this proposed supplement, leveraging standards as possibly constrained and/or specified for use in the exchange of healthcare FHIR-based resources. Security Labels to support Authorization and Access Control policies – reusing the fields and terminology specified in the HL7 Healthcare Classification System and that support the needs of project such as the S&I DS4P. This specification may be able to clarify the use of security labels in the RESTful API.

Development Considerations Risks: Policy considerations: Over-thinking the merits of any particular privacy policy used as an example/reference for implementation. Need to stay focused on the technical application of privacy metadata in a RESTful API rather than engage in a policy discussion about the benefits or drawbacks of any particular privacy policy. The specification may constrain the base standards for healthcare and, specifically, for secure exchange of privacy-protected information Effort Estimates This project proposal is looking to result in a useful, concise, policy agnostic supplement (less than 30 pages). The ONC S&I DS4P community will be encouraged to join/participate in the IHE process for the development of this supplement, including encouraging existing and new S&I DS4P pilots to work with IHE to develop, implement and test the supplement in a healthcare setting. DS4P S&I resources and pilots will be encouraged to help support the development effort and participate in community meetings.

User Story Example (1)  The Patient receives care at their local hospital for a variety of conditions, including substance abuse as part of an Alcohol/Drug Abuse Treatment Program (ADATP).  Data requiring additional protection and consent directive are captured and recorded. The patient is advised that the protected information will not be shared without their consent.

User Story Example (2)  A clinical workflow event triggers additional data to be sent to Provider/Organization 2. This disclosure has been authorized by the patient, so the data requiring heightened protection is sent along with a prohibition on redisclosure.  Provider/ Organization 2 electronically receives and incorporates patient additionally protected data, data annotations, and prohibition on redisclosure.