TriGuard Device for Cerebral Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Multicenter Real-World Experience Masieh Abawi, Ermela.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ghanem et al., J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:1427–32..
Advertisements

INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve ® has been approved. The CoreValve ® System is not currently approved in the USA,
STS 2015 John V. Conte, MD Professor of Surgery Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators Transcatheter Aortic.
The DEFLECT III Trial: A Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the TriGuardTM HDH Embolic DEFLECTion Device during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.
6-Month Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With a Novel Repositionable Self-Expanding Bioprosthesis Ian T. Meredith, MBBS, PhD,
A shifting paradigm of care: Advances in transcatheter heart valve procedures Sandra Lauck MSN, RN, CCN(C) Clinical Nurse Specialist, Arrhythmia Management.
The Risk and Extent of Neurological Events Are Equivalent for High-Risk Patients Treated With Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Thomas.
TCT 2015 | San Francisco | October 15, 2015 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses Danny Dvir, MD John G. Webb, MD and.
The Impact of Prior Stroke on the Outcome of Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Romain Didier, MD;
: PROFI : A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Proximal Balloon Occlusion vs. Filter Embolic Protection in Patients Undergoing Carotid Stenting Klaudija.
Incidence and Outcomes of Valve Hemodynamic Deterioration in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in U.S. Clinical Practice: A Report from the Society.
Longest Follow-up After Implantation of a Self-Expanding Repositionable Transcatheter Aortic Valve: Final Follow-up of the Evolut R CE Study Stephen Brecker,
G. Michael Deeb, MD On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators
The Impact of Preoperative Renal Dysfunction on the Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Andres M. Pineda MD, J. Kevin.
TAVR in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
VSD post TAVR: Mechanisms, Presentation and Management
Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest
Embolic Protection Devices in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Are We Barking Up the Wrong Vascular Tree? Circulation: cardiovascular intervention.
Open cervical approach for carotid artery stenting
Insights from NeuroARC
Patients at intermediate surgical risk undergoing isolated interventional or surgical aortic valve replacement for severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis.
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors / angiotensin receptor blockers and contrast induced nephropathy in patients receiving cardiac catheterization:
Trans- catheter aortic valve replacement vs
On behalf of the FORWARD Study Investigators
Subacute Subclinical Brain Infarctions after Transcatheter
TAVR Medtronic CoreValve® Subclavian Approach Clinical Data
Vatsal Ladia, MD, Hemang B. Panchal, MD, MPH, Terrence J
Raj R. Makkar, MD On behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
Preventive Role of Embolic Protection Devices:
Updates From NOTION: The First All-Comer TAVR Trial
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate Risk Patients with Aortic Stenosis Description: The goal of the trial was to assess.
Heart Valve Thrombosis & Neuro-Outcomes
MedStar Washington Hospital Center Cardiac Catheterization Conference
Claret Cerebral Protection Device: Implications of the Sentinel Study
30-Day Safety and Echocardiographic Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with the Self-Expanding Repositionable Evolut PRO System.
Predictors of Pacemaker Implantation With a Self-Expanding Repositionable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Ian T. Meredith AM, MBBS, PhD, FRACP FACC, FCSANZ,
Trans-apical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with History of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample Database.
First Report of Three-Year Outcomes With the Repositionable and Fully Retrievable Lotus™ Aortic Valve Replacement System: Results From the REPRISE I.
Carotid Artery Stenting Predictors of procedural and clinical success
Early Outcomes with the Evolut R Repositionable Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve in the United States Mathew Williams, MD, For the Evolut R US.
University of Pennsylvania
Zeeshan Khan, MD Second Year Cardiology Fellow
Giuseppe Tarantini MD, PhD
Early Recovery of Left Ventricular Systolic Function After CoreValve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Harold L. Dauerman, MD; Michael J. Reardon,
Procedural factors associated with PCI-related ischemic stroke
Direct Flow Medical Experience with a Conformable, Repositionable Retrievable Percutaneous Aortic Valve Reginald Low MD University of California, Davis.
TAVI „Catch me if you can!“
The Impact of Live Case Transmission on Patient Outcomes during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results from the VERITAS Study Dr. Ron Waksman.
Keith Dawkins MD FRCP FACC FSCAI Global Chief Medical Officer
Two-Year Outcomes With the Fully Repositionable and Retrievable Lotus™ Transcatheter Aortic Replacement Valve in 120 High-Risk Surgical Patients With Severe.
CoreValve Continued Access Study Shows Continued Improvement in 1-Year Outcomes With Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Steven J. Yakubov,
Mohamed Eid Fawzy, FRCP, FACC, FESC October 6 University Cairo, EGYPT
University Heart Center Hamburg
Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Valve System : OUS Data
Late Follow-Up from the PARTNER Aortic Valve-in-Valve Registry
Samir R. Kapadia, MD On behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
Median total new lesion volume
Embrella embolic deflection device for cerebral protection during transcatheter aortic valve replacement  Mariam Samim, MD, Pierfrancesco Agostoni, MD,
Alexander Ghanem et al. JACC 2010;55:
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Total lesions on MRI at 48 hours
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Five-Year Outcomes after Randomization to Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Final Results of The PARTNER 1 Trial Michael J. Mack, MD.
Aortic and innominate routes for transcatheter aortic valve implantation  Jean Porterie, MD, Nicolas Mayeur, MD, PhD, Thibaut Lhermusier, MD, PhD, Nicolas.
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes in Nonagenarians Stratified by Transfemoral and Transapical Approach  Christian McNeely, MD, Alan Zajarias,
Angioplasty Balloon-associated Coronary Debris and the EZ FilterWire
Procedural Characteristics
A new approach to carotid angioplasty and stenting with transcervical occlusion and protective shunting: why it may be a better carotid artery intervention 
A. Procopi, N. Procopi, JP Collet, O. Barthelemy, P. Leprince, R
Transcatheter versus medical treatment of symptomatic severe tricuspid regurgitation: a propensity score matched analysis Maurizio Taramasso MD, PhD from.
Presentation transcript:

TriGuard Device for Cerebral Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Multicenter Real-World Experience Masieh Abawi, Ermela Yzeiraj; Adriaan Kraaijeveld,; Michiel Voskuil,; Pieter A. Doevendans; Joachim Schofer; Pieter R. Stella Consecutive patients with aortic stenosis scheduled for TAVR and suitable anatomy for TriGuard, were included in this prospective 2 center study Successful device performance was defined as I) Accessing the aortic arch with delivery catheter; II) Deployment of the TriGuard filter unit from the delivery catheter into the aortic arch; III) Positioning the TriGuard to cover the cerebral vessels (as verified by angiography) without obstruction of the blood flow and interference with TAVR procedure; IV) Retrieving and removing the TriGuard system intact

RESULTS TriGuard was implanted in 51 patients (80± 8 years, 51% male, logistic EuroSCORE 12.6±8.3) with either transfemoral (96%) or transapical (4%) approach. Pre-TAVR balloon dilatation was performed in 67%, post-TAVR dilatation in 18%. Successful device performance was 100% without interference with TAVR procedure. Disabling and all stroke rate was 0%

DW-MRI Results in Patients With and Without TriGuard Cerebral Embolic Protection During TAVI Ermela Yzeiraj, Klaudija Bijuklic, Timo Haselbach, Julian Witt, Korff Krause, Lorenz Hansen, Friedrich-Christian Riess, Joachim Schofer 10 patients received TAVI under cerebral embolic protection with the TriGuard device. Control patients from the same site where 150 patients who underwent TAVI without cerebral embolic protection. All patients were treated with a balloon expandable valve and underwent DW-MRI 3-5 days after the procedure. Cerebral DW-MRI were analysed by a blinded physician to assess incidence, number and volume of new CI.

Baseline Clinical Characteristics Variables No TG (n = 150) TG (n = 10) p Value Age, mean ± SD 83 ± 6 83.5 ± 5 0.738 Male sex, n (%) 69 (46) 8 (80) 0.050 Logistic EuroSCORE , mean ± SD 21.25± 13 23.8 ± 14.8 0.582 Hypertension, n (%) 127 (85) 10 (100) 0.360 Dyslipidemia, n (%) 78 (52) 6 (60) 0.751 Diabetes Mellitus, n (%) 33 (22) 0 (0) 0.123 Coronary artery disease, n (%) 91 (61) 0.322 Carotid artery disease, n (%) 30 (20) 0.005 Previous Stroke, n (%) 23 (15) 2 (20) 0.661 Atrial fibrillation, n (%) 48 (32) 0.506 COPD, n (%) 24 (16) 4 (40) 0.079 Chronic kidney disease, n (%) 63 (42) 0.194

% of patients with new lesions ~ RESULTS ~ TriGuard protected Variables No TG (n = 150) Median (IQR) Mean (SD) TG (n = 10) P value # of lesions 1 (0-3) 2.1 (0.2) 0 (0-0.75) 0.6 (0.4) 0.06 Total Lesion Volume (TLV) 119 (-298) 206 (23) 0 (0-31) 44 (32) 0.08 Single lesion volume (SLV) 63 (0-106) 74 (8) 0 (0-10) 15 (11) 0.05 Control unprotected P=0.004 68% 20% % of patients with new lesions

safe and effective TriGuard device is with a high performance success without interference with TAVR procedure and with 0% stroke rate