MISSISSIPPI ADEQUATE EDUCATION PROGRAM (MAEP)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Public Hearing on the District Budget June 6, 2011.
Advertisements

1 MFP 101 Understanding the Minimum Foundation Program Formula FY
January 7, 2011 Overview of Governor’s Introduced Amendments to the Direct Aid to Public Education Budget (and other Public Education Funding)
Preliminary Budget May 15, PPR = Per Pupil Revenue.
April 29, Overview of Standards of Quality Funding Process Presented to the Standing Committee of the Standards of Quality Overview of Standards.
CLINTON COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT. MISSION STATEMENT The Clinton Community School District, proud to be in partnership with family and community, is committed.
FY16 Chapter 70 Aid Preliminary House 1 Proposal March 4, 2015.
Scenario – Practical Applications of School Law JESSAMY GUERRERO.
Joint Task Force on Local Effort Assistance July 16, 2002 Bill Freund, Consultant To The Task Force.
Dr. John Augenblick Augenblick, Palaich and Associates.
1 Wyoming Education Coalition Legislative Proposal Wyoming Education Coalition Wyoming Association for School Administrators Wyoming Association of School.
MISSISSIPPI ADEQUATE EDUCATION PROGRAM (MAEP) AN OVERVIEW OF HOW THE FORMULA IS CALCULATED.
BEP Formula OverviewBEP Formula Overview BEP Review CommitteeBEP Review Committee August 13, 2013August 13, 2013.
Chapter 70 Massachusetts School Funding Formula. Massachusetts School Revenues FY00-FY12 (in billions) 1/23/ School spending is primarily a local.
Manteca Unified School District 45 Day Revise Sept 9, 2003.
Proposed Budget. Assumptions COLA 4.53% 22,456.8 ADA No Growth (we declined this past year) Staffing by formula Employee Retirement Funded at.
Proposed Budget. UFTE 7, (Unweighted Full Time Equivalent Students) X Cost Factors = WFTE 8, (Weighted Full Time Equivalent Students)
Month/Date Budget Calendar Activity Responsibility Beginning January 2010 Prepare Budget Calendar and Budget Plan for review. CFO, Superintendent.
Ramona Unified School District Preliminary Budget Review April 23, 2009.
MFP 101: Seven Easy Steps to Understanding the Minimum Foundation Program Formula LEADS Conference July 26, 2006.
IBHE Presentation 1 Illinois Higher Education Performance Funding Model IBHE Board Meeting February 7, 2012 Dr. Alan Phillips.
Understanding the Nuts and Bolts of the Foundation Budget and Local Contribution Roger Hatch Melissa King MASBO Annual Institute May 17 th, 2013.
FY 2010 Budget Jeff Wooten, Ed.D. Superintendent 3200 Wilson Dam Highway, Muscle Shoals, Alabama.
Budget Message Fiscal Year Presented by Kelly Muzzey.
BAC Meeting: Review of Planning Factor Formulas Arlington Public Schools November 14,
Budge t Berkeley County Schools FY General Fund Budget Budget Development Presentation Ms. Brenda Blackburn, Superintendent Brantley Thomas,
Modernizing The Nevada Plan for School Finance Senate Bill 508 (2015 Session) 1.
QEIA Monitoring Regular Application Schools April 29, 2010 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association QEIA Northern and.
CONNECTIONAL MINISTRIES REACHING FURTHER WITH THE GOSPEL BY SHARING THE LOAD.
Total 1 FY2016 Approved Operating Budget 1 Wednesday, December 2, 2015.
Updates from MDE School Financial Services
Preliminary House 1 Proposal January 25, 2017
North Dakota League of Cities- City Auditor Workshop 2016
Hamilton County Department of Education
Updates from MDE School Financial Services
Dedham Public Schools proposed FY14 operating budget
Vocational and Skill Center Program Funding Priorities
Evaluation of the Space Projection Models
The SACS account code system
System Goals Academic Excellence Educational Equity Social and Emotional Learning Improving and Expanding Facilities.
GASBO Conference November 10, 2016 Angela Palm
Preliminary House 1 Proposal January 25, 2017
System Goals Academic Excellence Educational Equity Social and Emotional Learning Improving and Expanding Facilities.
Kingsport City Schools
Executive Director of Finance and Support Services
SBDM ALLOCATIONS Jody Maggard Perry County Schools.
General Appropriations Act July 17, 2017
Superintendent’s Funding Request FY19
2011/12 Budget Development Presentation
Proposed Expenditure Budget
Guilford County Schools
Budget Presentation FY 2019
Bell Times Analysis Task Force Budget
Budgeting, Cost Accounting & FTE
General Appropriations Act July 17, 2017
“Together, we’re so much more!”
CTE Administrative Internship Program January 18, 2008
BARBOUR COUNTY SCHOOLS SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET HEARING October 8th, 2018
Davenport School Board Meeting
DUBLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Harlingen CISD Budget Preparation Notes
Harlingen CISD Budget Preparation Notes
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #883
Budget Worksession III
Champlain Islands Unified Union School District March 5,2019
Florence County School District Three
BUDGET UPDATE May 28, 2019 For 5/28/19 Budget Work Session
BUDGET UPDATE May 21, 2019 For 5/21/19 Budget Work Session
General Appropriations Act July 2019
Presentation transcript:

MISSISSIPPI ADEQUATE EDUCATION PROGRAM (MAEP) AN OVERVIEW OF HOW THE BASE STUDENT COST (BSC) IS CALCULATED

Office of School Financial Services What is MAEP? The formula established by the Legislature to provide adequate operation funding levels for each school district to meet the accountability scale of “Successful” as established by the State Board of Education regardless of the school district’s geographic location. (37-151-7) Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Office of School Financial Services Purpose of MAEP Ensure that every Mississippi student is afforded an adequate educational opportunity regardless of where he/she lives. In order to accomplish this the system must: Provide equity to districts by recognizing differences in local resources Provide a level of resources necessary for an adequate education Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Office of School Financial Services MAEP Funding Formula (Average Daily Attendance + High Growth) x Base Student Cost + At-Risk - Local Contribution + Hold Harmless Guarantee = MAEP Formula Allocation MAEP Formula Allocation + Add-On Programs = Total MAEP District Funding For this presentation, each part of the formula calculation will be referred to as a “component” Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Office of School Financial Services Base Student Cost (BSC) Component MS Code provides the guidelines for how the BSC is to be calculated. It contains four major components: Instruction, Administration, Operation & Maintenance of Plant, and Ancillary Support The average cost of the four components are combined to form the base student cost The BSC is recalculated every four years to maintain stability for appropriation and budgeting purposes Utilize data from the second preceding year of the year for which funds are being appropriated FY19 is the next full recalculation period; using FY17 data Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Office of School Financial Services Base Student Cost (BSC) Component (cont.) In the years that the BSC is not recalculated, an inflation component is added to the previous year’s BSC The inflation component is 40% of the base student cost times the current Consumer Price Index (CPI). The CPI is provided by the State Economist Any adjustments for teacher pay, health insurance costs, or PERS costs may also be added to the base student cost Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Office of School Financial Services Base Student Cost (BSC) Example FY17 BSC calculation: 1. FY16 BSC (as calculated) $5,354.98 2. 40% of BSC (#1 x .40) $2,141.99 3. CPI 0.187% 4. Inflation Component(#2 x #3) $4.01 5. Other adjustments $0 6. FY17 BSC (#1 + #4 + #5) $5,358.99 Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Office of School Financial Services Instructionally Successful For a district to be selected as “instructionally successful”, the official accountability grade must be a “C” on the current accountability rating scale Only “C” districts are chosen (not C and above) For the FY19 recalculation, the official grade of the FY2016-17 school term will be used Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Office of School Financial Services Instructionally Efficient The ratio of teachers per one thousand students must be between one standard deviation above the mean and two standard deviations below the mean of statewide average of teachers per one thousand students Statewide average is determined using Months 1-9 ADA divided by 1,000 Self-contained Special Education students are removed Number of teachers is derived from the full-time equivalent units (FTE) in MSIS Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Instructionally Efficient Screen District No District Name FY15 Months 1-9 ADA (less SC SPED) ADA / 1,000 FY15 FTE Classroom Teachers FTE Teachers per 1,000 students in ADA Instructionally Efficient 1005 A County 1,959.74 1.9597 143.1825 73.0635 TRUE 1015 B Consolidated 2,078.28 2.0783 129.8847 62.4956 FALSE 1025 C Municipal 7,458.03 7.4580 534.7388 71.7000 1035 D Public 580.12 0.5801 45.0252 77.6163 1045 E County 666.09 0.6661 58.7360 88.1790 1055 F City 827.44 0.8274 62.0403 74.9822 1065 G County 1,693.21 1.6932 131.0685 77.4088 1075 H Consolidated 4,973.53 4.9735 360.3763 72.4593 1085 J Public 1,130.13 1.1301 74.3770 65.8145 1095 K County 3,022.10 3.0221 226.6786 75.0070 10 districts Mean = 72.0050 1 St Dev = 80.0943 2 St Dev = 55.8264 Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Instructionally Successful and Efficient District No District Name 2015 Official Grade Instructionally Successful District Instructionally Efficient District Instructionally Successful & Efficient 1005 A County C True 1015 B Consolidated A False 1025 C Municipal D 1035 D Public 1045 E County B 1055 F City 1065 G County 1075 H Consolidated 1085 J Public 1095 K County 10 districts 6 8 5 Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Office of School Financial Services Instructional Cost Component Costs from the second preceding year are divided by the latest available months 1-9 ADA. Costs are pulled from the following codes: Fund 1120 / Functions 1110-1199 / Objects 100-999 Fund 1120 / Functions 1210, 1220, 2150-2159 / Objects 210 & 215 Fund 1130 / All Functions / Objects 210 & 215 Fund 2711 / All Functions / Objects 210 & 215 Fund 2001, 2070, and 2420 / Functions 1110-1199 / Objects 100-999 (Fund 2001 and 2420 no longer exist. Fund 2070 no longer used) Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Office of School Financial Services Instructional Cost Component Prior to the calculation, revenue for Chickasaw Cession, Master Teacher Certification, and At-Risk funds must be removed At-Risk funding is prior to local contribution (LC), so LC must be backed out of the amount; reductions in funding are also taken into account Only the costs for districts that are instructionally successful and efficient are used in the component Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Instructionally Successful & Efficient Instructional Expenditures Instructional Cost Component District No District Name Instructionally Successful & Efficient ADA Instructional Expenditures 1005 A County True 1,959.74 $6,488,171.07 1035 D Public 580.12 $1,995,504.72 1055 F City 827.44 $2,528,204.72 1065 G County 1,693.21 $6,194,324.64 1095 K County 3,022.10 $10,734,697.06 5 districts 8,082.61 $27,940,902.21 Instructional Cost component $3,456.92 Using FY15 data, only 37 districts out of 144 would have been selected for the Instructional cost component Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Base Student Cost Formula Component Amount Instructional $ 3,456.92 Administrative $ Plant Operation & Maintenance Ancillary Support Adjustments Base Student Cost Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Office of School Financial Services Administratively Efficient Screen For a district to be selected as “Administratively Efficient”, they shall have a ratio of administrative staff to non-administrative staff that is between one standard deviation above the mean and two standard deviations below the mean of the statewide average Administrative staff includes: Superintendents, Assistant Supt, Deputy Supt (511001-511003) School Business Administrators, Directors, Assistant Directors, Coordinators (511004-511011, 511013-511017, 551002, 551019) Principals, Assistant Principals (601001-601002) Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Instructionally Successful and Administratively Efficient District No District Name 2015 Official Grade Instructionally Successful District Administratively Efficient District Administratively Successful & Efficient 1005 A County C True 1015 B Consolidated A False 1025 C Municipal D 1035 D Public 1045 E County B 1055 F City 1065 G County 1075 H Consolidated 1085 J Public 1095 K County 10 districts 6 9 Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Office of School Financial Services Administrative Cost Component Costs from the second preceding year are divided by the latest available months 1-9 ADA. Costs are pulled from the following codes: Fund 1120 / Functions 2300-2599 / Objects 100-999 Fund 1120 / Functions 2800-2899 / Objects 100-999 Fund 2711 / Functions 2300-2599 / Objects 100-999 Fund 2711 / Functions 2800-2899 / Objects 100-999 Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Administrative Cost Component District No District Name Instructionally Successful & Administratively Efficient ADA Administrative Expenditures 1005 A County True 1,959.74 $2,160,265.37 1035 D Public 580.12 $ 907,808.41 1055 F City 827.44 $1,030,685.51 1065 G County 1,693.21 $1,858,389.26 1085 J Public 1,130.13 $1,339,787.10 1095 K County 3,022.10 $3,289,709.82 6 districts 9,212.74 $10,586,645.47 Administrative Cost component $1,149.13 Using FY15 data, only 39 districts out of 144 would have been selected for the Administrative cost component Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Base Student Cost Formula Component Amount Instructional $ 3,456.92 Administrative $ 1,149.13 Plant Operation & Maintenance $ Ancillary Support Adjustments Base Student Cost $ 4,606.05 Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Office of School Financial Services Plant Maintenance Efficiency Screen Part I – Staffing Ratio For a district to be selected as “Efficient”, they shall have a ratio of maintenance staff per 100,000 square feet of building space that is between one standard deviation above the mean and two standard deviations below the mean of the statewide average Maintenance staff includes: Directors (511016, 511019) Supervisors (751007, 751028) Workers (751026, 751027, 751029) Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Plant Staff Efficient District Office of School Financial Services Plant Maintenance Efficiency Part I – Staffing Ratio District No District Name 2015 Official Grade Plant Staff Efficient District 1005 A County C True 1015 B Consolidated A 1025 C Municipal D False 1035 D Public 1045 E County B 1055 F City 1065 G County 1075 H Consolidated 1085 J Public 1095 K County 10 districts 9 Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Office of School Financial Services Plant Maintenance Efficiency Screen Part II – Costs For a district to be selected as “Efficient”, they shall have a ratio of maintenance expenditures per 100,000 square feet of building space that is between one standard deviation above the mean and two standard deviations below the mean of the statewide average Costs from the second preceding year are divided by the latest available months 1-9 ADA. Costs are pulled from the following codes: Fund 1120 / Functions 2600-2699 / Objects 100-699 and 800-999 Fund 2711 / Functions 2600-2699 / Objects 100-699 and 800-999 Fund 2430 / Functions 2600-2699 / Objects 100-699 and 800-999 Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Plant Maintenance Efficiency Screen Part II – Costs District No District Name Plant Staff Efficient District Plant Cost Efficient District Plant Staff & Cost Efficient District 1005 A County True False 1015 B Consolidated 1025 C Municipal 1035 D Public 1045 E County 1055 F City 1065 G County 1075 H Consolidated 1085 J Public 1095 K County 10 districts 9 8 7 Both screens must be met by a district to be selected for the calculation Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Instructionally Successful and Plant Operation/Maintenance Efficient District No District Name 2015 Official Grade Instructionally Successful District Plant Staff & Cost Efficient District Instructionally Successful & Efficient 1005 A County C True False 1015 B Consolidated A 1025 C Municipal D 1035 D Public 1045 E County B 1055 F City 1065 G County 1075 H Consolidated 1085 J Public 1095 K County 10 districts 6 7 3 Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Plant Operation and Maintenance Cost Component District No District Name Instructionally Successful & Plant Efficient ADA Administrative Expenditures 1055 F City True 827.44 $ 905,109.35 1085 J Public 1,130.13 $ 962,566.85 1095 K County 3,022.10 $2,870,651.15 6 districts 4,979.67 $4,738,327.35 Plant Maintenance Cost component $951.53 Using FY15 data, only 36 districts out of 144 would have been selected for the Plant cost component Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Base Student Cost Formula Component Amount Instructional $ 3,456.92 Administrative $ 1,149.13 Plant Operation & Maintenance $ 951.53 Ancillary Support $ Adjustments Base Student Cost $ 5,557.58 Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Office of School Financial Services Ancillary Support Efficiency Screen For a district to be selected as “Efficient”, they shall have a ratio of the number of librarians, media specialists, guidance counselors and psychologists per one thousand students that is between one standard deviation above the mean and two standard deviations below the mean of the statewide average Ancillary staff includes: Librarians and media specialists (601007) Non-vocational Counselors (601005, 601017) Psychologists (131003, 601014) Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Ancillary Support Efficiency Screen District No District Name 2016 Official Grade Instructionally Successful District Ancillary Support Efficient District Instructionally Successful & Ancillary Support Efficient 1005 A County C True 1015 B Consolidated A False 1025 C Municipal D 1035 D Public 1045 E County B 1055 F City 1065 G County 1075 H Consolidated 1085 J Public 1095 K County 10 districts 6 9 Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Office of School Financial Services Ancillary Support Cost Component Costs from the second preceding year are divided by the latest available months 1-9 ADA. Costs are pulled from the following codes: Fund 1120 / Functions 2110-2129 / Objects 100-999 Fund 1120 / Functions 2140-2149 / Objects 100-999 Fund 1120 / Functions 2220-2229 / Objects 100-999 Fund 2001 / Functions 2100-2129 / Objects 100-999 Fund 2001 / Functions 2140-2149 / Objects 100-999 Fund 2001 / Functions 2220-2229 / Objects 100-999 Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Ancillary Cost Component District No District Name Instructionally Successful & Ancillary Support Efficient ADA Ancillary Support Expenditures 1005 A County True 1,959.74 $ 406,307.13 1035 D Public 580.12 $ 182,152.40 1055 F City 827.44 $ 434,900.15 1065 G County 1,693.21 $ 524,661.09 1085 J Public 1,130.13 $ 310,325.87 1095 K County 3,022.10 $ 721,054.38 6 districts 9,212.74 $2,579,401.02 Ancillary Cost component $279.98 Using FY15 data, only 38 districts out of 144 would have been selected for the Ancillary cost component Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Base Student Cost Formula Component Amount Instructional $ 3,456.92 Administrative $ 1,149.13 Plant Operation & Maintenance $ 951.53 Ancillary Support $ 279.98 Adjustments $ -0- Base Student Cost $ 5,837.56 Adjustments for teacher pay raises, PERS increases, premium increases for State Health or Life if not presented prior to the calculation Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Office of School Financial Services Total MAEP Funding MAEP Formula Amount and the Add-On Amount are combined into a total MAEP funding request for each district and submitted to the Legislature In the event the MAEP formula is not fully funded, both the formula and the add-on amounts will be reduced by the pro-rata amount of the final allocation; or as directed by the Legislature Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services

Office of School Financial Services Questions ? Sept. 14-16, 2016 MASBO Fall Conference Office of School Financial Services