Keiko Nagao (National Institute of Technology, Niihama College, Japan)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NEWS: Nuclear Emulsion Wimp Search
Advertisements

Abstract Dark matter is a generic term for an exotic class of particles that might provide sufficient gravity to explain the observed movements of stars.
Combined Energy Spectra of Flux and Anisotropy Identifying Anisotropic Source Populations of Gamma-rays or Neutrinos Sheldon Campbell The Ohio State University.
Dark Matter Annihilation in the Milky Way Halo Shunsaku Horiuchi (Tokyo) Hasan Yuksel (Ohio State) John Beacom (Ohio State) Shin’ichiro Ando (Caltech)
Neutralino Dark Matter in Light Higgs Boson Scenario Masaki Asano (ICRR, University of Tokyo) Collaborator S. Matsumoto (Toyama Univ.) M. Senami (Kyoto.
Comprehensive Analysis on the Light Higgs Scenario in the Framework of Non-Universal Higgs Mass Model M. Asano (Tohoku Univ.) M. Senami (Kyoto Univ.) H.
Dark Matter Searches with Dual-Phase Noble Liquid Detectors Imperial HEP 1st Year Talks ‒ Evidence and Motivation ‒ Dual-phase Noble Liquid Detectors ‒
Constraints on the very early universe from thermal WIMP Dark Matter Mitsuru Kakizaki (Bonn Univ.) Mitsuru Kakizaki (Bonn Univ.) July 27, Karlsruhe.
Physics 133: Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology Lecture 11; February
Significant enhancement of Bino-like dark matter annihilation cross section due to CP violation Yoshio Sato (Saitama University) Collaborated with Shigeki.
Dijet searches near Resonance and seeing beyond the Neutrino Bound. Malcolm Fairbairn King’s College London.
I. Giomataris NOSTOS Neutrino studies with a tritium source Neutrino Oscillations with triton neutrinos The concept of a spherical TPC Measurement of.
Dark Matter Search with Direction sensitive Scintillator Ⅱ Department of Physics, School of Science The University of Tokyo Y. Shimizu, M. Minowa, Y. Inoue.
Applications of Micro-TPC to Dark Matter Search 1. WIMP signatures 2. Performance of the Micro-TPC 3. WIMP-wind measurement 4. Future works 5. Conclusions.
Neutralino Dark Matter in Light Higgs Boson Scenario (LHS) The scenario is consistent with  particle physics experiments Particle mass b → sγ Bs →μ +
Neutron scattering systems for calibration of dark matter search and low-energy neutrino detectors A.Bondar, A.Buzulutskov, A.Burdakov, E.Grishnjaev, A.Dolgov,
1 Determination of Dark Matter Properties in the Littlest Higgs Model with T-parity Masaki Asano (SOKENDAI) Collaborator: E. Asakawa (Meiji-gakuin), S.
Gamma rays annihilated from substructures of the Milky Way and Quintessino dark matter Bi Xiao-Jun Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of.
Future work Kamioka Kyoto We feel WIMP wind oh the earth NEWAGE ~ Direction Sensitive Direct Dark Matter Search ~ Kyoto University Hironobu Nishimura
A Study of Background Particles for the Implementation of a Neutron Veto into SuperCDMS Johanna-Laina Fischer 1, Dr. Lauren Hsu 2 1 Physics and Space Sciences.
K. Miuchi K. Miuchi July 10, 2008 Dark Matter and Dark Energy Direction-Sensitive Dark Matter Search --NEWAGE-- Kentaro Miuchi (Kyoto University) (New.
Directional Statistics for WIMP direct detection Anne Green Astro-Particle Theory and Cosmology Group University of Sheffield Ben Morgan, AMG and Neil.
A Lightning Review of Dark Matter R.L. Cooper
22 December 2006Masters Defense Texas A&M University1 Adam Aurisano In Collaboration with Richard Arnowitt, Bhaskar Dutta, Teruki Kamon, Nikolay Kolev*,
Neutrino mass and DM direct detection Daijiro Suematsu (Kanazawa Univ.) Erice Sept., 2013 Based on the collaboration with S.Kashiwase PRD86 (2012)
Daily Modulation of the Dark Matter Signal in Crystalline Detectors Nassim Bozorgnia UCLA TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you.
Vergados DSU11 29/09/11 Direct Dark Matter Searches- Exploiting its Various Signatures J.D. Vergados J.D. Vergados University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
WIMP search Result from KIMS experiments Kim Seung Cheon (DMRC,SNU)
Dark matter and hidden U(1) X (Work in progress, In collaboration with E.J. Chun & S. Scopel) Park, Jong-Chul (KIAS) August 10, 2010 Konkuk University.
Kamioka Kyoto We feel WIMP wind on the earth NEWAGE Direction-sensitive direct dark matter search with μ-TPC * 1.Dark.
JPS 2003 in Sendai Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation ~ Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ~ 2. Event selection 3. mass.
Robert Cooper. What is CENNS? Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering To probe a “large” nucleus Recoil energy small Differential energy spectrum.
Abstract Several models of elementary particle physics beyond the Standard Model, predict the existence of neutral particles that can decay in jets of.
Identification of Dark Matter with Directional Detection Julien Billard, F. Mayet, D. Santos, O. Guillaudin, C. Grignon (MIMAC Collaboration) Laboratoire.
Measurements of the model parameter in the Littlest Higgs Model with T-parity 1 Masaki Asano (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) Collaborator: E. Asakawa ( Meiji-gakuin.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
Dark Matter Detectors and the Neutrino Wall Malcolm Fairbairn IDM 2016 Sheffield.
Gamma-ray emission from warm WIMP annihilation Qiang Yuan Institute of High Energy Physics Collaborated with Xiaojun Bi, Yixian Cao, Jie Liu, Liang Gao,
KIMS & Inelastic DarK Matter(iDM)
WIMP direct detection:
The Dark Universe Susan Cartwright.
Nady Bakhet PhD Student – Cairo University PhD Thesis Title
Ben Morgan & Anne Green University of Sheffield
Dark Matter Search With an Ultra-low Threshold Germanium Detector proposed by Tsinghua University Seoul National University Academia Sinica Qian Yue.
An interesting candidate?
Special UCLA High Energy & Astro-Particle (HEAP) Seminar
UK Dark Matter Collaboration
Sterile Neutrinos and WDM
Germán Gómez Vargas Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Direct Detection of Vector Dark Matter
Gluon Contribution to Dark Matter Direct Detection
Non-Baryonic Dark Matter: From the CMB and axial direct detection
Topics in Higgs Portal Dark Matter
Direct Detection of Dark Matter
John Kelley IceCube Journal Club 27 February 2008
Neutron Detection with MoNA LISA
Searching for states analogous to the 12C Hoyle state in heavier nuclei using the thick target inverse kinematics technique. Marina Barbui 5/17/2018, Galveston,
1. Introduction Secondary Heavy charged particle (fragment) production
Dark Matter Search with Stilbene Scintillator
Using Single Photons for WIMP Searches at the ILC
Constraining neutrino electromagnetic properties using Xenon detectors
J-F. Glicenstein, P.Brun, E.Moulin (IRFU-Saclay)
We-Fu Chang, Wei-Ping Pan
Indirect dark matter search with YBJ-AS Observatory
Yue, Yongpyung, Korea Prospects of Dark Matter Search with an Ultra-Low Threshold Germanium Detector Yue, Yongpyung, Korea
Leptophilic Dark Matter from ATIC and Pamela
The Estimated Limits For A 5g LE-Ge Detector
Sven Vahsen, CYGNUS physics meeting
Can new Higgs boson be Dark Matter Candidate in the Economical Model
Dark Matter Detection,Models and Constraints
Presentation transcript:

Anisotropy of DM velocity distribution measured with directional detection Keiko Nagao (National Institute of Technology, Niihama College, Japan) Collaboration with Ryota Yakabe (Kobe Univ.), Tatsuhiro Naka (Nagoya Univ.) and Kentaro Miuchi (Kobe Univ.) arXiv:1707.05523 ICNFP 2017 (Crete)

Dark Matter No good candidate in SM Observations electrically neutral stable non-relativistic weakly interacting Observations cosmological measurements direct detections indirect detections search at colliders Anisotropy of DM velocity distribution measured with directional detection

Direct Detection Scattering Constraint for cross section Detect recoil energy of DM-target scattering Constraint for cross section target nucleus DM ER Cross section Event rate Anisotropy of DM velocity distribution measured with directional detection

Directional detection See Asada’s talk on 29th Aug. Direction detect not only the recoil energy but also direction where DM comes from. Advantages Powerful back ground rejection Bkg : isotropic DM signal : come from the direction of the Cygnus DM wind the Solar system Anisotropy of DM velocity distribution measured with directional detection

Directional Searches DRIFT DMTPC NEWAGE MIMAC NEWS D3 Solid Detector (Ag, Br, C,…) SI cross section Gaseous Detector (CF4, CS2, CHF3) = SD cross section 5 of them use the gaseous detector, the target particle is CG4, that is suitable to observe the SD cross section. only one experiment is using the solid detector, and focusing on the SI cross section. Anisotropy of DM velocity distribution measured with directional detection

Outline Introduction Velocity Distribution of Dark Matter Velocity Distribution Observed in the Directional Detector Summary

Velocity Distribution of Dark Matter

velocity distribution mass Clues velocity distribution abundance Dark Matter cross section density distribution In the directional DM search, it can be possible to make a constraint for the velocity distribution. Correct distribution is required to derive appropriate constraints for the interaction Anisotropy of DM velocity distribution measured with directional detection

Standard Distribution Maxwell distribution isotropic Is DM distribution surely this shape? v0: velocity of the Solar system vE: Earth’s velocity relative to DM f(v) Catena and Ullio (2012) Anisotropy of DM velocity distribution measured with directional detection

Co-rotating DM N-body simulation including baryons and gas the Galaxy the Solar system N-body simulation including baryons and gas DM co-rotates with baryons in the galaxy. Anisotropic distribution radial velocity tangential velocity Ling, Nezri, Athanassoula & Teyssier (2009) cf. Kuhlen et al. (2012), David R. Law (2009) …

Anisotropy parameter “r” isotropic anisotropic Tangential velocity Anisotropy parameter 0 < r < 1 r=0.25 is suggested by N-body simulation Anisotropy of DM velocity distribution measured with directional detection

Velocity Distribution observed in Directional Detector cf. Ben Morgan, Anne M. Green, Neil J. C. Spooner (2004) Ole Host, Steen H Hansen (2007)

Set up of simulation Monte Carlo simulation Elastic scattering Target θ DM wind Monte Carlo simulation Direction (scattering angle) Recoil energy Elastic scattering mass relation mdm=3mN Anisotropy of DM velocity distribution measured with directional detection

✔ Analysis Energy resolution :NG Directionality histogram Angular resolution :OK Energy resolution :OK Angular resolution :NG Ordinary direct detection Directionality histogram Energy-Angular distribution ✔ Anisotropy of DM velocity distribution measured with directional detection

Directionality Histogram (light target) Ethr=20keV (Light target F) Shape for r=0.3 is quite similar to that for r=1. Anisotropy of DM velocity distribution measured with directional detection

Directionality Histogram (heavy target) Ethr=50keV (Ag) Shape for r=0.3 is quite similar to that for r=1 in both case target F and Ag. Anisotropy of DM velocity distribution measured with directional detection

Angular resolution :OK Energy resolution :OK Angular resolution :OK Anisotropy of DM velocity distribution measured with directional detection

Energy-angular distribution light target (F) ER[keV] r = 0 r = 0.3 r = 1 cosθ Ethr = 0keV Even in energy-angular distribution, shape for r=0 and 0.3 is similar. Concrete method to compare the distributions is required. Anisotropy of DM velocity distribution measured with directional detection

“pseudo-experimental” data Chi squared test Many Data (#108) ideal “template” ideal difficult to achieve Few Data (#104) realistic chi squared test “pseudo-experimental” data Anisotropy of DM velocity distribution measured with directional detection

Chi squared test for r (light target) #exp.=6*10^3 Ethr=20keV (F) chi2 rtmp=0 chi2 rtmp=0.3 chi2 rtmp=1 90% C.L. 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 rexp 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 rexp If r=0.3, isotropic case (r=0) can be excluded at 90% C.L. Energy threshold is a factor to clearly characterize the difference between r=0 and 0.3. Anisotropy of DM velocity distribution measured with directional detection

Chi squared test for r (heavy target) #exp.=6*10^4 Ethr=100keV (Ag) chi2 rtmp=0 chi2 rtmp=0.3 chi2 rtmp=1 90% C.L. 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 r 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 r 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 If r=0.3, isotropic case (r=0) can be excluded at 90% C.L. Energy threshold is a factor to clearly characterize the difference between r=0 and 0.3. Due to form factor effect, more signal number is required in heavy target case than light target case. Anisotropy of DM velocity distribution measured with directional detection

Summary Possibility to discriminate the anisotropy in the velocity distribution of DM is discussed. With “template data”, the chi squared test is helpful to figure out anisotropy if O(10^4) data is obtained.

Backup Slides Anisotropy of DM velocity distribution measured with directional detection

Chi squared test (F) #exp.=6*10^3 Ethr=20keV (F) Anisotropy of DM velocity distribution measured with directional detection

Chi squared test (Ag) #exp.=6*10^4 Ethr=50keV (Ag) Anisotropy of DM velocity distribution measured with directional detection

Energy-angular distribution (light target) Ethr = 0keV Anisotropy of DM velocity distribution measured with directional detection

Energy-angular distribution (heavy target) Ethr = 0keV Anisotropy of DM velocity distribution measured with directional detection

Periodic Table Anisotropy of DM velocity distribution measured with directional detection

Sensitivity NEWAGE(2010) NEWS (expected) () Anisotropy of DM velocity distribution measured with directional detection