Compliance Monitoring Overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Law Enforcement Implications of House Bill 87 Bill is known as the Illegal Immigration Reform and Enforcement Act of Many different implications.
Advertisements

Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Terminal Objective Upon completion of this module, the participant will be knowledgeable about the sections of the Code.
Overview of Juvenile Justice in Michigan John Evans, Director Bureau of Juvenile Justice Michigan Department of Human Services 1.
Juvenile Justice system
PROCESSING OF YOUTHFUL AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN NORTH CAROLINA Youth Accountability Planning Task Force December 10, 2009.
1 ICAOS 2011 Rule Amendment Presentation for Deputy Compact Administrators & Compact Office Staff Presented by:
1 Audits of State Compliance Monitoring Systems Presented by Thomas Murphy, State Representative, OJJDP.
The Juvenile Justice System
Juvenile Justice Training Institute for State JJ Specialists (300 Slides)
Misdemeanor Sanctions
Compliance Monitoring 101 OJJDP FACJJ Training Washington, D.C. April 7, 2008.
1 State Advisory Group (SAG)/ Compliance Monitoring Training Sponsored by The U.S. Department of Justice The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency.
The JJDP Act Core Requirements ___________ CJCA New Directors Seminar August 4, 2011 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator USDOJ/OJJDP.
Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP.
2005 Children’s Code Amendments: Delinquency Act.
Reporting Requirements for School Staff Presented by Nancy Hungerford November 30, 2011 Presented by Nancy Hungerford November 30, 2011.
Understanding the “System”
AVERY FOWLER CREATIVE CREATION. LET’S TAKE A MOMENT TO REVIEW THE G.P.S FOR OUR UNIT SS8CG6 The student will explain how the Georgia court system treats.
Slide 1 Promoting and Supporting Status Offense System Reform Presentation to National Conference of State Legislators June 23, 2014 Allie Meyer Vera Institute.
A Strategic Partner in Advancing Training and TA Excellence.
Juvenile Justice System. The Juvenile Justice System, 6 th ed. Dean J. Champion Presented by: D. Romeo 2 The Juvenile Justice System CRCT pp 193 The Juvenile.
Juvenile Justice How and why juvenile justice differs from adult justice.
Chapter 16: Juvenile Justice
The Juvenile Justice System
CHILDREN DON’T BELONG IN JAIL! ●In Florida, a 17-year-old mildly retarded boy who was pleaded guilty to sexual battery was strangled by his 20-year-old.
Steps in the Adult Criminal Justice Process
Purpose and Scope of Juvenile Court Act
Juvenile Justice Ch. 16.
Navigating the Juvenile Justice System.  Taxpayers save $2 million for each child who is prevented from beginning a life of crime  20% of teens live.
CHAPTER LOCAL FACILITIES FOR DETENTION County to maintain county jail; location; agreements for detention of prisoners Duties of.
Compliance with the Separation Core Requirement: The Oregon & Missouri Experiences JJDPA Today: CJJ Summit on Reauthorization of the JJDP Act Washington,
Chapter Six Juvenile Justice Procedures. Most youth come in contact with juvenile justice through contact with a police officer. The officer has several.
Stacy L. Miller Attorney at Law. This session will cover appeals from Juvenile Court to Circuit Court and what is required of the Clerks of each court.
Juvenile Justice. Certification Certification – the proceeding in juvenile court in which the court determines if a juvenile will stand trial as an adult.
Criminal Justice BHS Law Related Education Chapter 4: A Separate System for Juveniles LESSON OBJECTIVES 4-1 Analyze and define the legal doctrine of parens.
SCOC NYS Compliance with the JJDPA 1. Core Requirements DSO Separation Jail Removal 2.
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidentiality of Records and Interagency Sharing of Educational Records.
Intro to Juvenile Justice in Virginia
Do now pg.59 1.What are all the steps in a criminal court case?
Juvenile Justice System
Lesson 6: Juvenile Justice (Chapter 15 Section 4)
Intro to Virginia’s Judicial System
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
STANDARDS: SS8CG6 The student will explain how the Georgia court system treats juvenile offenders. a. Explain the difference between delinquent behavior.
AJS101 (40384) Monday, October 3, 2016 Time Keeper.
Dependency Court Flowchart
Annual October Count of Children in
Definition, Offenders and Goals and Functions of Corrections
Confidential Records and Protected Disclosures
The Juvenile Justice System in Georgia
Georgia Studies Unit 8 – Judicial Branch in Georgia
Understanding the Criminal Justice System
The Juvenile Justice System in Georgia
Defining and Measuring Delinquency
LESSON OBJECTIVES Chapter 4: A Separate System for Juveniles
Existing Law: Sanctuary Cities Banned In South Carolina
Georgia Studies Unit 8 – Judicial Branch in Georgia
The Juvenile Justice System in Georgia
Juvenile Offenders Delinquent acts and unruly acts are legal terms for behavior in minors under the age of 16. Delinquent behavior is an act committed.
Connections Abuse Prevention Plan 2018.
The Juvenile Justice System in Georgia
287(g) Community Meeting February 13, :00pm – 4:30pm
Georgia Judicial System
Juvenile Justice.
The Juvenile Justice System in Georgia
Thursday, January 23rd Grab a yellow, orange and white sheet from the front table. Have your local government webquest on your desk. Read the front and.
Law Enforcement I Juvenile Law.
Juvenile Justice It’s all about you!.
The Juvenile Justice System in Georgia
Presentation transcript:

Compliance Monitoring Overview “Strengthening the Community Response to Increase Successful Outcomes for Our Youth” 2017 JJAB Conference

JJDP Act Core Requirements Deinstitutionalization of Status Offenders—1974 Separation—1974 Jail Removal—1980 Disproportionate Minority Confinement—1988

Deinstitutionalization of Status Offenders (DSO) Section 223(a)(11) Juveniles who are charged with or who have committed offenses that would not be criminal if committed by an adult… or such non-offenders as dependent or neglected children shall not be placed in secure detention or correctional facilities.

Separation Section 223(a)(12) Juveniles alleged to be or found to be delinquent [and status offenders and non-offenders] will not be detained or confined in any institution in which they have contact with adult inmates.

Jail Removal Section 223(a)(13) No juvenile shall be detained or confined in any jail or lockup for adults.

Core Requirements of the JJDP Act Deinstitutionalization of Status Offenders Sight and Sound Separation Jail Removal Disproportionate Minority Contact

DSO Sec. 223 (a)(11) A status offender is a juvenile offender who has been charged with or adjudicated for conduct that would not be a crime if committed by an adult. A non-offender is a juvenile who is subject to the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, usually under abuse, dependency, or neglect statutes, for reasons other than legally prohibited conduct of the juvenile. Status Offenders and non-offenders cannot be placed in secure detention or correctional facilities. DEFINE NOT AN OFFENDER – TO DISTINQUISH FROM NON OFFENDER

DSO—Sec. 223 (a)(11) Examples of Status Offenses Runaway Ungovernable/incorrigible Curfew violation Truancy Possession of alcohol as a minor Possession of tobacco as a minor Traffic violations civil in nature

DSO—Section 223(a)(11) Examples of Non-Offenses Child abuse and neglect Immigration violations (aliens) Danger to self or others (mental health) Abandonment

DSO—223(a)(11) IV. Youth Handgun Safety Act Prohibits possession of a handgun by a minor under age18. Youth who violate the Youth Handgun Safety Act or a similar law are considered delinquent offenders. Such youth can be placed in secure detention or correctional facilities.

Notes! States found out of compliance with the DSO Core Requirement lose 20% of their Formula Grants allocation. The remaining 50% of the Formula Grants allocation must be spent to bring the State back into compliance with DSO.

Core Requirements of the JJDP Act Deinstitutionalization of Status Offenders Sight and Sound Separation Jail Removal Disproportionate Minority Contact

SEPARATION Section 223(a)(12) Juveniles alleged to be or found to be delinquent [and status offenders and non-offenders] will not be detained or confined in any institution in which they have contact with adult inmates.

SEPARATION Sec. 223 (a)(12) [cont’d] Contact is defined to include any physical or sustained sight and/or sound contact between juvenile offenders in secure custody status and incarcerated adults, including inmate trustees.

SEPARATION Sec. 223 (a)(12) [cont’d] Inadvertent or Accidental Contact: Instances need not be reported if they occur in secure areas of a facility that are not dedicated to use by juvenile offenders and which are nonresidential. Any contact in a dedicated juvenile area, including residential area of a secure facility, would be a violation.

Scared Straight, Shock Incarceration, Jail Tours… No juvenile shall enter under public authority, for any amount of time, into a secure setting or section of an adult jail, lockup, or correctional facility as a disposition of an offense or as a means of modifying his or her behavior.

Deinstitutionalization of Status Offenders Sight and Sound Separation CORE REQUIREMENTS OF THE JJDP ACT Deinstitutionalization of Status Offenders Sight and Sound Separation Jail Removal Disproportionate Minority Contact

Jail Removal Section 223(a)(13) No juvenile shall be detained or confined in any jail or lockup for adults.

Jail Removal Exceptions: JAIL REMOVAL Section 223(a)(13) Jail Removal Exceptions: Six-Hour Rule Court Appearance Hold III. Rural Exception IV. Transferred, Certified, Waived, or Direct File Youth

JAIL REMOVAL Section 223(a)(13) I. Six-Hour Rule of Reason An alleged delinquent may be detained for up to six hours, while separate from adults, for the purposes of identification, processing, and arranging for release to parents or transfer to juvenile court officials or juvenile shelter or detention facilities.

JAIL REMOVAL Section 223(a)(13) II. Six-Hour Court Appearance Hold An alleged or adjudicated delinquent may be detained, while separate from adults, for up to six hours before and after a court appearance. This hold must be related to a court appearance.

Custody Flowchart

Inspection of Facilities Three reasons to inspect facilities: To confirm your classification (secure or nonsecure and who is being held there) To assess the separation levels at all points in the facility To determine if their record keeping system is adequate for you to collect the necessary data to determine compliance with the Core Requirements

Inspection of Facilities (cont’d) Confirm your classification: Is this facility secure or nonsecure? Is it for juveniles only, adults only, or juveniles and adults? Is it residential or nonresidential? Public or private? Once you answer these, and perhaps more, questions you will know how to classify it pursuant to federal definitions of terms.

Inspection of Facilities (cont’d) Walk through the facility as if you were a juvenile. Assess separation levels Ask lots of questions: When are adults in this area? When are trustees used? May I have a copy of your policies on separation? Enter a cell and ask the Deputy to walk into an adjoining cell to test sound separation (where juveniles are held securely in the vicinity of adults).

Inspection of Facilities (cont’d) More questions: How are juveniles processed? Where do they enter facility? Who escorts them? Is time-phasing used? Where are nonsecure areas? Is there a nonsecure booking area?

Inspection of Facilities: Onsite Walk through the facility as if you were a juvenile. Review sight and sound separation, records, security levels. Obtain a layout and sample of log. Obtain copies of any policies.

Why Monitor Facilities? Section 223(a)(14) of the JJDP Act: Participating States must provide for an adequate system of monitoring jails, detention facilities, correctional facilities, and nonsecure facilities to insure that the requirements of paragraph (11), paragraph (12), and paragraph (13) are met, and for the annual reporting of the results of such monitoring to the [OJJDP] Administrator…

Note! Section 223(a)(14) requires that States monitor NONSECURE facilities.

How Frequently Must Facilities Be Monitored Onsite? 100% of secure facilities in your universe must be inspected onsite at least one time every three years. A minimum of 10 percent per year must be inspected. Exception: Lockups (even those believed to be nonsecure) must be subject to inspection one time every three years. This is a minimum standard. Best practice dictates that States monitor 100% of secure facilities annually.

Monitoring Adult Facilities

What Adult Facilities Need Monitoring? Adult jails Adult lockups—police departments, substations, sheriffs’ departments Court holding facilities Adult prisons

Note! Adult lockups are the primary adult facilities needing monitoring. 2. An adult lockup is where the majority of data will be as it is often the first stop for youth upon arrest.

Federal Definition of Adult Lockup Similar to an adult jail, except that an adult lockup is a temporary-hold facility which does not hold persons after they have been formally charged. Law enforcement facilities without cells but containing cuffing rails or cuffing benches.

How to Monitor Adult Jails and Lockups for DSO, Jail Removal, and Separation Facilities’ self-report admissions logs. Compliance Monitor verifies potential violations over the phone. Compliance monitor conducts onsite inspections to verify violations and visually confirm sight and sound separation.

Note! Juveniles who have been transferred to adult court and against whom criminal felony charges have been filed do not fall under the auspices of the JJDP Act for jail removal and separation requirements within jails and lockups. These juveniles are subject to State law.

Court Holding Facilities A court holding facility is a secure facility, other than an adult jail or lockup, that is used to temporarily detain persons immediately before or after detention hearings or other court proceedings.

Court Holding Facilities (cont’d) Court holding facilities must: Meet the definition of a court holding facility. Not detain individuals overnight (i.e., nonresidential). Not be used for punitive purposes or other purposes not related to a court appearance. Provide for sight and sound separation in all secure areas. If the facility does not meet this criteria, it must be monitored as an adult jail or lockup.

Court Holding Facilities (cont’d) A status offender may be held in a court holding facility if the facility meets the requirements of a court holding facility. A delinquent offender may be held in a court holding facility if the facility meets the requirements of a court holding facility. Sight and sound separation must be provided at all times.

Which Core Requirements Apply to Court Holding Facilities? Separation

Compliance Monitors are not simply bean counters. Rather, they… Ensure that children and youth are treated in accordance to the Act. Serve as the authority in the State on Compliance Monitoring issues. Assist facilities in meeting liability with regards to how children can be detained.

QUESTIONS?