Developing a Template for Use Across Departments in Temple University's College of Public Health Lorraine Ford, Assistant Director of Information Technology;

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lessons Learned: Lessons Learned: BB9 Pilot Running Multiple Blackboard Products Simultaneously in a Production Environment Information: The Power to Transform.
Advertisements

Supporting Quality of Student Learning Online: Using Quality Matters to Strengthen Online Teaching and Learning Valencia College - Orlando, Florida Charles.
Learning From Our Stakeholders: Using Research to Redesign a Business Writing Course Barbara J. D’Angelo, Ph.D. Otis White Association for Business Communication.
Blackboard Course Design and Quality Matters
Custom Faculty Development: Reach Faculty Where They Live Linda A. Leake, M. Ed. Instructional Designer/Blackboard Support Specialist University of Louisville.
The Integration of Embedded Librarians at Tuskegee University Juanita M. Roberts Director Library Services Ford Motor Company Library/Learning Resources.
End of Course Evaluation Taimi Olsen, Ph.D., Director, Tennessee Teaching and Learning Center Jennifer Ann Morrow, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Evaluation,
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Presentation by: Carol Mattson, Dean of Academic Services, Fullerton College Nancy Deutsch, Reading Faculty/Staff Development Coordinator, Cypress College.
MAP the Way to Success in Math: A Hybridization of Tutoring and SI Support Evin Deschamps Northern Arizona University Student Learning Centers.
Quality Matters Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
Development of an Interactive Online Masters of Public Health in Nutrition Degree Program NANCY L. COHEN, PhD, RD, LDN and PATRICIA BEFFA-NEGRINI, PhD,
THE USE OF QUALITY MATTERS™ AND THE INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROCESS Presented by Meridith Bergeron, M.Ed. Director of Educational Technology Our Lady of the.
11 Transforming the Lens of Pedagogy Cristi Ford, Associate Vice Provost Center for Innovation in Learning and Student Success.
From the Mountains to the Prairies: A National Online Model for Training Field Instructors Diane Casey Crowley, MSW, LCSW Kristina Whiton-O’Brien, MSW,
Use of Quality Matters in the Faculty Mentor-Mentee Relationship
Through the Looking Glass: Examining QM through Different Lenses in the Development of an Online EMBA. Presenters: Dr. Karen Donovan Ms. Cindy Hart & Dr.
Bachelor of Social Work Program Cohort Information
Online Quality Course Design vs. Quality Teaching:
Pilot’s Log: Getting Our Professional Development Course QM Recognized
Implementing QM towards Program Certification
Hello. I’m Miran Kang, Director of Instructional Design and Support Services at the Global Campus. In this presentation, I will talk about objectives,
The Academic Technology Center
Creating a Culture of Assessment
Minnesota State Concurrent Enrollment Directors Monthly Meeting
From the Ground Up: RN to BSN Completion
Ruth Fiedler, EdD, PMHCNS-BC, CNE Associate Professor
QM, Health Care, Adult Learners, and Leadership
Katie Datko PCC Online Distance Education Webinar Wednesday 3/1/17
Introducing the QM Rubrics and Gaining Faculty Buy-in: Using Non-Threatening Approaches to Using the QM Rubrics Kimberly M. Christopherson, Jackie Barber,
Fresno State’s SI Program: Eliminating the Achievement Gap, Raising Grades, and Increasing Graduation Rates.
Harvesting the Benefits of QM Culture for Institutional Accreditation
How an Assessment Framework helped revitalize Program Review at JCCC
No Instructional Designer! Now What?
The QM K-12 Rubric as a Course Development Roadmap
Melissa Kaufman, MS – Instructional Designer
The Road to Quality - A Panel Discussion on Campus Implementation
Pittsburg State University
CTE Academy: Engaging Faculty in a Culture of Continuous Improvement
Maine is IT! at SMCC Grant Playbook for
At Large! QM Reviews at Multi - Campus Districts
Field Educator Orientation Fall 2017
Implementing a Quality Matters Internal Review process
Online Teaching Conference
Integrating UD Into a Certificate Program in Online Learning
Fresno State’s SI Program: Eliminating the Achievement Gap, Raising Grades, and Increasing Graduation Rates.
HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM or
Scaling UP Training & Support: Running with the COLT Course
Tools for Infusing QM Standards into the Course Development Process
Engaging Faculty through Instructional Technology Training
Determining an Internal Course Review Process
Providing Customized Training on Quality Online Design and Delivery
Collaborative Leadership
Accessibility Updates
Adjunct, newbies, and non-tenure track faculty – oh my!
The MSU Denver Difference: MSW Program Basics
GREAT COLLEGES TO WORK FOR: 2016 SURVEY PROGRESS
The Secret Ingredient for Success
eCampus Resources for Developing and Reviewing Courses
Faculty Perspectives on the Gold Review
High Tech and High Touch: Re-Designing a Large-Enrollment Course
Crafting Online Course Standards while Maintaining Academic Freedom
Trying to get the Horse in Front of the Buggy
Running with the COLT Course to Maintain Quality Across the Board
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Leadership and Engaging Stakeholders November 3, 2015 Micheline Besner
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Elizabeth Crawford The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
QM – Putting the Pieces Together for Strategic Visioning and Accreditation Planning QM East Regional Conference April 26, 2019.
General Studies ePortfolio Pilot
Presentation transcript:

Developing a Template for Use Across Departments in Temple University's College of Public Health Lorraine Ford, Assistant Director of Information Technology; Anne Frankel, PhD, MPH Online Program Coordinator; Laurie Friedman, MPA, MSW, LCSW, MSW Online Coordinator; Jamie Mansell, PhD, LAT, ATC, Director of Athletic Training Education; Ellen Papacostas, Instructional Technologist

Goals for Today Attendees will be able to describe one approach to utilizing the QM standards to guide development of online program courses; Attendees will be able to discuss Temple University College of Public Health's approach to integrating the QM framework within existing course structures; Attendees will identify at least 4 areas in which Temple’s College of Public Health integrated QM standards into existing course peer review structures; Attendees will be able to identify at least 5 ways that adhering to QM standards engages key stakeholders in the development of online programs, including students, College administrators, faculty, and accrediting bodies.

Let’s Jump Right In . . . . . . With an overview

Background Online teaching and learning can be challenging for both instructor and students; One of these challenges is the time and energy spent orienting students to the format of a course; Offering a structure for standardization provides consistency across courses, saving time for both faculty and students;

Background Representatives from 3 departments in CPH worked with IT to develop a Blackboard template The team was made up of representatives from Information Technology, Social Work, Kinesiology, Social and Behavioral Sciences, and the CPH Dean’s office, all of whom have experience with online teaching; Team used the online teaching “Quality Matters” rubric as the foundation

Why a Template? Align with online teaching best practices (Quality MattersTM) Offer students a standardized experience Increase accessibility of Temple resources for online students Assist in gaining access to offer program across state lines Assists with compliance with legal, ethical and accessibility issues regarding online courses

“As students move through the program, they seek a degree of familiarity and continuity in the same way that students enjoy the sense of knowing their way around campus” (King & Alperstein, 2015, p.65)

So that this….

Becomes this…

Our Approach

Development Timeline May 2016: Attended day training with Temple’s General Education by QM: Applying the QM Rubric June 2016: Ongoing meetings with CPH IT Team to create template July/August 2016: Template pilot tested within one course Fall 2016: Piloted with 6 faculty members across CPH departments; two team members participated in QM Peer Reviewer Course Late Fall 2016: “Peer reviewed” our template and integrated feedback from faculty on final template Spring 2017: Rolled out template to CPH faculty and revised based on feedback

Questions about the rationale/process for developing a template?

Utilized CPH syllabus template with university and college policies; Integrating the Template into Existing Course Structures Particular attention was paid to creating standardization while allowing for individual instructor autonomy within the online classroom, as well as deliberately including spaces for instructor presence; Utilized CPH syllabus template with university and college policies; Leveraged existing University and College resources Student services and technology support sections

Peer Review Process Roll out of monthly discussions centered on pedagogy and technology; Introducing the new CPH Template; Alignment throughout the course; Diverse learning opportunities; Student support in the online environment Buy in from Associate Dean of Academic Affairs Online course through Center for Advancement of Teaching Use of Template by summer 2017 Creation of teaching resource guides Program specific

Engaging Key Stakeholders Students Recruitment Orientation College Administrators Reduces need for specific QM training; Improves brick and mortar programs Faculty More time spent on course content Accrediting Bodies Ensures quality programs

Questions? Thank you for sharing your time with us today!