Data and maps in the afh Presented to:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE (AI) City of Missoula.
Advertisements

+ James Carras. + Carras Community Investment, Inc. Prepared Fair Housing and Equity Assessment for regional vision and plan – Seven/50 Prepared Regional.
Advocating for Persons with Disabilities as a Housing Priority: Discussion of Proactive Ways to Providing Accessible Housing Presented by Barbara Chandler.
AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING Memphis Fair Housing Center – Memphis Area Legal Services Sapna V. Raj, Managing Attorney (901)
Heidi Aggeler, Managing Director Presented by: Presented to: BBC Research & Consulting 1999 Broadway, Suite 2200 Denver, Colorado.
State of Maryland Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice COSCDA Program Managers Meeting Washington, D.C. March 16, 2010.
Surviving a FHEO Compliance Review and Complying with AFFH.
Fair Housing/Equal Opportunity Glenn Misner  September 4, 2014.
2014 CDBG Applicants' Workshop Fair Housing/Equal Opportunity.
2011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop Fair Housing/ Equal Opportunity and Section 3.
Affordable Housing Initiatives: Building Your Own Local Toolbox Mara S. Register Community Development Director City of Valdosta, Georgia.
University of Maryland Law School April 12, 2013 Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing in HUD Housing Programs A First Term “Report Card” Philip Tegeler,
Fair Housing/Equal Opportunity Glenn Misner  September 10, 2015.
April 12, 2013 University of Maryland School of Law The Fair Housing Act at 45: Actualizing the Duty to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing.
Fair Housing/Equal Opportunity Steed Robinson, Office of Community Development  September 10, 2015.
2013 CDBG Recipients' Workshop Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing.
BEVERLY DAVIS, ASST. DIRECTOR, FAIR HOUSING AND HUMAN RIGHTS CHRIS PLUMMER, ASK DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE.
Housing & Urban Development Mixed-Income Housing.
 Introduction to the AFFH Rule 2   Provide for better fair housing planning and address issues raised with the Analysis of Impediments process  To.
AVOIDING DISPARATE IMPACT CLAIMS UNDER THE FAIR HOUSING ACT.
+ ECFRPC Sustainable Communities FHEA and Initial Sunrail Station Area Analysis James Carras Carras Community Investment Inc. September 20, 2013.
The Fair Housing and Equity Assessment (FHEA). Goals of FHEA Assessment  To encourage communities to reflect upon where current challenges and opportunities.
Massachusetts Association of Planning Directors Jennifer Raitt, Metropolitan Area Planning Council January 2016.
Presented to Illinois NAHRO August 13, 2015 Jennifer Novak Chan, Secretary, Illinois NAHRO.
 Introduction to the AFFH Rule 2   Provide for better fair housing planning  Promote better understanding by program participants of AFFH  Address.
Presented by Mollie Fitzpatrick, Heidi Aggeler, Jen Garner 1999 Broadway, Suite 2200 Denver, Colorado (303)
AVOIDING DISPARATE IMPACT CLAIMS UNDER THE FAIR HOUSING ACT.
Seattle City Council February 11, 2010 Potluck Consulting Eva Wingren, Lan Bai, Gary Pollack Poverty Dispersal Policies.
Presented by: Erin Boggs, Esq. Deputy Director Connecticut Fair Housing Center Opportunity, the Analysis of Impediments and the Fair Housing Equity Assessment:
HUD Community Development Block Grant Program Public Hearing For The PY 2015 Action Plan & Pre-Application Workshop March 19, 2015.
Opportunities and Challenges in Development Siting June 2016.
AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING: ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING (AFH) KORI SCHNEIDER PERAGINE NCDA June 22, 2016.
Orange County Consolidated Plan One-Year Action Plan and Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice August 2, 2016 BCC.
Demystifying the Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH)
AFFh overview September 22, 2016 Presented by
Site and Neighborhood Standards for RAD Conversions
What is Planning for Progress?
Laurel Hart, Director Housing Finance & Development
Loudoun County Housing Needs Assessment
Office of Minority Health and Disparities Elimination
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT AND FAIR HOUSING PLENARY
understanding the link
Glossary AFFH Rule - 24 C.F.R. §§
Community Public Forum City of Los Angeles
Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH)
The Moment. The Moment Mile High Connects A Growing Network.
Using Data to Assess Fair Housing
Project statement Obtain an understanding of poverty in the community
Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH)
NCSHA 2016 Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Robert Renner, Office of Policy Development and Research
Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH)
Naco – Housing platform
Limited English Proficiency (LEP)
Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Fiscal Mapping Community of Practice
Cuyahoga County Housing Study and Plan
Assessment of Fair Housing
Description of the Goal
AFFH: Next Steps for your community
AFFH – Tools to Use for Your Community
Climate Justice Communities of color run the greatest risk of suffering from climate change. If equity is not the focus of climate change policy, these.
Haksoon Ahn, PhD Associate Professor
Assessment of Fair Housing
Haksoon Ahn, PhD Associate Professor
Current conditions.
Western Greater Yellowstone Area Analysis of Impediments to
The Consolidated Plan Nicole Engels City of Omaha Planning Housing and Community Development.
Planning for the next 5 years Consolidated Plan and Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice Required by HUD for Federal Programs: CDBG, HOME, ESG.
2019 Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Data and maps in the afh Presented to: CO & Mountain Plains NAHRO Conference Session 2, 3:45-5:15(?), Thursday, May 25, 2017 What does this mean? Interpreting the HUD maps and data for the Assessment of Fair Housing In this interactive session, Mollie Fitzpatrick and Mehgie Tabar with BBC Research & Consulting will show attendees how to navigate HUD’s AFFH-T—the online data and mapping system developed for the Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH)—and how to interpret the maps and tables. As a member of HUD’s national training team for the AFH, Mollie leads training modules on data and mapping and uses the tool in BBC’s consulting work for jurisdictions. Mehgie has used the AFFH-T tool in preparing fair housing and AFH studies for Santa Fe, New Mexico; Pocatello, Idaho; San Mateo County, CA; and the State of Minnesota. Presented by: Mollie Fitzpatrick, Director Mehgie Tabar, Research Associate 1999 Broadway Suite 2200 Denver, Colorado 80202 303.321.2547 x 256 haggeler@bbcresearch.com May 25, 2017

PRIMARY AFH TOPICS Analysis of Fair Housing Issues Demographic Summary Segregation/Integration R/ECAPs Disparities in Access to Opportunity Disproportionate Housing Needs Publicly Supported Housing Analysis Disability and Access Analysis Fair Housing Enforcement, Outreach Capacity, and Resources Analysis

Segregation/integration Segregation: Areas of concentration due to policies, programs, discrimination Concentrations can be due to housing preferences; segregation is caused by more than preferences. HUD purposes; more than race/ethnicity: Race Ethnicity (Hispanic/non) You also need to analyze distribution of residents by: Poverty Disability Family status—focus on single parents and large families National Origin Limited English Proficiency (LEP)

Segregation/integration “Segregation” and “integration” require further analysis. Segregation can be determined through an analysis of historical (hopefully not current) policies and practices. Analysis of what has driven housing choices of residents in segregated areas informed by input from residents living in these areas through focus groups and surveys. “Integration” = areas that are not segregated. We define area with a diverse socioeconomic base—i.e., where income and racial/ethnic distribution representative of region.

Dissimilarity index Dissimilarity Index: Measures “evenness” in which two separate groups are distributed across geographic units—such as a county The dissimilarity index is somewhere between 0 and 1 An index near 0 indicates perfect distribution of racial groups across all Census tracts in a region An index of 1 indicates perfect segregation of racial groups across the region Use caution when protected class population is small (< 1,000 people)

R/ECAPS R/ECAPs are “racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty.” Defined as concentrated areas + 40% family poverty rate or higher, or a poverty rate exceeding three times the region’s rate

Disparities in Access to opportunity Data HUD provides: Low poverty index—includes receipt of public assistance. High score=low poverty School proficiency index—based on 4th grade state tests in reading and math. Complicated by choice and magnet/charter schools enrollment. Labor [engagement] market index—measures human capital and labor market engagement by neighborhood. Jobs proximity index—examines location of neighborhoods to employment concentrations Note: Inversely weighted by labor supply (competition)

Disparities in Access to opportunity Data HUD provides: Transit trips index—likelihood that low income renters in that neighborhood use public transit Low transportation cost index—transportation costs for low income renters Environmental health index—exposure to toxins

Disproportionate housing needs “a. Which groups (by race/ethnicity and family status) are more likely than other groups to experience housing cost burden, overcrowding, or substandard housing? Which groups also disproportionately experience severe housing cost burdens? b. Which areas in the jurisdiction and region experience the greatest housing burdens? Which of these areas align with segregated areas, integrated areas, or R/ECAPs and what are the predominant race/ethnicity or national origin groups in such areas? c. Compare the needs of families with children for housing units with two, three, or four bedrooms with the available existing housing stock in each category of publicly supported housing.” Use HUD maps, data, CHAS tables from eCon Plan, Housing Market Analyses

Publicly Supported Housing Patterns Analysis Concentrations of racial/ethnic groups in public housing Concentrations of voucher holders in certain neighborhoods Who is concentrated? Why? What are the characteristics of these neighborhoods? Difference in demographic composition of persons living in assisted housing v. income-eligible population overall Are certain protected classes under- or over-represented? Differences in siting of public-assisted housing Public housing authority policies, decisions for preferences, siting of housing, community opposition, impediments to mobility, quality of affordable housing information

Disability and access analysis Locational distribution by age, reasons for demographic patterns Is there sufficient affordable and accessible housing in a range of unit sizes? To what extent do persons with disabilities in or from the jurisdiction or region reside in segregated or integrated settings?

Disability and access analysis What are the range of options for persons with disabilities to access affordable housing and supportive services? To what extent are persons with disabilities able to access the following? Identify barriers faced. Government services and facilities Public infrastructure (e.g., sidewalks, pedestrian crossings, pedestrian signals) Transportation Proficient schools and educational programs Jobs What processes exist in the jurisdiction and region for persons with disabilities to request and obtain reasonable accommodations and accessibility modifications to address the barriers discussed above?

Fair housing contributing factors Defined by rule as: “a factor that creates, contributes to, perpetuates, or increases the severity of one or more fair housing issues.” -24 C.F.R. Sec. 5.152

Fair housing contributing factors Excellent description beginning on page 202 of AFFH Rule Guidebook: Access to financial services Lack of local private fair housing outreach and enforcement Access to proficient schools for person with disabilities Lack of local public fair housing enforcement Access to publicly supported housing for persons with disabilities Lack of private investment in specific neighborhoods Access to transportation for persons with disabilities Lack of public investment in specific neighborhoods, including services or amenities Admissions and occupancy policies and procedures, including preferences in publicly supported housing Lack of regional cooperation The availability of affordable units in a range of sizes Lack of resources for fair housing agencies and organizations The availability, type, frequency, and reliability of public transportation Lack of state or local fair housing laws Community opposition Land use and zoning laws Deteriorated and abandoned properties Lending discrimination Displacement of residents due to economic pressures Location of accessible housing Impediments to mobility Location of employers Inaccessible buildings, sidewalks, pedestrian crossings, or other infrastructures Location of environmental health hazards Inaccessible government facilities or services Location of proficient schools and school assignment policies Lack of affordable, accessible housing in a range of unit sizes Location and types of affordable housing Lack of affordable in-home or community-based supportive services Occupancy codes and restrictions Lack of affordable, integrated housing for individuals who need supportive services Private discrimination Lack of assistance for housing accessibility modifications Quality of affordable housing information programs Lack of assistance for transitioning from institutional settings to integrated housing Regulatory barriers to providing housing and supportive services for persons with disabilities Lack of community revitalization strategies

Setting fair housing priorities and goals Fair Housing Goals: Identify one or more contributing factors that the goal is designed to address Describe how the goal relates to overcoming the contributing factor(s) and related fair housing issues Identify metrics and milestones for results—with timeframes Identifies responsible parties See Guidebook, page 124, for strategy examples

The affh tool https://egis.hud.gov/affht/

Access to opportunity indicators Low poverty index—includes receipt of public assistance. High score=low poverty School proficiency index—based on 4th grade state tests in reading and math. Complicated by choice and magnet/charter schools enrollment. Labor [engagement] market index—measures human capital and labor market engagement by neighborhood. Jobs proximity index—examines location of neighborhoods to employment concentrations Transit trips index—likelihood that low income renters in that neighborhood use public transit Low transportation cost index—transportation costs for low income renters Environmental health index—exposure to toxins

Access to opportunity table

Access to opportunity analysis HIGH is always good. Magnitude isn’t important; DIFFERENCES are important.

Questions? Thank you for your participation! Mollie Fitzpatrick & Mehgie Tabar mfitzpatrick@bbcresearch.com 303-321-2547