A new QF1 magnet for ATF3 Alexey Vorozhtsov

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Magnets for the ESRF upgrade phase II
Advertisements

Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2
ET 332a Dc Motors, Generators and Energy Conversion Devices Lesson 2: Magnetic Circuits- Quantities and Definitions 1.
Hybrid QD0 Studies M. Modena CERN Acknowledgments: CERN TE-MSC CLIC Magnets Study Team: A.Aloev, E. Solodko, P.Thonet, A.Vorozhtsov “CLIC/ILC QD0” Meeting.
M. Modena CERN Acknowledgments: CERN TE-MSC CLIC Magnets Study Team: A. Aloev, E. Solodko, P. Thonet, A. Vorozhtsov “CLIC magnets developments” “CLIC Project.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnet Design Workshop: Magnet Design and Analysis Charles Spataro, NSLS-II Project NSLS-II is a new 3Gev synchrotron.
1 M. Modena for the CLIC MDI magnet study Team (A. Aloev, P. Thonet, E. Solodko, A. Vorozhtsov) CLIC MDI Meeting,16 January 2015.
Powered Magnets, DB Formation and Decelerator Alexey Vorozhtsov (JINR) International Workshop on Linear Colliders October 2010.
Magnet designs for Super-FRS and CR
LCWS14 Benoit CURE - CERN/PH Dept.1 International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders October 2014 Organized by the Vinca Institute of Nuclear.
Task7: NUSTAR2 - Design and Prototype Construction of a Radiation-Resistant Magnet C. Mühle GSI Task leader: G. Moritz /GSI.
Author CERN – Geneva – CH Jacques.Dutour 14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland 1 / 16 MQW magnets:
Options for Final Focusing Quadrupoles Michele Modena CERN TE-MSC Many thanks for the contributions of: J. Garcia Perez, H. Gerwig, C. Lopez, C. Petrone,
Status of: CLIC Two-Beam Module Magnets R&D and Procurement 1 Michele Modena, CERN TE-MSC IWLC10, WG8, 21October 2010.
M. Modena, A. Aloev CERN, Geneva, CH “An alternative Super-ferric design for ILC QD0” “LCWS14, 6-10 October 2014 Belgrade.
Permanent Magnet Quadrupoles for the CLIC Drive Beam Jim Clarke, Norbert Collomb, Neil Marks, James Richmond, and Ben Shepherd STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
F James T Volk June Permanent Magnets for Linear Colliders James T Volk Fermilab.
ATF2 Magnets ATF2 Magnets 27/28 Feb 2007Cherrill Spencer, SLAC. Info for QC3 machining discussion 1 Information for discussion about how to enlarge the.
Liesbeth Vanherpe, Olivier Crettiez, Alexey Vorozhtsov, Thomas Zickler Quadrupole Electro-magnets for Linac4 at CERN ATS Seminar, CERN, July 11, 2013.
Magnet Design & Construction for EMMA
CLIC Workshop th -17 th October 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC 1 CLIC Main Linac Quadrupoles Preliminary design of a quadrupole for the stabilization.
Consolidation of the Booster Injection Quadrupole Magnets (part 2) A. Aloev 14 th February 2013.
CLIC Stabilisation Day’08 18 th March 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN.
Drive Beam Quadrupoles Jim Clarke, Norbert Collomb, Ben Shepherd, Graham Stokes STFC Daresbury Laboratory, UK Antonio Bartalesi, Michele Modena, and Mike.
CLIC requirements on Warm Magnets (for CLIC Modules mainly) 1 M. Modena, CERN TE-MSC 13 April 2011 CERN-UK Collaboration Kick-off Meeting.
Reducing the Iron in the Endcap Yoke of CLIC_SiD Benoit Curé, Konrad Elsener, Hubert Gerwig, CERN CERN, June 2014 Linear Collider Detector Magnet Meeting.
"Static" steering correction on the DB Quadrupoles Alexey Vorozhtsov 14 Dec 2010.
Linac4 MAC 29 th January 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 Magnets for Linac4 Th. Zickler CERN Linac4 Machine Advisory Committee 28 th - 30 th January.
Yingshun Zhu Design of Small Aperture Quadrupole Magnet for HEPS-TF
HTS and LTS Magnet Design and Prototyping for RAON
New Magnet Design for FCC- ee Attilio Milanese, CERN 26 Oct presented by Frank Zimmermann.
WP15.4 Status March 2017.
Iranian Light Source Facility, IPM, P.O. Box , Tehran, Iran
Halbach magnets and correctors for the C and eRHIC projects
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Status of BDS (QD0 and SD0) and PCL magnet studies for CLiC
One plane dipole corrector for the CLIC MBQ TYPE 1
Yingshun Zhu Design progress of QD0 in CEPC Interaction Region
Generalised Halbach Magnets for a Non-Scaling FFAG Arc
Some Design Considerations and R &D of CEPCB Dipole Magnet
Test of a Permanent Magnet Quadrupole Placed in a Dipole Field
Normal Conducting Magnets
Procurement, Measurement and Installation of 2 Octupoles for ATF
Physics Design of CBETA Quadrupoles
Warm magnets for LHeC / Test Facility arcs
6th BINP-FAIR-GSI Workshop,
The design schemes of the low field dipole magnets
Preliminary Design of High Precision Small Aperture Magnets for BAPS
Development of the Canted Cosine Theta Superconducting Magnet
PROGRESS REPORT OF A NLNS-FFAG ADS MAGNET
Halbach Magnets: Design, Prototypes & Results
Arc magnet designs Attilio Milanese 13 Oct. 2016
CHEN, Fusan KANG, Wen November 5, 2017
Magnets for the ESRF upgrade phase II
Main magnets for PERLE Test Facility
CLIC Workshop 2016, CERN 20th January 2016
Pierre-Alexandre Thonet
Conceptual Design of CEPC Interaction Region Superconducting Magnets
Magnet developments for the ESRF-EBS
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Compact and Low Consumption Magnet Design The DESY Experience
CBETA Magnet Production
Power Magnetic Devices: A Multi-Objective Design Approach
PERMANENT MAGNET QUADRUPOLE FOR THE LINAC 4 CCDTL
High Precision Magnet Production for NSLSII at IHEP
Fusan Chen, Wen Kang, Mei Yang*
CEPC Collider Magnets CHEN, Fusan November 13, 2018.
CEPC Final Focus Superconducting Quadrupole and Anti-solenoid Magnets
CEPC Booster Ring Magnets
Electron Collider Ring Magnets Preliminary Summary
Presentation transcript:

A new QF1 magnet for ATF3 Alexey Vorozhtsov International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders 26-30 September 2011

Requirements for QF1 and QD0 Magnet Name QF1FF QD0FF Units Gradient Nom. / Ultra low 6.772 / 6.791 12.45 / 12.46 T/m Magnetic length 475 mm Nom. Integrated gradient 3.226 5.919 T Tuning range ±5 % Aperture radius > 35 Good Field Region radius 20 Space constrains Not specified Field quality requirements Harmonic №: Skew an=An/B2 Normal bn=Bn/B2 3 0.124 0.748 units@rGFR 4 0.344 4.12 5 0.665 2.76 6 1.57 9.82 Reference H. Garcia, E. Marin. R. Tomas. “ATF2 QD0FF and QF1FF specifications”, CERN, 26/07/2011. LCWS11, 28/09/2011 Alexey Vorozhtsov

Model 1: Electromagnetic Quadrupole Parameters UNITS Magnet name QF1 QD0 Aperture radius [mm] 40 Good Field Region radius 20 Effective length 475 Field gradient [T/m] 6.791 12.46 Pole field [T] 0.272 0.498 Yoke length 455 COIL Conductor dimensions mm 10 × 10 , Ø=5 12 × 12 , Ø=6 Number of turns per coil 13 16 Number of pancakes per coil 1 Average turn length [m] 1.2 1.25 Total conductor length 57.2 80 Electrical parameters Ampere turns per pole [A] 4560 8350 Current 351 522 Current density [A/mm2] 4.42 4.54 Total resistance [mOhm] 12.3 12 Voltage [V] 4.3 6.3 Power [kW] 1.5 3.26 COOLING Cooling circuits per magnet Coolant velocity [m/s] 1.1 1.6 Cooling flow per circuit [l/min] 1.28 2.75 Pressure drop [bar] 2.3 5 Reynolds number 7771 13877 Temperature rise [K] 17 Yoke consists of 4 pieces: Assembling errors Water cooled coils: Magnet vibration Power consumption: 1.5kW - QF1, 3.3kW -QD0 LCWS11, 28/09/2011 Alexey Vorozhtsov

QF1 Model 2: Permanent Quadrupole Magnet (PMQ) with adjustable strength P.M. blocks -as a flux generators Aluminum ring (made in a single piece) -as a support structure, p.m. blocks and pole nose will be mechanically clamped by this ring. Pole tip made of soft iron material- to smooth the effects of possible differences, among the p.m., in terms of easy axis orientation. Tuning blocks (movable mechanically at 10 mm (max), independently per pole) - to compensate the possible p.m. inequalities and to set the field gradient (max at 12.5% from the nominal value), the exact position of the block will be regulated by the non-magnetic spacers of different thickness. Magnet name QF1 Aperture radius 40 mm Magnet height ×width × length 220 ×220×455 mm Effective length 474 mm Field gradient 6.8 T/m Integrated field gradient 3.225 T Tuning 12.5 % LCWS11, 28/09/2011 Alexey Vorozhtsov 4

Field computation 2D model Opera 2D/ST code –to design the pole profile, yoke cross-section, permanent block size and position. Pole tip-profile: Hyperbolic shape was replaced by the arc segments – to simplify the machining of the poles. Harmonic amplitudes were obtained by Fourier analysis of the radial field component Br on a circle r=20 mm (GFR boundary): b6, b10 < 0.2 [Units]@ r=20mm LCWS11, 28/09/2011 Alexey Vorozhtsov

p.m. easy axis orientation errors LCWS11, 28/09/2011 Alexey Vorozhtsov

Field computation: 3D model Opera 3D Tosca code –to study the end effects LCWS11, 28/09/2011 Alexey Vorozhtsov 7

Integrated field quality Chamfer of 8 mm × 450 – to minimize the integrated dodecapole field component B6 Harmonic amplitudes were obtained by Fourier analysis of the integrated radial field component Br : integrated b6, b10 < 0.4 [Units]@ r=20mm for selected chamfer height LCWS11, 28/09/2011 Alexey Vorozhtsov

Example of similar magnet : LINAC 4 PMQ prototype ( constructed at CERN in 2011 ) Magnet Name QF1FF Linac 4(Proto) Gradient 6.791 T/m ~16 T/m Aperture radius 40 mm 22.5mm GFR radius 20mm (50%) 15 mm (67%) Harmonic N Required MSRD@15 mm Scaled@11.25 mm(50% ) an bn 3 0.124 0.748 8.5 -5.2 6.38 -3.90 4 0.344 4.12 0.5 6.1 0.28 3.43 5 0.665 2.76 -1.3 -0.3 -0.55 -0.13 6 1.57 9.82 0.8 -2.2 0.25 -0.70 Reference D. Tommasini, M. Buzio, P. A. Thonet, A. Vorozhtsov. “Design, manufacture and measurements of permanent quadrupole magnets for Linac4”, Presented at MT-22, September 2011 LCWS11, 28/09/2011 Alexey Vorozhtsov 9

QF1 Model 3: Hybrid quadrupole (based on PMQ) Aperture radius 40 mm Magnet length 512 mm Yoke height ×width × length 290 ×290×455 mm Effective length 474 mm Nom. field gradient 6.9 T/m Nom. Integrated field gradient 3.27 T Tuning range ± 4.6 % Coil parameters Number of turns per pole 35 Conductor size 4 mm x 4 mm Current ± 20 A Max. current density 1.2 A/mm2 Cooling Air, natural convention LCWS11, 28/09/2011 Alexey Vorozhtsov

P.M. material High remnant field Br=1.12 [T] Sm2Co17 Recoma 30S from “ARNOLD Magnetic Technologies” High remnant field Br=1.12 [T] The smallest deviation ~3% of the magnetic characteristic (Br,Hc) from the typical values. ±2[deg] error of easy axis orientation Radiation and corrosion resistant Reversible temperature coefficient of Br = -0.035%/0C LCWS11, 28/09/2011 Alexey Vorozhtsov