Risk Assessment Process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Museum Presentation Intermuseum Conservation Association.
Advertisements

Homeland Security and Law Enforcement Created By: Ashley Spivey For _Local_Actions_for_Homeland_Security.pdf.
WMD Crime Scene Management
WMD Crime Scene Management
United States Fire Administration Chief Officer Training Curriculum Operations Module 12: Terrorist Incident Simulation Exercise.
DEFENSE SUPPORT OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES (DSCA)
Chapter 13 Crimes Against the State Joel Samaha, 9th Ed.
Visual 8.1 Terrorism and CERT  Define terrorism.  Identify potential targets in the community.  Identify CERT operating procedures for a terrorist incident.
Capability Cliff Notes Series PHEP Capability 5—Fatality Management What Is It And How Will We Measure It?
FBI Intelligence Houston Field Intelligence Group Overview Carlos J. Barrón FIG Coordinator Field Intelligence Group H O U S T O N UNCLASSIFIED.
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program 2.1 State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Process State Homeland Security Program.
Session 8: Modeling the Vulnerability of Targets to Threats of Terrorism 1 Session 8 Modeling the Vulnerability of Targets to Threats of Terrorism John.
Fiscal Year 2008 Urban Areas Security Initiative Nonprofit Security Grant Program Investment Justification Questions, Criteria, and Prioritization Methodology.
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program State Process and SHSS.
Office for Domestic Preparedness Overview Briefing National Governors Association March 13, 2003 Department of Homeland Security Andrew T. Mitchell Acting.
© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning Part I The Nature and Setting of Police Administration Chapter 3 Police Administration and Homeland Security.
“Who’s In Charge?” “THE COMMAND SECTION”. The Incident/Unified Commander Incident/Unified Commander(s) provides direction and guidance through:  Key.
IS-0700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
PREPARE AMERICA for a Unified Response to Terrorism A NATIONAL HOMELAND SECURITY PREPAREDNESS TRAINING SOLUTION OFFERED BY AMERICA’S COMMUNITY COLLEGES.
Workshop Summary ISPS Drills & Exercises Workshop Port Moresby 2006.
Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency International Cooperation in Nuclear Security David Ek Office of Nuclear Security.
Technician Module 2 Unit 8 Slide 1 MODULE 2 UNIT 8 Prevention, Intelligence & Deterrence.
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program Agricultural Assessment Component.
Part of a Broader Strategy
Jeffery Graviet Emergency Services Coordinator, Salt Lake County Chairperson, Salt Lake Urban Area Working Group.
Module 3 Develop the Plan Planning for Emergencies – For Small Business –
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program Risk Assessment Process.
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program Develop Planning Factors for CBRNE Scenarios.
Agricultural Investigations Law Enforcement Perspective.
Critical Infrastructure Protection Overview Building a safer, more secure, more resilient America The National Infrastructure Protection Plan, released.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
Port Security Safeguarding ISPS Drills & Exercises Workshop
Technician Module 2 Unit 2 Slide 1 MODULE 2 UNIT 2 Planning, Assessment & Analysis.
Force Protection. What is Force Protection? Force protection (FP) is a term used by the US military to describe preventive measures taken to mitigate.
Salary Possibilities Newly assigned Special Agents start at a yearly salary of $43,441, or also recognized as a GS-10, plus multiple other pay increases.
Hazardous Materials Response Team Unit Operational Response Section.
Building Legal Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies April East Lansing, Michigan Conducting an Effective Emergency Legal Training Exercise.
Technician Module 2 Unit 1 Slide 1 MODULE 2 UNIT 1 Introduction & Review.
NFPA 1600 Disaster/Emergency Management and Business Continuity Programs.
MODULE 3 Composition & Roles. TAT TEAM APPROACH UPON COMPLETION OF THIS MODULE, PARTICIPANTS SHOULD UNDERSTAND: 3 – 2  Composition of the Threat Assessment.
Specialization Investigation Terrorism.  As you know class, this is our last seminar. I enjoyed the term.  Seminar, Discussion, and Research Project.
1 Washington State Critical Infrastructure Program “No security, No infrastructure” Infrastructure Protection Office Emergency Management Division Washington.
1 Book Cover Here Chapter 23 TERRORISM AND URBAN DISORDER Criminal Investigation: A Method for Reconstructing the Past, 7 th Edition Copyright © 2014,
Fiscal Year 2007 Urban Area Security Initiative Nonprofit Security Grant Program Investment Justification Questions, Criteria, and Prioritization Methodology.
WMD Operations Unit 1 slide 1 MODULE 2 UNIT 1 Training at the Awareness Level Review.
SEC 420 Entire Course (UOP) SEC 420 Week 1 DQ 1 (UOP)  SEC 420 Week 1 Individual Assignment Responsibilities of Personal Protection Officers Paper 
Civil Aviation Security Program The FBI’s Counterterrorism Division’s (CTD) Civil Aviation Security Program (CASP) is responsible for Criminal and Terrorism.
November 19, 2002 – Congress passed the Homeland Security Act of 2002, creating a new cabinet-level agency DHS activated in early 2003 Original Mission.
DHS/ODP OVERVIEW The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Office for Domestic Preparedness (ODP) implements programs designed to enhance the preparedness.
1 Portland Office of Emergency Management (POEM) Urban Areas Security Initiative State Homeland Security Office of Domestic Preparedness - Grant Programs.
Risks and Hazards to Consider Unit 3. Visual 3.1 Unit 3 Overview This unit describes:  The importance of identifying and analyzing possible hazards that.
Chapter 16 Terrorism and National Security.
Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness
Disaster and Emergency Management
MODULE 2 UNIT 4 Working at the Scene Allow 30 minutes for this section.
Citizen Corps Citizen Corps areas of emphasis: Crime Natural disasters
Joint Force Headquarters-Michigan CCIRs and PIRs
Disaster Preparedness
What is terrorism? There is no agreed definition of terrorism internationally. The UK’s Terrorism Act 2000, defines terrorism as: The use or threat of.
Joint Force Headquarters-Michigan CCIRs and PIRs
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved.
Federal Protective Service
Disaster and Emergency Management
MODULE 2 UNIT 1 Introduction & Review Instructor Notes.
MODULE 2 UNIT 2 Incident Command Allow 60 minutes for this section.
Securing Critical Chemical Assets: The Responsible Care® Security Code
Training at the Awareness Level Review
Prevention, Intelligence
MODULE 2 UNIT 4 Working at the Scene Allow 30 minutes for this section.
Presentation transcript:

Risk Assessment Process

Fit into the Homeland Security Strategic Planning Process? How Does “Threat” Fit into the Homeland Security Strategic Planning Process? Threat Assessment

State Administrative Agency Risk Assessment Needs Assessment Threat Assessment Planning Factors CBRNE* Scenarios Two components of Risk…Threat and Vulnerability Desired Capabilities Current Capabilities Vulnerability Assessment Threat Assessment Shortfalls or “Gaps”

Groups or individuals indicating the unlawful use of force or violence PTE Defined Groups or individuals indicating the unlawful use of force or violence Specifically the utilization of a WMD… To intimidate or coerce… Government or civilian population… Political or social purposes R E F E R E N C E : Jurisdiction Handbook page 11 Threat Assessment Use this definition as a guide to determine existing PTE’s keep focused

Weapons of Mass Destruction (18 USC 2332a) Defines a weapon of mass destruction as (1) any destructive device as defined in section 921 of this title, [which reads] any explosive, incendiary, or poison gas, bomb, grenade, rocket having a propellant charge of more than four ounces, missile having an explosive or incendiary charge of more than one-quarter ounce, mine or device similar to the above; (2) poison gas; (3) any weapon involving a disease organism; or (4) any weapon that is designed to release radiation or radioactivity at a level dangerous to human life. Threat Assessment Use this definition to maintain focus regarding WMD capability when determining existing PTE’s

Law enforcement personnel/intelligence components Threat Working Group Law enforcement personnel/intelligence components Consider all appropriate personnel/agencies Additional participants should be limited to subject matter experts who advise on terrorism related issues FBI WMD Coordinator FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force Provide information on motives and capabilities of PTE Threat Assessment Introduce FBI guests Provide forum to discuss next two slides FBI WMD Coord. JTTF

Joint Terrorism Task Force Combines federal, state and local law enforcement Develop cohesive strategy for identifying, investigating and prosecuting terrorists Intelligence collection and analysis to prevent terrorist acts 66 JTTF’s nationwide Threat Assessment

Located within FBI field offices FBI WMD Coordinator Located within FBI field offices Assist state and local jurisdictions with identifying WMD threat elements Assist state and local jurisdictions in their establishment of policies and procedures established for responding to WMD terrorist attacks Liaison to the Joint Terrorism Task Force Threat Assessment

Law Enforcement On-line (LEO) Threat Assessment

Information sharing limited to working group Safeguards Information sharing limited to working group No recording or forwarding of sensitive information Alternatives recognized but require submission using existing format Threat Assessment

“Snapshot” of current operational activity within jurisdiction Cautions “Snapshot” of current operational activity within jurisdiction Assessment does not warrant opening an investigation Lone offenders and splinter groups should be considered Different interpretations of threat factors Tendency to “inflate” results Threat Assessment This assessment is merely one portion of the entire assessment No need to inflate results

Threat Assessment Process Assessment completion off-line R E F E R E N C E : Jurisdiction Handbook page 12 Threat Assessment Process Assessment completion off-line Organize threat working group PTE existence Past violent history Evidence of intentions Evidence of capability Evidence of targeting Jurisdiction threat rating (highest threat) On-line entry of threat rating Threat Assessment All worksheets are completed offline Only Summary data entered into system

Document Threat Working Group R E F E R E N C E : Jurisdiction Handbook page 14 Document Threat Working Group Jurisdiction population and coordinating agency POC for Threat Working Group Working group agencies FBI/Joint Terrorism Task Force participation Threat Assessment

Threat Assessment Factors Existence: The presence of a group or individual, operating within the jurisdiction… Threat Assessment Must exist within jurisdiction borders If threat capabilities exist outside of jurisdiction borders, planning factors established later will address response requirements

History: Demonstrated past terrorist activity over time or a recorded, violent criminal history… Threat Assessment

Intentions: Credible advocacy/threats of force or violence, acts, preparations to act; evidencing intent to create a WMD, carry out a plan to release a WMD, or to participate in a WMD incident Threat Assessment

Capability: Credible information that a specific PTE possesses the requisite training, skills, finances, and access to resources needed to develop, produce, or acquire a particular type of WMD in a quantity and/or potency sufficient to produce mass casualties, combined with information substantiating the PTE’s ability to safely store, test, and deliver the same Threat Assessment

Targeting: Credible information indicative of preparations for specific terrorist operations against identifiable targets located within the specified jurisdiction Threat Assessment

Threat Factor Values Threat Assessment Jurisdiction Handbook page 16 R E F E R E N C E : Jurisdiction Handbook page 16 Threat Assessment If no PTE exists, there can be no history, intentions, capability, or targeting

Assess PTE Motivations Political Religious Racial Environmental Special Interest Threat Assessment If a PTE exists, are there known motivators?

CBRNE Identify WMD Capabilities of PTE Chemical Biological Radiological Nuclear Explosive Threat Assessment CBRNE If a PTE exists, are there known capabilities?

Jurisdiction Threat Worksheet Threat Factors Threat Level (1-10) Motivation P=Political R=Religious E=Environmental Ra=Racial S=Special Interest Choose one or more WMD Categories C=Chemical B=Biological R=Radiological N=Nuclear E=Explosive PTE Existence (1) Violent History (1) Intentions (2) WMD Capability (2) Targeting (4) PTE 1 1 2 Ra E PTE 2 PTE 3 Threat Assessment PTE capabilities, if any, will be a key element that feeds planning factors for CBRNE scenarios

Jurisdiction Threat Profile process Number of PTE Existing PTE capabilities WMD Threat History Jurisdiction Threat Rating R E F E R E N C E : Jurisdiction Handbook page 18 Threat Assessment This will be the only threat assessment data sent forward using the on-line system

PTE assessed in your jurisdiction Step 1 - Number of PTE PTE assessed in your jurisdiction If no known PTE - a rating of zero is recorded here Threat Assessment Total Number of PTE

Step 2 - Existing PTE capabilities Document PTE capabilities CBRNE Threat Assessment Chemical Nuclear Biological Explosive Radiological None

Step 3 - WMD Threat History Document threat history January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2002 Threatened WMD Hazard Total Number of Responses to Suspected WMD Threats and/or Incidents Number of WMD Threats and/or Incidents Determined to be Criminal Chemical Biological Radiological Nuclear Explosive Threat Assessment

Jurisdiction threat rating Step 4 - Threat Rating Jurisdiction threat rating Highest threat level Threat Assessment Jurisdiction Threat Rating

DISCUSSION Threat Assessment

Basic Vulnerability Assessment How Does “Vulnerability” Fit Into the Homeland Security Strategic Planning Process? Basic Vulnerability Assessment

State Administrative Agency Basic Vulnerability Assessment Risk Assessment Needs Assessment Basic Vulnerability Assessment Planning Factors CBRNE* Scenarios Desired Capabilities Current Capabilities Vulnerability Assessment Threat Assessment Shortfalls or “Gaps”

Basic Vulnerability Assessment Vulnerability Defined The process of identifying any weaknesses that can be exploited by an adversary to gain access or information Vulnerabilities can result from, but are not limited to: Building characteristics Equipment properties Personal behavior Operational practices Basic Vulnerability Assessment

Basic Vulnerability Assessment R E F E R E N C E : Reference Handbook page B-10 Potential Targets Facilities Sites Systems Special events Basic Vulnerability Assessment Mention transportation infrastructure

Basic Vulnerability Assessment Vulnerability Working Group Multi-discipline members Include personnel who can provide specific information unique to potential target Basic Vulnerability Assessment Who should be included in the working group? Special events personnel Facilities personnel Transportation personnel Private sector

Basic Vulnerability Assessment R E F E R E N C E : Jurisdiction Handbook page 20 4 Step Process Determine Jurisdictional Vulnerability Highest Worksheet Rating Jurisdiction Vulnerability Rating Conduct Individual Target Vulnerability Assessments Vulnerability Assessment Worksheets 7 Assessment Factors Basic Vulnerability Assessment Identify Potential Targets Critical Assets List Top 10% (10 or less – all targets) List and identify those critical assets within the jurisdiction Assess the top 10% The seven vulnerability factors will be discussed next Only summary data will be sent forward using the on-line system Organize the Assessment Team Multidiscipline members Working knowledge of facilities, sites, systems, or special events

Basic Vulnerability Assessment Seven Factors Used to Assess Vulnerability Level of visibility Criticality of target site to jurisdiction Impact outside of the jurisdiction PTE access to potential target Potential target threat of hazard Potential target site population capacity Potential for collateral mass casualties Basic Vulnerability Assessment

Basic Vulnerability Assessment Step 1 - Assess the awareness of the existence and visibility of the target to the general public Basic Vulnerability Assessment

Basic Vulnerability Assessment Step 2 - Assess usefulness of assets to local population, economy, government, etc. Potential targets deemed essential to the continuity of the jurisdiction Basic Vulnerability Assessment

Basic Vulnerability Assessment Step 3 - Assess the effect loss will have outside of the jurisdiction Basic Vulnerability Assessment

Basic Vulnerability Assessment Step 4 - Assess the availability of the target for ingress and egress by a PTE Basic Vulnerability Assessment

Basic Vulnerability Assessment Step 5 - Assess the presence of legal WMD material (CBRNE) in quantities that could be the target of a terrorist attack or would complicate the response to an incident at that facility Basic Vulnerability Assessment

Basic Vulnerability Assessment Step 6 - Assess the maximum number of individuals at a site at any given time Basic Vulnerability Assessment

Basic Vulnerability Assessment Step 7 - Assess potential collateral mass casualties within a one-mile radius of the target site Basic Vulnerability Assessment Note these are in addition to the casualties expected within the primary facility

Document rating for each target Summary score Rating key Enter target rating Document rating for each target Summary Score _____Visibility _____Criticality _____Impact Outside Jurisdiction _____PTE Access to Target _____Potential Target Threat _____Potential Site Population _____Potential for Collateral Mass Casualties ____ TOTAL Basic Target Vulnerability Assessment Rating Key 0 - 2 pts. = 1 18 - 20 pts. = 7 3 - 5 pts. = 2 21 - 23 pts. = 8 6 - 8 pts. = 3 24 - 26 pts. = 9 9 - 11 pts. = 4 27 - 29 pts. = 10 12 - 14 pts. = 5 30 - 32 pts. = 11 15 - 17 pts. = 6 33 - 35 pts. = 12 Basic Vulnerability Assessment Target Name or Number: Rating

Basic Vulnerability Assessment Jurisdiction Vulnerability Rating R E F E R E N C E : Jurisdiction Handbook page 25 Final vulnerability rating Highest vulnerability rating of all site/targets Include raw score Basic Vulnerability Assessment Jurisdiction Vulnerability Rating Basic Vulnerability Summary Raw Score (Highest Target Score) Basic Vulnerability Rating Vulnerability ratings are sent forward using the on-line system

Number of sites located Basic Vulnerability Assessment Legal Hazards: Adhere to CBRNE definitions CBRNE Material Number of sites located in jurisdiction Chemical (Tier II) Biological (Infectious Only) Radiological Nuclear Explosive Basic Vulnerability Assessment

Basic Vulnerability Assessment Critical Infrastructure Assessment IAIP in conjunction with the TSA desire to collect Vulnerability Worksheets Need to compile a national list of valuable assets USSS Key Asset Program contact FOIA considerations Basic Vulnerability Assessment Specialized assessment survey estimates for future ODP needs

Basic Vulnerability Assessment R E F E R E N C E : Jurisdiction Handbook page 27 Site-Specific Vulnerability Assessment Survey for ODP Specialized assessment to harden target Estimates future assessments required By jurisdiction Basic Vulnerability Assessment Specialized assessment survey estimates for future ODP needs

Basic Vulnerability Assessment DISCUSSION Basic Vulnerability Assessment