CCSDS USLP Activities April 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transitioning to IPv6 April 15,2005 Presented By: Richard Moore PBS Enterprise Technology.
Advertisements

20.1 Chapter 20 Network Layer: Internet Protocol Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
1 Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) What the caterpillar calls the end of the world, nature calls a butterfly. - Anonymous.
Umut Girit  One of the core members of the Internet Protocol Suite, the set of network protocols used for the Internet. With UDP, computer.
Joining LANs - Bridges. Connecting LANs 4 Repeater –Operates at the Physical layer no decision making, processing signal boosting only 4 Bridges –operates.
EEC-484/584 Computer Networks Lecture 10 Wenbing Zhao (Part of the slides are based on Drs. Kurose & Ross ’ s slides for their Computer.
Connecting Networks © 2004 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Defining the IP Packet Delivery Process INTRO v2.0—4-1.
G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R 1 The Trade Between CCSDS and HDLC Framing on Global Precipitation Measurement David Everett and Jonathan.
Process-to-Process Delivery:
CCSDS IPsec Compatibility Testing
Presentation on Osi & TCP/IP MODEL
Lecture 2 TCP/IP Protocol Suite Reference: TCP/IP Protocol Suite, 4 th Edition (chapter 2) 1.
1 Chapter 8 Copyright 2003 Prentice-Hall Cryptographic Systems: SSL/TLS, VPNs, and Kerberos.
EITnotes.com For more notes and topics visit:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan is a nonprofit corporation and independent licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. Internet Engineering.
Fall 2005Computer Networks20-1 Chapter 20. Network Layer Protocols: ARP, IPv4, ICMPv4, IPv6, and ICMPv ARP 20.2 IP 20.3 ICMP 20.4 IPv6.
Dr. John P. Abraham Professor UTPA
CCSDS Unified Space Data Link (USLP)
Overview of the RBS Plan Review Process Leslie Ann Hay, Implementation Lead Megan Stout, CDSS Analyst.
TCP/IP Honolulu Community College Cisco Academy Training Center Semester 2 Version 2.1.
FSH/security SLS-SLP fall2009 (version 4) Page 1 Security Headers + Homogeneous approach to FSH and Insert Zone in TM/AOS/TC frames: some problems and.
Chapter 9 Hardware Addressing and Frame Type Identification 1.Delivering and sending packets 2.Hardware addressing: specifying a destination 3. Broadcasting.
Chapter 3: Network Protocols and Communications
1 Computer Communication & Networks Lecture 19 Network Layer: IP and Address Mapping Waleed Ejaz.
IPSec is a suite of protocols defined by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) to provide security services at the network layer. standard protocol.
Figure 2-6: Internal Organization of Protocol Entity (Sending End) Figure 4-14: Internal Organization of Protocol Entity (Sending End) MAP Packet Service.
Packet Service Packet Extraction VC Access Service VC_FSH Service VC Frame Service MC_Insert Service MC Frame Service MC_OCF Service Virtual Channel Reception.
Lect 8 Tahani al jehain. Types of attack Remote code execution: occurs when an attacker exploits a software and runs a program that the user does not.
Why we need USLP Greg Kazz Ed Greenberg November 9-10, 2014 CCSDS Fall London Question: Why the change of name from NGSLP to USLP? Answer: 1) In time the.
K. Salah1 Security Protocols in the Internet IPSec.
February 14, 2013 POIWG Technical Overview CR / HM-3430 Ku Forward Capability.
CCSDS IPsec Compatibility Testing 05/4/2016 CHARLES SHEEHE, CCSDS GRC POC OKECHUKWU MEZU, Test Engineer 1.
NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory Kelvin Nichols, EO50 March 2016 MSFC ISS DTN Project Status.
1 CMPT 471 Networking II OSPF © Janice Regan,
CCSDS IPsec Compatibility Testing
The Network Layer Role Services Main Functions Standard Functions
Why we need USLP Greg Kazz Ed Greenberg November 9-10, 2014
CCSDS Security Credentials Blue Book
Chapter 9: Transport Layer
Instructor Materials Chapter 9: Transport Layer
Network Layer Security Update
Publicly Available – Distribution is Unlimited
Transfer Frame Structures
Figure 2-6: Internal Organization of Protocol Entity (Sending End)
HOSC DTN Work.
How Updated CCSDS Protocols can Simplify Data Formatting for the Constellation Project Ed Greenberg Greg Kazz.
Understand the OSI Model Part 2
CCSDS Link Security Proposal
TCP Transport layer Er. Vikram Dhiman LPU.
Ed Greenberg Greg Kazz 10/17/2012
Lecture 2 Overview.
Adam Schlesinger NASA - JSC October 30, 2013
* Essential Network Security Book Slides.
Dr. John P. Abraham Professor UTPA
EEC-484/584 Computer Networks
May 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Considerations on general MAC frame] Date Submitted:
Process-to-Process Delivery:
Dr. John P. Abraham Professor UTRGV, EDINBURG, TX
70-293: MCSE Guide to Planning a Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Network, Enhanced Chapter 4: Planning and Configuring Routing and Switching.
Dr. John P. Abraham Professor UTPA
Net 323 D: Networks Protocols
Cengage Learning: Computer Networking from LANs to WANs
Chapter 7 Internet Protocol Version 4 (IPv4)
May 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Considerations on general MAC frame] Date Submitted:
OSI Reference Model Unit II
Process-to-Process Delivery: UDP, TCP
OSI Model 7 Layers 7. Application Layer 6. Presentation Layer
NET 323D: Networks Protocols
Transport Layer 9/22/2019.
Presentation transcript:

CCSDS USLP Activities April 2016

Overview: The purpose is to discuss highlights regarding DLR and HOSC USLP activities over the last 6 months and focusing on CCSDS interoperability testing Two implementations The USLP implementation from Stefan Veit at German Aerospace Center. The USLP implementation from Kevan Moore at Marshall Space Flight Center. Prototype and Test team members DLR - Stefan Veit at German Aerospace Center NASA - Kevan Moore at Marshall Space Flight Center Additional support from the CCSDS USLP team as required

Overview: Specification status Basis for USLP work CCSDS 732.1-W-0 USLP July version of the White book was the initial spec Basis for USLP work Two independent implementations by two independent organizations DLR and NASA/HOSC Budgetary considerations affected late start-up for HOSC Current updating testing and prototyping based on March 9th, 2016 document update Comments and discussions from the ongoing USLP working group

Current Interoperability Testing Overall test configuration: At least one node shall be established by each participant; DLR and NASA HOSC. Unique test stations at each end shall be established based on test conductors’ particular setup. Two test conductors are required; one at MSFC/HOSC and one at DLR. Connections are protected by IPSEC VPN.

Current Interoperability Testing The HOSC took the lead to generate a preliminary test plan with basic configurations detailed by participants DLR Originally Based on July 20 White Paper, Now Based on March 9th 2016 White Book SLES 12 with 64 bit Implemented in C++ MSFC HOSC Developed with MSFC Tech Excellence funding Executing on SuperMicro/KVM virtual servers Linux based on RHEL5.11 with 64 bit

Current Interoperability Testing Testing is at local and remote locations Test configuration use UDP/IP transfer of data is via IPSEC VPN to the remote tester using two methods USLP frames can be sent between senders A and B or Sender A can send a UDP packet to Sender B Sender B will incorporate the UDP packet data into a USLP frame Sender B will transfer the USLP frame back to Sender A Sender A will receive the USLP frame, extract the data, and “deliver” the data. Sender B can test a variety of features with Sender A without A reconfiguring

Outcome of Interoperability Testing Testing and prototyping has been an ongoing activity since late last year Initial testing entailed establishment of the VPN and continuity testing, ping Once the testing environment was established, testing conducted as needed to evaluate protocol development and is ongoing

Test cases Test cases are repeated each from a both directions respectively in order to exercise source and destination nodes adequately. Transfer Frame Header Only Truncated Frame Header and Transfer Frame Data Zone Transfer Frame Header and Transfer Frame Data Zone Data Fields with Boundary Lengths that Exercise All Construction Rule Operations 1. Single minimum length data zone 2. Single maximum length data zone 3. Data Lengths to Exercise Start/Continuation/End SDU Segmentation and Packet Segmentation All Permutations of Presence/Absence of Data Fields and Optional Fields 1. Verify Data Zone Length Is Adjusted Appropriately With Optional Fields 2. Presence/Absence of Insert Zone, OCF, Security Header/Trailer, FECF.

Test cases Test cases are repeated each from a both directions respectively in order to exercise source and destination nodes adequately.   Upcoming test activities Construction Rule 111 with several packets Transmit upon Data Receipt vs Transmit at Release Time VC multiplexing Spanning Idle Packets MAP multiplexing (the most complex feature, will be tested at the very end)

Test summary matrix

backup

Abbreviations and Acronyms CCSDS Consultative Committee on Space Data Systems DLR Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. HOSC Huntsville Operations Support Center ID Identification IPSEC Internet Protocol Security MAP Multiplexer Access Points MSFC Marshall Space Flight Center OCF Operational Control Field TFDF Transfer Frame Data Field USLP Unified Space Link Protocol VC Virtual Channel VPN Virtual Private Network