Preliminary Assessment of the CCSDS SANA Registry Management Policy on the SFW Document April 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENQA seminar:First external evaluations of quality assurance agencies – lessons learned Panel discussion: Practicalities and challenges of self and external.
Advertisements

05 July 2007Cologne NPA WG66.009: Type and Group Ratings Juan Anton.
Regional Policy Template and model for cooperation programmes under the ETC goal 1 13 th Meeting of the Expert Group on Delegated and Implementing Acts.
PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT
Mod_03_12 Alignment of TSC with Revised VAT Arrangements 29 th May 2012.
60 Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Anti-hijack Policy.
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
1 Workshop on Quality Control and Quality Assurance of Greenhouse Gas Inventories and the Establishment of National Inventory Systems 2-3 September 2004.
June 6, 2007 TAC Meeting NERC Registration Issues Andrew Gallo, Assistant General Counsel, Litigation and Business Operations ERCOT Legal Dept.
Standards experts. Accreditation solutions. Andrea Spencer Coordinator, WTO/NAFTA Enquiry Point (Canada) TBT Special Meeting on Procedures for Information.
S/W Project Management
CSSM Meeting Summary Fall 2012 Meetings 15 – 18 October E. Barkley Chair (NASA/JPL) C. Haddow Co-Chair (ESA/ESOC) Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Proposal for a new UNECE regulation on recyclability of motor vehicles Informal Document GRPE Reply to the Comments of the Russian Federation Informal.
Delta-DOR SIG: Report of the Fall 2007 Meeting Heppenheim, Germany October 5th, 2007 Roberto Maddè ESA/ESOC
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
Second expert group meeting on Draft fiche on delegated act on the European code of conduct on partnership (ECCP) Cohesion Policy
PS 1 12 June 2006 SEA Opening Plenary Rome, Italy, 12 June 2006.
SEAN-CC Regional Training Workshop: Building Capacity on Access to Funds for Climate Change Adaptation Initiatives NIE accreditation process Mozaharul.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
PS -0 System Architecture Working Group RASDS Status 14 June 2006 Peter Shames NASA / JPL
CCSDS Registry Re-Engineering Organizations & Persons SCIDs, Assets (new) & OID Tree Peter Shames, Erik Barkley Marc Blanchet, Brian Oliver, Tom Gannett.
NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory Page 1 Bob SANA End of Meeting Summary.
Functional Resource and Service Component Information Maintenance 9 November 2015 Darmstadt, Germany.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
Incorporating Road Safety Audit into Development Control Kevin Nicholson Principal Consultant.
Grid Deployment Technical Working Groups: Middleware selection AAA,security Resource scheduling Operations User Support GDB Grid Deployment Resource planning,
Creation of the Archiving Component of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Template for International Missions IPDA MOU project members.
 Planning an audit of cost statements, records and other related documents is considered necessary to ensure achievement of audit objectives with available.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
SANA Activities Update
System Engineering Area SANA BoF Kick-Off
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN
Colorado Springs, CO, USA, 24 April 2009 Deputy – David Giaretta
CCSDS Name & Number Registries Issues & Proposed Fixes
Global Science and Technology, Inc., Greenbelt, MD, USA
Administration of a FIDIC Contract - Commencement Date to + 28 Days -
European Commission “Intelligent Energy for Europe”
INTERCONNECTION GUIDELINES
What Does it Mean for UN/CEFACT ?
Interaction between Scheduling Instances
WORKING GROUP 2: PARTNERSHIPS PROGRESS UPDATE
Joint IPR/DAI Workshop
Service Specification Framework
Version 3 April 21, 2006 Takahiro Yamada (JAXA/ISAS)
July 2010 doc.: IEEE /0xxxr0 A summary of draft LS from 3GPP in response to IEEE 802 LS in March May 2017 Authors: Name Company Phone.
JAXA CCSDS Secretary Office
Construction Management
Transmitted by the expert
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO]
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
Introduction to Design Patterns Part 1
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO]
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN : Post-IPv4-Free-Pool-Depletion Transfer Policy Staff Introduction.
D2 NIS REVIEW PROCESS March 2014: Draft Manual endorsed by WG GES
CCSDS Liaison Consultative Committee on Space Data Systems
Multimedia and Internet Technology
Updates about Work Track 5 Geographic Names at the Top-Level
ANSI REFRESHER COURSE 2018 CHANGES TO THE ISO DIRECTIVES
0433: Inclusion of the Transmission to Distribution “System Operator Agreement Guidelines” within the Offtake Arrangements Document.
July 2010 doc.: IEEE /0xxxr0 A summary of draft LS from 3GPP in response to IEEE 802 LS in March May 2017 Authors: Name Company Phone.
Overview US Paper C2-7.INF
Integrated Territorial Investment
Presidential Permits Implementing EO 13337
Education and Training Statistics Working Group, May 2011
DOTD Form September 4, 2014.
Leuven Policy implementation.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Bill Coleman IWVTA Ambassador to GRPE
Presentation transcript:

Preliminary Assessment of the CCSDS SANA Registry Management Policy on the SFW Document April 2016

Registry Categories The SFW deals with all three categories: “enterprise” because it builds the SII using OIDs from that category “global” as it intensely uses OIDs and the overall OID tree that is under CCSDS purview falls into this category “local” as the management of the OID subtrees where the document assigns OIDs can be delegated to the CSS Area or for now even to the CSTS WG

Enterprise Category It is understandable that the RMP document has been written with a CCSDS centric view, which may create problems when cross-support involves an organization that is not associated with the CCSDS Example: Spacecraft. Can one create an entry which has an OID but no SCID? Who would have the authority to request such entry for a non-CCSDS spacecraft? Note: A work-around based on a bilaterally agreed pseudo OID is feasible Concern: By when can we assume that the spacecraft registry contains OIDs? Can we already get the URL for inclusion in the SFW? Same question regarding the Facility element of the SII which shall come from the Service Site and Aperture Registry

Global Category In essence no impact assuming that we can reach agreement that the management of the OID subtrees used by the SFW and the FRs and the management of the FR registry is delegated to the CSS Area. Such delegation is foreseen in the RMP However, I’m not clear about the following requirement in the RMP: 3.4.7.11 Any CCSDS Recommended Standard requiring a new OID (sub-)type in the OID Registry shall document it in a CCSDS Recommended Standard and review it with the SSG. What is a new OID (sub-)type?

Local Category Here some tweaking of words will be necessary so that the specification of the registry policy is aligned with the RMP. Suggested wording taken from the RMP: The registration rule will be type b) Change requires an engineering review by a designated expert However, the following RMP requirement might be not commensurate with our FR registry needs: 3.5.4.12 … changes to existing registries must be specified in a CCSDS Blue Book or Magenta Book. …

We should discuss this aspect with Peter Shames: Local Category The SFW stipulates for now that the agenciesFunctionalities subtree is split into agency specific subtrees and that agencies shall interact directly with SANA to get FRs registered We should discuss this aspect with Peter Shames: Does the agency specific nature move this to the enterprise category of registries? Can we still regard this to be an Area level issue? Would it be acceptable that we require agencies wishing to register an FR to have to go via the Area rather than directly to SANA How can we keep the OID tree structure clean (external OID reference for identifying the agency)?