Automatic Right to Independent Counsel?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Remedies Against Govt Defendants – Some Basics 11 th amendment bars suits against the State, unless Lawsuit is against state officer in their official.
Advertisements

Page 1 Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited. TOP 10 MISTAKES TO AVOID WHEN A LIABILITY CLAIM COMES IN.
New Chilean Regulation of Liability Insurance Insurance Contract Act Statute Law Nr – May 9th, 2013 Under a Project written by Prof. Osvaldo Contreras-Strauch.
 Two Privileges; Different Purposes ◦ Attorney-Client Privilege ◦ Attorney Work Product Privilege ◦ Implicit assumption: “privilege and work product.
Navigating the Insurance Claims Handling Process: A Practical View With a Focus on D&O Insurance Presented by: Donald W. Kiel, K&L Gates Anthony P. La.
Law 20 Conflicts of Interest. o Based on duties of o Loyalty o Confidentiality o Rules cover: o Concurrent representation of adverse clients o Representation.
“In the vast area of legal jurisprudence, there are undoubtedly many instances where being the first, or only, jurisdiction to grant rights to persons.
A [Drunk] Wolfe at the Door (handling covered combined with uncovered claims) Thomas, Thomas & Hafer, LLP Peter J. Speaker, Esquire Joshua J. Bovender,
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 11 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 20, 2002.
Scott F. Johnson Maureen MacFarlane.  Attorneys have a myriad of ethical obligations  This presentation covers some of those obligations and considers.
© 2003 Rule 1.9. Duties to Former Clients (a) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person.
Presenter: Marshall Gilinsky, Esq. (212) Canadian Capital RIMS Chapter Meeting March 11, 2009 Understanding Key E&O,
Your source for professional liability education and networking. Reservation of Rights and the Insurer April 21, 2015 Sponsored by PLUS Diamond Sponsors:
Craig S. Hudson, Esquire Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin 1 East Broward Boulevard, Suite 500 Fort Lauderdale, FL.
Evaluating the Impact of Heightened Enforcement of Anti- Corruption Legislation Around the World on your D&O Policies; Experience to Date, What Coverages.
. Insurance Litigation For Non-legal Insurance Professionals.
Presented by David P. Schack, Partner June 29, 2006 Insurance Coverage For Multi- State Investigations: Can You Get Your Insurer to Pay for.
Mon. Sept. 24. removal 1441(a) Except as otherwise expressly provided by Act of Congress, any civil action brought in a State court of which the district.
The Challenge of Rule 26(f) Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer July 15, 2011.
Indiana’s Open Door Law Heather Willis Neal Indiana Public Access Counselor Presented to Fort Wayne Housing Authority Fort Wayne Housing Authority Board.
Session 6 ERM Case Law: The Annual MER Update of the Latest News, Trends, & Issues Hon. John M. Facciola United States District Court, District of Columbia.
ETHICS: CONFIDENTIALITY OF IFTA DATA IFTA ATTORNEYS’ SECTION MEETING October 7, :30-10:00 a.m. Jim Clark Motor Carrier Services Attorney Indiana.
Category Day Presentation to the Public Health Service Commissioned Corps June 21, 2012.
CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION F CLASS 13 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 21, 2005.
Thurs. Feb. 11. Holzer Buchanan v. Doe (Va. 1993)
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
Indiana’s Public Access Laws Heather Willis Neal Indiana Public Access Counselor Indiana Association of Cities and Towns Red Flag and Sunshine Workshop.
Third Party Insurance Defense Work: Who is really the Client? Michael McTaggart Counsel Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP November 7, 2015.
MAXIMIZING INSURANCE PAYOUTS WHEN PUNITIVE DAMAGES ARE AT ISSUE MAXIMIZING INSURANCE PAYOUTS WHEN PUNITIVE DAMAGES ARE AT ISSUE Kirk C. Chamberlin Chamberlin.
Tues. Feb. 16. pleading and proving foreign law Fact approach to content of foreign law.
GOVERNMENT LAWYER’S REPRESENTATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES Craig E. Leen City Attorney City of Coral Gables *** With special thanks to Yaneris Figueroa,
HIPAA Training Workshop #3 Individual Rights Kaye L. Rankin Rankin Healthcare Consultants, Inc.
The Nuts and Bolts of Contractual Liability Exposures and Coverage
Litigating Institutional Bad Faith
Presented by Wendy Carlisle, Carlisle Law Firm, LLC
Troublesome Contract Clauses College of Liberal Arts
Professional Liability Claims & Reporting Triggers; Tips & Traps
Building the Defense of a Product: Taking a Technical Approach
Visa Bankruptcy Education Services
Reservation of Rights: General Principles and the Lessons of Lobenthal
PRE-SUIT CONSIDERATIONS
College of Nursing December 13, 2006 John O. Cates
MECHANICS LIENS: New Changes & Old Issues
Dispute Resolution Between ICT Service Providers in Saudi Arabia
ARE BOTH SIDES’ COVERAGE PRIVILEGES DISAPPEARING?
Visa Bankruptcy Education Services
Visa Bankruptcy Education Services Bankruptcy Statistics May 19, 2016.
Practical Tips on Policyholder Claims for Insurer Bad Faith
Tues., Oct. 22.
EPA SUBCONTRACT TEMPLATE Overview September 2017
Moderator: Brittany Kauffman, IAALS
Conflict of Laws M1 – Class 4.
Mon. Nov. 5.
Thurs., Oct. 12.
Election Contracts, Joint Election Agreements & Leases For Equipment
Bring Your “A” Game: Arbitration Agreements with Class Waivers
FC&S Legal presents: Hot Issues in the Insurance Bad Faith Arena
Thurs., Sept. 15.
Limited Scope Representation
Mon., Sep. 10.
CHALLENGES TO VOTER REGISTRATION APPLICATIONS AND REGISTERED VOTERS
Mon., Oct. 29.
Bonnie Weiss McLeod Cooley LLP
Mon., Sept. 5.
Mon., Sept. 9.
Government Data Practices & Open Meeting Law Overview
ACI – 17th National Forum on Prepaid Card Compliance
Thurs., Sept. 19.
Government Data Practices & Open Meeting Law Overview
Proposed Commission Rules Changes WCLA 10/20/16
Presentation transcript:

Automatic Right to Independent Counsel? Maybe Not So Automatic Anymore! Dominica C. Anderson, Duane Morris LLP Christine A. Gudaitis, Ver Ploeg & Lumpkin, P.A. Lindsay Lankford Rollins, Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, P.C. Jennifer S. Senior, Jenner & Block LLP October 20, 2016

Automatic Right to Independent Counsel? Maybe Not So Automatic Anymore! Moderator: Dominica Anderson, Duane Morris LLP Panel: Christine A. Gudaitis, Ver Ploeg & Lumpkin, P.A. Lindsay Lankford Rollins, Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, P.C. Jennifer S. Senior, Jenner & Block LLP Women In Insurance Networking CLE Workshop October 20, 2016 All Rights Reserved.

Introduction

Law Breaks Down Into These Categories: No Right to Independent Counsel Ever Automatic Right if ROR Issued Sometimes Right – Conflict Analysis Needed Unsettled or Open Question

Trends in the Right to Independent Counsel Per Se Disqualification No Right to Ind. Counsel Per Se Disqualification Trends in the Right to Independent Counsel Conflict Analysis Undecided

ALASKA Right to Independent Counsel Codified Broad Right Reservation = Right Exception: Punitive and Excess Limits Other Issues

CALIFORNIA Right to Independent Counsel Codified (Civ. Code § 2860) Conflict Analysis Needed – Independent Counsel Not Automatic From ROR Federal v. MBL (Aug. 2013) – General ROR doesn’t trigger right; DOL doesn’t trigger right; only issues defense could control which could impact coverage trigger right Other Issues

NEVADA State Farm Mutual Auto v. Hansen (Sept. 2015) – adopted California approach from MBL 6-0 decision – no automatic right, conflict analysis needed Only Right if There is an Actual Conflict Not All RORs Trigger Right

OREGON No Right, except in environmental cases and there codified: OR Environmental Cleanup Asst. Act (1999, amended 2013) Automatic Right with ROR if Environmental Case

ALABAMA Generally No Right to Independent Counsel Defense Under Reservation of Rights Imposes “Enhanced Obligation of Good Faith” Insurer must (1) Thoroughly investigate; (2) Appoint competent counsel to represent only insured; (3) Keep insured informed; and (4) Act in insured’s interest Breach of Enhanced Obligation of Good Faith Triggers Right to Independent Counsel at Insurer’s Expense

KENTUCKY Per Se Disqualification – Insured Is Not Required to Accept Defense Under ROR Unclear Whether Independent Counsel May Be Obtained At Insured’s or Insurer’s Expense Auto-Owners, Insurance Co. v. Egnew (E.D. Ky. 2016): Federal District Court declined jurisdiction on grounds that insurer’s request for reimbursement for cost of independent counsel presented novel issue of state law

TEXAS Conflict Analysis – ROR Creates Potential Conflict, But Only Actual Conflict Triggers Right to Independent Counsel At Insurer’s Expense Actual Conflict Arises When Facts to Be Adjudicated In Liability Suit Are Same Facts Upon Which Coverage Depends “Same Facts” May Be Construed Narrowly Graper v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co. (5th Cir. 2014): whether insured’s conduct was “willful” did not involve same facts as whether insured’s conduct involved “knowing violation of rights another”

ILLINOIS Actual Conflict of Interest Right to independent counsel where proof of certain facts would transfer liability from the insurer to the insured, or where there is a conflict between two insureds Effect on settlement if policyholder controls defense Insurer waives right to approve settlements Insurer can still contest reasonableness and coverage First Mercury Ins. Co. v. Nationwide Sec. Servs., Inc., 54 N.E.3d 323, 330-31 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016

PENNSYLVANIA Actual Conflict of Interest – Denial of Coverage ROR does not automatically entitle policyholder to control defense, but if insurer believes coverage does not exist, insurer should deny coverage and allow insured to control defense Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Am. Nuclear Insurers, 131 A.3d 445, 456-57 (Pa. 2015) Earlier 1966 case held insurer should advise policyholder to secure counsel if insurer reserved right to deny claim Prejudice may be presumed where insurer fails to clearly communicate ROR denying coverage on timely basis Erie Ins. Exch. v. Lobenthal, 114 A.3d 832, 839 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015)

MISSOURI Per Se Disqualification Policyholder may select counsel and control defense if insurer’s defense would be pursuant to ROR Recent case addresses requirements for insurer’s ROR Smith v. Maryland Cas. Co., No. SD 3341, 2015 WL 302141 (Mo. Ct. App. Jan. 23, 2015) (policyholder had notice of conflict of interest in second lawsuit where insurer defended pursuant to ROR even though ROR was issued only with respect to first lawsuit)

WISCONSIN State appellate decisions support per se disqualification Unclear whether policyholder or insurer has right to select counsel Recent federal cases note split of authority and assume, without deciding, that insurer has right to select counsel when it defends under ROR so long as counsel is truly independent Haley v. Kolbe & Kolbe Millwork Co., Inc., 97 F. Supp. 3d 1047, 1053 (W.D. Wis. Apr. 1, 2015)

FLORIDA Florida Claims Administration Statute Section 627.426 … (2) A liability insurer shall not be permitted to deny coverage based on a particular coverage defense unless: (a) Within 30 days after the liability insurer knew or should have known of the coverage defense, written notice of reservation of rights to assert a coverage defense is given to the named insured by registered or certified mail sent to the last known address of the insured or by hand delivery; and (b) Within 60 days of compliance with paragraph (a) or receipt of a summons and complaint naming the insured as a defendant, whichever is later, but in no case later than 30 days before trial, the insurer: 1. Gives written notice to the named insured by registered or certified mail of its refusal to defend the insured; 2. Obtains from the insured a nonwaiver agreement following full disclosure of the specific facts and policy provisions upon which the coverage defense is asserted and the duties, obligations, and liabilities of the insurer during and following the pendency of the subject litigation; or 3. Retains independent counsel which is mutually agreeable to the parties. Reasonable fees for the counsel may be agreed upon between the parties or, if no agreement is reached, shall be set by the court.

FLORIDA “Coverage defense” = a defense to coverage that otherwise exists Conflict between insured and additional insured: carrier must provide independent counsel for each Insured must affirmatively REJECT offer of defense under ROR to avoid jeopardizing coverage

MASSACHUSETTS ROR: Policyholders are entitled to independent counsel; carrier must pay reasonable costs Policyholder may reject defense under ROR

MISSISSIPPI Conflict: policyholders have a right to independent counsel Examples: where policy covers only a portion of claim or only one theory of liability but not another, where carrier may be privy to confidential information it might later use in coverage litigation, where insurer knows it can later assert non-coverage

NEW JERSEY Actual conflict: independent counsel required Carrier insuring codefendants with conflicting interests must retain separate and independent counsel for each or permit each insured to do so at carrier’s expense Where pleading alleges covered and non-covered claims, and without expressly-agreed ROR, carrier may be obligated to finance defense subject to reimbursement

NEW YORK Conflict: carrier must inform insured of right to select independent counsel at carrier’s expense Example: one theory of liability would be covered but another would not If conflict arises, appointed counsel must withdraw – attorney represents policyholder, not insurer

VERMONT Right to independent counsel has not been directly addressed by Vermont courts Cases suggest independent counsel required Vt. Rules of Prof’l Conduct R 1.7cmt (in case of conflict, “special counsel’s prof’l independence” must be assured) Carrier that controls defense with knowledge of facts that may exclude coverage waives all defenses to coverage unless it obtains nonwaiver agreement

Questions? Dominica C. Anderson Christine A. Gudaitis Duane Morris LLP Email: dcanderson@duanemorris.com Lindsay Lankford Rollins Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, P.C. Email: lrollins@hdjn.com Christine A. Gudaitis Ver Ploeg & Lumpkin, P.A. Email: cgudaitis@vpl-law.com Jennifer S. Senior Jenner & Block LLP Email: JSenior@jenner.com