Department of Environmental Quality

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Certification of Compliance By Evita Lagard
Advertisements

Chapter F.A.C. Updates F. Thomas Lubozynski, P.E. Waste Program Administrator.
Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Section January 12, 2012 Coal Combustion Residuals Regulatory Framework Implemented by the Division of Waste Management.
NC SWANA FALL 2014 MEETING Presented by Ed Mussler P.E., Wilmington, NC October 2014 DWM Post-Closure Landfill Use Concepts and Considerations.
S-1925 Subsection t Stakeholder Meeting November 9, :30-2:30pm NJDEP Public Hearing Room 1 st Floor, 401 East State Street Trenton, NJ.
The Past, Present and Future of Coal Ash Management in Virginia Presentation to the State Water Commission June 23, 2014.
Coal Ash Ponds The Romeo and Juliet Story of Coal Fired Power Plants Society sees them as toxic together, but currently, one cannot exist without the other.
EMC Review of Groundwater Corrective Action and Compliance Boundary Rules EVAN KANE NC DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES.
OSM CCB Placement in Coal Mines - Proposed Rulemaking John R. Craynon, P.E. Chief, Division of Regulatory Support Office of Surface Mining Reclamation.
Adem.alabama.gov Coal Combustion Waste Regulation Stephen A. Cobb Governmental Hazardous Waste Branch Land Division.
Overview of Regulatory Changes, Policy and Implementation Colleen Brisnehan Colorado Department of Public Health And Environment Hazardous Materials and.
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32, Article V, Solid Waste Management, and to Chapter 38, Zoning Orange County Code Presented by the Orange County Environmental.
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32, Article V, Solid Waste Management, and to Chapter 38, Zoning Orange County Code Presented by the Orange County Environmental.
Coal Combustion Residuals Final Regulation August 19, 2015 Frank Ney U.S. Environmental Protection Agency – Region 4.
CCR Final Rule Utility Perspective on Key Compliance Items
Idaho Solid Waste Facility Record Keeping June 20, 2006 Idaho Department of Environmental Quality.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM Land Division Update Chip Crockett Chief, Industrial Hazardous Waste Branch Air & Waste Management Association Southern Section Pine.
Jim Roewer Executive Director USWAG. CCR Background 1993 and 2000 Bevill Amendment Regulatory Determinations – Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) do not.
Cumberland Park CCB Project Virginia Department of Environmental Quality October 9, 2007.
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
PowerSouth Energy Cooperative:
2015 Coal Handling and Storage Conference
Think safe. Act safe. Be safe. LEHR Site Annual Soil Management Plan Training Sue Fields, Environmental Health & Safety Sept,
Item 21 May 11-12, 2004 CIWMB Meeting Discussion And Request For Rulemaking Direction To Formally Notice Proposed Regulations For RCRA Subtitle D Program.
Division of Water Quality Coal Ash Storage, Use, & Disposal: Update Ted L. Bush, Chief Aquifer Protection Section Division of Water Quality “To protect.
NPDES Permitting for Coal Ash Ponds in North Carolina EMC Meeting January 12, 2012 Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D. 1.
Department of Environmental Quality January 13, 2016 Environmental Review Commission.
David K. Paylor Virginia State Board of Health March 17, 2016.
Department of Environmental Quality Life-of-Site Permitting Required Changes to Solid Waste Management Rules 15A NCAC 13B March 10, 2016.
Missouri Waste Control Coalition Environmental Conference July 14, 2015 CCR Rule What Location Restrictions Mean for Missouri.
Gary J. Pendergrass, PE, RG Midwest Environmental Compliance Conference May 13, 2015 | Overland Park, Kansas USEPA Coal Combustion Residuals Rule: Impact.
NCACC Environmental Steering Committee Legislative Update October 2013.
Department of Environmental Quality
Evan Kane, DWR Ken Pickle, DEMLR Jon RisGAARD, DWR
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
2015 Definition of Solid Waste Rule
Introduction to the Definition of Solid Waste Final Rule
EPA Options for the Federal Regulation of Coal Combustion Waste Lisa Evans Earthjustice October 22, 2010.
Division of Waste Management
July 13, 2016 Department of Environmental Quality Proposed Amendments to UST Rules 15A NCAC 02N and 02O Ruth Strauss.
September 8, 2016 Department of Environmental Quality Proposed Amendments to UST Rules 15A NCAC 02N and 02O Ruth Strauss.
Environmental Management Commission July 13, 2017 Jeff Manning, DWR
Georgia Update Jeff Cown Land Protection Branch
Department of Environmental Quality
Water Quality Rulemaking in Response to S.L
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
Groundwater and Waste Management Committee November 9, 2016
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
Rulemaking and Readoption of 15A NCAC 02T .1500
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Jessica Montie, Division of Waste Management
Evan Kane Division of Water Resources
Temporary Rulemaking for 15A NCAC 02L Section .0400
Department of Environmental Quality Scott Bullock
September 8, 2016 Request Approval of the Determinations to be Submitted to Rules Review Commission for Subchapter 15A NCAC 02E (Periodic Review of Existing.
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Department of Environmental Quality
Periodic Review Reports for 15A NCAC 02N, 02O, and 02P
Coal Combustion Products Quantities Produced and Disposed
Jessica Montie, Division of Waste Management
3 step process Step 1: Agency determination
Regulatory Reform Act (SL ) Periodic review and expiration of existing rules NC Environmental Management Commission March 13, 2014 Jeff Manning.
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Ellen Lorscheider, Division of Waste Management
the path less traveled Termination of Post Closure Care
May 15, 2018 David Paylor, Director
Presentation transcript:

Department of Environmental Quality Groundwater and Waste Management Committee Meeting November 9, 2016 Proposed 15A NCAC 13B .2000 Coal Combustion Residuals Rule Department of Environmental Quality

Schedule for Coal Combustion Residuals Rules Sept. 7, 2016 GWWMC – Committee asked for staff to revise rules to include standards for groundwater detection/assessment, to define “Seasonal High” and return to committee in November Nov. 9 & 10, 2016 GWWMC, EMC - Approval of text to proceed to public comment/hearing Nov. 22, 2016 Submit rule text to OAH for publication in N.C. Register. Dec. 15, 2016 Rule published in N.C. Register and agency’s website(with fiscal note); Comment Period Begins. Dec. 30, 2016 Earliest date for public hearing. Feb. 13, 2017 Comment Period Ends, Finalize Hearing Officer's Report. Feb. 16, 2017 Submit attachments (hearing officer's report, final rule text) for EMC meeting. March 9, 2017 EMC Meeting: Action items - Approval of Hearing Officer's Report and Adoption of Rule. March 20, 2017 Submit text and forms to RRC. April 20, 2017 RRC meeting: Action item - Approval by RRC. May 1, 2017 Earliest effective date for rule. Submit Solid Waste Management Plan to EPA for Approval

EPA Coal Combustion Residuals Rules Two regulatory options published in the federal register on June 21, 2010 regulate Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) as non-hazardous (subtitle D of RCRA) or as a special waste (subtitle C of RCRA) EPA received more than 450,000 comments, conducted eight public hearings and published three Notices of Data Availability (NODAs) EPA finalized rule under a subtitle D, the solid waste or non-hazardous waste provisions of RCRA Dec. 14, 2014 The rule provides a definition of beneficial use to clarify the distinction between beneficial use and disposal

CCR Management and HB630 SL 2016-95 On July 14, 2016, Session Law 2016-95, Section 3(a) revised the Coal Ash Management Act of 2014 The session law: - Abolished the Coal Ash Management Commission that was found to be unconstitutional - Directed the N.C. Department of Environmental Quality to issue final classification for remaining impoundments no later than Oct. 15, 2018 - Mandated the recycling of ash from three Duke Energy facilities - Allowed closure under the federal CCR rule, thus making the department write the CCR rule into state code

Benefits of CCR Rules SL 2016-95: Closure of CCR Surface Impoundments must “Comply with the closure requirements established by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as provided in 40 CFR Parts 257 and 261, Hazardous and Solid Waste Management System; Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals From Electric Utilities." “The EMC shall adopt rules as necessary to implement the provisions of the Part” (2I Coal Ash Management in Article 9) Rules would be consolidated into one location adding clarity for operating facility, DEQ staff and the public Monitoring and inspection data available to the public on a website Defines large CCR fills and piles as CCR units, which are not currently covered by CAMA Identifies contaminants specific to coal burning industry

Location of Coal-Fired Power Plants

High-Risk Classification The legislation deemed the following facilities as high-risk Asheville Steam Station (2 impoundments) – Buncombe County Dan River Steam Station (2 impoundments) – Rockingham County Riverbend Steam Station (2 impoundments) – Gaston County Sutton Energy Complex (2 impoundments) – New Hanover County No later then Dec. 31, 2019, the above facilities have to: - excavate the coal ash impoundments - move the CCR to a synthetically lined, onsite industrial landfill - transport the CCR to an existing offsite synthetically lined industrial landfill or MSW or structural fill - beneficially reuse the CCR

Intermediate Classification If deemed intermediate impoundments are required to close no later than Dec. 31, 2024. Legislation determined that the impoundments at the following facilities were intermediate-risk and are to close by Aug. 1, 2028: H.F. Lee Steam Station (5 impoundments) - Wayne County Cape Fear Steam Station (5 impoundments) - Chatham County Weatherspoon Steam Station (1 impoundment) – Robeson County

Low-Risk Classification The impoundments can receive a low-risk classification if the following conditions are met: - the impoundment owner must provide permanent water supplies to each household that has: 1. a drinking water supply well located within a half mile radius of the established compliance boundary of a CCR impoundment and is not separated from the impoundment by the primary channel of a river or any other body of water that would prevent migration of contaminants through groundwater. 2. a drinking water supply well that is expected to be impacted by constituents related to CCR as demonstrated by modeling or site investigations. - the impoundment owner must rectify the deficiencies of any dam safety order issued by the N.C. Environmental Management Commission as detailed in 130A-309.213(d)(1)(b)

TOTAL Ash Inventory (tons) Plant Number of Basins Acreage Ash Inventory (tons) Number of Landfills Number of Ash Fills TOTAL Ash Inventory (tons) Allen 2 293 16,540,000 1 1,140,000 3 1,590,000 19,270,000 Asheville 78 6,280,000 Belews Creek 283 12,090,000 6,680,000 990,000 19,760,000 Buck 134 5,060,000 250,000 5,310,000 Cape Fear 5 173 5,730,000 Cliffside (Rogers) 144 7,810,000 1,880,000 200,000 9,890,000 Dan River 43 1,600,000 1,360,000 2,960,000 HF Lee 314 5,900,000 60,000 5,960,000 Marshall 382 16,020,000 7,510,000 7,360,000 30,890,000 Mayo 6,600,000 380,000 6,980,000 Riverbend 69 3,620,000 1,560,000 5,180,000 Roxboro 220 19,500,000 7,320,000 7,800,000 34,620,000 Sutton 137 6,650,000 690,000 7,340,000 Weatherspoon 36 2,450,000 115,850,000 24,910,000 21,860,000 162,620,000 High Risk yellow, Intermediate green

Tons Removed as of October 9, 2016 Potential Low Sites High/ Intermediate Sites Total Tons Tons Removed as of October 9, 2016 Potential Low Sites Asheville 6,280,000 4,882,328 Allen 19,270,000   Dan River 2,960,000 715,155 Belews Creek 19,760,000 Riverbend 5,180,000 1,164,152 Rogers (former Cliffside) 9,890,000 186,212 Sutton 7,340,000 923,213 Marshall 30,890,000 Cape Fear 5,730,000 Mayo 6,980,000 Weatherspoon 2,450,000 Roxboro 34,620,000 H.F. Lee 5,960,000 Buck 5,310,000 35,900,000 126,720,000

Location Restrictions The CCR Rule establishes five location restrictions to ensure CCR disposal units are appropriately sited: Placement above the uppermost aquifer Wetlands Fault areas Seismic impact zones Unstable areas Units are prohibited from being sited in these areas unless specific demonstrations can be made Demonstrations must be certified by a qualified professional engineer

Design Standards Composite liner design Comply with the technical requirements addressing: Foundation settlement Overall and slide slope stability Side slope and subgrade reinforcement Leachate collection and removal system maintains minimal leachate over liner Groundwater monitoring system requirements Overfills cannot be constructed unless the underlying unit has been de- watered, capped and completely closed in accordance with the requirements of the rule

Operational Standards Fugitive Dust Control Run-on/Run-off for Landfills Hydrologic and Hydraulic Capacity Requirements for Surface Impoundments Inspections for Surface Impoundments and Landfills

Structural Integrity of Surface Impoundments Conduct periodic hazard potential classification assessment Develop an Emergency Action Plan if unit is designated as a “high” or “significant” hazard Cover embankment or dike slopes with either vegetation or an alternative form of slope protection CCR surface impoundments that exceed a height of five feet or more and a storage volume of 20 acre feet or more; or a height of 20 feet or more must: Compile a history of construction Conduct structural stability assessments every five years Remedy situation as soon as feasible Conduct periodic assessments of safety factor: end of construction loading long-term maximum storage pool condition maximum surcharge pool loading condition seismic liquefaction

Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action All CCR units must install a groundwater monitoring system and conduct groundwater monitoring Sampling is representative of background quality and the groundwater passing the waste boundary Minimum of one up-gradient and three down-gradient wells. Must justify using the minimum Professional engineer must certify system is equally capable of detecting monitored constituents at the waste boundary of the CCR unit as the individual groundwater monitoring system Annual report certifying compliance, including data, must be posted on facility’s website Detection monitoring (Appendix III) Assessment monitoring (Appendix IV) within 90 days if there is a statistically significant increase from background Public meetings to discuss remedy

EPA Groundwater Parameters Constituent 2L Standard (ug/L) IMAC (ug/L) MCL (ug/L) Appendix III   Boron 700 Calcium NE Chloride 250,000 Fluoride 2000 4000 pH 6.5-8.5 Sulfate TDS 500,000 Appendix IV Antimony 1 6 Arsenic 10 Barium Beryllium 4 Cadmium 2 5 Chromium 100 Cobalt Lead 15 Lithium Mercury Molybdenum Selenium 20 50 Thallium 0.2 Radium 226 & 228 5 pCi/L

Closure and Post-Closure Care Closure of a CCR unit When the unit fails to meet one or more specific technical criteria: Location restrictions Leaking, unlined CCR surface impoundments Fails to demonstrate or meet factors of safety When the known final waste shipment or when the last known volume of CCR for beneficial use is removed When a unit is “idle” for more than two years (no receipt of CCR or removal of CCR for beneficial use) Post-Closure Maintain integrity and effectiveness of final cover system If applicable, maintain integrity and effectiveness of leachate collection and removal system Maintain groundwater monitoring system and continue monitoring groundwater Owners or operators must continue post-closure care for 30 years

Record-keeping and Public Notification Owners or operators are required to document how the provisions of the rule are being met by placing information in an operating record and providing notification of these actions to the state director Owners or operators must also establish and maintain a publicly accessible internet site that posts documentation that has in many instances also been entered into the operating record Most files must be maintained in the operating record and on the internet site for five years As long as the facility remains active, the following documents must be maintained: Emergency Action Plan Fugitive Dust Control Plan Closure Plan

Recycling of Coal Ash 3 sites mandated under 130A-309.216 (Ash Beneficiation Projects) By Jan. 1, 2017, Duke Energy must designate two facilities for the beneficiation project A third site must be designated by July 1, 2017 Each site must produce 300,000 tons per year Beneficiation expected to supply product to the cement industry Carbon content too high in ash basins, must be further processed The sites must be operational within two years of permit issuance Impoundments must be emptied of ash by Dec. 31, 2029 Duke Energy announced on Oct. 5, 2016 that Buck Steam Station be the first site slated for beneficiation

Department of Environmental Quality Ellen Lorscheider, Solid Waste Chief Division of Waste Management (919) 707-8245 ellen.lorscheider@ncdenr.gov Department of Environmental Quality