Master Plan Personal Rapid Transit Analysis for Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport by Peter Muller, P.E. President, PRT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
Advertisements

Monterey Branch Line Association of Environmental Professionals and American Planning Association July 28, 2010.
West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
SkyTran™ Personal Maglev Transporters™.
Tampa Bay Regional Transportation Summit October 10, 2013.
Master Plan Personal Rapid Transit Analysis Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport Peter Muller, P.E. Master Plan Personal Rapid.
Personal Rapid Transit Impact on Intermodality and Safety at Heathrow and Masdar Dr Chris Elliott FREng Pitchill Consulting Ltd.
Tacoma Link Expansion Infrastructure, Planning and Sustainability Committee Tacoma City Council--Nov. 13, 2013.
Cellular Mass Transit (CMT) CMT4Austin.org. SOLUTION: Cellular Mass Transit Circulator Routes would converge on each Transit Center.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Elizabeth Sall Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
New Technology Feeder Systems Advanced Transit Association Seminar May 4-5, 2007 West Virginia University Morgantown, W V Robert Johnson R. E. Johnson.
Vehicle Flow.
Personal Rapid Transit Fort Carson Community Sustainability.
New Shuttle Routes. Current Health Sciences Shuttles – Four (4) different primary routes with excessive stops – A few single purpose routes – “Concierge”
Improving Transportation Through Innovative Engineering A Personal Rapid Transit Airport Automated People Mover Comparison Peter Muller PRT Consulting.
Sponsored by Cedar Rapids Area Chamber of Commerce and the The Greater Cedar Rapids Community Foundation.
An Analysis of Intra Airport Transport From A User’s Perspective Allison Davis December 5, 2002.
SLC Overview SLC Evolution Operations Statistics and Fee’s AVI Park and Wait Lot 2002 Winter Olympics UTA Light Rail Project New Technology & Ideas Landside.
1 Metrolinx delivers The Big Move Regional Transportation Plan: Transforming Transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area November 5, 2012 Bruce.
Ultra at Heathrow & beyond BASE April 2013 Presentation by Adam Ruddle, Key Account Manager, Ultra Global PRT.
ITS for BRT Systems: How Does Boston’s Silver Line Compare With Other BRT Systems? Carol Schweiger, Assistant Vice President ITS Georgia Annual Meeting.
Synergies Between PRT and Driverless Cars Prof. Em. Ingmar Andreasson LogistikCentrum AB.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 20: Transit System Design.
Improving Transportation Through Innovative Engineering Some Personal Rapid Transit Activities Peter Muller Some Personal Rapid Transit Activities Peter.
Personal rapid transport (or transit) = ”automatbane(?)”
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Service Planning & Standards Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
Initial Applications for Automated Vehicles on Exclusive Roadways Advanced Transit Association Annual Technical Meeting January 11, 2009 Washington, DC.
“An Iterative Capacity Constrained Parking Methodology for Ridership Forecasts for BART Extension Stations” Mike Aronson May 19, th TRB National.
2020 GHG? Gas tax? Car insurance? Will SoCal meet 2020, 2035 GHG transp tgts? Raise gas tax by $5/gal  28% less driving? Save $ on car insurance when.
February 2014 Bus Rapid Transit for Chennai. Chennai city bus service GOOD PATRONAGE  50 lakh daily passenger trips  3650 buses  Maximum flow of.
Slide 1 PRT Industry Status Steve Raney, Ultra Global PRT Outline –Technology / what it is  video –4 PRT systems {1. Masdar, 2. Heathrow, 3. Suncheon,
00 Metropolitan Transit System Transit Serving Point Loma September 23, 2008.
Vehicle Flow. Homework Ch 3 # 1,4, 7, 15 Vehicle Flow How do vehicles operate in the system –capacity –speed –headway –density.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference The Results of Selected BRT Projects 2:00 – 3:20 p.m. Walt Kulyk Director, FTA Office of Mobility Innovation.
Micro-Simulation of Automated Vehicles with Minimal Central Control Advanced Transit Association Annual Technical Meeting January 12, 2008 Washington,
Express/Rapid Bus Opportunities for Priority Bus Transit in the Washington Region Sponsored by National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Chun.
Tampa International, Peter O. Knight, Plant City and Tampa Executive Airports Aviation Authority Welcome AGTA Members Spring 2014.
Commuter Rail Studies Summary of MAG High Capacity Transit Study June 2003 Commuter Rail Summary.
Automated Transit Network
Los Angeles – San Diego – San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Update
T-Share: A Large-Scale Dynamic Taxi Ridesharing Service
Getting to the Walters Art Museum, Sunday, September 18th
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ACEC Presentation May 25, 2017
Network Characteristics
Automated Transit Network Opportunities
THE REGIONAL JET INTER-AIRPORT MOTOR COACH PASSENGER SERVICES
Transportation Summit
NREL: Yuche Chen, Stan Young, Jeff Gonder UC Riverside: Xuewei Qi
A Combined Quantitative and Qualitative Approach to Planning for Improved Intermodal Connectivity at California Airports (TO5406) Status Briefing to.
Project Feasibility Analysis
Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit
Passenger Train Classification
Developing Service: Measuring Quality of Service
RELATED TO AGENDA ITEM W1
Network Characteristics
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
Focus40 Overview A long-range plan for how the MBTA can meet the needs of the region in 2040: A 20-year plan as required by MBTA enabling legislation A.
Bus Rapid Transit Study
A B A B C D C D A B A B C D C D A B A B C D C D A B A B C D C D
LRT, GRT, PRT Comparison Peter Muller, PE Ingmar Andreasson, Ph. D.
Annual Operating & Capital Budget
Introduction to Micro-Transit / Demand Responsive Transit
Charles “Cody” Smith, PE
Kabinkový systém electrically powered - 2kW continuous
Annual Operating & Capital Budget
Comparative Visualization
NORMS AND STANDARDS FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN GAUTENG PROVINCE
Capital Trade-Offs Evaluated three major capital expenditure scenarios
Presentation transcript:

Master Plan Personal Rapid Transit Analysis for Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport by Peter Muller, P.E. President, PRT Consulting, Inc.

Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) Driverless vehicles on a guideway One to four seated passengers plus luggage Direct origin to destination service No need to transfer or stop Service on demand – not scheduled Very short headways (seconds) PRT definition by the Advanced Transit Association.

Open Guideway (ULTra) Captive Bogey (Postech) Suspended (Mister)

PRT Characteristics Level of Service Trip Time Safety & Security Viability Energy Use Emissions Costs

BWI Master Plan PRT Analysis Investigate conceptual feasibility of PRT for: Surface transport garages to terminals Secure inter-concourse travel Expansion to surface lots, Amtrak & CONRAC

Assumptions Speeds 15 mph 25 mph Minimum headway (seconds) 2 3 Peak period average occupancy 2.0 Maximum theoretical capacity (pphpd) 3,600 2,400 Average wait times < 1 minute 95% wait less than 3 minutes

Phases 1, 2 and 3 TERMINAL PARKING GARAGE PARKING GARAGE

All Four Phases HOTELS AMTRAK LIGHT RAIL PARKING PARKING GARAGES EMPLOYEE PARKING TERMINAL CONRAC

Phase Breakdown Phase Guideway Feet Stations T-Pods Peak Hour Passengers Cap Cost (MUS$) Ops Cost (MUS$) 1 10,000 15 152 1,784 94 7 2 5,500 6 30 NA 33 3 19,000 9 60 360 69 4 43,300 275 1,385 191 All 77,800 37 517 3,529 387 12

APM Comparison APM PRT Miles of dual-lane guideway 5.7 3.6 Miles of single-lane guideway - 7.7 Stations 15 37 In-terminal service Seated travel Minutes CONRAC to Term C 14 10 Daily ridership 61,400 58,817 Capital cost (MUS$) 1,194 387 Annual operating cost (MUS$) 13 12

Conclusions PRT could improve surface transportation Less waiting Less uncertainty Easier way-finding Improved travel times & comfort Roll-on, roll-off No on-site emissions Reduced energy use

Conclusions (cont.) Capital costs Operating costs Revenue About 32% APM Operating costs About 60% shuttle bus Revenue Could attract customers from off-site lots Could boost concession sales

Conclusions (cont.) PRT - low cost, direct and on-demand travel BWI - low cost carriers, “Easy Come- Easy Go” A Good Fit?

Contact Information Peter Muller PRT Consulting, Inc. 1340 Deerpath Trail, Ste 200 Franktown, CO 80116 Ph: 303-532-1855 Cell: 720-318-4795 Fax: (303) 309-1913 www.prtconsulting.com