CPR in ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROM

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Patient Oriented Therapy Non STE ACS
Advertisements

Unstable angina and NSTEMI
Risk stratification and medical management of NSTE-ACS (UA/NSTEMI )
A Pharmaco-invasive Reperfusion Strategy with Immediate Percutaneous Coronary Intervention is Safe and Effective in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome with ST elevation ESC guidelines 2008 Dr. David Tran A&E dept. FVH 22/12/09.
Acute coronary syndrome : Risk stratification – markers of myocardial necrosis Paul Calle Emergency Department Ghent University Hospital Belgium.
CHEST PAIN Belgian Inter disciplinary Working group of Acute Cardiology Claeys MJ Vandekerckhove Y Bossaert L Calle P Martens P Hollanders G Vrints C Van.
Optimal Timing of PCI in ACS Patrick Hildbrand. Trends and Prognosis in ACS Furman MI, JACC 2001, 37: Hospital 1 year.
“ If physicians would read two articles per day out of the six million medical articles published annually, in one year, they would fall 82 centuries behind.
British Cardiac Intervention Society Risk Assessment In Acute Coronary Syndromes Dr David Newby BHF Senior Lecturer in Cardiology Associate Director of.
 Decide on the correct management of patients with acute coronary syndrome based on the findings of a clinical history, examination and relevant test.
Acute Coronary Syndrome. Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Definition of ACS Signs and symptoms of ACS Gender and age related difference in ACS Pathophysiology.
1 Dr. Zahoor Ali Shaikh. 2 CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE (CAD)  CAD is most common form of heart disease and causes premature death.  In UK, 1 in 3 men and.
1 What is… ? Disparities Among Women in Acute Cardiac Care Frances Canet, MD Cath Conference Thursday, May 26, 2011.
The Heart of the Matter A Journey through the system of care.
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME (ACS). ACS Pathophysiology is that of a ruptured or eroded atheromatous plaque. Pathophysiology is that of a ruptured or eroded.
Ten Points to Remember from the 2007 STEMI Guideline Update Based on the 2007 Focused Update of the 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With.
ACS and Thrombosis in the Emergency Setting
Acute STEMI: current approach
TARGET and TACTICS Clinical Trial Commentary Dr Eric Topol Chairman and Professor, Department of Cardiology Director of the Joseph J Jacobs Center for.
Which Early ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Therapy (WEST) Trial Paul W. Armstrong, WEST Steering Committee Published in The European Heart Journal.
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES Part I. Definition Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) describes a spectrum of clinical conditions ranging from ST segment elevation.
Update of 2013 ACCF/AHA Guidelines for STEMI Junbo Ge MD,FACC,FESC,FSCAI Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University.
Acute Coronary Syndromes
The INT egrelin and E noxaparin R andomized assessment of A cute C oronary syndrome Treatment T rial Sponsored by the Canadian Heart Research Centre, Key.
Acute Coronary Syndromes SIGN 93. MINAP Mortality after Acute Coronary Syndromes Cumulative: 13.6% Blue 10.6% Green 11.6% Red.
Acute Coronary Syndromes. Learning outcomes To understand the clinical spectrum of coronary disease To recognise different presentations of the disease.
Acute Coronary Syndrome David Aymond, MD. ACS Definition: Myocardial ischemia typically due to atherosclerotic plaque rupture  Coronary thrombosis ACS.
MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION. CASE 1 Mr. A: 38 years old He smokes 1 pack of cigarettes per day He has no other past medical history 8 hours ago, he gets sharp.
Acute Coronary Syndromes Risk-Stratification Pathophysiology Diagnosis Initial Therapy Risk-Stratification Risk-Stratification Invasive vs Conservative.
Early Management of AMI Key points Recognition of symptoms by the patient and prompt seeking of medical attention Rapid deployment of emergency medical.
Dallas 2015 TFQO: Karen Woolfrey #COI 261 EVREV 1: Karen Woolfrey # COI 261 EVREV 2: Daniel Pichel #COI 513 Taskforce: ACS ACS 872: Pre-hospital Diversion.
Date of download: 6/2/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines.
Chest Pain in the Emergency Department Junior Teaching C. Brown August 2015.
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Prehospital NSTEMI Patient Assessment and Treatment
Cardiac causes of cardiac arrest
Risk Stratification of Chest Pain: Best Practices
Coronary artery disease
By Saranya Temprasertrudee M.D.
T1: ACS Treatment Tutoring
CHEST PAIN.
Gender differences in the management of acute coronary syndrome patients: One year results from HPIAR (HP-India ACS Registry) Kunal Mahajan*, Negi PC,
Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Antiplatelet therapy for STEMI
ASSENT-3 PLUS 1,639 patients with STEMI Treatment Group A
INTERVENSI PADA ACS Nursing perspective Ns. Yuyun Yuniaty, SKep
Ischaemic Heart Disease Acute Coronary Syndrome
Coronary artery disease
R. Jay Widmer, MD, PhD, Peter M. Pollak, MD, Malcolm R
Brief History on Mission: Lifeline
Unstable Angina and Non–ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
STEMI-INITIAL PRESENTATION TIMING 2013 ACC/AHA GUIDELINES
Section A: Introduction
European Heart Association Journal 2007 April
The following slides are based on a presentation at a Satellite Symposium in association with the Annual Cardiovascular Conference at Lake Louise, Alberta,
Section F: Clinical guidelines
TIMI IIIA Protocol Design 391 Patients with Unstable Angina / NQWMI
The European Society of Cardiology Presented by RJ De Winter
Undetectable High Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Level in the Emergency Department and Risk of Myocardial Infarction Nadia Bandstein, MD; Rickard Ljung,
Undetectable High Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Level in the Emergency Department and Risk of Myocardial Infarction Nadia Bandstein, MD; Rickard Ljung,
© 2004 American Heart Association
Acute Coronary Syndrome (1)
What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose?
Intermediate/low-risk UA
How would you approach this patient?
OASIS-5: Study Design Randomize N=20,078 Enoxaparin (N=10,021)
Management of AMI in patients presenting with STEMI
R. Jay Widmer, MD, PhD, Peter M. Pollak, MD, Malcolm R
Presentation transcript:

CPR in ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROM دکتر سعید رضا نامی متخصص بیهوشی فلوشیپ بیهوشی قلب

symptoms of AMI may be more intense than angina and most often persist for longer periods of time (eg, longer than 15–20 minutes). classic symptom : chest discomfort , shortness of breath Diaphoresis , sweating, nausea, vomiting, and dizziness  Atypical or unusual symptoms are more common in women, the elderly, and diabetic patients. The physical examination of the patient with ACS is often normal

تغییرات اصلی : 1- نوارقلب قبل بیمارستان ومداخله 2-انتخاب استراتژی ریپرفیوژن هنگامی که امکان فیبرینولیزقبل بیمارستانی وجود دارد PCI انتخاب استراتژی در بیمارستانهای بدون امکان- 3 4-کاربرد تروپونین بعنوان شاخصی که کدام بیماران رامیتوان بدون خطر از اورژانس مرخص نمود 5-مداخلات قبل بیمارستانی که میتوانند سودمند یا بی اثر باشند

نوار قلب ومداخلات قبل بیمارستانی: نوار قلب 12 لیدی توسط پرسنل اورژانس غیر پزشک آموزش دیده آنالیز کامپیوتری برای کمک به پزشک یا پرسنل اورژانس در تشخیص STEMI برای بیماران STEMI توسط اورژانس پیش بیمارستانی به کت لب اطلاع داده شود مداخلات پیشرفته برای بیماران STEMI در بیمارستان صورت پذیرد

جدید (2015): اگر در STEMI دسترسی به فیبرینولیز اولیه ویا مستقیما مرکز PCI اولیه میسر است میبایست پس از تریاژ به مرکز PCIارجاع گردد ._(ریسک خونریزی مغزی) STEMI در دپارتمان اورژانس بیمارستان فاقد PCI سریعا انتقال به مرکزPCI بدون فیبرینولیز STEMI درمواردی که امکان انتقال نیست ویا درزمان مناسب نمیرسد باید تحت فیبرینولیز قرار بگیرد سپس آنژیوگرافی اولیه شود بجای انتقال مستقيم به مرکز PCI تمام بیماران تحت فیبرینولیز اولیه باید در 3تا6 ساعت اول وحداکثر 24ساعت اول بعد PCI اعزام جهت آنژیو(کاهش ریسک انفارکت مجدد)

تروپونین بعنوان شاخص ترخیص بی خطر از اورژانس تروپونین منفی I&T ساعت 0و2 رد کننده ACS نیست ولی ریسک وقایع قلبی در 30 روز بعد ترخیص ( (MACE کمتر از 1% در همراهی با شاخص TIMI score 0 یا 1 ویا ونکوور low risk score major adverse cardiac event (MACE). Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI]

negative troponin I or troponin T measurements at 0 and between 3 and 6 hours may be used together with very low-risk stratification (TIMI score of 0, low risk score per Vancouver rule, North American Chest Pain score of 0 and age less than 50 years, or low-risk HEART score) to predict a less than 1% chance of 30-day MACE.

Troponin to Identify Patients Who Can Be Safely Discharged From the Emergency Department Also, 2010 (Old): If biomarkers are initially negative within 6 hours of symptom onset, it was recommended that biomarkers should be remeasured between 6 to 12 hours after symptom onset. Why: Relying on a negative troponin test result, either alone or in combination with unstructured risk assessment, results in an unacceptably high rate of MACE at 30 days. However, predictions based on negative troponin test results, combined with structured risk assessment, carry a risk of less than 1% of MACE at 30 days.

Other Interventions neither additional benefit nor harm compared with waiting to administer it in the hospital. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) administered to patients with STEMI in the prehospital setting has not been shown to provide additional benefits to giving it in the hospital. Adenosine diphosphate inhibition for hospital patients with suspected STEMI has been recommended weak evidence of no benefit and possible harm prompted a recommendation that supplementary oxygen was not needed for patients with ACS who had an oxyhemoglobin saturation of 94% or greater

For STEMI patients, prehospital administration of UFH or bivalirudin is reasonable. For suspected STEMI patients who are being transferred for PPCI, enoxaparin is a reasonable alternative to UFH

Public education campaigns increase patient awareness and knowledge of the symptoms of ACS, yet have only transient effects on time to presentation.32,33 For patients at risk for ACS (and for their families), primary care physicians and other healthcare providers should consider discussing the appropriate use of aspirin and activation of EMS system. Furthermore, an awareness of the location of the nearest hospital that offers 24-hour emergency cardiovascular care can also be included in this discussion. Previous guidelines have recommended that the patient, family member, or companion activate the EMS system rather than call their physician or drive to the hospital if chest discomfort is unimproved or worsening 5 minutes after taking 1 nitroglycerin treatment.34

Because aspirin should be administered as soon as possible after symptom onset to patients with suspected ACS, it is reasonable for EMS dispatchers to instruct patients with no history of aspirin allergy and without signs of active or recent gastrointestinal bleeding to chew an aspirin (160 to 325 mg) while awaiting the arrival of EMS providers.39-44 (Class IIa, LOE C)

If the patient is dyspneic, hypoxemic, or has obvious signs of heart failure, providers should titrate therapy, based on monitoring of oxyhemoglobin saturation, to ≥94%.45 (Class I, LOE C)

EMS providers should administer nonenteric aspirin (160. to 325. mg) EMS providers should administer nonenteric aspirin (160* to 325* mg). (Class I, LOE B Class I, LOE C)

patient should chew the aspirin up to 3 nitroglycerin doses (tablets or spray) at intervals of 3 to 5 minutes. Nitrates in all forms are contraindicated systoloic blood pressure <90 mm Hg or ≥30 mm Hg below baseline right ventricular infarction phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitor within 24 hours (48 hours for tadalafil  Caution inferior wall STEMI, extreme caution, inferior STEMI and suspected right ventricular (RV)

Chest Pain Discomfort / ACS The administration of Aspirin was moved to early on in the protocol. The administration of Morphine has been changed to a standing order of 2 mg every 5 minutes to a total dose of 10 mg or relief of pain. In the presence of hypotension or bradycardia the ALS provider should consider the use of Fentanyl. The protocol was revised to incorporate a standing order for Fentanyl at 50 micrograms repeated every 5 minutes to a total dose of 150 micrograms.

Morphine is indicated in STEMI when chest discomfort is unresponsive to nitrates. (Class I, LOE C) LAST UPDATED: OCT 2010 Morphine should be used with caution in unstable angina (UA)/NSTEMI due to an association with increased mortality in a large registry.53 (Class IIa, LOE C)

ED Evaluation quickly assess patients with possible ACS. Ideally within 10 minutes of ED arrival history while a monitor is attached to the patient and a 12-lead ECG is chest discomfort, associated signs and symptoms, prior cardiac history, risk factors for ACS, fibrinolytics or other therapies the goals of reperfusion are to administer fibrinolytics within 30 minutes of arrival (30-minute interval “door-to-drug”) or to provide PCI within 90 minutes of arrival (90- minute interval “door-to-balloon”). (Class I, LOE A) LAST UPDATED: OCT 2010

Routine consultation with a cardiologist or another physician is not recommended except in equivocal or uncertain cases. Consultation delays therapy and is associated with increased hospital mortality rates. (Class III, LOE B) LAST UPDATED: OCT 2010

ST-segment elevation: 2 or more contiguous leads J-point elevation 0.2 mV (2 mm) in leads V2 and V3 and 0.1 mV (1 mm) in all other leads (men ≥40 years old) J-point elevation 0.25 mV (2.5 mm) in leads V2 and V3 and 0.1 mV (1 mm) in all other leads (men <40 years old); J-point elevation 0.15 mV (1.5 mm) in leads V2 and V3 and 0.1 mV (1 mm) in all other leads (women).

UA/NSTEMI Ischemic ST-segment depression >0.5 mm (0.05 mV) or dynamic T- wave inversion with pain or discomfort Nonpersistent or transient ST-segment elevation ≥0.5 mm for <20 minutes Threshold values for ST-segment depression consistent with ischemia are J-point depression 0.05 mV (-.5 mm) in leads V2 and V3 and -0.1 mV (-1 mm) in all other leads (men and women). patients with normal ECGs and those with ST-segment deviation of <0.5 mm (0.05 mV) or T-wave inversion of ≤0.2 mV. This category of ECG is termed nondiagnostic. requiring further risk stratification

ST-Segment Elevation or New or Presumably New LBBB: Evaluation for Reperfusion Step 1: Assess time and risk Time since onset of symptoms Risk of STEMI Risk of fibrinolysis Time required to transport to skilled PCI catheterization suite Step 2: Select reperfusion (fibrinolysis or invasive) strategy Note: If presentation <3 hours and no delay for PCI, then no preference for either strategy. Fibrinolysis is generally preferred if: Early presentation (≤3 hours from symptom onset) Invasive strategy is not an option (eg, lack of access to skilled PCI facility or difficult vascular access) or would be delayed – Medical contact-to-balloon or door-balloon >90 minutes – (Door-to-balloon) minus (door-to-needle) is >1 hour No contraindications to fibrinolysis An invasive strategy is generally preferred if: Late presentation (symptom onset >3 hours ago) Skilled PCI facility available with surgical backup Medical contact-to-balloon or door-to-balloon <90 minutes (Door-to-balloon) minus (door-to-needle) is <1 hour Contraindications to fibrinolysis, including increased risk of bleeding and ICH High risk from STEMI (CHF, Killip class is ≥3) Diagnosis of STEMI is in doubt

Selection of Initial Treatment Strategy for Patients With Non-ST-Elevation ACS: Invasive Versus Conservative Strategy* Preferred Strategy Patient Characteristics Invasive Recurrent angina or ischemia at rest or with low-level activities despite intensive medical therapy Elevated cardiac biomarkers (TnT or TnI) New or presumably new ST-segment depression Signs or symptoms of HF or new or worsening mitral regurgitation High-risk findings from noninvasive testing Hemodynamic instability Sustained ventricular tachycardia PCI within 6 months Prior CABG High-risk score (eg, TIMI, GRACE) Reduced LV function (LVEF less than 40%) Conservative Low-risk score (eg, TIMI, GRACE) Patient or physician preference in absence of high-risk features

Prognosis of NSTEMI vs STEMI: Short-term (in-hospital or one month) mortality is lower in NSTEMI (3-5%) compared to STEMI (10-15%). Re-infarction rate (further heart attack) is higher in NSTEMI (15-25%) after hospital discharge compared to STEMI (5-8%). Long-term mortality is similar or higher in NSTEMI compared to STEMI (two year mortality is approximately 30% in both cases).

Thanks…