Experience with combined Fe55 / Tycho SNR calibration NRCO 71 EPIC Calibration & Operations Meeting Mallorca, Spain, 2008 April 7 - 8
Internal calibration source onboard XMM-Newton / EPIC-pn Al-K Mn-K
30 ks in 2000 210 ks in 2008 30 ks 10 ks
Experience with combined Fe55 / Tycho SNR calibration General plan: start with ‘normal’ Tycho observation add the internal calibration source finish with ‘normal’ calclosed observation does the internal calibration source disturb the Tycho observation ? does Tycho disturb the calclosed measurement ? Unfortunately, this sequence was scheduled as three independent observations, performed in a non-contiguous mode superposition with short-term changes in the absolute energy scale no firm conclusions about potential changes of the absolute energy scale possible however: general idea about ‘calopen’ observations
Experience with combined Fe55 / Tycho SNR calibration 1) Tycho FF Medium, 2007-12-30 / 19:55 – 2007-12-31 / 03:37, 27 ks
Experience with combined Fe55 / Tycho SNR calibration 2) Tycho FF Cal Medium, 2008-01-01 / 19:58 – 2008-01-02 / 09:59, 50 ks
Experience with combined Fe55 / Tycho SNR calibration 3) Calclosed, 2008-01-03 / 01:06 – 2008-01-03 / 08:11, 25 ks
1) Tycho FF Medium, 2007-12-30 / 19:55 – 2007-12-31 / 03:37, 27 ks
2) Tycho FF Cal Medium, 2008-01-01 / 19:58 – 2008-01-02 / 09:59, 50 ks
3) Calclosed, 2008-01-03 / 01:06 – 2008-01-03 / 08:11, 25 ks
Narrow-line images at Mn-K: 5.70 – 6.05 keV adu ΔE = 350 eV
Narrow-line images at Mn-K: 5.70 – 6.05 keV scaled to the same exposure time ΔE = 0.35 keV Tycho CalClosed Tycho + CalClosed
all energy bands centered on Mn-K Tycho + CalClosed all energy bands centered on Mn-K ΔE = 0.35 keV ΔE = 1.0 keV ΔE = 2.0 keV ΔE = 5.0 keV
Narrow-line images at Al-K: 1.375 – 1.575 keV adu ΔE = 200 eV
Narrow-line images at Al-K: 1.375 – 1.575 keV scaled to the same exposure time ΔE = 0.20 keV Tycho CalClosed Tycho + CalClosed
calclosed
Tycho
Tycho + calclosed
Mn-K calclosed
Mn-K Tycho + calclosed
Al-K calclosed
Al-K Tycho + calclosed
CTI determination: Illustration of the Template Cross Correlation method (EPIC pn) 25 macro pixels, 20-29 singles per macro pixel
calclosed CTI
Tycho + calclosed CTI
Tycho + calclosed CTI
Experience with combined Fe55 / Tycho SNR calibration Tycho + calclosed seems ok for Mn-K, but not for Al-K Tycho better suited for LW than for FF Calclosed & LW no useful combination are there celestial calibration targets which are better suited for a combined Fe55 exposure ?
Vela SNR
Vela SNR (62 ks)
calclosed (25 ks)
Vela SNR + calclosed (scaled to 62 ks)
Experience with combined Fe55 / Tycho SNR calibration Vela + calclosed might be an interesting alternative: the parts of the Vela SNR covered by the FOV are similarly extended as the internal calibration source the X-ray surface brightness of the Vela SNR is similar to that of the internal calibration source the X-ray spectrum of the Vela SNR is almost complementary to that of the internal calibration source But the Al-K region would need to be checked in detail..