Grant Writing for Success

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ing%20for%20Success.pdf Information from NIH: Louis V. De Paolo NICHD Roger G. Sorensen.
Advertisements

How to write a Research Grant? or How to get a grant rejected? Spencer Gibson Provincial Director, Research CancerCare Manitoba.
Ten Fatal Flaws of NIH Grant Submissions (and how to avoid them) Steffanie A. Strathdee, PhD Thomas L. Patterson, PhD.
How your NIH grant application is evaluated and scored Larry Gerace, Ph.D. June 1, 2011.
How Your Application Is Reviewed Robert Elliott, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
NIH Writing Your Specifics Aims CHIP Grant Workshop 2014 Amy Gorin, Ph.D. Listen Up! This is a critical section of your application.
INSTITUTE OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES WRITING GRANT PROPOSALS Thursday, April 10, 2014 Randy Draper, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research Room 125, IBS.
Grant Writing: Specific Aims and Study Design Zuo-Feng Zhang, MD, PhD EPIDEMIOLOGY
GRANT WRITING FOR SUCCESS Grant Writing for Success Michael A Sesma, Ph.D., NIGMS/NIH Roger G Sorensen, Ph.D., NIDA/NIH.
How Your Application Is Reviewed Vonda Smith, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
Cheryl Anne Boyce, Ph.D. National Institute on Drug Abuse Roger G. Sorensen, Ph.D., MPA National Institute on Drug Abuse 2010 NIH Regional Seminars, Portland.
What makes a good grant? A good idea A good approach Good writing.
1 Major changes Get ready! Changes coming to Review Meetings Considering Potential FY2010 funding and beyond: New 1-9 Scoring System Scoring of Individual.
The Life Cycle of an NIH Grant Application Alicia Dombroski, Ph.D. Deputy Director Division of Extramural Activities NIDCR.
Getting Funded: How to write a good grant
How to Improve your Grant Proposal Assessment, revisions, etc. Thomas S. Buchanan.
Grant Writing for Success
Nancy L Desmond, Ph.D. Division of Neuroscience & Basic Behavioral Science Key Things to Know about Research Project Grants (R01)
THE NIH REVIEW PROCESS David Armstrong, Ph.D.
Navigating the Grant Submission Process Anita L. Harrison Associate Director of Administration Hollings Cancer Center March 26, 2015.
Writing Successful Research Grant Proposals
Grant-Writing Boot Camp © 2015 A.G. Williams Grant-Writing Boot Camp TWO DAY TWO.
Michael A. Sesma, Ph.D.; NIMH What Is A Strong Grant Application? What Is A Strong Grant Application? Simple steps to a successful grant application Michael.
CSR Peer Review of NIH HIV/AIDS Grant Applications NIH Grantsmanship Workshop Diana Finzi, Ph.D. Chief, Pathogenesis and Basic Research Program Division.
Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.
NIH Challenge Grants in Health and Science Research RFA OD
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference: Insights from the AHRQ Peer Review Process Training Grant Review Perspective Denise G. Tate Ph.D., Professor, Chair HCRT Study.
Cecelia McNamara Spitznas, Ph.D. National Institute on Drug Abuse Roger G. Sorensen, Ph.D., MPA National Institute on Drug Abuse 2010 NIH Regional Seminars,
Training Grants: Introduction Read the Program Announcement Pick most appropriate program Follow directions and organize in order.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Components of a Successful AREA (R15) Grant Rebecca J. Sommer Bates College.
Tips on Fellowship Writing A Reviewer’s Perspective Wendy Havran.
GRANT WRITING FOR SUCCESS Grant Writing for Success LeShawndra N. Price, Ph.D., NIMH, NIH Henry Khachaturian, Ph.D., OEP/NIH.
National Institutes of Health AREA PROGRAM (R15) Thomas J. Wenzel Bates College, Lewiston, Maine.
GRANT WRITING FOR SUCCESS: TOP 10 REVIEWER CONCERNS AND GOOD/BAD GRANTS Grant Writing for Success LeShawndra N. Price, Ph.D., NIMH, NIH Henry Khachaturian,
Working with the NIHR Research Design Service to maximize successful grant applications Dr. Steven Blackburn NIHR Research Design Service West Midlands.
Key Elements in Applying for a Clinical Research Grant Niloofar Afari, PhD Associate Professor University of CA, San Diego Director of Clinical Affairs.
What Makes a Proposal Successful Dr. George B. Stefano The State University of New York College at Old Westbury October 6, 2008.
Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases Amanda Boyce, Ph.D. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal.
An Insider’s Look at a Study Section Meeting: Perspectives from CSR Monica Basco, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer Coordinator, Early Career Reviewer Program.
Insider Guide to Peer Review for Applicants Dr. Valerie Durrant Acting Director CSR Division of Neuroscience, Development and Aging.
Practical Research Paul D. Leedy Jeanne Ellis Ormrod
2 Who Are the Peer Reviewers? Senior Researchers Well-funded by NIH or Other Agencies Well-published, recognized in the field Associate Professor or higher.
Funding Opportunities for Investigator-initiated Grants with Foreign Components at the NIH Somdat Mahabir, PhD, MPH Program Director Epidemiology and Genetics.
R01? R03? R21? How to choose the right funding mechanism Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Grantsmanship: The Art and Science of Getting Funded Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. Senior Advisor, Molecular Endocrinology National Institute of Diabetes and.
Research Strategy: Approach Frank Sellke, MD Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery Brown Medical School Providence RI AATS Grant Course 2011.
Peer Review and Grant Mechanisms at NIH What is Changing? May 2016 Richard Nakamura, Ph.D., Director Center for Scientific Review.
Office of Extramural Programs GRANT WRITING FOR SUCCESS Rebekah S. Rasooly, Ph.D. NIDDK/NIH.
Reviewers Expectations Peter Donkor. Outline Definitions The review process Common mistakes to avoid Conclusion.
Grant Writing for Success
GRANT WRITING FOR SUCCESS
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Career Development Plan: the cornerstone of the K award
Why and When to Write a Grant. Karen E
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Grant Writing Information Session
What Reviewers look for NIH F30-33(FELLOWSHIP) GRANTS
The NSF Grant Review Process: Some Practical Tips
Grant Writing for Success
HOW TO GET GRANTS Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry
Rick McGee, PhD and Bill Lowe, MD Faculty Affairs and NUCATS
Russell Center Small Research Grants Program
How to Succeed with NIH: September 28, 2018
University of Missouri Research Board Why this, why now, why me?
Successful Application
NEUROLOGY FACULTY DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP SERIES:
GRANT WRITING FOR SUCCESS
Writing an Effective Grant Application
Presentation transcript:

Grant Writing for Success Teresa L. Z. Jones M.D., NIDDK/NIH

Hallmarks of an Outstanding Grant Application Strong significance to an important problem in public health Clear rationale High degree of novelty and innovation Strong track record by a well qualified applicant Relevant and supportive preliminary data Clear and focused approach that provides unambiguous results Careful attention to details in the presentation

Common Reasons Cited for a Weak Application Significance and impact not obvious or weak Too ambitious, lacking focus Unclear or flawed hypothesis or rationale Applicant track record weak or lacking appropriate expertise Feasibility unsupported Approach flawed Poor writing

Grantsmanship Tips 101 GET FEEDBACK Show your draft specific aims page to a colleague Show your draft Specific aims to a colleague… who does not already know what you intend to do Show your draft specific aims to a NIH Program official

National Institutes of Health Mission of each NIH Institute or Center (IC) is based and defined in law Authorizations (create/continue an agency – periodic) Appropriations ($ for the agency – annual) ICs establish specific research emphases Legislative mission Current state of science Use the Web to find out!

www.nih.gov

Look for the IC Website of Interest

Grantsmanship Tips 101 Study sample applications From a website, http://www.niaid.nih.gov/researchfunding/grant/pages/appsamples.aspx#rpindex From a colleague 8 8

US - Ireland R&D Partnership Write for the study section. The science, rather than the program, should be the driver for the partnership. Synergy, organization and feasibility of the collaboration should be clear. (Multi-PI Leadership Plan) Strong recommendation for a US investigator with history of NIH funding.

US - Ireland R&D Partnership Multi-PI R01 grant format. Could have a specific aim from each of the three groups. For the budget pages, include RoI and NI laboratories as subawards with no F&A costs for the US site for the subawards. Include Letters of Support from the RoI and NI funding agencies under the Consortium/Contractual section.

After the Review Read the summary statement Wait for the AWARD, or Reread the summary statement Contact your program officer and be prepared to discuss: what the reviewers said about your application (after you have summary statement) Scores and percentiles the likelihood of funding the prospects of a revised application Wait for the AWARD, or Listen to advice from Program Officer about options

If Not Funded, Try Again! You are in good company Know your options Get advice, Regroup Contact your Program Officer

Where Do I Get More Information? NIH homepage: http://www.nih.gov/ Office of Extramural Research (OER): http://www.grants.nih.gov CSR website: http://www.csr.nih.gov/ Grant writing tips: http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/grant_tips.htm Sample R01 applications: http://www.niaid.nih.gov/researchfunding/grant/pages/appsamples.aspx#rpindex