WP 5: Assessment of Transition Pathways to Regional Sustainability of Agriculture “to build on findings from WP3 to inform participatory identification.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality & Impact in DE defined: a selection
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
QUICKScan A Participatory Spatial Analysis Tool to Facilitate Policy Assessments Peter Verweij, Michiel van Eupen Geospatial world forum – policy/research.
Regional Trajectories to the Knowledge Economy: A Dynamic Model IKINET-EURODITE Joint Conference Warsaw, May 2006.
Communities of Practice: The Leading Edge Joanne Cashman, IDEA Partnership Emilie Braunel, WI Facets Jen Ledin, WI CoP.
Assessing Progress For Sustainable Development
Welcome to the FarmPath Kick-off Meeting! Farming Transitions: Pathways Towards Regional Sustainability of Agriculture in Europe.
Encourage Investment, Technical Cooperation, Policy, Education, Awareness and Extension PLAN OF ACTION FOR PILLAR TWO FOR THE EUROSIAN SOIL PARTNERSHIP.
WP 5: Assessment of Transition Pathways to Regional Sustainability of Agriculture “to build on findings from WP3 to inform participatory identification.
Scenario-building as a communication tool Skryhan Hanna Krasnoyarsk, February, 15 – February, 22, 2014.
Mali Work Packages. Crop Fields Gardens Livestock People Trees Farm 1 Farm 2 Farm 3 Fallow Pasture/forest Market Water sources Policy Landscape/Watershed.
UNDP-GEF Adaptation 0 0 Impact of National Communications on Process of Integrating Climate Change into National Development Policies UNFCCC Workshop on.
RTD-B.4 - Regions of Knowledge and Research Potential Regional Dimension of the 7th Framework Programme Regions of Knowledge Objectives and Activities.
SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME FP INCO-MPC-1 MEditerranean Development of Innovative Technologies for integrAted waTer managEment.
Across Latitudes and Cultures Bus Rapid Transit Centre of Excellence Durban, South Africa; September 16, 2011 General Assembly 1.
AWARE: Stakeholder Analysis Udaya Sekhar Nagothu, Per Stålnacke, Bioforsk, Norway. AWARE kick-off meeting Rome, 3-5 June, 09.
WP5 – topics to include in case study analysis for the scenario development  WP 5: Assessment of Transition Pathways to Regional Sustainability of Agriculture.
FarmPath Kick-off Institute of Agricultural and Forestry Economics University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Ika Darnhofer WP5 – Protocol.
This research has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/ ) under grant agreement No The LiveDiverse.
Lukas Zagata & Michal Lostak Czech University of Life Sciences Prague WP4 SYNTHESIS OF FARMING MODELS FOR YOUNG FARMERS AND NEW ENTRANTS Progress to date.
Fourth IABIN Council Meeting Support to Building the Inter-American Biodiversity Information Network.
Workshop and Steering Committee Meeting Globally-important Ingenious Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) Project Rome, 7-9 June 2004 Components and Processes.
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation S3 DESIGN LEARNING WORKSHOP Chisinau, Moldova, 18 February, 2016 THE.
OutcomeObjectivesResearch questionsOutputs Activities Smallholder families adopt technology packages that improve food, nutrition and income security 1.To.
Group 1 Community Based Adaptation. The Process Presented two case studies Presented two case studies Case studies came with a set of research questions.
Exploitation means to use and benefit from something. For Erasmus+ this means maximising the potential of the funded activities, so that the results are.
1 © 2007 Chapter 3 Strategic Planning for the EHR Migration Path.
Win! Win! A case study of student / tutor / researcher / technician collaboration in teaching and research integration. Presentation by Michael Horswell,
Module 8 Guidelines for evaluating the SDGs through an equity focused and gender responsive lens: Overview Technical Assistance on Evaluating SDGs: Leave.
The most represented stakeholders within the NAPA process were governments, followed by research institutions, UN Agencies and local communities. Private.
Poster 1. Leadership Development Programme : Leading Cultures of Research and Innovation in Clinical Teams Background The NHS Constitution is explicit.
Win! Win! Win! Win! A case study of student / tutor / researcher / technician collaboration in teaching and research integration. Presentation by Michael.
Evaluating ESD in RCEs: The Start-up Tools
Group 1 Issues of highest importance Foci for discussion/action
A Guide to SDG Interactions: from Science to Implementation
Wrap-up of Workshop 2 - Innovation and Competitiveness
How do we know that two heads are better
Mieke De Schoenmakere 13 September 2016, Studiedag circulaire economie, Mechelen Transition towards more sustainability: the role of resource efficient.
Alan Duncan NBDC Reflection Workshop Nov 2012
European Network on teacher Education Policies
Support to and Capitalization on the EU Land Governance Programme
Oceans and Society: Blue Planet
RELOCAL 16th February, Barcelona.
Interpreting Foresight Process Impacts:
LUCAS Task Force 30 September 2015 Item 4 – Update on the Knowledge Innovation Project on Accounting for Natural Capital and ecosystem services (KIP INCA)
Partnership Collections
Policy Process and Extension Communication Methods:
The concept and approach of European Quality of Life survey
Win! Win! Win! Win! A case study of student / tutor / researcher / technician collaboration in teaching and research integration. Presentation by Michael.
Building Knowledge about ESD Indicators
Animal Welfare EU Strategy
RECARE set-up Rudi Hessel on behalf of coordination team
Considerations in Development of the SBSTA Five Year Programme of Work on Adaptation Thank Mr. Chairman. Canada appreciates this opportunity to share.
Community-based adaptation & Communicating climate change
Outreach and Engagement
First draft of ALiSEA charter: clarification and approbation
Project Duration: 3 years
ICARDA-NCARE technical meeting
IENE – INTERCULTURAL EDUCATION OF NURSES AND MEDICAL STAFF IN EUROPE
Rare Disease Impact Case
“The Anatomy of Grass root Capacity Building for Sustainable Management of Natural capital in the Nile Basin” -A Political Economy Approach Donald Kasongi.
Community-based adaptation & Communicating climate change
The Compelling Case for Integrated Community Care: Setting the Scene
MSDI training courses feedback MSDIWG10 March 2019 Busan
Environment and Development Policy Section
Project Conceptual Group Meetings
My name is VL, I work at the EEA, on EA, and particularly on developing a platform of exchange which aims at facilitating the planning and development.
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
And now the Framework WP4.
Presentation transcript:

WP 5: Assessment of Transition Pathways to Regional Sustainability of Agriculture “to build on findings from WP3 to inform participatory identification of multiple future transition pathways to sustainable agriculture at regional level, typifying both pathways and regions identified through stakeholder scenario development exercises.” Participatory scenario development exercise. Identify pathways and visions, reflecting differentiation. Assess needs. Develop Handbook. 1 case-study area in each field research country. Months 17 to 34. Most teams have 7 man months for WP5 Outcomes: 1 book chapter, 1 final report, fact sheets, 1 Handbook September 2012 4rd FarmPath meeting

WP5 : Strengths and added value to Farm Path Regional Sustainability of Agriculture: from initiatives to the regional scale Transdisciplinarity: progressing to knowledge with the stakeholders, and even leading to empowerment Linking science to practice, also beyond the project: the Handbook as an outcome September 2012 4rd FarmPath meeting

WP5: scenarios, what can they bring us ? Figure 1 – Scenarios can help address uncertainty in complex systems. Source: Zurek and Heinrichs (2007) September 2012 4rd FarmPath meeting

WP5: scenarios, where can they bring us ? (Wright and Spers 2006; Tress and Tress 2003) where to go >> process focused in accordance with our conceptual framework greater empowerment (Darnhofer 2011; Vega-Leinert, Kleemann and O’Riordan 2009) Figure 2 – Different approaches in studies exploring the future. Source: Ramos (2008) September 2012 4rd FarmPath meeting

WP5: the questions to be addressed We want to * identify a set of pathways and visions for sustainable agriculture, which reflect both regional differences and social and technological innovation needs to attaining these visions * assess how possible institutional arrangements, support measures and socio-technical networks amongst actors within the farming community, policy, technology and wider society can lead to increased regional sustainability of agriculture * involve stakeholders in this discussion and identification, leading to a higher level of awareness on possible transition pathways for their region and join references September 2012 4rd FarmPath meeting

WP5: the questions to be addressed What are the wishable futures for agriculture in the region ? >> In which direction you would like to go >> Which scenarios are more sustainable *we deal with agriculture and other land management activities: activities and people managing the land What are the required pathways ? >> why has the scenario not happened yet ? >> what is required in order for it to happen ? (what policies, institutional arrangements, governance mechanisms, etc. could be facilitators) >> what can you get involved and support this pathway ? September 2012 4rd FarmPath meeting

WP5: temporal and spatial scale (Southern et al 2011) The time frame: what we can relate to, what can capture the stakeholders involvement: between 10 and 15 years and also behind the next European policy framework program >> scenario 2025 The spatial frame: the regional sustainability of agriculture above local case studies but still possible to grasp for the involved well acknowledged units + explicit shared drivers for transition >> in between Nuts 3 and LAU 1 (group of LAU 1; in DE, NUTs 2; Natura 2000 site; peri-urban domain; planning units) September 2012 4rd FarmPath meeting

WP5: a focus group based approach (Krueger 1998; Southern, Lovett, O’Riordan and Watkinson 2011) The groups: Official interests: NGOs, farmers associations, business associations, unions,... Run the land: farmers, land owners, hobby and lifestyle farmers, managers of protected areas,... Young farmers Land users: those who benefit from the management of the land – end users, recreationists, educational people, residential and consumer organizations, ... >> careful selection so as to secure effective participation September 2012 4rd FarmPath meeting

WP5: a focus group based approach (Krueger 1998; Southern, Lovett, O’Riordan and Watkinson 2011) The steps Small interviews / meetings of max 3 people: building trust, and engagement in the process listen to stakeholders concerns now and for future Identification of the relevant criteria for identifying trends towards the regional sustainability of agriculture: work with the NSPG criteria to be linked to indicators, based on existing list September 2012 4rd FarmPath meeting

WP5: a focus group based approach The steps 3) Focus groups: 4 meetings of up to 8 people from each of the stakeholder groups external facilitator identify and describe whishable scenarios come out with 2 agreed upon scenarios 4) From the 8 final scenarios, select 3 most in accordance to the sustainability criteria >> if possible, work with NSPG apply the predefined indicators (qualitative assessment) the new scenarios can be a merge of some of the first build up short narratives the selection is validated by the focus groups participants, through written information and small meetings September 2012 4rd FarmPath meeting

WP5: a focus group based approach The steps 5) One large workshop at the end: supporting governance and identifying pathways preparatory documents sent before: characteristics of the region, foreseen overall changes, integration of WP3 findings, and narratives on the scenarios a whole afternoon and all stakeholders mixed together the three scenarios are presented supporting tools may be used (e.g. visualization) definition of transition pathways: constrains and supports identification of possible involvement >> reporting on national process and findings + join report + handbook September 2012 4rd FarmPath meeting

WP5: what can be gained from WP3 informing the discussions – in NSPG and in final workshop: a grounded assessment of what is relevant today for the regional sustainability of agriculture, as it has emerged from the initiatives + similarities across Europe; an identification of what is common x what depends on regional contexts, and thus need a differentiated approach; a reflection on the potentialities and limitations of the existing indicators and approaches for their measurement; >> main assets and fragilities of each region >> institutional arrangements >> what depends on the different levels of governance September 2012 4rd FarmPath meeting

WP5: the Handbook >> “development of a handbook for assessment of agricultural sustainability at regional level, and identification of possible future transition pathways” the objective is to reach diverse institutions and inform about our results >> what is needed to make transition pathways happen >> transform findings into user friendly information for people taking decisions on agriculture and land management, at various scales for decision makers at regional, national and European a 25-30 pages booklet, informative content with simple presentation; in English + may be translated into national languages September 2012 4rd FarmPath meeting

WP5: the Handbook 1) >> multiple transitions require multiple response capacity from the regime >> sustainability requires stakeholder involvement reflecting on the scenario exercise 2) >> acknowledging differentiation: therefore the regional spreading typology of regions and agricultures mapping diversity 3) >> suggesting pathways what could support transition in one sense, in the different types of regions: institutional arrangements, policy design, local drivers September 2012 4rd FarmPath meeting