David E. Kandzari, MD on behalf of the BIONICS investigators

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
“Real World”: SVG, De Novo or Restenotic Coronary Artery Lesions Chronic Stable Angina, Silent Ischemia, Acute Coronary Syndromes Vessel Diameters:
Advertisements

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board1 Resolute in the DES era: Indications & Limitations Georgios I. Papaioannou, MD, MPH, FACC, FSCAI Athens Medical Center Cardiac.
Resolute all comers trial Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of the new generation ZES stent versus the everolimus eluting stent. Study:Multicenter,
ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 Randomized Trial Zotarolimus- vs. Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Lesions Julinda Mehilli,
2 Year Clinical Outcomes from the Pivotal RESOLUTE US Study Laura Mauri MD, MSc on behalf of the RESOLUTE US Investigators Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
1 of Presented by Gregg W. Stone, MD, ACC PROMUS Stent is a private-labeled Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System manufactured.
Endeavor Safety: Pooled Analysis of Early and Late Safety of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Laura Mauri, MD, MSc Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard Clinical.
Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Stable Coronary Disease: Results from the FAME.
CIT 2016 Template Title 40 pt Bold Arial David Liu, MD Subtitle 34 pt Arial Bold Italics.
Endeavor 4: A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus- Eluting Stent and a Paclitaxel- Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Martin B.
ISAR-CABG Objective To compare the efficacy of DES with BMS in a randomized trial powered for clinical events Sample 610 patients with de novo SVG lesions.
For OMA distribution only. © 2014 Medtronic, Inc. All rights reserved DOC_1A 03/14 Four-Year Outcomes Following Resolute Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent.
A Prospective, Randomized Trial of a Paclitaxel coated Balloon vs. uncoated Balloon Angioplasty in Patients with Drug- Eluting Stent Restenosis PEPCAD-DES.
Philippe Généreux, MD for the Tryton Bifurcation Trial Investigators Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation New York City.
Late Clinical Outcomes after Bioresorbable or Permanent Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents: 2-Year Results from the EVOLVE II Randomized Trial Dean J.
Final 5 year results from the all-comer COMPARE trial: a prospective randomized comparison between Xience-V and Taxus Liberté TCT 2013 San Francisco Pieter.
Durable Polymer DES: 5 Year Outcomes RESOLUTE Update Sigmund Silber, MD FESC, FACC, FAHA Heart Center at the Isar Munich, Germany On Behalf of the RESOLUTE.
Prof. Dr. Sigmund Silber, FESC, FACC On behalf of the RESOLUTE
Martin B. Leon, MD Key Messages Tryton Pivotal: Randomized Trial and
Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest
Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB III Trial 2-Year Results Stephen G. Ellis, MD,
Disclosures Runlin Gao has received a research grant
Clinical Trials and Outcomes with DES in CTO Revascularization
Runlin Gao, M.D. On behalf of ABSORB China Investigators
Updates From NOTION: The First All-Comer TAVR Trial
New Generation Resolute Integrity Drug-Eluting Stent Superior to Benchmark Xience Drug-Eluting Stent: Primary Endpoint Results from the PROPEL Study –
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
Two-year clinical outcomes in the EVOLVE FHU trial: A randomized evaluation of a novel bioabsorbable polymer-coated, everolimus-eluting stent Ian Meredith.
A Novel Abluminal Coated Sirolimus-Eluting Stent as a Treatment Option for Diabetic Patients: Results from an All-Comers Multi-center Study: the En-ABL.
MiStent SES® Program Technology and Clinical Data Update
Main Arena IV - Plenary Session XXVII: First Reports #4
12 Month Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Implanted with a Resolute Zotarolimus-eluting Stent: Initial Results from the RESOLUTE Global Clinical.
BRS Next Large Trials: What is on the Horizon?
Harmonized Assessment by Randomized Multicenter Study of OrbusNEich’s COMBO StEnt Japan-USA HARMONEE: Primary Report of A Randomized Trial of a Bioabsorbable.
ABSORB Japan: 3-year Clinical and Angiographic Results of a Randomized trial Evaluating the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs. Metallic Drug-eluting.
The Tryton Bifurcation Trial:
LONG-DES II Trial Randomized Comparison of the Efficacy of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Long Native Coronary.
On behalf of all principal COMPARE II investigators:
TAXUS IV Trial Slow-rate release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent compared with bare stent in patients with single de novo coronary lesions Presented.
DES Should be Used as the Default Stent in ACS!
TCT 2016, Washington convention center
OCT-Guided PCI What needs to be done to establish criteria?
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
On behalf of J. Belardi, M. Leon, L. Mauri,
TRANSCATHETER MITRAL VALVE IMPLANTATION FOR SEVERE MITRAL REGURGITATION: THE TENDYNE GLOBAL FEASIBILITY TRIAL 1 YEAR OUTCOMES David WM Muller, MBBS,
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
FINAL FIVE-YEAR CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF THE NOBORI2 TRIAL
Two-Year Extended Follow-up in Patients Receiving a Zotarolimus-eluting Stent in the E-Five Registry Martin T. Rothman, Ian T. Meredith, Keyur Parikh,
A Randomized, Prospective, Intercontinental Evaluation of a Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-eluting Stent: the CENTURY II Trial: an Update with 2 Years.
American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Stephan Windecker
REALITY: 8 month results
Kyoto University Hospital, Japan
3-Year Clinical Outcomes From the RESOLUTE US Study
ENDEAVOR IV: 5 Year Final Outcomes
Comparison of Everolimus- and Biolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds: 2-year Outcomes of the EVERBIO.
The American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Raimund Erbel
On behalf of all principal COMPARE II investigators:
ENDEAVOR II Five-Year Clinical Follow-up
FOR DISTRIBUTION BY MEDTRONIC OFFICE OF MEDICAL AFFAIRS ONLY.
12-month clinical and 13-month angiographic outcomes from a randomized trial evaluating the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs. metallic drug-eluting.
ENDEAVOR III Multicenter Randomized Trial Clinical/MACE Angio/IVUS
Updated 3-Year Meta-Analysis of the TAXUS Clinical Trials Safety and Efficacy Demonstrated in 3,445 Randomized Patients Time allocation for this talk.
Martin B. Leon, David R. Holmes, Dean J. Kereiakes, Jeffrey J
Long Term Clinical Results from the Endeavor Program: 5-Year Follow up
Maintenance of Long-Term Clinical Benefit with
ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions J. Mehilli, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum Technische.
Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: First Report of the Five-Year Clinical Outcomes from.
ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 Randomized Trial Zotarolimus- vs
The American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. A. Abazid
ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 Randomized Trial Zotarolimus- vs
Presentation transcript:

David E. Kandzari, MD on behalf of the BIONICS investigators BIONICS Trial BioNIR Ridaforolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System In Coronary Stenosis Trial David E. Kandzari, MD on behalf of the BIONICS investigators

Disclosure Within the past 12 months, I or my spouse/partner have had a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with the organization(s) listed below Affiliation/Financial Relationship Company Grant/Research Support Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Medtronic CardioVascular, Biotronik, St. Jude Medical/Thoratec, Ablative Solutions Consulting Fees/Honoraria Boston Scientific Corporation, Medtronic CardioVascular, Micell, St. Jude Medical Major Stock Shareholder/Equity None Royalty Income None Ownership/Founder None Intellectual Property Rights None Other Financial Benefit None

Medinol Ltd., Tel Aviv, Israel BioNIR System Flat manufacturing: Quality & cost efficiency Variable strut width/ frequency: Uniform dosing BioNIR - 80µm CoCr Wizecell design - Ridaforolimus high therapeutic index drug DES A DES B Elastomeric Polymer: Remains intact post elution Spring tip: Pushable & visible BioNIR DES A DES B Medinol Ltd., Tel Aviv, Israel

BioNIR Pharmacokinetics Drug Release Drug Deposition 99.6% 95.6% 100 80 60 86.8% Resolute Percent Cumulative Release Arterial Drug Concentration [ng/mg] 84.9% Xience V 40 BioNIR 77.61% BioNIR fit 20 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 Days Days Carter et al TCT 2006 Perkins et al J Interven Cardiol 2009;22:S28-S40 Yazdani et al J Invasive Cardiol 2013

NIREUS Primary Endpoint 6-month angiographic late loss, N=302 100 90 6 Month In-Stent Late Loss 80 BioNIR Resolute PNoninferiority 0.042 (0.306) 0.030 (0.308) <0.0001 70 BioNIR Resolute 60 Cumulative Percent 50 40 Data represented as mm, STD 30 20 10 -0.8 -0.7 -0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 In Stent Late Loss at 6 Months 6 Month Clinical Outcomes BioNIR Resolute P value TLF 1.5% (3/201) 3.0% (3/101) 0.39 CV Death 0.5% (1/201) 0.0% (0/101) 1.00 Target Vessel MI 1.0% (2/201) 0.23 Target Lesion Revascularization 1.6% (3/201) 1.0% (1/101) 0.68 5 Smits, P. EuroPCR, May 2016

BIONICS – Trial Design “More Comers” Population with Symptomatic CAD (eg, NSTEMI, CTO, SVG, MVD) BioNIR Stent N=958 76 Centers in NA, Europe, Israel FAS*:1919 patients randomized 1:1 Resolute Stent N=961 Noninferiority Design (Event rate 5.8%, Delta 3.3%, Power 90%) Primary Clinical Endpoint Follow Up 30d 6mo 12mo 13mo 2yr 3yr 4yr 5yr QCA & Imaging Endpoints Primary Endpoint: 12-month target lesion failure (TLF), composite of cardiac death, target vessel MI and ischemia driven TLR Secondary Endpoints: 12-month MACE, TVF and individual component endpoints Definite/probable stent thrombosis Procedural success *FAS= Full Analysis Set

Procedural Outcomes BioNIR N=958 patients, 1275 lesions Resolute p value Device Success 98.3% 99.5% 0.004 Lesion Success 99.9% 99.8% 1.00 Procedure Success 97.7% 97.3% 0.57 Device success: final in-stent residual QCA diameter stenosis of <50% using the assigned device only and without a device malfunction Lesion success: final in-stent residual QCA diameter stenosis of <50% using any percutaneous method Procedure success: final in-stent QCA diameter stenosis of <50% using the assigned device and/or with any adjunctive devices, without the occurrence of cardiac death, Q wave or non-Q wave MI, or repeat revascularization of the target lesion during the hospital stay

BIONICS – Primary Endpoint TLF at 12 months 10 pnoninferiority=0.0012 8 Difference=0% ( - , 1.8%) 6 5.3% 5.3% %TLF at 12 mo. 4 2 3.3 (ƍ) Favors BioNIR Favors Resolute BioNIR Resolute

BIONICS 12 mo Key Endpoint Results BioNIR N=958 Resolute N=961 Relative Risk P value Target Lesion Failure (TLF) 5.3% (49/926) 5.3%(49/930) 1.00 [0.68,1.48] 0.98 Cardiac Death 0.5% (5/926) 0.2% (2/930) 2.51 [0.49, 12.91] 0.29 TV-MI* 3.1% (29/926) 3.3% (31/930) 0.94 [0.57, 1.55] 0.81 ID-TLR 3.0% (28/926) 2.4% (22/930) 1.28 [0.74, 2.22] 0.38 Total Mortality 1.2% (11/931) 1.1% (10/936) 1.11[0.47,2.59] 0.82 * SCAI definition for periprocedural MI, Moussa et al. JACC 2013

BIONICS Stent Thrombosis BioNIR (N=958) Resolute (N=961) P value Stent Thrombosis   Definite/Probable 0.4% (4/921) 0.6% (6/927) 0.75 Definite 0.5% (5/926) 1.00 Any Stent Thrombosis 0.8% (7/928) 0.37 Timing of Event Acute ST 0.1% (1/920) 0.1% (1/926) Sub-Acute ST 0.3% (3/921) 0.3% (3/927) Late 0.0% (0/920) 0.25 12 Month DAPT Adherence: 75.1% BioNiR, 75.9% Resolute

Target Lesion Failure at 1 Year by Subgroups 12-Month TLF Rate n/N (%) Relative Risk [95% CI] P value BioNIR Resolute Overall 49/926 (5.3%) 49/930 (5.3%) 1.00 [0.68, 1.48] Medically Treated Diabetes Yes No 22/277 (7.9%) 27/649 (4.2%) 21/264 (7.9%) 28/666 (4.2%) 1.00 [0.56, 1.77] 0.99 [0.59, 1.66] 0.5 Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) ACS No ACS 18/380 (4.7%) 31/546 (5.7%) 19/363 (5.2%) 30/567 (5.3%) 0.91 [0.48, 1.70] 1.07 [0.66, 1.75] 0.39 Sex Male Female 39/725 (5.4%) 10/201 (5.0%) 40/762 (5.3%) 9/168 (5.4%) 1.03 [0.67, 1.57] 0.93 [0.39, 2.23] 0.46 Age >=65 Year <65 Year 33/433 (7.6%) 16/493 (3.3%) 27/441 (6.1%) 22/489 (4.2%) 1.24 [0.76, 2.03] 0.72 [0.38, 1.36] 0.19 Region North America Outside of N. Am. 22/420 (5.2%) 27/506 (5.3%) 25/402 (6.2%) 24/528 (4.6%) 0.84 [0.48, 1.47] 1.17 [0.69, 2.01] 0.28 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Favors BioNIR Favors Resolute Interaction p value: Gail-Simon test for qualitative interactions (interaction between the treatment and the subgroup variable)

BIONICS Conclusions In the present large-scale, ‘more comers’ trial, the BioNIR ridafirolimus-eluting stent was non- inferior to the Resolute stent for the primary endpoint of target lesion failure at 1 year, and resulted in low rates of target lesion revascularization and stent thrombosis These findings endorse the safety and efficacy of BioNIR in patients representative of real world clinical practice