2017. 06. 08 Jin-Sun Ryu.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Mre11 complex is required for ATM activation and the G 2 /M checkpoint Carson, C.T. et al The EMBO J (Vol. 22), 2003.
Advertisements

p53 Revealed character as a tumor suppressor gene in 1989.
BRCA1 The First Breast Cancer Gene Presentation By Liz Mosley.
Requirement of ATM-Dependent Monoubiquitylation of Histone H2B for Timely Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks.
1 H2AX: functional roles and potential applications.
BRCA2 Clark Cunningham March 26, 2015 BIOL445 American Cancer Society, eastcancer/make-a-pink-ribbon-lapel-pin,
1. p53 Structure, Function and Therapeutic Applications Provider: Dr.Davood Nourabadi(PhD,medical physiology) mdphysiology.persianblog.ir.
BRG-1 in Cancer BRG-1 is an ATPase subunit of the SWI/SNF class of chromatin remodeling complexes It has been found mutated in a number of cancer cell.
 Crosstalk between histone modifications during the DNA damage response ◦ Histone ◦ Histone modification ◦ DNA damage ◦ DNA damage response.
Audeh MW et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Clinical Science Symposium)
Tumor Suppressor Gene Involved in Breast and Ovarian Cancers SCIENCE96/gene.cgi?BRCA1.
Bmi-1 in Cancer Cancer genetics 2012/04/ 전종철
Tumor protein D52 represents a negative regulator of ATM protein levels Yuyan Chen, Alvin Kamili, Jayne R Hardy, Guy E Groblewski, Kum Kum Khanna, and.
* And-1 ; acidic nucleoplasmic DNA-binding protein 1
New players in the BRCA1-dependent
WOORI BAE.
JeeHeun Kim (AK).
DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Inhibitors as Cancer Therapeutics
Targeting signal transduction
Telomerase reverse transcriptase in the regulation of gene expression
Targeting the DNA Damage Response in Cancer
An Introduction to DNA Damage Repair in Cancer: Beyond PARP
BRCA1 Breast Cancer.
Concept 18.5: Cancer results from genetic changes that affect cell cycle control The gene regulation systems that go wrong during cancer are the very same.
Figure 2 Signalling pathways and physiological domains that are
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
ASF1a Promotes Non-homologous End Joining Repair by Facilitating Phosphorylation of MDC1 by ATM at Double-Strand Breaks  Kyung Yong Lee, Jun-Sub Im, Etsuko.
Chk1 and Chk2 kinases in checkpoint control and cancer
Figure 1 Putative anticancer mechanisms of action of PARP inhibitors
SMARCAD1 Phosphorylation and Ubiquitination Are Required for Resection during DNA Double-Strand Break Repair  Sharmistha Chakraborty, Raj K. Pandita,
Origin of Chromosomal Translocations in Lymphoid Cancer
FANCF methylation contributes to chemoselectivity in ovarian cancer
Richard C. Centore, Stephanie A. Yazinski, Alice Tse, Lee Zou 
Cancer and the Cell Cycle
Volume 137, Issue 2, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (January 2018)
RNA Processing and Genome Stability: Cause and Consequence
DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Inhibitors as Cancer Therapeutics
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages (April 2012)
Mechanisms of PARPi resistance in HR-deficient cells.
Graeme Hewitt, Viktor I. Korolchuk  Trends in Cell Biology 
SENP7 regulates chromatin decondensation required for HR repair.
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Cancer Susceptibility and the Functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2
Epigenetics modification
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
DNA DSB repair signaling pathways through the apical DDR kinases.
Andrew N. Blackford, Stephen P. Jackson  Molecular Cell 
Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 61, Issue 3, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 55, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Bacterial Interference of Ubiquitination and Deubiquitination
The DNA Damage Response: Making It Safe to Play with Knives
Graeme Hewitt, Viktor I. Korolchuk  Trends in Cell Biology 
Epigenome Maintenance in Response to DNA Damage
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Modes of p53 Regulation Cell
ATM function in repair of double-stranded DNA breaks.
Markus Löbrich, Penny Jeggo  Trends in Biochemical Sciences 
Ubiquitin pathway at sites of DNA double-strand breaks.
The effect of chronic mild hypoxia on
The DNA Damage Response: Making It Safe to Play with Knives
Tenets of PTEN Tumor Suppression
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (October 2015)
Successful targeting of ErbB2 receptors—is PTEN the key?
Models showing the effects of BRCA1 PARsylation on genome integrity control after DNA damage. Models showing the effects of BRCA1 PARsylation on genome.
PTEN and p53: Who will get the upper hand?
Volume 131, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Zuzana Tothova, D. Gary Gilliland  Cell Stem Cell 
NSD2-mediated methylation of PTEN at K349 dictates cellular sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. NSD2-mediated methylation of PTEN at K349 dictates cellular.
Presentation transcript:

2017. 06. 08 Jin-Sun Ryu

Introduction BRCA1 functions in a number of cellular pathways that maintain genomic stability including DNA damage-induced cell cycle checkpoint activation, DNA repair (HR), protein ubiquitination, chromatin remodelling, transcriptional regulation and apoptosis. [Her J et al., Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2016]  * RAP80 ; ubiquitin-interacting motifs (UIMs) [Yan J, Jetten AM., Cancer Lett. 2008]

RAP80 is important for BRCA1 recruitment to the DSBs and RAP80 depletion results in loss of BRCA1 focus formation, induces genomic instability and impairs HR. RAP80 fine tunes BRCA1 activity and prevents excessive HR by blocking DSB end resection. [Coleman KA, Greenberg RA., J Biol Chem. 2011]  * BRCA1-RAP80 → prevents excessive recruitment of the MRN/CtIP and formation of the BRCA1-CtIP-MRN complex → limiting end resection and maintaining an appropriate balance between HR DSB repair and NHEJ in S and G2 cell cycle phases [Kim H et al., Science. 2007]

DSB-induced BRCA1 focus formation is essential for proper BRCA1 function in DDR. To further study the regulation of BRCA1 focus formation, → performed a targeted shRNA library screen of the USP subfamily of deubiquitinases for their role in regulating BRCA1 focus formation.

Results 1. USP13 regulates RAP80-BRCA1 complex foci formation. DSB-induced BRCA1 focus formation is one of the key signatures for proper BRCA1 function in the DDR. → performed a targeted shRNA library screen of USP family of deubiquitinases for their role in regulating BRCA1 focus formation. USP13 is a deubiquitination enzyme that has been implicated in melanocyte development, hypoxia signalling, tumorigenesis and the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway. A previous publication reported that USP13 regulates PTEN (tumour suppressor).

To exclude the probable role of PTEN in the DDR, chose the PTEN-null BRCA1 WT ovarian cancer cell line EFO-27 as cell model. To confirm the role of USP13 in regulating BRCA1 focus formation, → generated USP13-null EFO-27 cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system and confirmed that knockout of USP13 reduces BRCA1 but not 53BP1 focus formation. Cisplatin

PARP inhibitor DSB induced by I-SceI

To evaluate the recruitment of USP13 and RAP80 at DSBs, → analysed the kinetics of GFP-USP13 and GFP-RAP80 accumulation on stripes after laser microirradiation. → suggesting USP13 is recruited earlier than RAP80. ∴ These results suggest that USP13 regulates the focus formation of the RAP80-BRCA1 complex. Since RAP80 recruits BRCA1 to DSBs through CCDC98, → hypothesized that RAP80 might be the target of USP13.

2. USP13 interacts with and deubiquitinates RAP80. Hypothesis ; RAP80 might be the target of USP13. To test hypothesis, first examined whether USP13 interacts with RAP80. Since USP13 is an ubiquitin-specific protease that functions to remove ubiquitin chains from its substrate proteins, → analysed the effect of USP13 expression on RAP80 ubiquitination (in vivo). * USP13 specific inhibitor, Spautin-1 * USP13- catalytically inactive (CA) mutant ∴ These results suggest that USP13 regulates RAP80 ubiquitination and foci formation through its deubiquitinase activity.

Next, performed an in vitro deubiquitination assay to further confirm that USP13 directly deubiquitinates RAP80. Ubiquitin ∴ Suggesting that USP13 deubiquitinates K63-linked ubiquitin chain of RAP80. Taken together, these results suggest that USP13 deubiquitinates RAP80 both in vitro and in vivo.

3. USP13 regulates DNA damage response through RAP80. RAP80-BRCA1 pathway plays an important role in DNA repair and DNA damage signal transduction. Therefore, tested whether USP13 is involved in DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoint, response to radiation and chemo sensitivity. DNA damage-induced G2/M checkpoint

→ suggesting that USP13 regulates DDR by targeting RAP80. To further confirm that USP13 regulated DDR through RAP80, → generated RAP80 knockout cells by CRISPR-cas9. DNA damage-induced G2/M checkpoint → suggesting that USP13 regulates DDR by targeting RAP80.

In addition, USP13 deficiency results in decreased HR. * USP13 inhibitor ; Spautin-1 → Taken together, these results suggest that USP13 regulates DDR through RAP80.

4. Deubiquitination of RAP80 by USP13 is important for DDR. USP13 is important for RAP80 recruitment to DSBs and DDR (Figs 1 and 3). Consistent with this, found that RAP80 ubiquitination decreases following DNA damage. → Suggesting that USP13 promotes RAP80 deubiquitination following DNA damage.

Together with results showing USP13 is important for DDR and RAP80 localization at the sites of DNA damage, → Hypothesized that RAP80 ubiquitination is inhibitory of its (RAP80) function, and deubiquitination of RAP80 by USP13 following DNA damage promotes RAP80 function in the DDR pathway. The UIM domains of RAP80 bind with polyubiquitin K63 linkage following DNA damage, which is critical for the recruitment of RAP80 to the DNA damage sites. Hypothesized that USP13 may regulate RAP80 binding with polyubiquitin K63-linkage following DNA damage through deubiquitinating RAP80. [Troy E. Messick and Roger A. Greenberg, J Cell Biol. 2009] → These results suggest that deubiquitination of RAP80 by USP13 following DNA damage facilitates the binding between RAP80 and K63- linked polyubiquitin chain.

(proteomics database → 15 candidate sites) Next, mapped potential ubiquitination sites of RAP80 that are targeted by USP13. (proteomics database → 15 candidate sites) 3KR Single deficiency ; no effect → These results suggest that K75, K90 and K112 of RAP80 are key deubiquitination sites targeted by USP13.

Next, further explored how RAP80 deubiquitination regulates its localization and function. Examined the focus formation of RAP80 using WT RAP80 and 3KR mutant. Rescue RAP80

RAP80 K63 linked Ub. chain Rescue → Taken together, these results demonstrated that ubiquitination of RAP80 around its UIM domain interferes with its interaction with polyubiquitin. Deubiquitination of RAP80 by USP13 plays an important role in the ability of RAP80 to bind (K63 linked) polyubiquitin, which is important for RAP80 recruitment and DDR.

5. USP13 is phosphorylated by ATM following DNA damage. USP13 deubiquitinates RAP80 following DNA damage, which in turn facilitates RAP80 recruitment to DSBs. However, how USP13 is regulated in response to DNA damage is unclear. → This result suggests that USP13 may be phosphorylated by ATM following DNA damage. SQ/TQ motifs, which are consensus ATM or ATR phosphorylation sites Ku55933 ; ATM inhibitor Next analysed the USP13 protein sequence and found three threonine sites fitting the ATM consensus phosphorylation motif (SQ/TQ motif): T196, T380 and T385. → further examined the phosphorylation of these candidate sites. To further confirm these results, generated site-specific antibody against p-Thr196 and examined the USP13 phosphorylation following DNA damage. ATM-proficient cells ATM-deficient cells → Suggesting ATM phosphorylates USP13 on T196 following DNA damage.

To further characterize the biological significance of USP13 phosphorylation, → stably expressed USP13 WT and T196A mutant in USP13-deficient cells. First, examined whether USP13 is recruited to the DSB site. → suggesting USP13 phosphorylation by ATM is important for RAP80 deubiquitination.

In addition, reconstitution of WT USP13, but not the T196A mutant, fully rescued the foci formation of the BRCA1-A complex, DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint in USP13-deficient cells and reversed hypersensitivity to cisplatin or olaparib induced by USP13 deficiency. → Together, these results suggest that USP13 phosphorylation by ATM is important for its recruitment to DSBs, DDR and chemo sensitivity.

Next, investigated how USP13 phosphorylation regulates its localization. → suggesting direct binding between USP13 p-T196 residue and the MDC1 FHA domain. USP13 ∴ USP13 phosphorylation by ATM is important for USP13 recruitment to DSB sites following DNA damage and proper DDR.

6. The role of USP13 in chemoresistance. Chemoresistance is one of main obstacles for cancer therapeutics. One of the major mechanisms that contributes to cancer chemoresistance is enhanced DDR. Since USP13 deubiquitinates RAP80 and regulates DDR, → next examined the role of USP13 in cancer. human ovarian epithelial cell line (HOSE) and ovarian carcinoma cell lines. Olaparib : PARP inhibitor, FDA-approved targeted therapy for cancer * USP13 inhibitor ; Spautin-1 sensitivity (USP13-low) (USP13-overexpression) resistant → These results suggest that USP13 may be a good therapeutic target for ovarian cancer with WT BRCA1. * USP13 knockout

<Xenograft model> Next, further confirmed the role of USP13 in response to chemotherapy in vivo. <Xenograft model> ∴ USP13 may be a causal factor and a therapeutic target of cancer cell response to chemotherapy.

Discussion USP13 plays an important role in DNA repair and one of the components of the BRCA1 complex, RAP80, is a target of USP13. In response to DNA damage, USP13 is phosphorylated by ATM, which in turn facilitates USP13 recruitment to DSBs, RAP80 deubiquitination, and triggers DDR signalling. Importantly, depleting or inhibiting USP13 sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin and Poly (ADPribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor (olaparib) suggesting USP13 is a potential novel therapeutic target for ovarian cancer. DSB Ub P ATM RNF168 P ATM Ub RNF8 /UBC13 MRN MRN RAP80 MRN MDC1 MDC1 53BP1 Me MDC1 P (1) P Me (no damage) P MRN MDC1 K63 Ub P Ub Me Me Ub USP13 (3) 53BP1 Ub 53BP1 Ub P RAP80 USP13 BRCA1 Ub Ub (2)