© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Campus Climate for UNC Charlotte Faculty Findings from the 1998, 2001, & 2004 UCLA HERI Faculty Surveys Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment Office of.
Advertisements

Work-Life Balance Methods in Clinical Cancer Research April 28.
York St John University Staff Survey Highlights 2010 David Evans Research Consultant October 2010.
HERI FACULTY SURVEY Surveys mailed through campus mail to all Full-Time faculty during the Spring 2005 semester A follow-up second mailing for non- respondents.
Employee Survey 2005 Results from employee survey run during Feb/March 2005.
and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1
Table 4. Age group distribution of enteropathogens
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of participants
Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education
Figure 3. Comparison of class performance
Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App
Table 1. A list of interview questions with lecturers
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
K. El Hassan, PhD. Director OIRA
Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value
Teachers Response (N= 11)
student achievement scores
Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group
Table 8. Unit Key Performance Indicators
Table 7. Clinical Practice
Table 3. Shared Governance
Table 3. Educational Qualification of Respondance
in the last evaluation of the software
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language
Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Significant (2- tailed)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Contrast equality of group means
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
Table 1. Rice yield in MT (Source-USDA, Foreign Agricultural Service)
Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Educational Attainment
Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )
Number of questionnaires sent out
Table 5. Organizational Procedures
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Training Programs in Management and Leadership
Behavioral strategies
Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
t-test for Equality of Means
chemistry that are involved in peer group
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment
Table 2. Sample items for measuring attitude towards e-learning
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant
Table 1. Sampled Size by Status and Qualification of Academic Staff
MASTERS DEGREE HOLDERS
Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 5. Response on Indicators for Emotion focused Coping Techniques
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Educational Attainment
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 3. Perception of Senior University academic staff on Quality of Work-Life in Universities of the SSGP Zone Item No Senior University Academic Staff perception on QWL ( N=347) Rating Decision (A) Professional Development 1 My job gives me opportunity to learn new things in my field through seminars, workshop etc. 3.15 Accepted 2 3.33 3 My university has resource centers, which serve as institutional support for professional development. 2.22 Not Accepted 4 I am generally treated with respect because of my academic qualifications. 2.78 5 My department places more emphasis on faculty development than professional development. 2.29 Overall rating of professional development 2.75 (B) Personal security &safety 6 There is a number of security agents in my university. 2.65 7 The security agents in my university enjoy high reputation. 2.31 Not accepted 8 The personal security of academic staff in my university is a priority of management. 2.23 9 I am discriminated against on the bases of gender. 1.92 Overall rating personal security & safety 2.27 ( C) Reward Opportunity 10 I am rewarded appropriately for my performance. 2.56 11 What I earn on my job is equitably. 2.44 12 It is easy for me to find a job in another University for approximately the same income. 2.76 Overall rating of reward opportunity 2.59 (D) Work place democracy 13 The perceived performance of my colleagues inspires me to greater heights. 2.91 14 I am sure that academic staff need a strong academic staff union to protect their interest. 3.24 Overall rating WPC 2.99 (E) Promotion opportunities 15 My department inspires the very best of me through promotion opportunities. 2.48 16 My promotion opportunity is such that I know that what I would be at anytime. Overall rating of promotion opportunity. (F) Academic Workload 17 The demands of my job often interfere with my family life. 2.77 18 My workload is mentally too heavy. 2.55 19 I often find my work stressful. 2.67 20 On the whole, I am satisfied working in my faculty. 0verall rating of Academic Workload. 2.74 Overall Mean Rating ( X or X) 2.68 Mamedu O. P. et al. Quality of Work-life and University Goal Attainment Perception by Academic Staff in the South-south Geo-political Zone of Nigeria. American Journal of Educational Research, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 20, 1323-1336. doi:10.12691/education-4-20-3 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.