Overview of TC Programme Cycle Management Framework (PCMF)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Cycle Management
Advertisements

Guidance Note on Joint Programming
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Secretariat of the Basel Convention (SBC) Enhancing cooperation between the Basel Convention and the Stockholm.
Technical Cooperation Programme Cycle Management Framework
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
Session V: Programme Roles and Responsibilities
EEN [Canada] Forum Shelley Borys Director, Evaluation September 30, 2010 Developing Evaluation Capacity.
EVALUATION IN THE GEF Juha Uitto Director
1 MBA PROJECT Nasir Afghan/Asad Ilyas. 2 Objective To enable MBA students to execute a client focused challenging assignment and to enhance.
IN YEAR MONITORING & BUDGET PREPARATION WORKSHOP PREPARED BY BUDGET OFFICE MAY
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Certificate IV in Project Management Course Structure Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
Tracking of GEF Portfolio: Monitoring and Evaluation of Results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Aaron Zazueta March 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam.
PPAR Workflow National Projects 1 Report request sent by PMO two weeks prior to the end of the reporting period, i.e. 15 June & 15 Dec. 2 CP can start.
PACIFIC AID EFFECTIVENESS PRINCIPLES. Purpose of Presentation Provide an overview of Pacific Principles on Aid Effectiveness Provide an overview of Pacific.
SESSION 3: FROM SETTING PRIORITIES TO PROGRAMMING FOR RESULTS.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AND COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Guidelines for the TC Project Design.
Certificate IV in Project Management Certificate IV in Project Management Course Structure Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
Aaron Zazueta Chief Evaluation Officer 2013 EVALUATION IN THE GEF.
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Project Management Learning Program 7-18 May 2012, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Writing Project Report Multi-Purpose Reporting.
Senior Evaluation Officer GEF Independent Evaluation Office Minsk, Belarus September 2015 Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Session 1: ACT – Project cycle
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Too l PREPARING FOR A TADAT ASSESSMENT.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
ACTED AME Appraisal, Monitoring and Evaluation. Summary 1/ ACTED AME department 2/ AME Responsibilities 3/ AME throughout project cycle 4/ Involvement.
Prinath Dias Former RCA Focal Person.  A little history  The policies behind the achievements  Some thoughts for the future.
Capacity Building in: GEO Strategic Plan 2016 – 2025 and Work Programme 2016 Andiswa Mlisa GEO Secretariat Workshop on Capacity Building and Developing.
Technical Cooperation Programme Cycle Management Framework “PCMF Member State Project Design Overview” – August 2016.
Work shop on Procurement Key-performance indicators with selected implementing entities Public procurement and property administration agency August 2016.
How to complete and submit a Final Report through
Implementation of RCA Projects
Alumanda Dela Rosa RCA MTS Working Group Chair
Solihull Review of Urgent Care Programme Approach And Governance 2013
Template Contents of the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS)
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Quality assurance in population and housing census SUDAN’s EXPERIANCE in QUALITY assurance of Censuses By salah El din. A . Magid OUR EXPERIANCE IN 5.
RCA Project on Establishing a Benchmark for Assessing the Radiological Impact of Nuclear Power Activities on the Marine Environment in the Asia and Pacific.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
GUIDELINES Evaluation of National Rural Networks
PROJECT MANUAL Galina Georgieva Project Officer
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Guidance notes for Project Manager
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
RRP6 Development Process
PARIS21 - League of Arab States
Monitoring and Evaluation using the
The Assessment of Results & Competencies (ARC) for RCs and UNCTs
Click Training Agreements Module
Roles of NLO, CP and RDC’s
FP7 SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS
Information session SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS Call FP7-ENV-2013-two-stage "Environment (including climate change)" Brussels 22/05/2013 José M. Jiménez.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Definition of Project and Project Cycle
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Task Force on Target Setting and Reporting TFTSR
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
GEF Project Cycle Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points
Radiation Safety Information Management System (RASIMS)
European Commission, DG Environment, Marine Unit
APEC Project Cycle Overview
Roles and Responsibilities
Click Training Safety Module
Mr. LONG Maoxiong CAEA, China 25 June. 2007
Presentation transcript:

Overview of TC Programme Cycle Management Framework (PCMF)

Programme Cycle Management Framework (PCMF) PCMF – What it is PCMF is an IT platform that provides transparent access to all parties involved in the development of the TC programme. PCMF – What it is not It does not replace the up stream work and corresponding identification of the project opportunities based on the national/regional development plan.

TC Programme Cycle Management PROGRAMME PLANNING & APPROVAL (PCMF Phases I & II) Formulating Strategies Planning/Concept identification Concept pre-qualification Prioritization Project design & formulation Resource & Budgeting Approval PROGRAMME REVIEW (PCMF Phase IV) Reviewing Results Plan & conduct review Assess Project/Programme Follow-up adjustments and implementation of recommendations PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION (PCMF Phase III) Monitoring, Assessing & Reporting Performance Operational execution Monitor progress Assess performance Make adjustments Report performance

Member State Roles NLO – National Liaison Officer. Reviews, comments on and approves all projects for the Member State they represent. Adds/Removes Counterparts (CPs) NLA – National Liaison Assistant. Can perform the same tasks as the NLO under the direction of the NLO NCR – National Coordinator for Regional Agreements. Designs and comments on regional projects in collaboration with PMO and TO. Adds/Removes CPs. CP – Project Counterpart. Designs both national and regional projects in collaboration with PMO and TO. RPM – Representative from Permanent Mission.

Major Roles within the Agency DIR-TC – Director Technical Cooperation. Approves all projects for their division in collaboration with the DIR-TD. SH-TC – Section Head Technical Cooperation. Comments and approves each project assigned to their section in collaboration with SH-TD. Adds/removes PMO. PMO – Programme Management Officer. Designs project in collaboration with TO and CP. Adds/removes project team members PPO – PACT Programme Officer. Design project in collaboration with PMO, TO and CP. Add/Remove project team members. PSS – Project Support Staff. Assists the project design team in the administration of the project design.

Major Roles within the Agency DIR-TD – Director Technical Division. Approves all projects for their division in collaboration with the DIR-TC SH-TD – Section Head Technical Division. Comments and approves each project assigned to their section in collaboration with SH-TC. Adds/removes TO FOA FP – Field of Activity Focal Point. Liaises between TC and TD in relation to allocation of projects to Fields of Activity. Adds/removes SH-TD and TO TO – Technical Officer. Designs projects in collaboration with PMO and CP

My Programme Note Key Features Submit Programme Note and Concepts Upload documents related to the project Email the Programme Note/Concept team Post discussion comments Download Feedback Note Transfer Concepts to Designs Transparent process

PCMF Programme Note Phase – Major Steps Programme Note Submission 2. Secretariat Review Return of Feedback Note Move of Concept to Design Phase Phase I

Programme Note: Submission Upstream work - concept identification NLO collects concepts NLO prepares Programme Note NLO selects concepts for submission Programme Note and Concepts submitted via PCMF website

Programme Note: Secretariat Review PMO makes initial review of each concept Each concept is passed to Tech Division for review Each concept review received PMO Final Review Safety review of all Member States concepts Consolidated Feedback Note prepared by PMO SH-TC and DIR-TC review Feedback Note DIR-TC sends Feedback Note to NLO

Programme Note: Feedback Note NLO receives Feedback Note Feedback Note provides guidance comments on overview comments on concepts input to decision making

Programme Note - Move to Design Phase Move to design performed by PMO in PCMF Withdrawal from further development performed by PMO in PCMF Lead counterpart identified at this stage Any additional team members added at this stage

Brief Overview of PCMF Programme Notes PHASE I

PCMF – Login 5/6/2009

PCMF – Cycles 5/6/2009

PCMF – Member State List 5/6/2009

PCMF – Programme Overview 5/6/2009

PCMF – Concept Action Required 5/6/2009

PCMF – Add Concept 5/6/2009

PCMF – Concept Budget 5/6/2009

PCMF – Edit Concept Budget Pop-up 5/6/2009

PCMF – Edit Overview (1/2) 5/6/2009

PCMF – Edit Overview (2/2) 5/6/2009

PCMF – How to Send to the IAEA 5/6/2009

PCMF – Workflow 5/6/2009

TC Programme Cycle Management PROGRAMME PLANNING & APPROVAL (PCMF Phases I & II) Formulating Strategies Planning/Concept identification Concept pre-qualification Prioritization Project design & formulation Resource & Budgeting Approval PROGRAMME REVIEW (PCMF Phase IV) Reviewing Results Plan & conduct review Assess Project/Programme Follow-up adjustments and implementation of recommendations PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION (PCMF Phase III) Monitoring, Assessing & Reporting Performance Operational execution Monitor progress Assess performance Make adjustments Report performance

Project Design Key Features Collaborative development of project design Transparent process Develop and extract LFM Develop and extract workplan Upload documents related to the project Email the project design team Post discussion comments

Major Steps in PCMF Project Design Phase Project / Programme Design 2. Secretariat Agreement 3. TACC/Board Approval Phase II

Project / Programme Design The initial project design is developed off-line using a word template provided Concept moved to the design phase by PMO & returned to MS by SH-TC Copy background details & the logical framework matrix (LFM) to PCMF Submit the design to the IAEA The project team reviews the design TC/TD review of the project design NLO reviews the package for the Member State The design goes to the Board of Governors for approval

Secretariat Agreement The project is approved by the team (CPs, NLO, TOs, PMO with support from NSRW and FPS) The project is approved by SH-TD, FOA FP, NS & SH-TC based on technical appraisal The project is then included in the thematic package for approval by DIR-TD The project becomes part of the national package to be approved by NLO DIR-TC clears Divisional programme

TACC/Board Approval The draft Programme of all Member State projects (new & ongoing) is available for the General Conference in September Adjustments can be made DDG-TC final clearance The final Programme is presented to the TACC and Board of Governors in November The approved Programme is initiated at the start of the following year

Brief Overview of PCMF Project Design PHASE II

Project Design Cycle Listing 5/6/2009

Member State Listing 5/6/2009

Programme Note Overview Listing 5/6/2009

Project Design Actions Required

Project Design Details 5/6/2009

Project Design: Background

Project Design: Edit Background

Elements of Project Plan Overall Objective contributing to Outcome to achieve an Plan Down Outputs to produce to carry out Activities Implement Up are provided Inputs

Logical Framework Matrix (LFM) Logical Framework Matrix: a 4x4 matrix like this Objective: Design Elements Narrative Indicators Means of Verification Assumptions Outcome   Outputs Activities Inputs

Logical Framework Approach (LFA) The matrix is designed based on the Logical Framework Approach that is the "temporal logic model" that runs through the matrix. This takes the form of a series of connected propositions: “If ………….., then………..”

Logical Framework Approach (LFA) If these inputs are available, and these assumptions hold, then these activities will be carried out; and If these activities are implemented, and these assumptions hold, then these outputs will be produced; after that If these outputs are produced, and these assumptions hold, then these outcomes will be achieved, and finally If these outcomes are achieved, and these assumptions hold, then this objective will be achieved!

Why LFA? A key advantage is that it creates a dialogue between the main project stakeholders, helping to clarify their roles during project implementation, in particular with regard to how they can ensure project sustainability and maximize results. This dialogue amongst stakeholders also establishes and expands ownership of the project.

Why LFA? Another critically important advantage is that applying the LFA clarifies the project objective and what the project can realistically achieve. Given a well-constructed logical framework, an informed skeptic and a project advocate should be able to agree on exactly what the project attempts to accomplish, and how likely it is to succeed.

Why LFA? This supports a better understanding of how the project will complement other projects with the same or similar objectives. Thus, the approach facilitates project formulation and lays the foundation for a successful project. A good project design will anticipate possible developments during the project implementation phase, and will thus contribute to smoother implementation.

Why LFA? Project Design Steps In accordance with LFA, the project is designed systematically, using a logical thinking process. It includes the following steps: Situation analysis Stakeholder analysis Problem analysis Objectives analysis Determination of the project scope and boundaries Design of the Logical Framework Matrix (LFM)

Work Plan Work planning The work plan is derived from the LFM. It clearly spells out: what is to be done when it is to be done who will do it what will it cost The work plan should provide the basis for developing terms of reference for contracting out certain activities, as well as the direction for implementation of project activities and the application of necessary resources.

Key Quality Criteria in TC Relevance – meets a real need, is safe Ownership – MSs institution exercises effective leadership Sustainability - the benefits after the completion of the project Effectiveness – outputs are produced, outcomes are achieved, there is a contribution towards the objectives Effectiveness - completed within budget and on time

Project Design LFM: Objective

Project Design LFM: Outcome

Project Design LFM: Output

Project Design LFM: Activity

Project Design LFM: Activity – add/edit

Project Design LFM: Input

Project Design LFM: Input Add/Edit

Project Design LFM: Assumptions

Project Design LFM: Indicators

Project Design: Related Documents & Discussion

Project Design: Navigation in Detail

Project Design: Team

Project Design: Generate LFM

Project Design: Generate Workplan (Text)

Project Design: View Status Map

Project Design: Workflow

TC Programme Cycle Management PROGRAMME PLANNING & APPROVAL (PCMF Phases I & II) Formulating Strategies Planning/Concept identification Concept pre-qualification Prioritization Project design & formulation Resource & Budgeting Approval PROGRAMME REVIEW (PCMF Phase IV) Reviewing Results Plan & conduct review Assess Project/Programme Follow-up adjustments and implementation of recommendations PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION (PCMF Phase III) Monitoring, Assessing & Reporting Performance Operational execution Monitor progress Assess performance Make adjustments Report performance

“My TCPRIDE” in PCMF Details all projects under implementation for all Member States Allows full details of HR and Procurement to be viewed on a per project basis View financial details for projects in summary Export information to Word, PDF and/or Excel Information transparent to all Member States

“My TCPRIDE” Search

“My TCPRIDE” Results

The old “TC PRIDE” website The website was migrated to the “My TC PRIDE” tab in PCMF

Periodic Reporting: PPAR (1/6)

Periodic Reporting: PPAR (2/6)

Periodic Reporting: PPAR (3/6)

Periodic Reporting: PPAR (4/6)

Periodic Reporting: PPAR (5/6)

Periodic Reporting: PPAR (6/6)

“My Project Management” Tab (1/4)

“My Project Management” Tab (2/4)

“My Project Management” Tab (3/4)

“My Project Management” Tab (4/4)

The Country Profile website The website will be migrated to the “My TC PRIDE” tab in PCMF

For specific questions / comments Email: PCMF.Contact-Point@iaea.org Thank You Website(s): http://www.iaea.org/technicalcooperation/ http://pcmf.iaea.org/ http://intouch.iaea.org/ http://tcpride.iaea.org/ For specific questions / comments Email: PCMF.Contact-Point@iaea.org