Deep Foundation Institute Bay Area Rapid Force Pulse Seminar

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STATNAMIC LOAD TESTING
Advertisements

JP Singh and Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., P.E. Gary Norris, Ph.D., P.E. March 2004 COMPUTER PROGRAM S-SHAFT FOR LATERALLY LOADED.
An-Najah National University
1 Application and Analysis of Helical Piers in Frozen Ground He Liu, Ph.D., P.E. Daniel Schubert, P.E. Hannele Zubeck, Ph.D., P.E. Sean Baginski.
USING THE RAPID LOAD TESTER TO PROVIDE PROJECT QUALITY CONTROL.
Prepared by J. P. Singh & Associates in association with
Konstantinos Agrafiotis
Experimental & Analytical Studies of Drilled Shaft Bridge Columns Sandrine P. Lermitte, PhD Student Jonathan P. Stewart, Assistant Professor John W. Wallace,
Foundations. Feature common to bridge and building structures Deep vs. shallow Safely transfer dead and live loads with acceptable levels of settlement.
Shake Table Testing of a Large Scale Two Span R-C Bridge Univ. of Washington *PI: Marc Eberhard Co-PI: Pedro Arduino Co-PI: Steven Kramer RA: Tyler Ranf.
Level (m-1 ) Level m h (1-c)h ch Rigid Beam x1x1 x k1k1 k2k2 knkn kHkH RC AND SRC SHEAR WALL MACRO-MODELING l Multiple Vertical Line.
AN INTRODUCTION TO MICROPILES CIVL 141 Spring 2011.
PILE FOUNDATION BY-.
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF DEEP FOUNDATION WEEK 9 FRICTION AND END BEARING PILES BEARING CAPACITY ANALYSIS OF PILES USING EMPIRICAL AND DYNAMIC FORMULAE.
Mousetrap Cars Unit 11.
Chapter 2b Foundations Shallow & Deep Foundations.
Liquefaction Analysis For a Single Piled Foundation By Dr. Lu Chihwei Moh and Associates, Inc. Date: 11/3/2003.
Reference Manual Chapter 9
Slop Stabilization Pertemuan
Static Pushover Analysis
TOPICS COVERED Building Configuration Response of Concrete Buildings
Raft & Piled-raft analysis (Soil-structure interaction analysis)
LIQUEFACTION FAILURE OF FOUNDATION - STRUCTURE COLLAPSE.
Bentley RM Bridge Seismic Design and Analysis
1 NEESR Project Meeting 22/02/2008 Modeling of Bridge Piers with Shear-Flexural Interaction and Bridge System Response Prof. Jian Zhang Shi-Yu Xu Prof.
Along-wind dynamic response
PAT328, Section 3, March 2001MAR120, Lecture 4, March 2001S14-1MAR120, Section 14, December 2001 SECTION 14 STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS.
AFT STATNAMIC Load Testing of High Capacity Marine Foundations
1 Foundations and retaining walls.
Response of MDOF structures to ground motion 1. If damping is well-behaving, or can be approximated using equivalent viscous damping, we can decouple.
Classical and Finite Difference Method to Estimate pile Capacity Compared With Pile Load Test Results Yogesh Prashar, P.E., GE Force Pulse Conference,
Foundation Loads Dead Load Live Load Wind Load
1 NONLINEAR ANALYSIS. 2 SOURCES OF NON LINEAR BEHAVIOUR non-linear supports contact stress tension/compression only links elastic foundation offset or.
BASICS OF DYNAMICS AND ASEISMIC DESIGN
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF DEEP FOUNDATION WEEK 10 DESIGN OF BORED PILE DESIGN OF GROUP AND RAKE PILE PILE SETTLEMENT.
Instrumentation Symposium 10/9/2010 Nigbor 1 Instrumentation Selection Strategies Robert Nigbor
PILE FOUNDATIONS UNIT IV.
BEARING PILES: H-PILE. BEARING PILES  Structural element, a post or pile, which transfers the weight of a foundation to soil that can support it.  Ideal.
GLE/CEE 330: Soil Mechanics Introduction to Foundation Engineering
Pile Foundation Reason for Piles Types of Piles
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-III (CE 434)
Basics of Earthquakes Frequency
General Formulation for Surface and Embedded Foundations (Gazetas,1991) FIGURE XXX (MIWA, 20XX) A number of investigations have been done after earthquakes.
AN OVERVIEW OF SHALLOW AND DEEP FOUNDATION SYSTEMS
MESB 374 System Modeling and Analysis Translational Mechanical System
Bassam A. Izzuddin* and Bassam A. Burgan†
Mechanical Measurements and Metrology
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurements
Chapter 4. Mechanical Testing: Tension Test and Other Basic Tests
The Study on High Efficiency and Low Vibration Flexure Bearing Stirling Cryocooler Chuanlin Yin1,2, Yao Gao1,2, Hao Yan1,2, Fei Wang1,2, Qing Hong1,2,
Bridge Pile Foundation Evaluation for a Soil Remediation Project
CHAPTER 2 - EXPLICIT TRANSIENT DYNAMIC ANALYSYS
Introduction to Structural Dynamics
CONDOMINIUM TOWER & PARKING
CFHT Pier Building Evaluation
Introduction We select materials for many components and applications by matching the properties of the material to the service condition required of the.
BRIDGES MOST IMPORTANT GEOTECHNICAL EFFECT- LIQUEFACTION
S S SUBMITTED BY:- CHARU BHARDWAJ civil engineering
Foundations.
I.I- Introduction i- Loading a- Types of dynamic loading Loading
Arch205 Materials and building construction 1 foundation
Christopher R. McGann, Ph.D. Student University of Washington
Arch205 building construction foundation
Assessment of Base-isolated CAP1400 Nuclear Island Design
Thoughts on (Efficient) Drilled Shaft Design
Earthquake resistant buildings
Pre-loaded micropiles at Credit Valley Hospital – …..Revisited
SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF MICROPILE SYSTEMS
Engineering Terms Engineers design all structures with enough strength to withstand the force and load that will be placed upon them. Generally loads are.
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION Foundation
Presentation transcript:

Lateral Statnamic Load Testing of Large Diameter Drilled Shafts and Piers Deep Foundation Institute Bay Area Rapid Force Pulse Seminar Don Robertson, P.E. – Applied Foundation Testing

Lateral Set-up Instrumentation Concept of Lateral Statnamic Analysis Results Lateral Statnamic Load Testing of Large Diameter Drilled Shafts and Piers

Lateral Statnamic Load Testing Key Points Capable of Loads Ranging From less than 100 kips to Over 3000 kips Relatively Easy Setup – No Reaction Pile Required Long load pulse width provides a good model of ship impact, earthquake, and other extreme event loads Analysis method provides excellent correlation with static response Has been done simultaneously with liquefied soils Very flexible - Has been used on single drilled shafts, single piles, piers founded on pile groups, piers founded on drilled shafts, auger cast-in-place piles, and ship hull testing

Lateral Statnamic Setup Hemispherical Bearing LVDTs Reference Beam H Accelerometers Lateral Sled Strain Gages Foundation Downhole Accelerometers

Lateral Statnamic Setup Same Concept and Theory as Axial Reaction masses on sled (friction is used to stop sled) Hemispherical bearing between shaft and piston to transfer load without restraining the test rotation and to reduce eccentricity

Lateral Statnamic Setup

Instrumentation Load Cell Strain Gages LVDT opposite load point on ref. beam Accelerometer on ref. beam Accelerometers on shaft opp. Load point to measure lateral acceleration String of 8 Downhole accelerometers in inclinometer casing embedded in shaft or foundation element 2,000 samples/sec recorded for 3+ sec. (longer duration to measure any shaft oscillations)

Instrumentation

Instrumentation

Instrumentation

Instrumentation

Analysis…Lateral Double integration of Accel. and direct measurement of displacement from LVDT Measure Statnamic lateral load with Load Cell Back calculate LPILE model for design from initial soil parameters and adjusted to match observed load/deflection and deflection/depth response of shaft, pile or pier

Analysis…Lateral Model Shaft using single degree of freedom, model includes Non-linear static spring resistance Inertia of the shaft rotating about a hinge pt. Viscous Damping FStatnamic=Finertia+Fdamping+FStatic Finertia = inertial resistance from effective mass of foundation, includes some passive earth pressure wedge of surrounding soil Fdamping=effective viscous damping resistance Fstatic=effective static soil resistance

Results From Lateral Load Test

Results…Lateral Load Test Four Cycles of increasing load applied to shaft

Results…Lateral Load Test LVDT and integrated accelerometer data similar

Results…Lateral Load Test Effective mass in calculations only top 16’, shaft yielded in bending about 9 feet below grade

Results…Lateral Load Test Gage at 75’, clipped in tension, likely much higher

Results…Lateral Load Test Soil criteria used to model test condition in LPILE

Results…Lateral Load Test LPILE model yields much earlier than observed, conservative Otherwise model captures shaft behavior well within general range

Results of Load Test Program Use of Statnamic load testing results by the designers allow the reduction of significant amounts of the drilled shaft quantities for this project: 952 lf of drilled shaft excavation 634 Cubic yards of concrete Total project savings on the order of $230,000.00 Future projects will benefit from these test results Reduced quantities allowed for more efficient equipment setup during production drilled shaft installation (shorter holes = smaller equipment)

Results…Lateral Load Test Four Cycles of increasing load applied to shaft

Results…Lateral Load Test Top of shaft displacement

Results…Lateral Load Test Downhole acceleration and displacement

Results…Lateral Load Test Peak displacement for four load cycles

Results…Lateral Load Test Strain measurements for four load cycles

Results…Lateral Load Test Peak strain measurements for four load cycles

Results…Lateral Load Test Initial shaft stiffness

Results…Lateral Load Test

Results…Lateral Load Test

Results…Lateral Load Test

Results…Lateral Load Test

Questions???

Applied Foundation Testing www.testpile.com