CARBON LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS OF BIOENERGY CROPS PLANTED IN THE MARGINAL SITES IN LOWER MISSISSIPPI ALLUVIAL VALLEY K.C. Dipesh1, Michael.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Session 1. Gather practical experience gained with the cultivation of traditional bioenergy crops in the Mediterranean with respect to their environmental.
Advertisements

Effects of Land Use Change on Forest Carbon Budgets Throughout the Southern USA from 1900 to 2050 Peter B. Woodbury Crop and Soil Sciences Department,
Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Opportunities for Growing, Utilizing & Marketing Bio-Fuel Pellets Roger Samson REAP-CANADA Resource Efficient Agricultural Production-Canada Box 125, Ste.
Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Accumulation of Rhizoma Perennial Peanut and Bahiagrass Grown under Elevated CO 2 and Temperature Leon H. Allen, ARS-FL.
A Potentially Valuable Component of Texas Bioenergy Projects
Don Scott Director of Sustainability National Biodiesel Board Biodiesel Liquid Solar Energy.
Morteza Mozaffari Soil Testing and Research Laboratory, Marianna Efforts to Improve N Use Efficiency of Corn in Arkansas Highlights of Research in Progress.
Bioenergy Crops: the Good, the Bad & the Ugly Alternative Agricultural Enterprises for the Treasure Coast October 19, 2011 Tim Gaver, Extension Agent –
Carbon Offsets – Agriculture & Forestry Neil Sampson June 25, 2004.
Environmental Sustainability of Biofuel Crops Bill Chism David Widawsky Office of Policy, Economics and Innovation.
Opportunities to Increase Carbon Sequestration Through Forestry Richard A. Birdsey USDA Forest Service Global Change Research Program Senate Agriculture.
Session 1. Gather practical experience gained with the cultivation of traditional bioenergy crops in the Mediterranean with respect to their environmental.
Fertilizing potatoes with biofuel byproducts Amber Moore, Ph.D University of Idaho Twin Falls Research and Extension Center.
Carbon sequestration in reclaimed soils Andrew Trlica, Sally Brown U. of Washington, College of Forest Resources INTRODUCTION: World soils contain more.
The Value of Native Ecosystems
Managing for Forest Carbon Storage. Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change.
EFFECT OF HARVEST REMOVAL ON PRODUCTIVITY OF A 15-YEAR-OLD DOUGLAS-FIR PLANTATION. by Dale W. Cole and Jana E. Compton University of Washington and Harvard.
Comparative Regional Economic Advantages for Cellulosic Feedstocks for Bioenergy Production. Burton C. English.
The Nitrogen Requirement and Use Efficiency of Sweet Sorghum Produced in Central Oklahoma. D. Brian Arnall, Chad B. Godsey, Danielle Bellmer, Ray Huhnke.
Programme for Enterprise Competitiveness Example of an Intervention: The Thai Palm Oil Sub Sector Thai-German Programme for Enterprise Competitiveness.
Residue Biomass Removal and Potential Impact on Production and Environmental Quality Mahdi Al-Kaisi, Associate Professor Jose Guzman, Research Assistant.
Integrating Forages into Multi-Functional Landscapes: Enhanced Soil Health and Ecosystem Service Opportunities Douglas L. Karlen USDA-ARS Presented at.
The Economics of Feedstocks - Calculating Your Cost of Producing Energy Crops and Crop Residues Madhu Khanna and Nick Paulson University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Sustainability Overview Laura McCann, on behalf of Alison Goss Eng U.S. Department of Energy Office of Biomass Program February 23, 2010.
Pennsylvania Biomass Energy Opportunities. Co-firing Biomass with Coal The opportunity to burn biomass with coal to produce electricity is better in PA.
Terrestrial Carbon Sequestration: Baselines, Supply Curves, Monitoring and Pilot Projects John Kadyszewski Winrock International September 30, 2003 West.
Putting the Hopes and Fears of Climate Change Legislation in Perspective _________________________________________ Sustainable Agriculture: The Key to.
NexSteppe Vision Be a leading provider of scalable, reliable and sustainable feedstock solutions for the biofuels, biopower and biobased product industries.
IntroductionIntroduction Land-use change or intensification can influence the dynamics and storage of soil organic matter (SOM) and the extent of carbon.
Surface Cover and Biomass in No-tillage Cropping Systems as Affected by Crop Rotation, Winter Cover Crop, and Winter Weeds Forbes Walker 1, Nick Ryan 1,
With the rise of the energy crisis, much attention is being paid to biofuel crop. Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) is one of the prospective plants for cellulosic.
InVEST Tier 1 Carbon Model. In the Tier 1 model we estimate carbon stock as a function of land use / land cover. Storage indicates the mass of carbon.
Coppice Short-Rotation Woody Crops Production Systems Introduction Advantages of Using Woody Crops for Bioenergy Energy Conversion of Woody Biomass Provide.
A Review of Forest Carbon Sequestration Cost Studies Q: What is Carbon Sequestration? A: Capture and Storage of Carbon in Sinks Terrestrial (forest, agriculture)
Carbon Sequestration in Farm and Forest Ecosystems Sarah Hines April 2009
Acknowledgements: This research was supported by the USDA-ARS Specific Cooperative Agreement Biologically Based Weed Management for Organic Farming Systems.
CARBON SEQUESTRATION BY HYBRID POPLARS IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST Dr. Jon D. Johnson Hybrid Poplar Research Program Washington State University - Puyallup.
1 Expert workshop on components of EEA Ecosystem Capital Accounts (ECA) Focus on biomass carbon and biodiversity data 24/03/2015.
Background Deriving fuel from biological sources is an idea that has become popular as fossil fuel supplies are diminished, atmospheric carbon dioxide.
Inventory Approaches to Forest Baselines: MAV Bottomland Hardwoods Case Study James E. Smith and Linda S. Heath Northeastern Research Station Durham, NH.
Bioenergy: Where We Are and Where We Should Be Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Chad M. Hellwinckel.
University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna Department of Applied Plant Sciences and Plant Biotechnology Universität für Bodenkultur.
Photo: David Brazier/IWMI Photo :Tom van Cakenberghe/IWMI Photo: David Brazier/IWMI Water for a food-secure world W. Mekuria, A. Noble, C.T.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Cover Crop Influences on Organic Grain Crop Production Emily Bruner, Laura Harris, Larry Grabau, Greg.
Life Cycle GHG Emission and Energy Consumption for Production of Biodiesel Using Catalyst from Crude Palm Oil and Curde Jatropha Curcas Oil in Indonesia.
Wood ash, the residue remaining from the combustion of bark, sawdust and yard waste for energy generation for forestry product operations, is an effective.
Biomass and Bioenergy Approaches to Assessing Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential Carly Green 20 November 2003IEA Bioenergy Task 38 National Meeting -
Logistical Efficiency with Dedicated Energy Crops
AAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Samuel I. Haruna. 1,2 , and Nsalambi V
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Pyrolysis of Bioenergy Crops Grown on Reclaimed Mining Land in
Carlo Chimento, Stefano Amaducci
Aboveground biomass C and N Belowground biomass C and N
Carbon Cycling in Perennial Biofuel Management Systems
Topsoil Depth at the Centralia Site
1Dept. of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, AL
Fig 1: Nitrogen fertilizer application at V7.
Management and Life Cycle Assessment of Bioenergy Crop Production
Tradeoffs Between Soil Carbon Sequestration and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Grazed Pastures of Northeastern US Organic Dairy Farms Alexandra Contosta1,
C. Kallenbach1. , W. Horwath1, Z. Kabir1, J. Mitchell2, D
Mississippi Feedstocks Research Dept. of Plant and Soil Science
Which forest type sequesters higher carbon in biomass – Pinus roxburghii or Quercus glauca Aditya Acharya School of forest sciences, UEF
By: Paul A. Pellissier, Scott V. Ollinger, Lucie C. Lepine
Bioenergy feedstocks at the Kellogg Biological Station
Mississippi Feedstocks Research Dept. of Plant and Soil Science
Global Forest Carbon Budget (tons of C/y)
Don O’Connor NBB Sustainability Workshop September 27, 2018
Presentation transcript:

CARBON LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS OF BIOENERGY CROPS PLANTED IN THE MARGINAL SITES IN LOWER MISSISSIPPI ALLUVIAL VALLEY K.C. Dipesh1, Michael A. Blazier1, Hal O. Liechty2, Matthew H. Pelkki2, Montgomery W. Alison1 1Louisiana State University AgCenter, 2Arkansas Forest Resources Center ABSTRACT The Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley (LMAV) region of the southern US may be developed as an agricultural industry because of its long growing seasons and well-developed infrastructures. Short-rotation woody crops (SRWCs) and perennial grasses are high biomass yielding bioenergy crops and could be better-suited for the marginal sites of LMAV region than conventional agricultural crops as crop production on such sites is chronically sub-optimal. With increased production and carbon sequestration in biomass and soils, bioenergy crops may provide landowners with additional income along with ecological benefits. It is, however, important to better understand how conversion of these marginal soils for bioenergy crop production affects carbon pools. We planted eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bartr), ‘Alamo’ switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) and soybean-sorghum (Glycine max – Sorghum bicolor) rotation in Arkansas and Louisiana in 2009 to quantify total carbon sequestration and emissions associated with each of the production systems. We carried out ‘cradle-to-grave’ life cycle analysis (LCA) approach in which we evaluated and quantified a complete carbon inventory for every field activity, total biomass (aboveground and belowground) produced, and soil in each production system from the start to the end of crop harvest in 2014. We found that soybean-sorghum produced largest biomass carbon. Overall, soybean-sorghum rotation cropping required more carbon release to the atmosphere, followed by cottonwood. We also found total soil carbon (top 30 cm) was higher in the end than at the beginning in Pine Tree and Rohwer, but not in Archibald. Data Total input data and output carbon data were recorded for the LCA analysis (Fig. 3). We recorded machine types, their engine horsepower, and their operation hours from the establishment phase to the end of the study in 2014. These data were used to estimate total carbon emitted during management. Total carbon emitted during the production of seeds/cuttings and fertilizers/herbicides were also taken into account based on previous studies. Oven-dried biomass of the crops were estimated each year of harvest except for cottonwood, whose aboveground biomass was estimated using the height and diameter at breast height at the end of the study. Belowground biomass and litterfall at the end of the study were also taken into account to estimate total biomass production. Samples of the representative crops were taken to the lab for carbon analysis. We used carbon percentage and biomass measurements to estimate total carbon sequestered by the crops. Change in soil carbon (top 30 cm) during the study period from the sites was also calculated from the soil samples taken in the beginning and at the end of the study. The Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley (LMAV) in the South Central United States provides and opportunity to explore the potential of bioenergy crops due to its longer growing seasons and well-developed agricultural industry. Growing the bioenergy crops may also increase carbon sequestration in biomass, accumulate carbon in soils, and with adequate markets, provide additional income to landowners. In 2009, we established a study at three locations to evaluate the potential of cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bartr.) , switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), and soybean-sorghum (Glycine max – Sorghum bicolor) rotation on the marginal lands of the LMAV. A component of the study involves carbon life cycle analysis (LCA) in which we quantified total carbon emitted and sequestered during the conversion of these marginal soils to bioenergy crop plantations. Here, we present the preliminary findings of our study. INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES RESULTS Fig 4. Graph showing total carbon released from different sources during crop establishment and total carbon sequestered by the crops by the end of the study period (AR = Archibald, PT = Pine Tree, and RO = Rohwer) Soil carbon 2009 and 2013 (Mg/ha) Study sites The study was established in 2009 and includes 2 study sites in Arkansas (Pine Tree and Rohwer) and 1 in Louisiana (Archibald) along the LMAV (Fig. 1). Each block consists of three treatments: 1) cottonwood (Fig. 2a) , 2) switchgrass (Fig. 2b), and 3) conventional soybean-grain sorghum rotation (Fig. 2c). Cottonwood cuttings were planted at a density of 4495 per ha-1 in 2009. Seeds of ‘Alamo’ switchgrass were drilled in the soil at 11.2 kg ha-1 in 2009 with replanting in 2010 where needed. The row crop plots consist of soybean plantation in 2009, 2011, 2012, and 2014, and sorghum in 2010 and 2013. Soybean seeds were planted at 61 kg ha-1 in whereas sorghum seeds were planted at 7 kg ha-1. METHODS SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF LCA STUDY Product I -Biomass (+) Establishment stage -Site preparation (-) -Plantation & seeding (-) Mid-stage -Competition control (-) -Fertilzation (-) Harvesting stage -Biomass harvesting (-) Pre-establishment stage -Seed production (-) -Cutting preparation (-) Post-harvesting stage -Transportation to the facility (-) Product II -Litterfall (+) Product III -Change in soil C (+/-) Inputs - Gasoline, diesel, lubricants (-) -electricity (-)   Outputs Fig 5. Graph showing total soil carbon at the beginning and at the end of the study period (AR = Archibald, PT = Pine Tree, and RO = Rohwer). We would like to express sincere gratitude to Agriculture and Food Research Initiative of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Grant No. 2011-67010-20078. We would also like to thank USDA Sustainable Agriculture and Research and Education program, Sun Grant, Arkansas Forest Resource Center, and Louisiana State University Agricultural Center. ACKNOWLEDGMENT Crops from all sites showed gain in net carbon at the end of the study except switchgrass in Rohwer (Fig. 4). Switchgrass cultivation was not a success in Rohwer for the first three years, and was harvestable in 2013 and 2014 only. However, switchgrass had the highest carbon sequestration at Pine Tree, where soil conditions for switchgrass were better unlike Archibald (ponding problems) and Rohwer (Sharkey clay-shrinking and swelling problems). Overall, soybean+sorghum sequestered more carbon than the others. The soil conditions did not seem to affect soybean+sorghum as they did to other crops. Soil carbon in the top 30 cm depth at the end of the study was higher at the end of the study than at the beginning except Archibald (Fig. 5), probably because Archibald was being used as a pasture for 5 years prior to the study. We are also analyzing plant and soil respiration data along with soil nitrogen data. We will soon be estimating the carbon emission while converting the crop biomass to biofuel in our lab. These data will be used with our current findings for a complete carbon LCA study. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Fig. 1. Study sites. Fig. 2. Study site representing cottonwood (a), switchgrass (b), and soybean-sorghum (c). a b c Fig 3. System boundary along with variables considered for the study. The -ve signs indicate carbon loss while +ve sign indicates carbon gain.