Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid Research Exchange Meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization on Yield and Quality of Bell Peppers Michelle Le Strange, UCCE Farm Advisor, Tulare & Kings Counties and Marita Cantwell,
Advertisements

2005 Irrigation Demonstration Results Ark Valley Research Center Hanagan Farms Proctor Farms.
Bryan Wilkins. In South Alabama we generally get enough rain in June and July to size our pecans. We don’t get enough steady rainfall during the critical.
Morteza Mozaffari Soil Testing and Research Laboratory, Marianna Efforts to Improve N Use Efficiency of Corn in Arkansas Highlights of Research in Progress.
Introduction Cotton producers throughout Tennessee must battle glyphosate-resistant (GR) weeds. The most problematic of these is Palmer amaranth, also.
Evaluation of Various Insecticide Regimes in Sweetpotato Production for Sugarcane Beetle Control in the Mid-South Larry Adams 1, Randall Luttrell 1 and.
Yield, Protein, and Quality Response to Planting Date, Variety, and Late N. B.D. Brown. University of Idaho. Introduction Higher market prices for the.
Integrated Crop Pest Management Montana Small Grain Guide.
Insecticidal Control of Caterpillar Pests of Cole Crops Alton N. Sparks, Jr. and David G. Riley, University of Georgia, Tifton, Georgia INTRODUCTION Cole.
Cruising Approaches  Area Based Methods  Tree Based Methods.
Comparison of Active Optical Sensors
2012: Weed Management and Crop Injury when Intercropping Melons and Cotton Traditionally, spring planted melon crops in southern Georgia are harvested.
Three Year Evaluation of High Populations of Reniform Nematode On Yield and Quality of Sweet Potatoes in the Mississippi Delta Larry Adams and Craig Abel.
Soybean Aphids in Iowa – Past and Present Marlin E. Rice Extension Entomologist Iowa State University.
The Effects of Topdressing Organic Nitrogen on Hard Red Winter Wheat - Year 2 Name: Erica Cummings Date: March 15, 2012 Title: Crops and Soils Technician.
BELT 4 SC (FLUBENDIAMIDE): A NEW INSECTICIDE FOR CONTROL OF HELIOTHINES IN CONVENTIONAL COTTON – 2006 Jarrod T. Hardke 1, Gus M. Lorenz 1, B.R. Leonard.
SEED PADDY PRODUCTION PROGRAME OF SRI LANKA. Why paddy seed is important Plant healthy and vigorous depend on seed quality. Directly influence to the.
HERBACEOUS WEEED CONTROL IN FIRST – YEAR LOBLOLLY PINE PLANTATIONS USING OUST XP, OUST EXTRA, OUSTAR, MATRIX, AND STEADFAST A. W. Ezell, J. L. Yeiser,
UTILIZATION OF CROP SENSORS TO DETECT COTTON GROWTH AND N NUTRITION
Insecticide Application Method and Chemistry Evaluation for Sweetpotato Production in the Mississippi Delta Larry C. Adams and Randall G. Luttrell USDA-ARS,
Insecticidal Control of Aphids, Impact on Lady Beetles and Yield Response Brant Baugh 1 and David Kerns 2 1 Texas AgriLife Extension Service, Lubbock Co.,
Development of Vegetation Indices as Economic Thresholds for Control of Defoliating Insects of Soybean James BoardVijay MakaRandy PriceDina KnightMatthew.
Calibrating Your Field Sprayer
Objectives To evaluate the effects of two simulated drift rates of 2,4-D on non-tolerant cotton at various stages of development. 1 Chandler P. Rowe, 1.
Open Discussion “Stink Bug Movement, Sampling, Damage and Controls – What We Have Learned in Recent Years” 2006 GA PAC/ACAA Annual Meeting Dothan, Al February.
1 Texas Liquid Fertilizer Corn TLF Commitment to you Increase yields Lower Costs Help solve those production problems that limit profitability.
LATE SEASON N APPLICATIONS FOR IRRIGATED HARD RED WHEAT PROTEIN ENHANCEMENT. S.E. Petrie*, Oregon State Univ, B.D. Brown, Univ. of Idaho. Introduction.
Calibration of your Field Sprayers using Shortcut Methods
©2005 copyright, FMC Corporation. FMC confidential. Carbine TM 50WG (flonicamid) 2006 Field Efficacy Results Craig Heim Henry R. Mitchell Yemel Ortega.
Insecticide Efficacy of Foliar Applications for Tarnished Plant Bug and Other Key Insect Pests of Cotton in the Mississippi Delta Dr. James Robbins Delta.
Best Management Practices by Barney Bernstein and Dr. Ron Heiniger - NCSU Smithfield recommended hybrids based on Mid-Atlantic OVT data Smithfield.
Phosphorus Fertilization Reduced Hessian Fly Infestation of Spring Wheat S. E. Petrie and K. E. Rhinhart Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon.
Blinka, E., J. Bacheler, P. Roberts, J. Greene, M. Toews, D. Mott,
Environmental Variables and Observed Field Differences in Aphid Population Change Across Geographic Locations John Gordy, Michael Brewer Texas A&M University.
Irrigation Method Impacts on Peanut Pod Yield. S. Leininger 1, L. J
Scott D. Stewart (project leader)
Conservation Tillage in Cotton: A Mississippi Delta Perspective
Tobacco Insect Management 2016 Update
SCA Sampling Protocol Results: 2016
Influences of Planting Population on Sugarcane Aphid (Melanaphis sacchari) in Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) Brittany Lipsey Mississippi State University.
Sugarcane aphid in California- adding flavor to fodder
Whitney D. Crow, Angus Catchot, Jeff Gore,
Leads: David Kerns and Gus Lorenz
RR Cotton Tolerance to Glyphosate and Managing Difficult to Control Weeds A. Stanley Culpepper.
2017 Corn and Sorghum Insect Update
Tracking sugarcane aphid infestations using myFields.info in 2016
Manuel Campos and Don Henne
Grain Sorghum/Sugarcane Aphid Insecticide Seed Treatment Test
Question 6: Sorghum IPM System for SCA Management
Brown Stink Bug Insecticide Trials
Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid Research Exchange Meeting
Jeff Gore Mississippi State University Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid
My Summer with Bunge Katie Schlake.
Research & Development and Product Development Update
Economics of Soybean Maturity Groups’ Yield Response to Insecticides Seed Treatments with Early Planting 1Normie Buehring, 2Angus Catchot, 3Don Cook, and.
2010 High Plains Crop Update
Sensors and Fertility Management
A number of hemipteran pests have the ability to directly
What Is Up with Soybean Yields?
Lodging immediately after July 4, 2007 storm.
Kristopher Giles Oklahoma State University Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid
2300 (11PM) September 21 Blue line is meridian..
Ryan Gilreath Louisiana State University Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid
PRAB Dry Bean Research Priorities Meeting 2.19
Untreated Weed-Free Check
Optimizing Revenue Through Defoliation Timing
Influence of Adjuvants on Leafspot Disease Management
PEANUT RESPONSE TO MULTIPLE SIMULATED OFF-TARGET
Sorghum Feedstock Performance Tests:
2015 January February March April May June July August September
Presentation transcript:

Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid Research Exchange Meeting Key Question #2: How can harvest aids be used in combination with the industry standards, Transform and Sivanto, when applied at a 14 d PHI? Robert Bowling Texas A&M University Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid Research Exchange Meeting Dallas, TX January 3 – 4, 2017

Collaborators Name Affiliation Trial Location Plant Date Spray Nick Seiter University of Arkansas Monticello, AR 4/25/16 7/29/16 Jeff Gore Mississippi State University Stoneville, MS 5/12/16 9/18/16 Francis Reay-Jones Clemson University Florence, SC 5/25/2016 Robert Bowling Texas A&M University Corpus Christi, TX 3/15/16 7/21/16

Introduction Sugarcane aphid on sorghum leaves during application of harvest aids frequently move to sorghum head SCA activity on sorghum heads may result in honeydew accumulations and present harvest issues/grain loss/harvest delays Key question: How can harvest aids be used in combination with the industry standards, Transform and Sivanto, when applied at a 14 d PHI?)

Materials & Methods University research farms or grower fields Randomized complete block design or as replicated strips Data Collected Number SCA on upper and lower leaves Number of aphids/head Timing: 3, 7, 10, and 14 days after application Rate grain heads for presence and severity of honeydew Light: honeydew is present and easily visible in parts of the head, but no sooty mold and few cast skins Moderate: honeydew is present throughout the head, with cast skins and sooty mold in patches Heavy: all or most of the head is covered with honeydew, sooty mold, and cast skins Make observations on amount of grain lost (kernels on the ground) and collect data if appropriate.

Materials & Methods

Nick Seiter University of Arkansas

Nick Seiter University of Arkansas

Nick Seiter University of Arkansas

Nick Seiter University of Arkansas

Nick Seiter University of Arkansas

Jeff Gore Mississippi State University

Jeff Gore Mississippi State University

Jeff Gore Mississippi State University

Jeff Gore Mississippi State University

Key Learnings SCA is a frustrating research subject! Rapid movement by SCA following NaClO3 application/rapid plant desiccation? SCA did move to head when RU used as defoliant or no harvest aid applied Aphids were successfully controlled and movement to the head was minimized when insecticide applied (Sivanto or Transform)

Next Steps What is the threshold for sugarcane aphids at hard dough/maturity?

Discussion Written Management suggestions (possibly a short publication) needed to help sorghum producers manage late-season SCA on sorghum. Is there value in a Harvest Aid Management document? What information should be included (i.e. insecticide rates, SCA populations worthy of a late-season/harvest aid tank mix, PHI’s are obvious, other info)? Can this document be a single offering for all sorghum production regions or should it be region specific?

Discussion Is there value in a Harvest Aid Management document? What information should be included (i.e. insecticide rates, SCA populations worthy of a late-season/harvest aid tank mix, PHI’s are obvious, other info)? Can this document be a single offering for all sorghum production regions or should it be region specific?

Extra Slides Monticello, AR trial design Randomized complete block, 4 replicate blocks arranged in columns, plots 4 rows x 40 feet with 2 rows unsprayed border Variety AgVenture AV7R21 planted 25 April (90,000 seeds per acre, 38-inch row spacing) Treatments applied 15 August using self-propelled Mudmaster multi-boom sprayer 10 plants per plot with colonies of aphids on the flag leaves were marked with flagging tape prior to treatment Marked plants in plots were sampled 19 Aug., 22 Aug., 25 Aug, 29 Aug. Harvested 29 August

Robert Bowling Texas A&M University Upper Leaf - F4,12 = 0.86 P = 0.5160 Lower Leaf – F4,12 = 1.04 P = 0.4270

Robert Bowling Texas A&M University Upper Leaf - F4,12 = 1.75 P = 0.5160 Lower Leaf – F4,12 = 0.76 P = 0.5737

Robert Bowling Texas A&M University Upper Leaf - F4,12 = 0.62 P = 0.6589 Lower Leaf – F4,12 = 1.52 P = 0.2590

Extra Slides Corpus Christi, TX trial design Randomized complete block, 4 replicate blocks arranged in columns, plots 4 rows x 40 feet with center 2 rows sprayed Variety Pioneer 84P80 planted 10 March (55,000 seeds per acre, 30-inch row spacing) Treatments applied 24 August using hand-held CO2 sprayer TT 11015 nozzle tips 10 plants per plot with colonies of aphids on plants were marked with flagging tape prior to treatment Marked plants in plots were sampled 23 June, 27 June, and 1 July. Plot area was not harvested because aphids never moved to head.