How to Combine Antiplatelet Therapy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Antiplatelet Therapy in the Catheterization Laboratory
Advertisements

Invasive Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes – the PLATelet Inhibition and patient Outcomes trial Outcomes in.
Recent ACS: STEMI, NSTEMI, UA Stabilized 1-7 Days Post-Index Event Exclusions: increased bleeding risk, warfarin use, ICH, prior stroke if on ASA + thienopyridine.
Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Acute Coronary Syndromes and Diabetes Chapter 26 Jean-Claude Tardif, Phillipe L. L’Allier, David.
Proton Pump Inhibitor Use is Likely a Marker for, Rather than a Cause of, a Higher Risk of Cardiovascular Events: Insights from PLATO Shaun G. Goodman,
Novel antithrombotic agents in acute coronary syndromes: better or worse than P2Y12 inhibitors Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai Sapienza Università di Roma
Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai Division of Cardiology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Luigi Oltrona Visconti Divisione di Cardiologia IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico S. Matteo Pavia Sindromi coronariche acute nei pazienti con fibrillazione.
TRial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet InhibitioN with Prasugrel TRITON-TIMI 38 TRITON-TIMI 38 Elliott M. Antman, MD.
Prasugrel Compared to Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing PCI with Stenting: the TRITON - TIMI 38 Stent Analysis Stephen D.
Anti-Xa Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events in Addition to Standard Therapy in Subjects with Acute Coronary Syndrome - Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction.
ACS is a major public health challenge In the US:  Over 1.5 million people experience ACS annually 1 In the EU:  ACS is the most common cause of death,
Clopidogrel in ACS: Overview Investigator, TIMI Study Group Associate Physician, Cardiovascular Division, BWH Assistant Professor of Medicine, Harvard.
The Landscape of Oral Antiplatelet Agents 2009 George D. Dangas, MD, PhD, FSCAI, FACC Associate Professor of Medicine Columbia University Medical Center.
Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel for Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients Managed without Revascularization — the TRILOGY ACS trial On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS.
Robert F. Storey Senior Lecturer and Honorary Consultant in Cardiology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK Stent thrombosis Future directions.
Dr Robert F. Storey Senior Lecturer and Honorary Consultant in Cardiology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield UK Managing bleeding post PCI.
What’s New in Acute Coronary Syndromes? Claudia Bucci BScPhm, PharmD Clinical Coordinator, Cardiovascular Diseases Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre 13.
John H. Alexander, MD, MHS Associate Professor of Medicine Director, Cardiovascular Research Duke Clinical Research Institute Duke Medicine Update on antithrombotics.
Managing Patients Who Cannot Take Anticoagulants Kenneth W. Mahaffey, MD, FACC Professor of Medicine, Cardiology Faculty Associate Director, DCRI Director,
Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction Benjamin M. Scirica, MD, MPH On behalf of the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 Steering.
Naotsugu Oyama, MD, PhD, MBA A Trial of PLATelet inhibition and Patient Outcomes.
The Risk of CV Events for Patients Treated with Clopidogrel or Prasugrel in Combination with a Proton Pump Inhibitor Results from the TRITON-TIMI 38 Trial.
The Safety and Tolerability of Atopaxar (E5555) in the Treatment of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: The LANCELOT-ACS Trial Michelle O’Donoghue.
Dominick J. Angiolillo, MD, PhD, FACC, FESC Director of Cardiovascular Research Assistant Professor of Medicine Update on Novel Antiplatelet Agents Under.
Pocket Guide to Anticoagulation in AF & Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in ACS Rumi Jaumdally 2015 This brief presentation will summarise the recently published.
Anti-Xa Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events in Addition to Standard Therapy in Subjects with Acute Coronary Syndrome – Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction.
Hypothesis: baseline risk status of the patients and proximity to a recent cardiovascular event influence the response to dual anti-platelet therapy. Patients.
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
TRITON TIMI-38 STEMI cohort Clopidogrel Under Fire: Is Prasugrel in Primary PCI or Recent MI Superior? Insights From TRITON-TIMI-38 Gilles Montalescot,
Gregg W. Stone MD for the ACUITY Investigators A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Bivalirudin in Acute Coronary Syndromes Final One-Year Results from the.
Challenges with Drug Administration Optimal Loading Dose and Delivery of P2Y12 Inhibitors: Should the Loading Dose Be Crushed? Dominick J. Angiolillo,
수요저널 우종신. ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update 2011 Class I 1. After PCI, use of aspirin should be continued indefinitely. (Level of Evidence.
AHA 2011 Late Breaking Trials Synthesis and Critical Review.
The Big Antiplatelet Debate: Why I Prefer Ticagrelor Over Prasugrel
CHU TIMONE, Marseille, FR
How will PIONEER-AF change our practice?
Stent Thrombosis and Optimal Duration of DAPT
Dominick J. Angiolillo, MD, PhD, FACC, FESC, FSCAI
Polypharmacy Anticoagulation: AF meets PCI
8th Platelet Colloquium dddd8th Platelet Colloquium
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
NOACs for ACS: Is there a Role?
Matthew J. Price MD Director, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory,
SOCRATES Trial design: Patients with acute ischemic stroke were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either ticagrelor 180 mg load + 90 mg BID or aspirin.
Sinai Center for Thrombosis Research Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.
Poly Pharmacy Anticoagulation: OAC + DAPT
Which Antiplatelet Therapy for PCI?
The GRAVITAS trial Matthew J. Price MD, FACC, FSCAI
ARCTIC-INTERRUPTION 2-year- Versus 1year Duration of Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy After DES implantation The randomized ARCTIC-Interruption Study JP Collet.
The EUROMAX trial is supported by The Medicines Company
Platelet Function Testing: Which one Should we Perform and
on behalf of the RE-DUAL PCI Steering Committee and Investigators
The Big Antiplatelet Debate Why I Prefer Prasugrel Over Ticagrelor
We Should Tailor Antiplatelet Therapy Based on Platelet Function Testing and Genotyping Paul A. Gurbel Sinai Center for Thrombosis Research Baltimore,
The ANTARCTIC investigators
Learning Objectives. Learning Objectives Variable Response to Clopidogrel.
Oral Anticoagulation and Preventing Stent Thrombosis
Antithrombotic Therapy in AF patients undergoing PCI
Figure 3 Ischaemic outcomes in the ST-segment elevation myocardial
NOACS: Emerging data in ACS/IHD
Would you recommend extending DAPT >1 year post-MI?
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
Why I Prefer Ticagrelor
August 30, 2009 at CET. Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes – the PLATO trial.
What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose?
Apixaban vs VKA and Aspirin vs Placebo in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and ACS/PCI: The AUGUSTUS Trial Renato D. Lopes, MD, PhD on behalf of the.
Efficacy and Safety of Fondaparinux in Elderly Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Data From the OASIS 6 Trial Ron J.G. Peters,
Presentation transcript:

How to Combine Antiplatelet Therapy with Oral Factor Xa Inhibitor in ACS Dominick J. Angiolillo, MD, PhD, FACC, FESC, FSCAI Director of Cardiovascular Research Associate Professor of Medicine University of Florida College of Medicine - Jacksonville

Dominick J. Angiolillo, MD, PhD Honoraria/Lectures: Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi-Aventis, Eli Lilly Co, Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Advisory Board: Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi-Aventis, Eli Lilly Co, Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., The Medicines Company, Portola Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Accumetrics, Medicure, Merck, Evolva Research Grants: GlaxoSmithKline, Otsuka, Accumetrics, Eli Lilly Co, Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., The Medicines Company, Portola Pharmaceuticals, Schering-Plough, Astra Zeneca, Johnson&Johnson, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi-Aventis

Presenter Disclosure Information Name: Dominick J Angiolillo Within the past 12 months, the presenter or their spouse/partner have had a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with the organization listed below. Honoraria/Lectures: Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi-Aventis, Eli Lilly Co, Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Advisory Board: Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi-Aventis, Eli Lilly Co, Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., The Medicines Company, Portola Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Accumetrics, Medicure, Merck, Evolva Research Grants: GlaxoSmithKline, Otsuka, Accumetrics, Eli Lilly Co, Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., The Medicines Company, Portola Pharmaceuticals, Schering-Plough, Astra Zeneca, Johnson&Johnson, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi-Aventis

Plasma Clotting cascade Thrombus Formation Two key elements: cellular (platelets) and plasmatic (coagulation factors) Platelet activation Platelet aggregation ADP Collagen THROMBUS TXA2 Thrombin Fibrinogen Fibrin Plasma Clotting cascade Tissue Factor Prothrombin

Thrombin Generation in ACS 300 250 200 150 100 50 400 600 800 1200 1000 Time (seconds) Thrombin (nM) Control Acute Coronary Syndromes n=28 Coronary Artery Disease n=25 Adapted from Brummel-Ziedins K, et al. J Thromb Haem 2008;6:104–110

The Role of Thrombin in Coagulation and Platelet Activation Platelet Aggregation Platelet Tissue Factor IIb/IIIa IXa + + Fibrinogen VII Ca ++ IIb/IIIa + X PAR - 1,3,4 Platelet VIII Ia Ib Receptor activation Collagen Vessel Wall Rivaroxaban Factor Xa Inhibitor PAR-1 Xa Platelet Adhesion Prothrombin THROMBIN Fibrinogen Fibrin Formation Coughlin SR, Nature 2000;407:258-264; Perzborn E et al. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10(1):61-75

ATLAS ACS-TIMI 46 Phase 2 Dose-Finding Study 4 Doses with QD and BID Formulations N=3,491 Placebo 6 HR 0.69 (95% CI, 0.50 – 0.96) P = 0.03 5.5% 4 3.9% Death, MI, or Stroke (%) Rivaroxaban (combined) TIMI Major Bleeding (%) 2 4 QD BID Large N 30 60 90 120 150 180 Placebo 5 mg 10 mg 15 mg 20 mg Rivaroxaban Days In Addition to Aspirin and Thienopyridine (Stratum 2) Mega JL, Braunwald E, Mohanavelu S, Burton P, Poulter R, Misselwitz F, Hricak V, Barnathan ES, Bordes P, Witkowski A, Markov V, Oppenheimer L, Gibson CM, Lancet 2009

Low BID Doses: Death, MI, or Stroke Results in pooled 2.5 mg BID and 5 mg BID doses Background: ASA Alone Background: ASA + Thieno 5% 15% HR 0.54 (0.27-1.08) HR 0.55 (0.27-1.11) PLACEBO 11.9% 12% P=0.08 4% P=0.09 PLACEBO 3.8% 3% 9% RIVA 6.6% RIVA 2.0% 6% 2% 3% 1% 0% 0% 90 180 90 180 Days Days Gibson CM, AHA 2009

Trial Design TIMI 51 2.5 mg BID Rivaroxaban 5.0 mg BID Placebo G02-536 w_script.ppt 1/30/2018 2:34:04 AM ATLAS ACS 2 Trial Design TIMI 51 Recent ACS: STEMI, NSTEMI, UA Stabilized 1-7 Days Post-Index Event Exclusions: increased bleeding risk, warfarin use, ICH, prior stroke or TIA if on ASA + thienopyridine N=15,526 ASA 75 to 100 mg/day Stratified by Thienopyridine Use at MD Discretion Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg BID Rivaroxaban 5.0 mg BID Placebo ¼. ½ PRIMARY ENDPOINTS: EFFICACY: CV Death, MI, Stroke (Ischemic, Hemorrhagic, or Uncertain Origin) SAFETY: TIMI major bleeding not associated with CABG 9

Primary Efficacy Endpoint: CVD, MI, or Stroke ATLAS ACS 2 Primary Efficacy Endpoint: CVD, MI, or Stroke TIMI 51 2 Yr KM Estimate Placebo 10.7% 8.9% HR 0.84 (0.74-0.96) mITT p = 0.008 ITT p = 0.002 ARR 1.8% NNT = 56 Estimated Cumulative Incidence (%) Rivaroxaban (both doses) Months After Randomization Mega JL, Braunwald E, Wiviott SD, Bassand JP, Bhatt DL, Bode C, Burton P, Cohen M, Cook-Bruns N, Fox KA, Goto S, Murphy SA, Plotnikov AN, Schneider D, Sun X, Verheugt FW, Gibson CM, NEJM 2012 10

Components of the Endpoint ATLAS ACS 2 Components of the Endpoint TIMI 51 Myocardial Infarction Cardiovascular Death Placebo Placebo HR 0.85 mITT p=0.047 ITT P=0.011 2 Yr KM HR 0.80 mITT p=0.038 ITT p=0.053 2 Yr KM 6.6% 4.1% 5.5% 3.3% Estimated Cumulative incidence (%) Estimated Cumulative incidence (%) Rivaroxaban (both doses) Rivaroxaban (both doses) 12 24 12 24 Months Months Mega JL, Braunwald E, Wiviott SD, Bassand JP, Bhatt DL, Bode C, Burton P, Cohen M, Cook-Bruns N, Fox KA, Goto S, Murphy SA, Plotnikov AN, Schneider D, Sun X, Verheugt FW, Gibson CM, NEJM 2012

Efficacy Endpoints: Very Low Dose 2.5 mg BID ATLAS ACS 2 Efficacy Endpoints: Very Low Dose 2.5 mg BID TIMI 51 CV Death / MI / Stroke Cardiovascular Death All Cause Death 5% 5% 12% HR 0.84 mITT p=0.020 ITT p=0.007 Placebo HR 0.66 mITT p=0.002 ITT p=0.005 Placebo HR 0.68 mITT p=0.002 ITT p=0.004 Placebo 10.7% 4.1% 4.5% 9.1% 2.7% 2.9% Estimated Cumulative incidence (%) Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg BID Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg BID Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg BID NNT = 63 NNT = 71 NNT = 63 12 12 24 24 12 24 Months Months Months Mega JL, Braunwald E, Wiviott SD, Bassand JP, Bhatt DL, Bode C, Burton P, Cohen M, Cook-Bruns N, Fox KA, Goto S, Murphy SA, Plotnikov AN, Schneider D, Sun X, Verheugt FW, Gibson CM, NEJM 2012 12

TIMI STENT THROMBOSIS* 51 2.9% Placebo 2.3% HR 0.69 (0.51- 0.93) ATLAS ACS 2 STENT THROMBOSIS* ARC Definite, Probable, Possible TIMI 51 2 Yr KM Estimate 2.9% Placebo 2.3% Estimated Cumulative incidence (%) HR 0.69 (0.51- 0.93) mITT p = 0.016 ITT p = 0.008 Rivaroxaban (both doses) ARC Definite/probable: HR=0.65, mITT p=0.017, ITT p=0.012 Months After Randomization * End point events are as adjudicated by the CEC across thienopyridine use strata Two year Kaplan-Meier estimates, HR and 95% confidence interval estimates from Cox model stratified by thienopyridine use are provided per mITT approach; Stratified log-rank p-values are provided for both mITT and ITT approaches; Rivaroxaban=Pooled Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg BID and 5 mg BID.

TIMI Stent Thrombosis 51 2 yr KM rates HR (95% CI) Riva Placebo ATLAS ACS 2 Stent Thrombosis TIMI 51 2 yr KM rates HR (95% CI) Riva Placebo 0.65 (0.46 - 0.93) mITT p=0.017 ITT p=0.012 Definite/Probable 1.5% 1.9% 0.69 (0.51 - 0.93) mITT p=0.016 ITT p=0.008 Definite/Probable/Possible 2.3% 2.9% HR 0.5 1.0 2.0 Favors Rivaroxaban Favors Placebo Gibson CM, TCT 2012

Rivaroxaban ASA + clopidogrel Stent Thrombosis 79% 86% 98% Thrombus mass (mg) *** *** *** Abstract: Effects of rivaroxaban, ASA and clopidogrel alone and in combination in a porcine model of stent thrombosis Authors: Eva Maria Becker, Elisabeth Perzborn, Alexandra Klipp, Caroline Luecker, Ulf Bütehorn, Raimund Kast, Volker Laux, Cardiovascular Research, Bayer Schering Pharma, Wuppertal – Germany Purpose: Stent thrombosis incidence with standard dual antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and clopidogrel, remains at 1.4% after stent placement for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). New oral anticoagulants are in late stage clinical studies for secondary prevention after acute coronary syndrome and may be beneficial for prevention of stent thrombosis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of rivaroxaban, a novel oral Factor Xa inhibitor, alone and in combination with ASA and clopidogrel in inhibiting high-shear induced stent thrombosis in a porcine ex vivo model. Methods: Stents (Cordis) (12 stents, 3 per treatment) were continuously deployed in a porcine ex vivo arteriovenous shunt and exposed to flowing arterial blood at a shear rate of 1,500 s-1. Stent thrombus formation was analysed under different treatments: vehicle (n=7); rivaroxaban 0.11, 0.33 and 1.1 μg/kg/h i.v (n=8); rivaroxaban + ASA (1 mg/kg i.v.) (n=6); rivaroxaban + ASA (1 mg/kg i.v.) + clopidogrel (0.5 mg/kg i.v.) (n=7); and ASA (1 mg/kg i.v.) + clopidogrel (0.5 mg/kg i.v.). Thrombus weight is displayed as mean ± SEM. Results: Rivaroxaban alone dose-dependently reduced stent thrombus by 33, 48 and 66%, respectively. Dual antiplatelet therapy with ASA + clopidogrel decreased thrombus weight by 79%. Rivaroxaban in combination with ASA was similar or even more effective in inhibiting stent thrombosis (48, 72 and 86%). Finally, the combination of rivaroxaban with ASA + clopidogrel inhibited stent thrombus formation under these experimental conditions to a nearly undetectable limit of 98%. Conclusions: Rivaroxaban, alone or in combination with antiplatelets, effectively inhibits stent thrombosis in an ex vivo model. These data provide additional support for further clinical studies. Vehicle control ASA + clopidogrel Rivaroxaban + ASA Rivaroxaban ASA + clopidogrel n=7 n=6 n=6 n=7 Rivaroxaban dose: 1 µg/kg/min. Error bars are the standard error of the mean. ***P<0.001 (unpaired t-test vs representative vehicle group). Becker, et al. Eur Heart J (2010) 31 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq290 Porcine Model 15

Safety Endpoints TIMI 51 Placebo Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg BID 5 mg BID ATLAS ACS 2 Safety Endpoints TIMI 51 Placebo Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg BID 5 mg BID Non-CABG TIMI Major 0.6% 1.8% (P<0.001) 2.4% ICH 0.2% 0.4% (P=0.04) 0.7% (P=0.005) Fatal 0.1% (P=NS) Fatal ICH 2-yr KM event rates Mega JL, Braunwald E, Wiviott SD, Bassand JP, Bhatt DL, Bode C, Burton P, Cohen M, Cook-Bruns N, Fox KA, Goto S, Murphy SA, Plotnikov AN, Schneider D, Sun X, Verheugt FW, Gibson CM, NEJM 2012

The Role of Thrombin in Coagulation and Platelet Activation Platelet Aggregation Platelet Tissue Factor IIb/IIIa IXa + + Fibrinogen VII Ca ++ IIb/IIIa + X PAR - 1,3,4 Platelet VIII Ia Ib Receptor activation Collagen Vessel Wall Apixaban Factor Xa Inhibitor PAR-1 Xa Platelet Adhesion Prothrombin THROMBIN Fibrinogen Fibrin Formation Coughlin SR, Nature 2000;407:258-264; Perzborn E et al. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10(1):61-75

APPRAISE-2 Primary Efficacy Outcome N=7,392 Considerations: Dosing APPRAISE 2 and ARISTOTLE used the same dose Dose not tested in the APPRAISE 1 Patient Population Very high risk (vs APPRAISE 1 and other studies) Possibly competing risks not modified by an anticoagulant Stroke and TIA patients (No: HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.74-1.06) n/N: 7.5% apixaban vs 7.9% placebo Alexander JH et al. N Engl J Med 2011. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105819

Antithrombotic Therapies CV Endpoints Prasugrel Aspirin + TRITON TIMI 38 COMPARATOR Ticagrelor Aspirin + PLATO Aspirin Clopidogrel Standard Dose + Rivaroxaban (Very Low Dose 2.5 mg BID)* ATLAS ACS 2 TIMI 51 Aspirin + Clopidogrel Standard Dose Antithrombotic Therapy Emp not Riva, P, and T Cross trial challenge, timing * Not approved for ACS in US

Targeting Antithrombotic Therapies High risk of ischemic events High risk of bleeding events Target Antithrombotic Therapy Ischemic risk Bleeding risk Adapted from Ferreiro, Sibbing, and Angiolillo. Thromb Haemost 2010;103(6):1128-35.