Content Knowledge of Elementary Pre-service Teachers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kindergarten Instructional Shifts-Focus. Why Common Core? Initiated by the National Governors Association (NGA) and Council of Chief State School Officers.
Advertisements

CCSS Mathematics Instructional Shifts 2 nd Grade Overview.
Office of Academics & Accountability
The International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme Rockville High School.
MARCH 2012 Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Implications for Grades K-12.
Technology Integration and the Common Core Linda Jones, Coordinator/Instructor, The Eighth Floor Technology and Learning Center.
Developmental Education Rosemary M. Karr, Ph.D. Collin County Community College January 24, 2008.
ESTEEMS (ESTablishing Excellence in Education of Mathematics and Science) Project Overview and Evaluation Dr. Deborah H. Cook, Director, NJ SSI MSP Regional.
Weber State University Teacher Preparation Program Levels, Field Experiences, and Assessments.
College and Career Readiness Mathematics at Middle School Poway Unified School District 2014.
K–8 Session 3: Exploring the Domain Progressions in Grades K–8 Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
The SAT ® What Does It Mean for Students?. 2 The SAT Focuses on College Success ™ Skills Critical Reading Mathematics Writing The SAT ® tests students’
Ryann Kramer EDU Prof. R. Moroney Summer 2010.
Common Core State Standards CCSS What Parents & Board Members Need to Know.
1 North Dakota Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Grades K-12 Adopted June 2011 Effective July 1, 2013 “After July 1, 2013, all public school districts.
Joanna O. Masingila Dana Olanoff Dennis Kwaka.  Grew out of 2010 AMTE symposium session about preparing instructors to teach mathematics content courses.
College-Ready Determination Policy and Performance Level Descriptors July
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Dr. Mary Ariail Georgia State University Teacher Education in the United States Mary Ariail, Ph.D. Department of Middle and Secondary Education College.
TOTOM 2014 WOU EMIL PROGRAM wou.edu/EMIL Cheryl Beaver, Math Laurie Burton, Math Rachel Harrington, Education.
Slide 1 PLAN shows your strengths and weaknesses in English, mathematics, reading, and science. PLAN lets you know if you’re on target for college and.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Standards For Teacher Preparation. What do you see in the previous slide? Students who are ready to answer the question? Students who are listening and.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of Numbers and Operations Fraction Standards via a Set.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
PHELPS LUCK ELEMENTARY GIFTED & TALENTED EDUCATION PROGRAM.
The Common Core State Standards Initiative Alisa Chapman, University of North Carolina October 24, 2013.
Angilee M. Downing, M.Ed. Vision: Educational Excellence For All Students.
November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
The MCEA Math Minor at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee DeAnn Huinker Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Mathematical Preparation for.
MMP Design Teams Reform efforts in elementary and secondary mathematical teacher preparation UMM Department of Mathematics UMM Department of Mathematics.
Mathematics Teachers Grade 8 October 10, 2013 Joy Donlin and Tony Lobascher.
Using Common Core State Standards of Seventh Grade Mathematics in the Application of NXT LEGO® Robotics for CReSIS Middle School Students.
High School Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
Charting a Course for the Future: A Wisconsin Perspective Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Department of Mathematical Sciences MSP STEM Summit.
Welcome to the SCMP 2 Grades 3-5 Fall Content Day.
Understanding by Design, UbD - based on work by McTighe and Wiggins.
The Life of a Co-Requisite Model at a Two-Year Technical College A project of the Texas State Technical College Waco Math Department funded by the Texas.
Summary of Assessments By the Big Island Team: (Sherry, Alan, John, Bess) CCSS SBAC PARCC AP CCSSO.
Mathematics Instruction In the Age of Common Core State Standards.
DATA ANALYSIS Looking at Student Work November 2013.
Using the Standards for Mastery Learning September 7, 2010 Math & ELA.
Dr. Leslie David Burns, Associate Professor Department of Curriculum and Instruction UK College of Education
Reformed Developmental Math Program ICTCM Conference March 11, 2016 Deanne Stigliano
Mater Gardens Middle School MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT WHERE LEARNING HAS NO FINISH LINE ! 1.
Council for the Accreditationof EducatorPreparation Standard 1: CONTENT AND PEDAGOGICAL KNOWLEDGE 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville, TN March 26-28, 2014.
OHIO LEARNING STANDARDS K-12 MATHEMATICS GRADE 3 BY: AMY FURMAN.
TAP Math: Teachers and Administrators Partnering for Mathematics Learning Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant (DPI)
100+ years of teacher education
Emporia State University
Preliminary Review of the 2012 Math SOL Results
Professional Teaching Portfolio
Mathematics Specialist Specialization Proposal
PRE-ACT TEST INTERPRETATION
Milwee Middle School Math Night
Why? Why do we provide for Talent Development opportunities in Cobb County? Meet the needs of high-achieving/highly- able students who have not qualified.
Math Standards Math 120—Algorithms for Arithmetic
Diamond Bar High School
Analyzing PARCC Results to Inform Instruction
Why? Why do we provide for Talent Development opportunities in Cobb County? Meet the needs of high-achieving/highly- able students who have not qualified.
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
INTASC Standards By: Michelle Dea.
TAMU 14th Annual Assessment Conference
Overview of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS)
MRHS Math Department Course Registration Information
Advanced Placement (AP), College Prep, and College Ready Courses
Integrated Math Courses
ECH/416 METHODS OF TEACHING IN EARLY CHILDHOOD: MATHEMATICS The Latest Version// uopcourse.com
ECH 416 ECH416 ech 416 ech416 Entire Course // uopstudy.com
Presentation transcript:

Content Knowledge of Elementary Pre-service Teachers Presentation slide for courses, classes, lectures et al. Ryan Nivens East Tennessee State University

Background Dr. Witherspoon’s Concerns RODP (online) vs. On-campus teaching of 1410/1420 Dr. Vogel’s research on content knowledge My own Concerns Letters of Recommendation Lack of knowledge of content strength Introductory notes.

Background (cont.) Ready2Teach Modular format of coursework “The Ready2Teach program will meet the standards of content knowledge requirements as well as any other teacher education program.” Introductory notes.

Background (cont.) InTASC Content Knowledge Standards Standard #4: Content Knowledge The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures of the discipline(s) he or she teaches and creates learning experiences that make these aspects of the discipline accessible and meaningful for learners to assure mastery of the content. Standard #5: Application of Content The teacher understands how to connect concepts and use differing perspectives to engage learners in critical thinking, creativity, and collaborative problem solving related to authentic local and global issues. Introductory notes.

Background National Council on Quality Teaching Standard 6: Elementary Content. The institution prepares teacher candidates with content understanding necessary to teach to the Common Core Standards as well as the full elementary curriculum, and have expertise in a single subject. A program will earn a "strong design" designation if adequate elementary mathematics content is combined with elementary mathematics methods instruction in a coordinated set or sequence of courses that satisfies indicators 5.1- 5.3. Common Core Standards – Math TCAP testing in public schools Introductory notes.

Combining Influences Content Knowledge Test MATH 1410 Drs. Witherspoon & Vogel Math Methods - Nivens Ready2Teach InTASC NCQT CCSS TCAP Content knowledge tests for my Math Methods courses mirroring CCSS Probability & Data; Num. & Ops in Base 10; Num. & Ops – fractions, ratio, proportions Geometry Expressions & Equations

New Modular Format for K-6 Math Methods Module 3: Assessment (InTASC #4,5,6) Designing an assessment (evidence-based best practices) Content Areas: Ratio & Fractions, Geometry (Common Core Domains: Number and Operations – Fractions, Geometry, Ratios and Proportional relationships) (Common Core “Mathematical Practices” #1-8)  Module 4: Reflective Teaching practices (InTASC #4,5,7,8,9,10) Performance-based Assessment teaching project Content Areas: Algebra (Common Core Domains: Expressions and Equations) (Common Core “Mathematical Practices” #1-8) Module 1: Student Learning (InTASC #1,2,3,4,5) Analysis of Student Work (PBL part 1) Content Areas: Probability, Data analysis (Common Core Domains: Statistics and Probability) (Common Core “Mathematical Practices” #1-8) Module 2: Instructional Strategies (InTASC #4,5,7,8) Remediation Plan (PBL part 2) Content Areas: Number & Operation (Common Core Domains: Number and Operations in Base 10)

Comparisons of Math requirements All three licensure programs Interdisciplinary Studies K-6 licensure Special Ed K-12 Early Childhood pK-3 Require 3-4 Hours of math from this list MATH 1530 Probability and Statistics Non-Calculus (3 hrs.) MATH 1840 Analytical Geometry and Diff Calculus (4 hrs.) MATH 1910 Calculus I (4 hrs.) Beginning course details and/or books/materials needed for a class/project.

Comparisons of Math requirements Interdisciplinary Studies K-6 licensure 6 additional hours in Math Math 1410 Number Concepts & Algebraic Structures (3 hrs.) Math 1420 Logic & Problem Solving (3 hrs.) Special Ed K-12 No additional hours in Math (currently planning to change that) CUAI 3430 Methods in Teaching Math K-8 (3 hrs.) Early Childhood pK-3 3 additional hours in Math Beginning course details and/or books/materials needed for a class/project.

The Idea that Formed Math 1410 Pre-Admission CUAI 3420 Special Education K-8 CUAI 4310 Teacher Education K-6 CUAI 4517 Early Childhood Education PK-4 Using the state Practice TCAP tests in grades 3-8, a battery of D2L assessments were created to assess the content knowledge of my teacher candidates. Beginning course details and/or books/materials needed for a class/project.

Research Questions What is the level of content knowledge of my pre- service math teachers? Is there a difference between pre-service teachers from programs with differing math requirements? Are items from the TCAP practice tests useful in answering these questions?

Pilot Testing Fall 2011 One section CUAI 3430 Math Methods K-8 Two sections CUAI 4310 Math Methods K-6 These courses were chosen because the tests fit the description of the course requirements. CUAI 4517, EC math methods, was not used because the test does not fit the scope of the course.

Pilot test Fall 2011 Probability (content grades 3, 5, 6) Class Program Class Average Range σ n 3430 Spec. Ed 89.21% 62 – 100% 9.8 18 4310 – 1 ISED 91.18% 76 – 100 7.1 24 4310 – 2 89.75% 77 – 100 5.5 25 A schedule design for optional periods of time/objectives.

Pilot test Fall 2011 Num&Ops Base 10 (content grades 3, 5, 6) Class Program Class Average Range σ n 3430 Spec. Ed 85.34% 66 – 100% 9.1 18 4310 – 1 ISED 91.71% 68 – 100 8.4 25 4310 – 2 89.75% 80 – 100 5.8 24 A schedule design for optional periods of time/objectives.

Pilot test Fall 2011: Num&Ops Fractions, Ratios & Geometry (content grades 3, 5, 6) Class Program Class Average Range σ n 3430 Spec. Ed 86.54% 43 – 100% 14.6 18 4310 – 1 ISED 92.65% 77 – 100 5.5 26 4310 – 2 89.58% 76 – 100 7.5 25 A schedule design for optional periods of time/objectives.

Pilot test Fall 2011 Algebra (content grades 3, 5, 6) Class Program Class Average Range σ n 3430 Spec. Ed 89.91% 51 – 100% 12.3 18 4310 – 1 ISED 94.22% 77 – 100 6.2 25 4310 – 2 93% 76 – 100 6.0 A schedule design for optional periods of time/objectives.

Average Scores on All Tests Example graph/chart.

Analysis In all sections on all tests, at least one person scored 100% The section with the least amount of mathematics course requirements always had the lowest score and the largest standard deviation The scores on the probability test may be higher due to all courses studying probability concepts in my course in the first weeks Introductory notes.

Discussion The entire TCAP practice sets of questions are now available in a D2L question library and as assessments, Available now or at the Math/Science for Elem. Teachers Conference (Roane State). Validity of the TCAP practice tests in assessing Common Core math. Currently I am analyzing the TCAP practice tests in relation to the CCSS-math. (poster session at CSMC Research Conference in March). Introductory notes.

Implications and Suggestions Thoughts on the tests Ideas Suggestions

Thank you for your time. Ryan Nivens, Ph.D Past-President, Appalachian Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators President, Upper East Tennessee Council of Teachers of Mathematics Assistant Professor | Center of Excellence in Mathematics and Science Education Department of Curriculum and Instruction | Clemmer College of Education East Tennessee State University PO Box 70684 Johnson City, TN 37614-1709 nivens@etsu.edu 423-439-7851 phone