CxA at Georgia Tech TRAINING OUTLINE Epsten Group, Darren Draper

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE HELP PROCESS. Professional medical equipment project management is the systematic, knowledgeable process through which all items of capital equipment.
Advertisements

TITAN Group …….Managing Site Build up for the telecom sector TICS Telecom Projects Consultancy Pvt. Ltd.
Effective Contract Management Planning
SBA Unit 8B: Building Commissioning Prepared By: David J Ellner, PE.
State of Utah Division of Facilities Construction and Management DFCM -- Our Mission To provide professional services to assist State entities in meeting.
1 NYP BEST PRACTICES EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEYS Presentation to Approved A/E Vendors to NYP June 17, 2013.
PERFORMING EFFECTIVE BUILDING SYSTEM RECOMMISSIONING STUDIES Joseph J. Watson, P.E. Booth # 312.
SUBMITTALS PROCESSING Fall 2008 ARCH 330
1100 Superior Ave., Suite Wolf Ledges Parkway, Suite West Third Avenue Cleveland, OH 44114Akron, OH 44311Columbus, OH
Sustainability and Energy ServicesSustainability and Energy Services.
Commissioning: The Most Important Component of LEED ® by Rick Miller, PE, LEED AP RNM Engineering, Inc. San Luis Obispo, CA.
Sustainability and Commissioning for Military Facilities WHAT IT IS AND WHAT IT IS NOT! Dan Jackson, PE, Vice President Tim Whitley, PE, CxA, CCP, LEED.
EFFECTIVE COMMISSIONING PROPOSALS Presented To: High Performance Buildings 2006 Las Vegas, April 7, 2006 Presented By: Rebecca T. Ellis, PE LEED® AP, CCP,
Building Enclosure Commissioning (BECx): Practical Project Implementation.
ASHRAE Guideline The Commissioning Process Building Commissioning Association Northeast Chapter Thomas Anderson, CCP.
Building Commissioning
THE PROJECT TEAM TYPICAL REQUIREMENTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PROJECT TEAM TRADITIONAL TEAM ORGANIZATION AND VARIATIONS THE OWNER’S TEAM THE DESIGN.
Copyright 2008, International Code Council 2012 IECC ® for SERBCA Based on the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code.
Commissioning Presentation For Society of American Military Engineers (SAME) George Washington University Chapter February 25, 2011.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES As-Built Drawings and Commissioning Status Steve Sawch Assistant Director for Construction Management NSLS-II Conventional.
Implementing Commissioning and the CxP for DOE Super ESPC Projects Draft Guideline Review Chuck Dorgan, P.E., Ph.D., CxAP Roger Johnson.
The Future of Commissioning for Sustained Building Performance Birmingham, AL SERBCA Fall Conference Proposed LEED Requirements for Commissioning.
Commissioning of Federal Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPC) May 20, 2003 Doug Dahle National Renewable Energy Lab.
Building Commissioning: It’s a Process For a Reason Presented by Rick Scivally CHFM, CHSP, CBCP, LEED AP.
The 5 th Annual Conference on Total Building Commissioning 2009 Commissioning Changes in LEED 2009 Paul McCown, PE, CxA, LEED AP, CEM SSRCx, LLC.
Southeast Region Chapter 2004 Summer Training Meeting Louisville, KentuckyThursday, August 19, 2004 COMMISSIONING ??? COMMISSIONING 101.
Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Presented by: Charles Kilfoil Bechtel National Waste Treatment Plant Richland WA.
Specifying Commissioning Derek De Jesús, CxA Commissioning Manager Chinook Systems, Inc. Understanding the Commissioning Process October 14, 2008.
Facilities Institute July , 2012 Houston, Texas CONSTRUCTION AND RENOVATION WARRANTY/GUARANTEE What Do You Get And When Does It.
National Sustainable Building Advisor Program Unit 8B Building commissioning Christopher Kerr, CxA Glumac June 4, 2010.
Commissioning for Sustained Building Performance Building Performance Birmingham, AL Marriott 9/29/11 Introduction to Commissioning and Retro-Commissioning.
Kristin Heinemeier, Ph.D., P.E. Technical Director Brooks Energy & Sustainability Lab Texas Engineering Experiment Station Texas A&M University System.
Dan Frasier, PE, CCP Successful Turnover of New and Renovation Construction Projects Successful Turnover of New and Renovation Construction.
King County Wastewater Treatment Division What you need to know about WTD’s Technical Standards.
UESC Project Implementation Construction & Installation ä Issue TO for construction ä The pre-construction meeting ä Review/accept final construction package.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Existing Building Commissioning (EBCx): A Strategy for Improving Your Building Performance Track: Building Performance.
SYSTEMS MANUALS A Systematic Approach Craig Hawkins, CxA.
M&V Part 1: D.O. Review. 1-2 Your Instructor Mark Stetz, P.E. Ø Worked with FEMP since Ø Serves as FEMP’s M&V Specialist. Ø Contributed to FEMP.
April, 2002Energy Audits1 April, 2002 Ryan Stroupe, Pacific Energy Center DeAnza College: ES 76 Energy Reliability and Your Organization Energy Auditing.
Commissioning of New and Existing Buildings Alexander P. Boucher, P.E., CEM, LEED BD+C.
High Performance Buildings 2007 Differences in Commissioning Scope ACG, ASHRAE Guideline 0, GSA and LEED Steven (Rusty) Ross PE, CxA, LEED AP SSRCx, LLC.
Building Commissioning: Cx 101 Brock Graham, Gilbane Building Co. Michael Gannon, BVH Integrated Services November 15, 2010.
Birmingham, AL SERBCA Fall Conference Presented by: Gary Sweatt, CxA, QCxP.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS – II CFAC Review Conventional Facilities Method of Accomplishment Marty Fallier Director for Conventional Facilities.
Halcom Consulting llc Sustainability Consulting & Commissioning 2917 Carlisle NE Suite 109 Albuquerque, New Mexico p f
Contracting for Commissioning Services A Priority for Facility Owner’s and Program Managers Matt Ferreira, CxA, LEED AP October 14, 2008.
BSBPMG501A Manage Project Integrative Processes Manage Project Integrative Processes Project Integration Processes – Part 1 Diploma of Project Management.
How to Create a Craig Hawkins acg 2008 Annual Meeting-Best Practices for Total Building Commissioning 1.
Specifying Commissioning Derek De Jesús, CxA Commissioning Manager Chinook Systems, Inc. Understanding the Commissioning Process October 14, 2008 ©2008.
Implementing the CxP for ESPC Projects – Maximizing Benefits Chuck Dorgan, P.E., Ph.D. Roger Johnson.
McDonough Bolyard Peck Educational Series Building Commissioning Presented by: Doug Wrenn Steve Baxter July
McDonough Bolyard Peck Educational Series HVAC Commissioning Presented by: Doug Wren Steve Baxter September 30, 2003.
Commissioning HVAC Systems: Lessons learned throughout
the Basic Commissioning (Cx) Process
Glendale Community College Why LEED? Why Commissioning? Blair Seibert, AIA, LEED AP, CSBA VERDE CONCEPTS Los Angeles.
Introduction to LEED Building Commissioning
Commissioning at NYP Joseph Lorino, PE, LEED Vice President
NYP BEST PRACTICES MEP Design Standards/Equip Cuts/Drawing Review
Implementing Effective Energy O&M Strategies on a Limited Budget
Monitoring-Based Commissioning what is it and how can I use in in LEED v4 Administrated by.
Description of Revision
FIVE PROJECT PHASES 5C-3 Sun. 8:00-10:00am 21/ 2/2016.
Designers’ Manual Overview and Chapter Contents
Kincaid Hall Renovation
CxA at Georgia Tech TRAINING OUTLINE Overview of CxA
The Business of Commissioning
NYP BEST PRACTICES EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEYS
DOE Review of the LCLS Project October 2006
Executive Project Kickoff
ESHAC #8 Safety Readiness Review Thomas Hansson, ESH
Presentation transcript:

CxA at Georgia Tech TRAINING OUTLINE Epsten Group, Darren Draper Overview of CxA Epsten Group, Darren Draper Overview of Georgia Tech Commissioning GT CxA Philosophy + Approach How and when to contract CxA Costs for CxA Engagement of O&M + Building Occupants Other Tools in Development Questions At Georgia Tech, the CxA is a critical member of the team for inspections – For BOR owned property, there is not a local jurisdiction inspecting MEP systems. We rely on the design team and the CxA to inspect work, in addition to special inspections and testing work.

What is Commissioning? Systematic process, led by a Commissioning Agent (CxA), ensuring that all building systems perform interactively according to the design intent and the Owner’s operational needs. Third party verification of performance Energy optimization balanced with occupant comfort Design reviews for maintainability Assistance with EUI targets Review of conformance with GT YB Construction observation and installation verification Functional performance testing Owner training At Georgia Tech, the CxA is a critical member of the team for inspections – For BOR owned property, there is not a local jurisdiction inspecting MEP systems. We rely on the design team and the CxA to inspect work, in addition to special inspections and testing work.

Commissioning Goals Fully-Functional, Efficient, and Maintainable Facility Reduce Change Orders / RFI’s Ensure Envelope Integrity Maximize Envelope Efficiency Coordinate Component Constructability Verify Trade Responsibility Reduce Contractor Call-Backs Avoid Costly Repairs Educate O&M Staff on Building Equipment Improve Component and Systems Life Cycle

What Commissioning is Not Design Engineering Test and Balance Construction Administration Code Enforcement (yet) Equipment Start-Up Only a Documentation Effort

Communication/Integration Importance of communication from outset cannot be overstated Begins with integration of CxA into design and construction teams CA should be looped into project team early in design At GT, we now prefer to engage the CxA early in the project – typically during SD. Buy-in of team members critical for success CxA more of a role player than just an inspector Identify pitfalls Generate honest feedback Propose real, practical solutions Project Team Owner A/E CM/GC CxA

Commissioning Phases Design Phase Construction Phase Acceptance Phase Warranty Phase

Design Phase Design Phase OPR & BOD Design Document Reviews (Systems) Create Owner’s Project Requirement via OPR Workshop Verify Basis of Design consistent with the OPR Design Document Reviews (Systems) Commissionability Maintainability Energy Model QC Best Practices (Systems) Energy optimization strategies Engineering assumptions Past experience/lessons learned applications O&M Training Requirements and Specifications Slide 7: Can Darren remind those in the room that at GT, “owners” means both building occupants and building operators. So, for OPR and O&M training requirements, getting input from appropriate “owners” is important. He can mention that Greg or others from GT will go into this in more detail further on.

Construction Phase Construction Phase Cx into the construction schedule! Kick-off Meeting Submittal/Shop Drawing reviews Installation Verification Review installation of systems and components for access and long-term maintenance Site Visit Reports and Observation Logs Major equipment start-up and pressure testing Progress Meetings

Acceptance Phase Acceptance Phase Verify Test & Balance (TAB) Systems Functional Performance Testing Contractor preparedness (ready for testing) NOT A CHECKLIST No sampling of major equipment Detailed steps based on Sequence of Operation O&M staff participation encouraged Integrated Systems Test Trending implementation and review

Acceptance Phase Acceptance Phase O&M Training Plan Training development meeting with owner and GC Assist owner and GC with training plan development CxA-Led Training Session Sequences of Operation review Systems component identification Functional testing review Training should: Identify operational intent Empower maintenance staff Provide troubleshooting techniques Include desired response to major incidents Proper training crucial to equipment longevity and sustained energy performance

Warranty Phase Warranty Phase Seasonal testing 10-Month warranty review Building occupants and O&M Staff interviews Review O&M log Identify warranty-related issues Review system operation DDC system trend data, alarms, set points, etc. Report issues to Owner and GC for resolution Issues must be resolved prior to warranty expiration Final Commissioning Report

Post-Occupancy M&V M&V critical to verify persistence of building performance compared to design Put M&V infrastructure in place early in design Provide M&V consistent with Owner’s interests and needs M&V Plan/Options HVAC loads Lighting loads Main power Cooling and heating water “Measurement is the first step that leads to control and eventually to improvement.” - H James Harrington

Building Systems to Consider Energy-Using Systems HVAC and HVAC Controls Lighting Controls Daylight Dimming Controls Domestic Water Heating Systems Life Safety Fire Alarm/Fire Protection Emergency Power Other Plumbing Security and Access Control A/V, Data/Network Vertical Transportation Specialty Systems

Building Systems to Consider Building Envelope Roof, Curtain Wall, Skin Systems Mock Up Reviews Renewable Energy Systems Photovoltaics Solar Water Heating Cogeneration Wind Turbines

ENVELOPE COMMISSIONING

BECx – Design Phase Similar to Systems Commissioning, Envelope Commissioning (BECx) is the third-party process of reviewing the design and construction of envelope. The Design Phase of the process consists of the following steps: Creation/Review of Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR) and designer’s Basis of Design (BOD) Commissioning Kick-Off Meeting Commissioning Plan Design Document Reviews Commissioning Specifications including Envelope/Mock-Up Testing Specifications Development of Installation Checklists

BECx – Construction Phase The Construction Phase of the BECx process includes: Submittal and shop drawing reviews Envelope construction checklists Pre-Installation meetings with the various envelope subcontracting trades to set clear expectations and responsibilities. Site observations Mock-up reviews and testing Envelope testing Envelope final inspection

Envelope Testing Testing generally falls into one of two areas: Water Tightness Water leakage testing Combined air and water testing Flood testing Infrared thermography Electronic Leak Detection (ELD) Air Tightness Blower door testing Combined blower door/IR testing Adhesion/thickness testing Testing strategies should be tailored to climate. Air testing techniques more important in colder climates and water testing in warmer climates.

GT Cx - Approach Overview GT Commissioning Overview Ensure that systems are designed to meet the project’s goals, and are installed, tested and function as intended, are operating to maximum efficiency and allow ease of maintenance. The CxA acts as a means to validate that staff is adequately trained and have the resources needed for proper operations and maintenance.

GT Cx - Approach Overview GT Commissioning Overview Select the CxA during Concept Design and keep the CxA engaged contractually through the warranty period. The CxA should be considered a subject matter expert and an important member of the integrated design and construction team.

GT Cx - Approach Overview When to Commission? As a guideline, The Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Construction Act of 2008, all new construction and major renovations over 10,000 SF shall be commissioned. Smaller projects with MEP scope of work, the replacement of significant MEP components (boilers, chillers, etc), projects with controls work or spaces with complex performance requirements. Resource: A narrative overview of the commissioning process and a list of CxA terms with definitions has been developed and is available on the D&C Forms Website

GT Cx – Procurement + Contracting Contracting Relationship for CxA General Consulting Contract Hired by GT, for direct reporting relationship, but integrated into the design and construction team. Get the CxA on board as early to assist with overall energy goals, design approach to MEP systems. (Engage by 50% SD as a guideline.) Qualification Based Selection For larger projects, a template RFP/Q with a detailed scope of work is available on the forms website. Interviews are always required.

GT Cx - Procurement + Contracting IDIQ Contracting For smaller projects, we maintain a number of IDIQ CxA contracts. CAP on contract values for IDIQ CxAs is $600K if no other contracts have been issued against the IDIQ. Currently the following firms are under contract: Burns McDonnell, CxGBS, Epstein Group, ICE, Working Buildings. Resource: An RFP/Q template, QBS selection guidelines, and a list of current IDIQ CxA contracts are available on the D&C Forms Website.

GT Cx – Cost of Services Cost of CxA Services Fee Variables: duration of the project, # of field visits and meetings, complexity, warranty period engagement, M&V, or sustainability objectives such as low EUI, ASHRAE 189.1 compliance or LEED . Georgia Tech CxA services on larger capital projects are typically > 1.25% of the project SCL. Resource: A spreadsheet of CxA fees for recent projects is available on the D&C Forms Website.

GT Cx – Engagement Matrix CxA Engagement Matrix Working Committee developed an CxA engagement matrix as a tool for project managers. Objective – Improve hand off and engagement of O&M team. O&M- Design Engagement Participation in OPR development and review, as well as energy modeling and EUI targets. Page turn meetings: SD, DD, CD Discuss that Garry Lockerman is A.D. of the Area Teams and PMs should reach out to him if they aren’t getting the input/engagement needed from O&M teams.

GT Cx – Engagement Matrix O&M - Construction Cx Kick Off Meeting + Bi-weekly 50% complete, 80% complete Wall / ceiling cover up inspections MEPF inspection walks with CxA or engineers Equipment start up and functional performance testing. O&M - Training Manufacturer training Building management and systems training overview Metysis interface training and troubleshooting

GT Cx – Engagement Matrix Warranty Phase, M&V + Diagnostics Set the CxA up with Metysis access during construction so that they can start reviewing trend data. (Send a help desk Quarterly M&V meeting to review building operation and trends, outstanding warranty issues Meetings should include CxA, project manager, O&M, building manager Seasonal TAB, as applicable Ten month warranty walk Mention quarterly O&M meetings in the Warranty Phase that we did on Glenn & Towers as a good practice to replicate.  Resource: The CxA process and engagement matrix is posted on the forms website.

GT Cx – Next Steps In Progress In Development We have hired Epstein Group to develop additional resources which should be available within six months: Boiler Plate OPR Document: develop a consistent OPR format and baseline requirements that tie to the yellow book for use as a starting point for project specific OPRs. CxA Specifications: GT specific commissioning specifications and requirements for inclusion in project documents. Additional Training for O&M Team on CxA Simplified Engagement Matrix for Small Projects Quarterly Cx Roundtable Commissioning requirements in project manual Make sure TRAINING requirements for O+M staff are clearly identified. Suggest requiring professional videographer. Creation of a Current Facility Requirements (CFR) document and O+M Manual at the completion of Commissioning.