The Evolving ILC Project

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Linac Quad Field and Position Stability Chris Adolphsen SLAC.
Advertisements

FNAL-SCRF 会議報告 1. Cryomodule, Plug-compatible Interface ( 大 内) 2. High Pressure Code, 5K Shield (Tom Peterson)
Alignment and assembling of the cryomodule Yun He, James Sears, Matthias Liepe MLC external review October 03, 2012.
Question 27: Outline the key steps for industrialization of machine components and the likely remaining vulnerabilities in achieving them. Achieving industrialization.
ILCTA_NML Progress at Fermilab Jerry Leibfritz September 10, 2007.
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
23 Jan 2007 LASA Cryogenics Global Group 1 ILC Cryomodule piping L. Tavian for the cryogenics global group.
R&D Status and Plan on The Cryostat N. Ohuchi, K. Tsuchiya, A. Terashima, H. Hisamatsu, M. Masuzawa, T. Okamura, H. Hayano 1.STF-Cryostat Design 2.Construction.
FNAL Meeting, July 2006 Basti, Bedeschi, Raffaelli, INFN-Pisa 1 ILC cryomodule mechanical work at INFN-Pisa  Ongoing work  Near term future  Manpower.
Summary of AWG7 SCRF technologies Eiji Kako Wolf-Dietrich Moeller Akira Yamamoto Hitoshi Hayano Tokyo, Nov
TESLA MEETING May 2003 Frascati LINAC TECHNOLOGY WORKING GROUP Working Group Linac techology introduction Cryomodule design and Assy. Tuner issue.
Present status of TTF-cryomodules short overview Bernd Petersen DESY MKS March, 7, 2005 Main design features of TESLA-cryomodules Design changes for XFEL-cryomodule.
Type IV Cryomodule Proposal (T4CM) Don Mitchell, 16 JAN 2006.
Cryomodule Design and R&D during the EDR phase Robert Kephart With input from the T4 CM Collaboration.
D.Proch, DESY; GDE meeting Vancouver 06 Technical systems: Cavity Report Overview on costing activities for ILC –European costing method Overview industrial.
Cryomodule Development at Fermilab Don Mitchell Representing the SRF engineering community at Fermilab April 20, 2009 Tsukuba, Japan TILC09.
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
Harry Carter – LCFOA Meeting 5/1/06 1 LCFOA Technical Briefings: Cryomodules H. Carter Fermilab Technical Division.
Aug 23, 2006 Half Current Option: Impact on Linac Cost Chris Adolphsen With input from Mike Neubauer, Chris Nantista and Tom Peterson.
5 K Shield Study of STF Cryomodule Norihito Ohuchi, Norio Higashi KEK Xu QingJin IHEP 2008/3/3-61Sendai-GDE-Meeting.
Meeting of the European Global Design Effort Report from INFN non EU-funded R&D Carlo Pagani University of Milano and INFN DESY, 10 May 2006.
Summary ( Cryomodule, Plug-compatible Interface) Norihito Ohuchi.
ILC Test Facility at New Muon Lab (NML) S. Nagaitsev Fermilab April 16, 2007.
LASA Medium-β Cavity Progress Update Paolo Michelato 2 nd ESS Collaboration Meeting - SRF Elliptical Cavities 15 th December 2015.
Summery of the power coupler session at the LCWS13 workshop E. Kako W.-D. Möller H. Hayano A. Yamamoto All members of SCRF WG November 14, 2013.
Rolf Lange DESY ILC Workshop 1-June-07 XFEL The European X-Ray Laser Project X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Module Industrialisation for XFEL How to proceed.
Accelerator/ Medium Beta Cavities Paolo Michelato INFN Milano - LASA April 21, 2015.
Medium Beta Cavities Paolo Michelato, Paolo Pierini, and Carlo Pagani INFN Milano - LASA.
Medium beta cavities Paolo Michelato, Paolo Pierini, Carlo Pagani INFN Milano - LASA.
Industrial Participation & SRF Infrastructure at Fermilab Phil Pfund with input from Harry Carter, Rich Stanek, Mike Foley, Dan Olis, and others.
Cryomodule prototype Yun He, Dan Sabol, Joe Conway On behalf of Matthias Liepe, Eric Smith, James Sears, Peter Quigley, Tim O’Connell, Ralf Eichhorn, Georg.
30 May 2007 DESY Cryomodule Discussion 1 Type 4 Cryomodule Technical Discussion Tom Peterson Compiled from various previous meeting notes and many sources.
Progress and Plans for R&D and the Conceptual Design of the ILC Main Linacs H. Hayano, KEK PAC2005 5/18/2005.
Lutz Lilje DESY -MPY- Summary of the Superconducting RF WG DESY -MPY Overview on talks given List European Assets.
Carlo Pagani University of Milano INFN Milano-LASA & GDE ILC and XFEL Cryomodules Preliminary thoughts for convergence ILC EDR Kick-off Meeting DESY,
S1 global: thermal analysis TILC09, April 19th, 2009 Serena Barbanotti Paolo Pierini.
Main Linac Issues for RDR 1/20/2006 Area group H. Hayano From Linac Area discussion posted on the web:
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
SPL cryomodule specification meeting, CERN 19th October 2010 SPL cryomodule specification: Goals of the meeting SPL cryomodule specification: Goals of.
5 K Shield Study of STF Cryomodule (up-dated) Norihito Ohuchi KEK 2008/4/21-251FNAL-SCRF-Meeting.
LCLS-II Prototype Cryomodule Vacuum Vessel and HGRP Tom Peterson 4 December 2014 Design Review.
1 Comments concerning DESY and TESLA Albrecht Wagner Comments for the 5th meeting of the ITRP at Caltech 28 June 2004 DESY and the LC What could DESY contribute.
Project X Workshop - Cryogenics1 Project X CRYOGENICS Arkadiy Klebaner.
Integration and Cold Testing of the CW ERL Cryomodule at Daresbury Shrikant Pattalwar ASTeC, STFC, Daresbury Laboratory (UK) On behalf of ERL Cryomodule.
ILCTA_NML Progress at Fermilab Jerry Leibfritz August 16, 2007.
Survey for SPL Dominique Missiaen BE-ABP/SU. Outline 12/11/2008 Dominique Missiaen BE-ABP-SU, Survey for SPL 2  Scope & Main Parameters  Technical Description.
ILC : Type IV Cryomodule Design Meeting Main cryogenic issues, L. Tavian, AT-ACR C ryostat issues, V.Parma, AT-CRI CERN, January 2006.
Shuichi NoguchiTTC Meeting at Milano, Injector Cryomodule for cERL at KEK Cavity 2 Prototypes were tested. Input Coupler 2 Couplers were tested.
S2 Progress Report for EC H. Padamsee and Tom Himel For the S2 Task Force.
TDR Cryogenics Parameters Tom Peterson 28 September 2011.
Crab Cavity Technical Coordination meeting:
S1G Experiment Schedule Plan
TDR guideline discussion on Cavity Integration
Status and plans for the 3.9 GHz section of XFEL
Requirements for Efficient CW SRF Cryomodules
Meeting for S1-Global module design Cryomodule and Cryogenics
5K or not? & TTF module thermal modeling update
EDR HLRF Work Packages Draft Summary
TTF module thermal modeling
Yamamoto WG3: ML-SCRF Parallel Session,
TDR: Cryomodule Paolo Pierini.
ILC Cryogenic Systems Draft EDR Plan
TESLA Cryomodule Design Ratinales
Electron Source Configuration
Nick Walker (DESY) EU GDE Meeting Oxford
ILC Cryogenics -- Technical Design Report Planning
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
Alignment of Main Linac Cryomodule (MLC)
ERL Director’s Review Main Linac
8-T Solenoid Package and Local Magnetic Shielding in FRIB Cryomodules
Presentation transcript:

The Evolving ILC Project 3rd T4CM – Type IV ILC Cryomodule Meeting INFN Milano – LASA, January 22-24, 2007 The Evolving ILC Project The Cryomodule from TTF/TESLA to the ILC RDR Carlo Pagani University of Milano INFN Milano-LASA & GDE

TESLA Cryomodule Design Ratinales High Performance Cryomodule was central for the TESLA Mission More then one order of magnitude was to be gained in term of capital and operational cost High filling factor: to maximize real estate gradient Long sub-units with many cavities (and quad): cryomodules Sub-units connected in longer strings Cooling and return pipes integrated into a unique cryomodule Low cost per meter: to be compatible with a long TeV Collider Cryomodule used also for feeding and return pipes Minimize the number of cold to warm connections for static losses Minimize the use of special components and materials Modular design using the simplest possible solution Easy to be alligned and stable: to fullfil beam requirements 3rd T4CM, LASA, 22 Jan 2007 Carlo Pagani

Performing Cryomodules in TTF Required plug power for static losses < 5 kW/(12 m module) Reliable Alignment Strategy Sliding Fixtures @ 2 K “Finger Welded” Shields Three cryomodule generations to: improve simplicity and performances minimize costs 3rd T4CM, LASA, 22 Jan 2007 Carlo Pagani

Three Cryomodule Generations in TTF 1st Module in TTF I Module 1 & 2 in TTF I Module 1, 2 & 3 in TTF II Module 4 & 5 in TTF II RF gun 400 MeV 120 MeV 800 MeV ACC 1 ACC 2 ACC 3 ACC 4 ACC 5 4 MeV 3rd T4CM, LASA, 22 Jan 2007 Carlo Pagani

WPMs to qualify alignment strategy WPM = Wire Position Monitor On line monitoring of cold mass movements during cool-down, warm-up and operation 2 WPM lines with 2 x 18 sensors 4 sensors per active element 8 mm bore radius 1 WPM lines 1 sensors per active element 25 mm bore radius 1 WPM line 7 sensors/module Cry 1 Cry 2 Cry 3 3rd T4CM, LASA, 22 Jan 2007 Carlo Pagani

ACC4 & ACC5 Met Specs Still some work at the module interconnection Cavity axis to be properly defined 3rd T4CM, LASA, 22 Jan 2007 Carlo Pagani

From Prototype to Cry 3 Extensive FEA modeling (ANSYS™) of the entire cryomodule Transient thermal analysis during cooldown/warmup cycles, Coupled structural/thermal simulations Full nonlinear material properties Detailed sub-modeling of new components and Laboratory tests Finger-welding tests at ZANON Cryogenic tests of the sliding supports at INFN-LASA 3rd T4CM, LASA, 22 Jan 2007 Carlo Pagani

Safe Cooldown of ACC4 and ACC5 X Y © Rolf Lange 3rd T4CM, LASA, 22 Jan 2007 Carlo Pagani

Very Low Static Losses 3rd T4CM, LASA, 22 Jan 2007 © Rolf Lange Carlo Pagani

Cryomodules installed in TTF II RF gun 400 MeV 120 MeV 800 MeV ACC 1 ACC 2 ACC 3 ACC 4 ACC 5 4 MeV ACC 4 & ACC 5 ACC 2 & ACC 3 3rd T4CM, LASA, 22 Jan 2007 Carlo Pagani

From Type III to TESLA Improving quadrupole package stability 2 K quadrupole package Quadrupole placed in the module center Sliding hanging as for cavities Improving linac filling factor Inter-cavity spacing reduced to a possible minimum: 283 mm 12 cavities per cryomodule instead of the 8 in TTF Inter-module spacing reviewed, including HOM absorber Reviewing cooling pipe size for TESLA 800 Conceived inside the available margins Not really studied at the time of the TDR 3rd T4CM, LASA, 22 Jan 2007 Carlo Pagani

From Type III to XFEL Type III cryomodule is maintained as the reference INFN drawing moved to 3D for modifications Some modifications and improvements are in progress: Cavity spacing adapted to be equal to 3/2 l Module interconnection reviewed Odd integer number of l/2 has to be respected HOM absorber integrated, Ti/SS connections reviewed Possible improvements on subcomponents Work mostly independent from ILC Some suggestion from industry is expected Two new Type III module fabricated Complete documentation for possible new suppliers Industrial Studies for technology transfer and cost saving 3rd T4CM, LASA, 22 Jan 2007 Carlo Pagani

From TESLA to ILC (BCD) Same general criteria than in the TESLA TDR Quadrupole package at the module center Cavity spacing as for TESLA Module interconnection includes HOM absorber but: 8 cavities per cryomodule instead of 12 Pipe size reviewing for the highest heat load and: Design performed in a full international collaboration Specifications consistent with all regional rules Subcomponent reviewing for cost reduction still important 3rd T4CM, LASA, 22 Jan 2007 Carlo Pagani

From ILC BCD to ILC RDR Change request presented to CCB on October 30, 2006: Change of the cryomodule (CM) layout driven by each of the 10MW klystron RF unit. Previously, with two 8-cavity CM without a magnet and one 8-cavity CM with a magnet. Now, with two 9-cavity CM without a magnet and one 8-cavity CM with a magnet. Reduce cryogenic power by 13% CCB, after a deep analysis and discussion, on November 28 suggested to EC to not accept this CCR#20. Because of its cost saving impact EC represented the same proposal, including a modification of the beam parameters CCB is now approving this change proposal, with the exclusion of the reduction of safety margin on cryogenics 3rd T4CM, LASA, 22 Jan 2007 Carlo Pagani

Consequences on the Cryomodule No consequences for the cryomodule with quadrupole Redrawing the cryomodule without quad with 9 cavities Note The two module have now a slightly different length But The two modules could easily have the same length: that’s good 3rd T4CM, LASA, 22 Jan 2007 Carlo Pagani

3rd T4CM Meeting Goals Reviewing the work done so far Consider the preparation phase ended Redefine the objectives for Type IV cryomodule and prepare a challenging, but also realistic, time schedule Which changes are included in the Type IV ? Which changes are postponed to the ILC prototype ? Who is doing what ? How stuff are shared and integrated into the EDMS ? How the control is done to preserve cost and performances ? 3D general drawing Regional 2D cuts with tolerances Material and fabrication specs 3rd T4CM, LASA, 22 Jan 2007 Carlo Pagani