Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk Environmental Ethics Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk © Michael Lacewing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Morality: constitutive of or overcoming self-interest?
Advertisements

Medical Ethics What’s it all about?.
Introduction to Environmental Engineering Dr. Glass Environmental Ethics.
© Michael Lacewing Environmental Ethics Michael Lacewing
Ethical Theories and Major Moral Principles. Ethical Theories Utilitarianism: Jeremy Bentham ( ) John Stuart Mill ( ) an ethics of consequences.
Philosophers on why be moral Michael Lacewing
The evidential problem of evil
Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics. How should we distribute the guitars? (Who should get one? Why?)
Applying Moral Philosophies to Business Ethics
Aristotle on voluntary action
Utilitarianism: happiness and preferences
Kant’s deontological ethics
Michael Lacewing Deception and lies Michael Lacewing
Conservation Values and Ethics. The Value of Biodiversity …may not be obvious to the public.
© Michael Lacewing Three theories of ethics Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing The Mind-Body Identity Theory Michael Lacewing
Animal Rights.
The treatment of animals Michael Lacewing
“A man without ethics is a wild beast loosed upon this world.”
Environmental Ethics. Ethics Ethics: the study of good and bad, right and wrong – The set of moral principles or values held by a person or society that.
Rule utilitarianism Michael Lacewing
Utilitarianism Michael Lacewing
A BRIEF HISTORY.
5-1 Chapter 5 Discussion: Ethics and the Environment Paul L. Schumann, Ph.D. © 2004 by Paul L. Schumann. All rights reserved.
Philosophy 220 The Moral Status of the More Than Human World: The Environment.
© Michael Lacewing Abortion and persons Michael Lacewing
Ethics Theory and Business Practice
From Last Time The good will is the only good thing in an ‘unqualified way” Acting from duty vs. acting in accord with duty Categorical vs. hypothetical.
Ethics Overview: Deontological and Teleological ( Consequentalist) Systems.
Utilitarian Theory of Ethics Utilitarian theory is a consequentialist approach to judging moral behavior. Consequentialist hold that –consequences count.
Objections to Kant’s ethics Michael Lacewing
Preference Utilitarianism. Learning Objectives By the end of this lesson, we will have... Consolidated our knowledge of Act and Rule Utilitarianism by.
Animals and Persons. Ethical status for animals Kantian and utilitarian ethics traditionally extended to all people, but only people Kant: all rational.
Utilitarianism: objections Michael Lacewing
Principles of Environmental Management Overview. Environmental Science An interdisciplinary area of study that includes both applied and theoretical aspects.
Justifications for Preserving the Environment Introduction to Environmental Science.
The evidential problem of evil
Natural Resources Management and Humans
Normative Virtue Ethics
Michael Lacewing Eating animals Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Midgley on human evil and free will
The logical problem of evil
Michael Lacewing Rule utilitarianism Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Michael Lacewing Mackie’s error theory Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Stage 2 Philosophy Moral Theories St John’s Grammar School
Introduction to Ethics
Aristotle on voluntary action, choice and moral responsibility
Michael Lacewing Aristotle on pleasure Michael Lacewing
Kant: the good will, duty and the Categorical Imperative
Michael Lacewing Virtue Ethics Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Animals and Persons.
What Is Morality?.
Chapter 8 Environmental Ethics
On your whiteboard: Remember from September:
Basic Moral Orientations An Overview
Happiness, pleasure and preferences
Mill and Bentham’s Utilitarianism
Marine conservation and ecotourism
Aristotle on eudaimonia and philosophy
On Whiteboards: Do animals have any moral status (should they be considered when making moral decisions)? Whether you answered yes or no, say why. On what.
Title of Presentation Subtitle of Presentation Your Name
Act utilitarianism, partiality and integrity
Michael Lacewing The Problem of Evil Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Utilitarianism: Jeremy Bentham.
Applied Ethics – Animals Recap
By Larry Chonko, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Arlington
On your whiteboard: What is the difference between teleological and deontological ethical theories? Is your ethical decision-making usually teleological.
Medical Ethics -frameworks
Ethics How do we decide?.
Healthy Relationships
Presentation transcript:

Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk Environmental Ethics Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk © Michael Lacewing

What is environmental ethics? Environmental issues: Pollution Depletion of natural resources Impact of overpopulation on ecosystems How do ethical systems respond? What is of value? Just human beings? Just individuals or also species, ecosystems, natural objects (rivers, mountains)? How should we make decisions about these issues?

Our question Which effects of pollution, depletion of natural resources, overpopulation, matter morally? Do only human beings ‘count’, or do effects on the environment matter as well? Why?

Hedonist utilitarianism Only pleasure and pain matter morally. So plants, ecosystems, natural resources, landscapes and species don’t count. Oi! That hurts!

Hedonist utilitarianism Environmental issues should therefore be decided on the basis of their effects on individual animals and human beings – particularly human beings – alone.

Preference utilitarianism The right thing to do is to maximise preferences. People have preferences about things they don’t experience, e.g. the desire that the rainforests continue to exist ‘unspoiled’. I want lakes to be unpolluted. Pollution? Wha’sh that, then?

Preference utilitarianism But the environment, species, resources, etc. still only has (and as much) value as we give it in our preferences.

Arguing in the opposite direction The predicted effects of environmental problems won’t be that bad; and technology will help fix problems. Preferences for preserving the environment are very weak compared to the need to use it. Discounting: uncertain bad consequences in the distant future don’t count as much as certain benefits now.

But I’m having a wonderful life, darling. Virtue ethics Is not polluting the environment and conserving natural resources part of a virtuous life? Virtuous people respect what has value. But does anything apart from human well-being have value? But I’m having a wonderful life, darling.

Virtue and the self Destruction of the environment, like vandalism, displays a bad character, e.g. greed, inability to appreciate beauty. Being human involves a relationship to the environment – both physical and ‘spiritual’, as shown in our aesthetic and personal relationships to animals, plants, landscapes, and in science.

Virtue and the self But why single this out as important to a good human life? It is just as human to treat nature as an object to be mastered.