So You Want to Write a Cyberinfrastructure Proposal

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
So You Want to Write a Proposal – Finding, Understanding, and Beating a Solicitation into Submission! Prof. Ken Vickers Research Professor, Physics Director,
Advertisements

Strengths of Funded & Weaknesses of Unfunded MRI Proposals
Session 5 Intellectual Merit and Broader Significance FISH 521.
NSF Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney, Ph.D Adjunct, Department of Biology New Mexico State University 24 September 2008.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
The Proposal Review Process Matt Germonprez Mutual of Omaha Associate Professor ISQA College of IS&T.
How to Write Grants Version 2009.
NSF Office of Integrative Activities Major Research Instrumentation Program November 2007 Major Research Instrumentation EPSCoR PI Meeting November 6-9,
CAREER WORKSHOP APRIL 9, 2014 Required Elements of the Proposal Beth Hodges Director, Office of Proposal Development FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY.
Grant Writing/Comprehensive Workshop Paul R. Albert, Ph. D
Tips for Writing a Successful Grant Proposal Diana Lipscomb Associate Dean for Faculty and Research CCAS.
Effective Communication: How to Talk to Researchers about Their Research Henry Neeman, University of Oklahoma Director, OU Supercomputing Center for Education.
National Science Foundation Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) Site Program.
So You Want to Write a Cyberinfrastructure Proposal Henry Neeman, University of Oklahoma Director, OU Supercomputing Center for Education & Research (OSCER)
Submitting a Proposal: Best Practices By: Anu Singh Science Assistant
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Integrating Diversity into.
Introduction to Research Consulting Henry Neeman, University of Oklahoma Director, OU Supercomputing Center for Education & Research (OSCER) Assistant.
Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Research & Education Facilitators: Overview Henry Neeman, University of Oklahoma Director, OU Supercomputing Center for Education.
Writing More Effective NSF Proposals Jeanne R. Small Oklahoma City, Oklahoma March 2, 2006 Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) National Science Foundation.
NSF GRFP Workshop Sept 16, 2016 Dr. Julia Fulghum
Define the project identify potential funding sources gather information write and package the proposal submit the proposal to a funder Piece of cake?
Parallel & Cluster Computing Monte Carlo Henry Neeman, Director OU Supercomputing Center for Education & Research University of Oklahoma SC08 Education.
CAREER WORKSHOP APRIL 6, 2015 Required Elements of the NSF Proposal Beth Hodges Director, Office of Proposal Development FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY.
Cyberinfrastructure What is it? Russ Hobby Internet2 Joint Techs, 18 July 2007.
Parallel & Cluster Computing N-Body Simulation and Collective Communications Henry Neeman, Director OU Supercomputing Center for Education & Research University.
Funding Caroline Wardle Senior Science Advisor, CISE Directorate National Science Foundation
ACI-REF Virtual Residency Henry Neeman, University of Oklahoma Director, OU Supercomputing Center for Education & Research (OSCER) Assistant Vice President,
Parallel & Cluster Computing Transport Codes and Shifting Henry Neeman, Director OU Supercomputing Center for Education & Research University of Oklahoma.
How to Obtain NSF Grants Review of Proposal Pieces A workshop providing information on the process of applying for external research awards. Sponsored.
Introduction to Parallel Programming & Cluster Computing MPI Collective Communications Joshua Alexander, U Oklahoma Ivan Babic, Earlham College Michial.
OKLAHOMA Supercomputing Symposium 2011 University of Oklahoma October 11, 2011 James Wicksted, RII Project Director Associate Director, Oklahoma EPSCoR.
Data Infrastructure Building Blocks (DIBBS) NSF Solicitation Webinar -- March 3, 2016 Amy Walton, Program Director Advanced Cyberinfrastructure.
Campus Cyberinfrastructure (CC*) Program NSF Larry Gallery Manager, Membership Development and K-20 Program Manager June 16,
Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Research & Education Facilitators Virtual Residency: Overview Henry Neeman, University of Oklahoma Director, OU Supercomputing.
The Whys/Whats/Hows of Proposal Writing Cindy Norris CS 5100.
Effective Communication: How to Talk to Researchers about Their Research Henry Neeman, University of Oklahoma Director, OU Supercomputing Center for Education.
So You Want to Write an NSF Grant Proposal
HI-TEC Conference Session, 10:30-11:15 a.m.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2016
So You Want to Write a Cyberinfrastructure Proposal
Setting Up a Low Cost Statewide Cyberinfrastructure Initiative
Supporting the NRP with a Lean CI Staff
The Whys/Whats/Hows of Proposal Writing
Key features of the first draft
Center for Excellence in Applied Computational Science and Engineering
Campus Cyberinfrastructure
John Halpin, Associate Dean, Perkins & Work Experience
NSF Graduate Research Fellowship
So You Want to Write an NSF Grant Proposal
Maine is IT! at SMCC Grant Playbook for
Introduction to Research Facilitation
The Shifting Landscape of CI Funding
CI Milieu (Mafia, Peeps, Homies)
Grant Writing Information Session
Introduction to Research Facilitation
Re-Establishing a Classified Senate
Rick McGee, PhD and Bill Lowe, MD Faculty Affairs and NUCATS
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2018
National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program
Henry Neeman, University of Oklahoma
NSF Tribal College Workshop
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2017
Writing More Effective NSF Proposals
Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program, NSF
Cyberinfrastructure Leadership Academy: Overview
Introduction to Research Facilitation
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
For more information and to book a program please visit our website:
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2019
Presentation transcript:

So You Want to Write a Cyberinfrastructure Proposal Henry Neeman, University of Oklahoma Director, OU Supercomputing Center for Education & Research (OSCER) Assistant Vice President, Information Technology - Research Strategy Advisor Associate Professor, Gallogly College of Engineering Adjunct Associate Professor, School of Computer Science ACI-REF Virtual Residency Workshop 2016 Friday August 12 2016

ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016 Outline Equipment Location and Type (MRI/CRI) Vision Research Activities to be Enabled Includes Results from Prior NSF Support Description of the equipment and Needs Impact on Research and Training Infrastructure Management Plan Cost Share & Institutional Commitment Write a CI Proposal ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016

ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016 Read the Solicitation The NSF provides an extensive, reasonably detailed solicitation. Read it. Obey it. Failure to obey the solicitation can be grounds for returning your proposal without review. Write a CI Proposal ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016

ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016 Vision Describe the overall project. Give your project a name. Use it often. It’s great if the name obviously relates to your institution. Justify: In your first paragraph, quote a report from a national body (e.g., NSF, national academies, etc) saying that this sort of project is important. What will be the outcome if the proposal isn’t funded? Don’t whine about how little your institution has or how old your current infrastructure is. That’s not the NSF’s problem. Give a quick list of research projects. Give a quick description of the equipment. Provide a table of all projects, including how much of the resource they need, their funding and headcounts. If the proposal has no unifying science theme, provide a list of themeless funded grants from past instances of the same program. Write a CI Proposal ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016

ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016 Research Projects Each research project to be served by the equipment should have anywhere from a page to a few sentences of description, along with the answers to the questions on the next few slides. Prove that it’ll be full a lot, ideally oversubscribed. Prove that what fills it is important, transformative research. Hero projects should get the most proposal real estate and should come first; gradually reduce the length of later, less shiny projects. For a Cyberinfrastructure proposal, the biggest consumers of the resource should be early, but you don’t have to go in order of consumption -- go from most compelling to least. For Small Institution proposals, there’s room to use teaching. Write a CI Proposal ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016

Equipment Proposal Questions #1 For each research project: How much funding does your research currently have? How much is pending? Planned? From what sources? How many faculty, staff, postdocs, grad students and undergrads on your team will be served by this equipment? What makes your research transformational? What are the broader impacts? Not just in the STEM research sense Underrepresented populations Integration of education and research Dissemination Societal impact etc Write a CI Proposal ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016

Equipment Proposal Questions #2 How much of the proposed resource (CPU hours, storage, bandwidth, whatever) do you expect to need over the next N years? How did you calculate this amount? Please give me a one page summary of your research that incorporates these issues. This is typically straightforward, because faculty often have either a 1 page summary from a grant proposal or a more broad research statement. Write a CI Proposal ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016

MRI/CRI for HPC Cluster Questions #1 How many CPU core hours or node hours will you need over the next N years? How did you determine that? Have you benchmarked your code? On what platform? What is the expected performance improvement on the proposed equipment, compared to the platform you benchmarked on? How did you come up with that estimate? If it’s your own code (or if you’re part of the development team for a community code), do you plan to optimize the software? If so, what performance improvement do you anticipate? Be conservative with your estimates. Wild claims of amazing speedup won’t impress the reviewers, they’ll just think you’re naïve or BSing. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2011/nsf11011/nsf11011.jsp Write a CI Proposal ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016

MRI/CRI for HPC Cluster Questions #2 If the proposal is for a new type of platform (for example, accelerators such as GPUs or Intel Xeon Phi/MIC): Who will be responsible for porting the code to the new platform? If this is either a community code or a commercial code, the porting may already have been done by the developers. Say that. Have they committed to do so? How reliable is that commitment? How is that being funded? What speedup is expected on the new platform? How was that number determined? Write a CI Proposal ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016

MRI/CRI for HPC or Storage Questions How much storage will be needed for this project? If this is for live storage: What is the maximum amount of storage at a time that will be needed for this project? If this is for archival storage: What is the total amount of storage needed over the lifetime of the equipment? How was that calculated? Write a CI Proposal ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016

ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016 CC* Questions #1 What is the expected typical size of each dataset being transferred? (It would be helpful to know expected growth rate: Are you expecting it to stay roughly the same over the next several years, or to double every two years, or what?) Write a CI Proposal ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016

ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016 CC* Questions #2 Where are such datasets originating, and where are they being transferred to? Why do such datasets need to be transferred between these endpoints? (That is, what requirement do these data transfers address for your team’s research?) Write a CI Proposal ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016

ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016 CC* Questions #3 What is the time window for transferring each such dataset? Why does each such dataset need to be transferred during that specific time window? That is, what's the negative impact of the transfer taking (a) marginally longer and (b) much longer? How often do you expect to have such a data transfer need? Write a CI Proposal ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016

ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016 Prior Results Every NSF proposal has to have a section on “Results from Prior NSF Support.” If your team has lots of that, you can’t fit it all. The solicitation and the NSF’s Grant Proposal Guide provide useful guidelines on that. The PI and each Co-PI should each provide the one most relevant grant. For an MRI, preference should be given to equipment grants, especially other MRIs. If you don’t have anything relevant, say that. If you do, is there a way that you can fit this proposal into a more coherent story about how your institution does CI? Write a CI Proposal ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016

Equipment Description Give a rationale for the equipment. This reinforces your vision statement. Describe the purchase process. Describe current similar equipment at your institution or otherwise available to your researchers. Just because there’s another one nearby doesn’t mean your proposal isn’t fundable. Just because there are national centers with bigger resources doesn’t mean your proposal isn’t fundable. Describe the role of the equipment. Write a CI Proposal ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016

Equipment Description Describe the equipment in detail. You can express lots of technical information in a modest number of paragraphs. Describe how the equipment will be accessed. Give the expected performance. Describe delivery, installation and operations training. Write a CI Proposal ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016

ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016 Impact Describe how the equipment will attract researchers. Will it be used to attract new faculty and/or new students? Refer back to the research section to describe the impact on your team’s research. Write a CI Proposal ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016

ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016 Broader Impacts Describe the broader impacts. Impact on STEM research Integration of research and education Underrepresented populations minorities, women, disabled non-PhD-granting institutions rural vs urban Societal impact: e.g., health, economic development etc National defense Refer back to the individual research projects’ broader impacts. You don’t need to have all of these items, but have some. Your broader impacts are judged more on what you’ve already done that on what you claim you’re going to do. Write a CI Proposal ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016

ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016 Management Plan Describe the facility where the equipment will reside, in detail. Operations labor: who, what credentials, who will manage them. You can make them or their boss Senior Personnel. Apportioning: Who will get how much? Decision making: Describe the procedure. Advisory committee(s) External: one CI, one researcher, one broader impacts. You can also have an Internal Advisory Committee. Timeline and milestones Sustainability plan: What happens when the grant ends? Write a CI Proposal ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016

Management Plan: Facility Where will the equipment reside? (e.g., data center) What capabilities does that location have? Space Power UPS? Generator? Cooling Fire suppression? Network Security Accessibility: Describe the path from loading dock to data center floor. Write a CI Proposal ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016

ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016 Cost Share For some programs (e.g., Major Research Instrumentation), cost share is mandatory for PhD-granting institutions and non-degree-granting institutions. MRI: 30% of total project budget (NSF pays 70%). For some programs (e.g., Major Research Instrumentation), cost share is forbidden for non-PhD-granting degree-granting institutions. Cost share can only be done at exactly the level required in the solicitation. There is NO SUCH THING as voluntary cost share: If they don’t ask for it, you can’t include it. Your proposal may be returned without review if you do. Write a CI Proposal ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016

Institutional Commitment Not the same as cost share. Not required, not prohibited. Strange rules: CANNOT mention any dollar figures (or anything that can be straightforwardly translated into dollar figures). MUST appear in the Facilities section (preference for at the end). SHOULD be confirmed in a letter of commitment from someone who has the authority to commit. MAY appear in the project description (which is a good idea). Write a CI Proposal ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016

CC: Cyberinfrastructure Plan Description of campus network: detail is good! Description of statewide network, if appropriate Relevant networking grants, if any IPv6 perfSonar InCommon BCP 38 (or uRPF) Connection to Internet2, AL2S, ESnet, etc Other relevant services (e.g., Globus Online, Cilogon) Be concise and specific …. Write a CI Proposal ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016

OK Supercomputing Symposium 2016 2002 Keynote: Ron Cooper Center of Excellence in IT & Telecom Exec Director 2003 Keynote: Peter Freeman NSF Comp & Info Sci & Engr Assistant Director 2005 Keynote: Walt Brooks NASA Advanced Supercomputing Division Director 2007 Keynote: Jay Boisseau Director Texas Advanced Computing Center U. Texas Austin 2004 Keynote: Sangtae Kim NSF Shared Cyberinfrastructure Division Director 2006 Keynote: Dan Atkins Head of NSF’s Office of Cyberinfrastructure 2008 Keynote: José Munoz Deputy Office Dir Sr Sci Advisor NSF Office of Cyberinfrastructure 2009 Keynote: Douglass Post Chief Scientist US Dept of Defense HPC Modernization Program 2010 Keynote Horst Simon Deputy Director Lawrence Berkeley Nat’l Laboratory FREE! Wed Sep 21 2016 @ OU Over 235 registra2ons already! Over 152 ie first day, over 200 in the first week, over 225 in the first month. 2015 Keynote: Jim Kurose Asst Director Comp & Info Sci & Engr Directorate, NSF 2011 Keynote Barry Schneider Program Manager National Science Foundation 2012 Keynote Thom Dunning Director National Center for Supercomputing Applications 2013 Keynote: John Shalf Dept Head CS Lawrence Berkeley Nat’l Lab CTO, NERSC 2014 Keynote: Irene Qualters Division Dir Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Division, NSF Reception/Poster Session Tue Sep 20 2015 @ OU Symposium Wed Sep 21 2015 @ OU 2016 Keynote: Dan Stanzione Exec Director Texas Advanced Computing Center U. Texas Austin Write a CI Proposal ACI-REF Virt Res 2016, Fri Aug 12 2016

Thanks for your attention! Questions? hneeman@ou.edu