Lindsay Barnette Medicare-Medicaid Coordination Office

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, FY.
Update on CMS Financial Alignment Initiative and State Integration Efforts Inside and Outside Demonstration Authority Lindsay Barnette Medicare-Medicaid.
Essential Health Benefits Benchmark Plan Selection, as of October 2012
Medicaid Eligibility for Working Parents by Income, January 2013
Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, as.
Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, as.
House price index for AK
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Children's Eligibility for Medicaid/CHIP by Income, January 2013
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Other Adults, January 2017
NJ WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NH NV
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
States with Section 1115 ACA Expansion Waivers, December 2015
Comprehensive Medicaid Managed Care Models in the States, 2014
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, May 2018 WY WI WV◊ WA VA^ VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, January WY WI WV◊ WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA.
Duals Integration Across the Spectrum
Share of Births Covered by Medicaid, 2006
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Coverage of Low-Income Adults by Scope of Coverage, January 2013
Dual Eligibles Across the States
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
WY WI WV WA VA* VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
WAHBE Brokers / QHPs across the country as of
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Participation in Medicaid Expansion, as of March 2014
Percent of Women Ages 19 to 64 Uninsured by State,
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Parents, January 2017
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
(map is coded by CAE-CD region)
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Average annual growth rate
Market Share of Two Largest Health Plans, by State, 2006
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
Uninsured Nonelderly Adult Rate Has Increased from Percent to 20
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Current Status of State Individual Marketplace and Medicaid Expansion Decisions, as of September 30, 2013 WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Income Eligibility Levels for Children in Medicaid/CHIP, January 2017
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Presentation transcript:

The Medicare-Medicaid Financial Alignment Initiative Overview and Status Update Lindsay Barnette Medicare-Medicaid Coordination Office Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services November 3, 2016

Medicare-Medicaid Enrollee Delivery System Transformation Current State Future State Provider and Payor-Centered Person-Centered Fragmented Care Coordinated Care Volume-Driven Outcome-Driven Complicated Benefit Overlap Simplified Processes 2

About the Medicare-Medicaid Coordination Office 3

Medicare-Medicaid Coordination Office Section 2602 of the Affordable Care Act Purpose: Improve quality, reduce costs, and improve the experience for individuals who receive Medicare and Medicaid benefits. Ensure full access to services to which they are entitled Improve coordination between the federal government and states Develop innovative care coordination and integration models Eliminate financial misalignments that lead to poor quality and cost shifting 4

Medicare-Medicaid Coordination Office Vision: Promote an improved experience for persons with both Medicare and Medicaid by: Focusing on person-centered models that promote coordination Developing a more easily navigable and simplified system of services Ensuring individual access to needed services and incorporating individual protections into each aspect of the new demonstrations Establishing accountability for outcomes across Medicare and Medicaid Requiring robust network adequacy standards for both Medicare and Medicaid Evaluating data on access, outcomes, and individual experience to ensure individuals receive higher quality, more cost-effective care 5

Overview of the Financial Alignment Initiative (FAI) 6

Financial Alignment Initiative Background: A longstanding barrier to coordinating care for Medicare-Medicaid enrollees is the financial misalignment between Medicare and Medicaid In 2011, CMS announced new models to integrate the service delivery and financing of both Medicare and Medicaid through federal-state demonstrations to better serve the population Goal: Increase access to quality, seamlessly integrated services for Medicare- Medicaid enrollees 7

Financial Alignment Initiative FAI Demonstration Models: Capitated Model: Three-way contracts among states, CMS, and health plans to provide comprehensive, coordinated care in a more cost- effective way Managed Fee-for-Service (FFS) Model: Agreements between states and CMS under which states would be eligible to benefit from savings resulting from initiatives to reduce costs in both Medicaid and Medicare Alternative Model: Agreement to integrate care for Medicare-Medicaid enrollees building on the State’s current infrastructure (MN) 8

The Capitated Model Enrollment assistance and options counseling Integrated set of enrollee materials and single ID card Person-centered care planning Choice of plans and providers Minimum travel and distance times Limitations on wait and appointment times Continuity of care provisions Care coordination and assistance with care transitions Integrated grievances and appeals process Substantive participating provider training requirements 9

Current Status of the FAI 10

FAI Participating States WA OR WY UT TX SD OK ND NM NV NE MT LA KS ID HI CO CA AR AZ AK WI WV VA TN SC OH NC MO MS MN MI KY IA IN IL GA FL AL VT PA NY* NJ NH MA ME CT DE RI MD DC Capitated financial alignment demonstration (10 states) Administrative alignment demonstration (1 state) Managed FFS financial alignment demonstration (2 states) *CMS and NY operate two separate capitated demonstrations, both in the NYC area. 11

FAI Participating States Demonstration Name Start Date Washington* HealthPathWashington July 2013 Massachusetts One Care October 2013 Illinois Medicare-Medicaid Alignment Initiative March 2014 California Cal MediConnect April 2014 Virginia Commonwealth Coordinated Care Ohio MyCare Ohio May 2014 Colorado* Accountable Care Collaborative September 2014 New York Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) January 2015 South Carolina Healthy Connections Prime February 2015 Michigan MI Health Link March 2015 Texas Texas Dual Eligible Integrated Care Project FIDA Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDD) April 2016 Rhode Island Rhode Island Integrated Care Initiative July 2016 *WA and CO are operating Managed FFS model demonstrations. All other states are operating Capitated model demonstrations. 12

FAI Independent Evaluation CMS contracted with RTI International to evaluate the demonstrations under the Financial Alignment Initiative The mixed methods evaluation includes qualitative components (e.g. site visits, beneficiary focus groups) and quantitative components (e.g. analyses on measures of quality, utilization, access to care, and costs) The first annual evaluation reports for Washington and Massachusetts were recently released An issue brief with early implementation findings from the first seven demonstrations is also available 13

FAI Lessons Learned Positive momentum Dramatic increase in the number of Medicare-Medicaid beneficiaries in financially integrated or total cost-of-care models Hundreds of thousands of assessments, increasing every day Major investments in new care coordination infrastructure Lessons learned Communications and enrollment Provider outreach and engagement Earning beneficiary engagement Unmet need Success stories 14

More Information www.cms.gov/Medicare-Medicaid-Coordination/Medicare-and- Medicaid-Coordination/Medicare-Medicaid-Coordination-Office/ MMCOCapsModel@cms.hhs.gov 15