Alternative Ratemaking Methodologies Docket No. M

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Decoupling Utility Revenues and Sales: Anti-consumer...anti-poor Presented by: Roger D. Colton Fisher, Sheehan & Colton Public Finance and General Economics.
Advertisements

FSR Training course Florence, October 10-14, 2011 REGULATION OF ENERGY UTILITIES Module 12 Electricity tariff design Ignacio J. Pérez-Arriaga Instituto.
TEEING OFF OUR DISCUSSION ON RETHINKING NATURAL GAS UTILITY RATE DESIGN The National Regulatory Research Institute Ken Costello Senior Institute Economist.
Glenn R. Jennings Chairman, President & CEO Delta Natural Gas Company, Inc. 1.
Cross-Border Infrastructure: A Toolkit Tariff and Rate Setting Session on Regulation & Accountability Max Bradford Castalia The views expressed here are.
GDN Charging Structure Bill Bullen Managing Director, Utilita.
3rd Party Billing Provider Content Provider Mobile User Mobile Content Percentage of User Fee User Fee (monthly subscription or actual usage.
1 NARUC/FERC Collaborative on Demand Response Pepco and Delmarva Power Blueprint for the Future Filings J. Mack Wathen July 15, 2007.
Jefferson County PUD 1 Presented by: Gary Saleba, President EES Consulting, Inc. A registered professional engineering and management consulting firm with.
Structure of Distribution Charges A User’s perspective David Tolley Innogy & Npower.
Policy Options for Energy Efficiency Programs: Decoupling and Other Innovative Rates Joint Meeting of the NARUC Committees on Gas, Electricity, Consumer.
Strategies for Addressing Fixed Cost Recovery Issues Dan Hansen Christensen Associates Energy Consulting October
Joseph A. Ferro June 15, 2010 Presented at 2010 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting San Francisco, CA Bay State Gas Company Distribution Rate Design “What is in the.
The Regulatory Assistance Project 177 Water St. Gardiner, Maine USA Tel: Fax: State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, Vermont.
An Overview of Revenue Decoupling Mechanisms Dan Hansen Christensen Associates Energy Consulting August 2012.
1 Managing Revenues in Regulated Industries Rate Design May 2008 Richard Soderman Director-Legislative Policy and Strategy.
Incentive Regulation Topics Scott A. Struck, CPA Financial Analysis Division Public Utilities Bureau Illinois Commerce Commission.
NASUCA 2015 MID-YEAR MEETING The Utility Push To Increase Customer Charge: What’s Wrong With It and How To Respond To It. Glenn A. Watkins, CRRA Senior.
March 30, 2008 AOBA Utility Report AOBA 2007 Year End Report on Utility Rates and Regulatory Activity (Updated March 30, 2008)
Revenue Decoupling: New York’s Experience & Future Directions NARUC 2007 Summer Committee Meetings July 17, 2007 James T. Gallagher Director, Office of.
Managing Retail Rate Changes Presented by Walter Haynes, Sr. Project Manager, Patterson & Dewar Engineers Central District Power Accountants Association.
Rate and Revenue Considerations When Starting an Energy Efficiency Program APPA’s National Conference June 13 th, 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Beauchamp,
Presentation to the: Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Demand-Side Response Working Group December 8, 2006 Gas Utility Decoupling in New Jersey A.
1 27 March 2013 MYPD3 Briefing Session – Portfolio Committee on Energy.
Realigning Utility Incentives Commissioner Wayne E. Gardner Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Keystone Energy Efficiency Alliance Sept. 20, 2011.
The Utility Push to Increase Customer Charge: What’s Wrong With It and How to Respond to It NASUCA Midyear Meeting Philadelphia, PA June 7-9, 2015 Kira.
Strategies for Addressing Fixed Cost Recovery Issues Dan Hansen Christensen Associates Energy Consulting August
Leveraging the Skills of Load Research to Add to the Bottom Line AEIC Load Research Conference Myrtle Beach, SC July 10-13, 2005.
CFC: Created and Owned by America’s Electric Cooperative Network Electric Rate Concepts In an Era of Change Oregon Statewide Directors Workshop Rod Crile.
1 SB 695 Impact On Rates LIOB- March 30, Current Residential Electric Rate Structure  Multi-tiered rate structure (up to 5 Tiers) based on the.
Designing Utility Regulation to Promote Investment in Cost-Effective Energy Efficiency Dale S. Bryk Natural Resources Defense Council Pennsylvania.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Energy Efficiency Action Plan Kathleen Hogan Director, Climate Protection Partnerships Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency NARUC Winter Meetings.
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION BALANCED RATES RULEMAKING R California Water Association’s Restatement of Goals and Objectives for the.
Example of Revenue Decoupling Utah Committee of Consumer Services Witness: David Dismukes Docket No T01 Exhibit CCS-2.1 Allowed Revenue per Customer.
FIRM TRANSPORTATION GAS SUPPLIER PRESENTATIONS GAS LOAD FORECAST.
2010 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting NASUCA 2010 Mid-Year Conference Presented by: Lee Smith Senior Economist and Managing Consultant Presented to: June ,
Rate Policy Discussion Presentation to Review Panel November 1, 2013.
RATE ANALYSIS FY FY 2019 March 6, 2014 CARSON VALLEY WATER UTILITY FUND 326 – DEPARTMENT 864.
Decoupling From Throughput and Conservation Rate Cases: A Case of Give and Take? Prepared by: Malcolm R. Ketchum Concentric Energy Advisors, Inc.
Tariff Structure Statements – Energex and Ergon Energy AER public forum.
Transmission Pricing Webinar 12 October Agenda for Webinar Introductions Purpose Potential Areas of Change – Overview –Revenue Proposal –Business.
Water Rate Presentation City Council Meeting December 14, 2010.
Customer Concerns with Implementing Demand Rates NASUCA and NARUC Conferences Austin, Texas November 2015 David Springe Consumer Counsel Kansas Citizens’
Washington Gas Winter Preparedness Paul S. Buckley - Director, Rates & Reg Affairs Nimmie S. Hickman - Manager, Gas Planning September 22, 2004.
Residential demand charges
Overview of Smart Metering initiatives in EU
Kaysville City, UT Electric Rate Study Results
City of Petersburg Water and Wastewater Rates
California Product Offerings
Iowa Industrial Energy Group Presentation
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
City of Sisters, OR 2017 Water & Sewer Rate Study
City of Petersburg Water and Sewer Rates April 26, 2011
Background and Process
RIIO-GD1:network charging volatility
Back to Basics What personal actions can I take now?
Cloud Billing - Monetization. Cloud Monetization Models Subscription model (Company provisioning) Subscription model (User provisioning) Pay As You Go.
Homework Ch 12 Electricity Regulation
May 2018 Proposed Electric Rate Increase - First Public Hearing
Matthew S. Dickens Resource Conservation Manager
Resource Adequacy Demand Forecast Coincidence Adjustments
2015 UNS Rate Case – DG Trends in Action
Director Jerry Werner March 26, 2010
Island Energy Advisory Committee Board
Energy Supply Business Model enabled by the Clean Energy Package
Retail Rate Design & Administration
OUTLINE Legislative context, NERSA vision and NERSA mission
Presentation transcript:

Alternative Ratemaking Methodologies Docket No. M-2015-2518883 March 3, 2016 Paula A. Strauss Director, Regulatory Strategy & Support Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania, Inc.

Columbia’s Proposed Residential Rate Designs Levelized Distribution Charge (“LDC”) Flat Monthly Fee for Distribution Service Volumetric Charges for Gas Costs and Rider Universal Services are Not Changed Revenue Normalization Adjustment (“RNA”) Provides Benchmark Distribution Revenues Established in a Rate Case “Breaks the Link” Between Residential Non-Gas Revenue and Gas Consumption Weather Normalization Adjustment (“WNA”) Adjusts a Customer’s Monthly Revenue Based on Actual Temperature Versus Normal

LDC is Columbia’s Choice for Residential Customers LDC Reflects Cost Causation Removes Existing Residential Intra-Class Cross Subsidies Sends Proper Price Signal for Consumers’ Usage Decisions Promotes Clarity for Shopping Customers Provides Clear Price Signals for Energy Efficiency Decisions Stability and Predictability Customers’ Bills are Less Volatile Columbia’s Revenues are More Predictable Simplifies an Economic Analysis Concerning Adding New Load May Help to Facilitate the Use of DSIC Simplicity of Bills Low Implementation Costs No Adjustments or Caps Needed Consistent Treatment of New and Existing Customers

Columbia’s Rate Designs