Overview of the FCC’s Rate-of-Return Reforms

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Universal Service Funding An Overview of the Connect America Fund Marsha Spellman, JD Oregon Connections Conference October 25,
Advertisements

Amendment 3/5 Workshop.
Feb , ETC DESIGNATION Feb , ETC Designation  What is an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (ETC)?  Carrier designated.
Different approaches before and after Telecom Act Before Telecom Act –Implicit cross subsidies –Based on rate of return approach –ILECs only receivers/IXCs.
View from the 8 th Floor August 7, 2012 Angie Kronenberg, Wireline Legal Advisor Office of FCC Commissioner Mignon Clyburn.
MOSS ADAMS LLP | 1 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 Rural Telecom Revenues FCC Reform Spring 2012 Presented to ABC Communications.
An analysis of the FCC’s USF and ICC Broadband Reform Proposals.
E-Rate Modernization & Montana’s Libraries Montana Telecommunications Association Annual Meeting Jennie Stapp, State Librarian August 6, 2014.
MOSS ADAMS LLP | 1 Tribal Telecom 2013 Federal Telecommunications Regulatory Updates.
Connect America Fund Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission February 28, 2012.
FCC Rural Broadband Trials: Funding to Connect Rural America Panelist: Jonathan Chambers, Chief Office of Strategic Planning and Policy Analysis Federal.
E-rate Modernization December 2, E-rate Basics Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism (E-rate) – Authorized by the 1996 Telecommunications.
NASUCA Baltimore Meeting November 11-14, 2012 Mark Schuling, Iowa Consumer Advocate.
NMECG PRESENTATION TO THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION APRIL 3, 2012 THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION’S ORDERS TO IMPLEMENT REFORM AND.
Joint Board Recommendation USF Reform NARUC Winter Meeting February 2008 Ray Baum Commissioner Oregon Public Utility Commission State Chair USJB.
Methods of Regulation Rate of return Incentive systems –Rate freeze –Rate bands or ranges –Price Caps.
ITA FCC WORKSHOP MARCH 14, Appreciate being here, but... I’d rather be playing Guard for the New York Knicks 2.
Different approaches before and after Telecom Act Before Telecom Act –Implicit cross subsidies –Based on rate of return approach –ILECs only receivers/IXCs.
Better Thinking. Better Results. Where does my Recovery Come from? Presented by: Bob Schoonmaker MTIA/ATA Annual Meeting August 9,
Access Charges The major questions –What services did IXC’s require in order to provide their interLATA toll and private line services? –What to do about.
Financial Considerations in the New World!! GTA Annual Meeting Hilton Head, SC June 19, 2012 Leo Staurulakis – Executive Vice President.
© 2015 Universal Service Administrative Company. All rights reserved Applicant Training Fiber Options.
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Wireless Telecommunications Overview January 2009.
The Nation Broadband Plan & Its Effects on USF and ICC Reform Krista K. Tanner Iowa Utilities Board June 7, 2010.
How Telephone Companies Make Money Doug Kitch Vince Wiemer Vince Wiemer.
Universal Service and USF Reform: Establishing a Rational and Efficient System Presentation to NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting San Antonio, TX June 28, 2011.
Summary and State Implications FCC Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking CenturyLink February 28, 2012.
Better Thinking. Better Results. Beyond “The Order” – The New Regulatory Horizon for Rural Carriers Bob Schoonmaker, President GVNW Consulting,
Introduction The following chapter will review: –Overview –Model assumptions –The Cost Proposal & Evaluation –Payments methodology –Financial Incentives/Disincentives.
Growth Initiatives Mailing Services MTAC February 18, 2010.
IGA State & Local Government Webinar May 2, 2012 Kim Scardino, Deputy Division Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau.
E-Rate Reform & The Impact for Kansas January 20, 2015.
Intercarrier Compensation: Rate of Return Carrier Impacts Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission – Workshop February 28, 2012 Jeff Dupree NECA.
Per-Minute Access Charges Per-Minute Access Charges to long distance companies Rates for 1996 through 1998 from Telecommunications Industry Revenue: 1998,
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
1 Service Center FY2007 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation Training Proposed Policy Revisions & Guidelines for Preparing FY2007 Billing Rate Proposals.
Uses of Rate of Return Method For regulatory commissions –At the state level, used as the basis for rate cases: carriers’ requests for a rate increase.
© 2010 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property. Intercarrier Compensation.
Default price-quality paths for gas pipeline services Briefing on the Commission’s final decision for financial market analysts 28 February 2013.
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
Tariff Structure Statements – Energex and Ergon Energy AER public forum.
FCC USF REFORM Presented by: Gordon Dauchy Vice President - JSI May 11, 2016.
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
Disparity in Operations: Comparative Analysis of Small ILEC CHCF-A Carriers to Non-CHCF-A Carriers Communications DivisionJanuary 2010* * Revised as of.
Revised draft decision: Initial default price-quality paths for gas pipeline services Briefing for financial market analysts 24 October 2012.
Mainstream Fiber Networks partnership Proposal
The FCC’s Love Triangle with Census Maps and the Illusion of Efficiency (AKA: Analyzing Competitive Overlap/Disaggregation of Costs in Competitive Areas) 
Pole attachmentS Joint Accounting Conference may 12, 2017
New Reporting Annual ETC Reporting One-time items
Agenda History, 1934 – 1996 What is Universal Service?
Agenda Model Accuracy Sufficiency of support and reasonable comparability of rates Standards for Unsubsidized Competitors Disaggregation Caps in the Presence.
Introduction Capital Allowances Depreciation specifically disallowed
Critical Issues.
FY2007 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation (Part I)
Different approaches before and after Telecom Act
Prepared by Doug Kitch, CPA, Principal
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
Strategies for Promoting Equity in Clean Energy Deployment June 27th 2016 Tracy Babbidge, Bureau Chief Energy Policy.
Discussion of Operating Expense Caps and Other Expense Considerations Resulting From the FCC’s Universal Service Fund Reform Order Prepared by Doug Kitch,
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
FCC National Broadband Plan (NBP) and Rural Universal Service Reform
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
Transmission Pricing & Regional Electric Markets
Process Overview for Service Providers
USF Disaggregation The Big Debate
Federal Policy Update “Fins to the left, fins to the right...”
Wireline Competition Bureau
The New Mexico Rural Universal Service Fund
Budget Update April 29, 2019.
Commonwealth of Virginia
Presentation transcript:

Overview of the FCC’s Rate-of-Return Reforms Presented by: Vince Wiemer, CPA Principal Alexicon USF Briefing May 16-17, 2016

Two Regime Options Model-Based Support Voluntary election Support calculated by Alternative Connect America Cost Model Defined term of support Support received before investments made Specific deployment obligations Revised Rate-of-Return Mechanisms Support calculated using modified existing mechanisms Standalone broadband support added Operating expense limits Capital investment allowance 5-year deployment obligations

Model Support Additional monies to spur rural broadband growth Viable option for carriers no longer receiving HCLS Close the digital divide among RoR carriers Provides support based on “forward- looking efficient costs” Why? : FCC motives Who? : Eligibility How? : Term and amount What? : Service obligations Where? : Deployment When? : Process Timeline Pesky Details

Model Support Carrier Eligibility Carriers reporting 10/1 broadband deployment to 90% or more of its eligible locations in the state are not eligible Statewide election of support Location Eligibility Census blocks will not be supported: with modeled costs < $52.50 per month with unsubsidized competitors where the incumbent or an affiliate provides 10/1 Mbps using fiber or cable Why? : FCC motives Who? : Eligibility How? : Term and amount What? : Service obligations Where? : Deployment When? : Process Timeline Pesky Details

Model Support How long? 10 year support term (2017-2026) Carrier will receive a set monthly support amount as determined by the model support offer process How much in total? Model-based budget includes up to $150 million per year in excess of electing carriers’ 2015 legacy support) If demand exceeds budget there is possible additional funding of $50 million Why? : FCC motives Who? : Eligibility How? : Term and amount What? : Service obligations Where? : Deployment When? : Process Timeline Pesky Details

Model Support How much per location? Eligible locations with costs between $52.50 and $252.50 are “fully funded” Eligible locations with costs exceeding $252.50 are “capped” and will receive a maximum of $200 in monthly support Why? : FCC motives Who? : Eligibility How? : Term and amount What? : Service obligations Where? : Deployment When? : Process Timeline Pesky Details

Model Support What? : Service obligations Why? : FCC motives Who? : Eligibility How? : Term and amount What? : Service obligations Where? : Deployment When? : Process Timeline Pesky Details Minimum usage: 150Mbp which will increase over time based on the average usage of the majority of consumers Latency: 95% or more of peak period < 100 milliseconds

Model Support Build-out obligations determined by the model Annual milestones required Build-out must be to eligible locations Must deploy to at least 95% of the required locations by the end of the 10 yrs Why? : FCC motives Who? : Eligibility How? : Term and amount What? : Service obligations Where?: Deployment When? : Process Timeline Pesky Details

Model Support Competitive challenges due 21 day after updated model released Final model and support offers released in June 2016 via Public Notice Carriers will have 90 days to elect into model Election irrevocable if budget not exceeded If demand does exceed budget, a revised offer will be prepared May result in changes to capped location support Additional 30 days to accept revised offer Why? : FCC motives Who? : Eligibility How? : Term and amount What? : Service obligations Where? : Deployment When? : Process Timeline Pesky Details

Model Support Glide Path Pesky Details Electors receiving less model support than current legacy support Transition based on support difference Note that transitions are up to 4 and 9 years Why? : FCC motives Who? : Eligibility How? : Term and amount What? : Service obligations Where? : Deployment When? : Process Timeline Pesky Details

Model Support ETC Reporting Changes Tariff Issues Geocoded new locations on “rolling” basis Final annual submission by March 1, starting in 2017 Best practice within 30 days of service Geolocation of existing locations due no later than March 1, 2019 Five- year plans not required after 2016 Tariff Issues No longer participate in NECA CL pool; not subject to RoR for common line offerings Can participate in NECA tariffs for end user charges May assess a wholesale broadband-only loop charge not to exceed $42 per month on end user or ISP Why? : FCC motives Who? : Eligibility How? : Term and amount What? : Service obligations Where? : Deployment When? : Process Timeline Pesky Details

Questions about the ACAM?

Revised Legacy ICLS will be renamed the Connect America Fund Broadband Loop Support CAF BLS will also recover the difference between Broadband-only Loop costs and high cost threshold 100% interstate allocation of common line costs for standalone broadband lines Assumes carriers will recover at least $42 per month from end users for broadband-only loops Note that “broadband-only” includes lines with non-traditional regulated voice services Data-Only Broadband Rate-of-Return Operating Expense Limits Capital Investment Limits Build-out Obligations Competitive Overlap Total Budget Limits Implementation Dates Pesky Details

Revised Legacy Rate-of-Return reduced from 11.25% to 9.75% Included 40+ pages of “analysis” and justification for the change Data-Only Broadband Rate-of-Return Operating Expense Limits Capital Investment Limits Build-out Obligations Competitive Overlap Total Budget Limits Implementation Dates Pesky Details

Revised Legacy Regression analysis based on operating cost per housing unit Density and housing units used as variables 1.5 standard deviations Plant specific, Plant Non-specific, Customer Operations, and Limited Corp Ops Expense Will be applied proportionately to the OpEx accounts used to determine a carrier’s HCLS and CAF BLS First year, 50% transition of reductions NECA to submit schedule of companies subject to the limitation Data-Only Broadband Rate-of-Return Operating Expense Limits Capital Investment Limits Build-out Obligations Competitive Overlap Total Budget Limits Implementation Dates Pesky Details

Revised Legacy Each carrier will have a CapEx allowance that is based on the carrier’s inflation adjusted depreciation loop plant CapEx allowance adjusted based on carrier’s current broadband deployment Adjusted 1% for each percentage point the carrier is above or below the average New rule applies to investments made after the effective date of the Order so it will not affect HCLS until 2018 or CAF BLS until 2017 Several specific situations that may cause adjustment (grants, loans, etc.) Data-Only Broadband Rate-of-Return Operating Expense Limits Capital Investment Limits Build-out Obligations Competitive Overlap Total Budget Limits Implementation Dates Pesky Details

Revised Legacy Carriers with < 80% 10/1 Mbps broadband deployment have deployment obligations Percentage of forecast CAF BLS used to deploy broadband to unserved locations Deployment obligation = CAF BLS / cost per location Higher of actual cost per loop of similar carriers with 95% broadband deployment or 150% of average cost of with similar density and deployment Or, ACAM calculated cost of service Data-Only Broadband Rate-of-Return Operating Expense Limits Capital Investment Limits Build-out Obligations Competitive Overlap Total Budget Limits Implementation Dates Pesky Details

Revised Legacy Wireline broadband not required where deployment cost would exceed the $250 per line per month cap or $10,000 per location per project limit Obligation can be met any time during the five-year deployment period Reasonable request standard still in effect for remaining unserved locations FCC “encourages” carriers to identify any census blocks where they expect not to deploy broadband for upcoming auction Why would any carrier do this? Data-Only Broadband Rate-of-Return Operating Expense Limits Capital Investment Limits Build-out Obligations Competitive Overlap Total Budget Limits Implementation Dates Pesky Details

Revised Legacy CAF BLS will not be provided in areas served by a qualifying unsubsidized competitor Does not affect HCLS Competitive service obligations 10/1 Mbps, 100ms latency, 150 Mb usage, comparable rates Facilities-based provider of voice and data Must certify ability to provide service within 10 days to 85% of residential locations in a given census block Excludes CETCs and incumbent affiliates Data-Only Broadband Rate-of-Return Operating Expense Limits Capital Investment Limits Build-out Obligations Competitive Overlap Total Budget Limits Implementation Dates Pesky Details

Revised Legacy Challenge process will determine competitively served census blocks Burden of proof is on the competitor Must provide sufficient evidence of serving 85% of census block If competitor does not participate in the process, are is not deemed competitive Cost disaggregation is needed in study areas with competitive census blocks May elect one of several mechanisms Support reductions will be phased in 2-year transition for reductions < 25% 5-year transition for reduction > 25% Data-Only Broadband Rate-of-Return Operating Expense Limits Capital Investment Limits Build-out Obligations Competitive Overlap Total Budget Limits Implementation Dates Pesky Details

Revised Legacy $2 billion annual budget as adopted in 2011 No inflationary adjustment If demand for support exceeds the budget, USAC will determine a target amount for HCLS and CAF BLS Reduction of support will be split between a per-line reduction and a pro rata reduction applied to each study area Data-Only Broadband Rate-of-Return Operating Expense Limits Capital Investment Limits Build-out Obligations Competitive Overlap Total Budget Limits Implementation Dates Pesky Details

Revised Legacy Order effective May 25, 2016 but… Following still awaiting OMB approval: Imputation of ARC for broadband-only lines OpEx and CapEx limits CAF ACAM model support option Annual reporting requirements Elimination of support due to competition End user charge for broadband-only service Removal of broadband-only from SpA CAF-BLS implementation Jan 1, 2017 Capital Investment Allowance effective June 24, 2016 (30 days after effective date of the Order) Data-Only Broadband Rate-of-Return Operating Expense Limits Capital Investment Limits Build-out Obligations Competitive Overlap Total Budget Limits Implementation Dates Pesky Details

Revised Legacy Rate of Return reduction starts July 1, 2016 CAF BLS Annual Schedule Data-Only Broadband Rate-of-Return Operating Expense Limits Capital Investment Limits Build-out Obligations Competitive Overlap Total Budget Limits Implementation Dates Pesky Details

Revised Legacy Cost Allocation and Tariffing Part 69 updated to include new Consumer Broadband-Only Loop category RoR carrier may (not required to) a consumer broadband-only loop charge Subject to FUSC if tariffed If detariffed, must remove CBOL RRQ from the pooling process Continue to assess Subscriber Line Charges on end-user of voice and voice+data. May also assess an Access Recovery Charge on any line that can be assessed a SLC Data-Only Broadband Rate-of-Return Operating Expense Limits Capital Investment Limits Build-out Obligations Competitive Overlap Total Budget Limits Implementation Dates Pesky Details

Revised Legacy CAF ICC Considerations Must impute ARC on Consumer Broadband- Only lines Any revenues recovered from facilities that were voice+data and become data-only should be reported as double recovery for CAF-ICC purposes Represcribed RoR does not impact recovery ETC Reporting Requirements Provide geolocation and speed information of newly served broadband locations for prior year by March 1 Reductions in support for non-compliance No longer required to file a 5-year plan and annual progress reports after 2016 Data-Only Broadband Rate-of-Return Operating Expense Limits Capital Investment Limits Build-out Obligations Competitive Overlap Total Budget Limits Implementation Dates Pesky Details

Questions about the Revised Legacy Mechanisms?

Vince Wiemer, CPA Principal vince@alexicon.net 903-440-2034