XU Gang IHEP, Beijing, China Oct. 30, 2012, Huairou, China

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide: 1 Welcome to the Non Linear Beam Dynamics Workshop P. Elleaume Non Linear Beam Dynamics Workshop, ESRF May 2008.
Advertisements

Lattice Status SuperB Project Workshop SLAC, October 6-9, 2009 Yuri Nosochkov for the SuperB Lattice Team Major recent updates by P. Raimondi and S. Sinyatkin.
SuperKEKB Lattice and Dynamic Aperture H. Koiso Apr. 20, 2005 Super B Factory Workshop in Hawaii.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Considerations for Nonlinear Beam Dynamics in NSLS-II lattice design Weiming Guo 05/26/08 Acknowledgement: J. Bengtsson.
Dr. Zafer Nergiz Nigde University THE STATUS OF TURKISH LIGHT SOURCE.
SuperB Damping Rings M. Biagini, LNF-INFN P. Raimondi, SLAC/INFN A. Wolski, Cockroft Institute, UK SuperB III Workshop, SLAC, June 2006.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
DR km DTC Lattice 7 July 2011 D. Rubin. DTC01 layout 1.Circumference = m, 712m straights 2.~ 6 phase trombone cells 3.54 – 1.92m long wigglers.
Optimization of dynamic aperture for the ESRF upgrade Andrea Franchi on behalf of the ASD Beam Dynamics Group Workshop on Accelerator R&D for Ultimate.
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
CLIC Pre-damping rings overview F. Antoniou, Y. Papaphilippou CLIC Workshop 2009.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
SuperB Lattice Studies M. Biagini LNF-INFN ILCDR07 Workshop, LNF-Frascati Mar. 5-7, 2007.
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design ( Modified FODO ) ** Yi-Peng Sun *,1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 Wei-Shi Wan 3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics,
1 Dynamic aperture studies in e+e- factories with crab waist IR’07, November 9, 2007 E.Levichev Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk.
An ultra-low emittance lattices for Iranian Light Source Facility storage ring Esmaeil Ahmadi On behalf of beam dynamics group Iranian Light Source Facility.
A DDBA lattice upgrade of the Diamond ring R. Bartolini, C. Bailey*, M. Cox*, N. Hammond*, R. Holdsworth*, J. Kay*, J. Jones**, E. Longhi*, S. Mhaskar*,
PEP-X Ultra Low Emittance Storage Ring Design at SLAC Lattice Design and Optimization Min-Huey Wang SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory With contributions.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Impact of Errors and Damping Wigglers on the Lattice W. Guo 02/26/2009 NSLS-II ASAC Meeting Acknowledgement: M. Borland.
Workshop on Accelerator R&D for Ultimate Storage Rings – Oct Nov.1 – Huairou, Beijing, China A compact low emittance lattice with superbends for.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 1 NSLS-II Lattice Design 1.TBA-24 Lattice Design - Advantages and shortcomings Low emittance -> high chromaticity -> small.
Super Tau Charm Lattice ST20_49/55 Pantaleo Raimondi La Biodola, May
Plans for Diamond-II ESLSXX Workshop, Bessy II, 19 November 2012 R. Bartolini Diamond Light Source and John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science University.
Choice of L* for FCCee: IR optics and DA A.Bogomyagkov, E.Levichev, P.Piminov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk HF2014, IHEP Beijing, 9-12.
ALCW at SLAC, January 7, 2004J. Rogers, Novel Schemes for Damping Rings1 Novel Schemes for Damping Rings J. Rogers Cornell University Improving dynamic.
Off-axis injection lattice design studies of HEPS storage ring
Round beams experience at BINP … and other ideas
LOW EMITTANCE CELL WITH LARGE DYNAMIC APERTURE
JLEIC simulations status April 3rd, 2017
NSLS-II Lattice Design Strategies Weiming Guo 07/10/08
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Summary of CEPC pretzel scheme design
CEPC pretzel scheme study
Non linear optimization of the CLIC pre-damping rings
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Pretzel scheme of CEPC H. Geng, G. Xu, Y. Zhang, Q. Qin, J. Gao, W. Chou, Y. Guo, N. Wang, Y. Peng, X. Cui, T. Yue, Z. Duan, Y. Wang, D. Wang, S. Bai,
Status of PEP-X Lattice Design Study
Laboratoire de L’Accélérateur Linéaire
PETRA IV Lattice Studies
The new 7BA design of BAPS
R. Bartolini Diamond Light Source Ltd
Progress of SPPC lattice design
Superconducting Ultimate-Storage-Ring Design
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Optics Design of the CEPC Interaction Region
Design of Interaction Region
SPEAR3 Lower Emittance & Nonlinear Dynamics
Study on Emittance Reduction with a Robinson Wiggler in HEPS
Pulsed Sextupole Injection for Beijing Advanced Photon Source
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
M. E. Biagini, LNF-INFN SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov , 2007
Update on CEPC pretzel scheme design
Lattice design for CEPC
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Sawtooth effect in CEPC PDR/APDR
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Fanglei Lin, Yuri Nosochkov Vasiliy Morozov, Yuhong Zhang, Guohui Wei
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
JLEIC Collider Rings’ Geometry Options (II)
Progress Update on the Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Current Status of Ion Polarization Studies
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

XU Gang IHEP, Beijing, China Oct. 30, 2012, Huairou, China BAPS Lattice Design XU Gang IHEP, Beijing, China Oct. 30, 2012, Huairou, China

Topics Goals Linear lattice design Damping wiggler Round beam Chromaticity correction Summary

Design Goals E=5GeV Circumference 1200~1500m High brightness operation mode Emittance 10pm/10pm(diffraction limit for 10keV X-ray) Beam current 100mA~150mA High flux operation mode flat beam(no damping wiggler) Beam current 200mA~300mA Large enough dynamic aperture for injection

Linear lattice design 7BA*36 25mm magnet pole diameter, combined bending magnet 15BA*16 6BA*40 48mm magnet pole diameter, quadrupole with sextuple components Damping wiggler 31mm period 2.3Tesla damping wiggler about 60m Round beam local: solnoid+ID+antisolenoid global: Mobius ring or other

7BA*36 Linear Optics Circumference: 1364.8 m, 2 superperiods, 36 supercells Working point: 111.39, 39.30 Natural chromaticity: -184, -181 Natural emittance: 51 pm.rad Y. Jiao, IHEP BP Seminar

Lattice layout in one superperiod 7-m low-beta straight section High-beta 10-m Straight section *2, bx/y = (80, 21) m; Low-beta 7-m Straight section *36, bx/y = (5,1.11) m ; Phase advance per supercell: (6p + p/6 + duxp/36, 2p + p/6 + duyp/36) with dux = 0.39, duy = 0.30. Y. Jiao, IHEP BP Seminar

Dynamic aperture Large enough on-momentum DA, satisfies the requirements of pulsed sextupole injection; Momentum acceptance is not large, ~ 1.5%, not long Touschek lifetime. However, this can be cured with top-up injection. On-momentum DA Off-momentum DA Y. Jiao, IHEP BP Seminar

Black: bare lattice, Green: multiple error=10-4, Blue: multiple error & bending error

Injection insertion φxinj= φxstd+2π φyinj= φystd Keep the symmetry for linear lattice Help for dynamic aperture for on-momentum Straight length>9m for pulse sextupole injection

PSM: pulse sextupole magnet for injection, L=0.6m, 1000Tesla/m2 52mm pole diameter bottom width<4μs (details ref. KANG Wen also JIAO Yi talk) SEP: Septum magnet Straight length 9.2m >5mm dynamic aperture

15BA*16

Lower β section with double wraists βx =3m, βy =1m, straight section 7m*2 Canting structure is neccesary

higher β section for injection βx =80m, βy =8m, middle straight section 9.2m for injection φxinj= φxstd φyinj= φystd(hope improve dynamic aperture for off-momentum)

Middle β section for Mobius ring βx = βy =7m, straight section 14m φxMob= φxstd φyMob= φystd Length between the two arc bending magets is equal to each other for high beta and middle beta section

Dynamic aperture for 15BA

6BA*40

Damping wiggler effects Damping wiggler (DW), peak field 2.3 Tesla, Undulator period 3.1 cm, 40-m DW  20 pm 50-m DW  17 pm 60-m DW  15 pm 70-m DW  14 pm Lu (m) Y. Jiao, IHEP BP Seminar lu (m)

Round beam Local round beam 1.75m 15Tesla solenoid( π/4 x-y rotating ) +2.5m ID(circle polarity EPU is best for decouple) + 1.75m 15Tesla anti-solenoid (- π/4 x-y rotating ) at least 6m space local scheme by A. Chao and P. Raimondi Global round beam: π/2 x-y rotating solenoid(Mobius ring) other method

εx= (AA DD-BB CC) Cos[(c z)/2]2 εy= (AA DD-BB CC) Sin[(c z)/2]2

Chromaticity correction Up to 5th order DA map( polynomial ) with sextupole, octupole, decuple, duodecupole strength variables(can reach to about 30 variables) Up to 6th order corresponding Hamiltonian Up to 4th order chromaticity Up to 2nd detuning coefficients Up to 6th resonance coefficients Optimizing chromaticity curve under controlling detuning and resonance coefficients (mainly on 3rd order and 4th order)

Comparison for different detune coefficient(dq/dx)

Summary The lattice design of BAPS is still in progress. To reach diffraction limit very strong damping wiggler and solenoid is necessary in our design The dynamic aperture for bare lattice and 10-4 multiple error looks acceptable for pulse sextupole injection For NBA structure, N=7 is popular in USR design, How large N(>7) is applicable?