Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
“Real World”: SVG, De Novo or Restenotic Coronary Artery Lesions Chronic Stable Angina, Silent Ischemia, Acute Coronary Syndromes Vessel Diameters:
Advertisements

DEFINITIVE AR - Acute Outcomes -
Randomized Comparison of FFR-guided and Angiography-guided Provisional Stenting for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: The DKCRUSH-VI trial Shao-Liang.
2 Year Clinical Outcomes from the Pivotal RESOLUTE US Study Laura Mauri MD, MSc on behalf of the RESOLUTE US Investigators Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
1 Michael Dake, MD Research/Research Grants, Clinical Trial Support –W. L. Gore –Cook Medical Consulting Fees/Honoraria –W. L. Gore –Abbott Vascular Equity.
FAST (Femoral Artery Stenting Trial) Final Results Hans Krankenberg (on behalf of the FAST Investigators) Hamburg University Cardiovascular Center Prof.
Klinikum Rosenheim Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology LINC 2014 DEFINITIVE AR Severe Ca++ Arm 30-Day Results Gunnar Tepe, MD On behalf.
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
Endovascular Treatment of Atherosclerotic Popliteal Artery Lesions – Balloon Angioplasty versus primary Stenting: A prospective, multi-centre, randomised.
Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial Myeong-Ki.
Early and Late Stent Thrombosis Rates in 5,054 Real-World Patients from XIENCE V USA With and Without Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Interruptions James Hermiller,
Philippe Généreux, MD for the Tryton Bifurcation Trial Investigators Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation New York City.
Prof. Dr. Sigmund Silber, FESC, FACC On behalf of the RESOLUTE
Martin B. Leon, MD Key Messages Tryton Pivotal: Randomized Trial and
Global Experience with Peripheral DCBs/Stent Studies: C.R. Bard
David E. Kandzari, MD on behalf of the BIONICS investigators
Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB III Trial 2-Year Results Stephen G. Ellis, MD,
Disclosures Runlin Gao has received a research grant
Is Zilver PTX DES the De Facto Stent to Deploy?
Runlin Gao, M.D. On behalf of ABSORB China Investigators
Lutonix® Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon to Treat Obstructive Lesions in the Superficial Femoral and Popliteal Arteries Preliminary Six-Month Results from.
DCB Potential Beyond the Selected SFA Lesions Types Studied in Trials to Date What We Know About the ‘Real World’ Krishna Rocha-Singh, MD Chief Scientific.
Nico H.J. Pijls, William F. Fearon, Peter Jüni, and Bernard De Bruyne
Updates From NOTION: The First All-Comer TAVR Trial
Heavily calcified SFA lesions do not avoid the use of 4 F systems
Fem-Pop Stenting: Is ZILVER PTX DES The “De Facto” Stent to Deploy?
Final Five-Year Follow-up of the SYNTAX Trial: Optimal Revascularization Strategy in Patients With Three-Vessel Disease and/or Left Main Disease Patrick.
Stent Graft for the Treatment of ISR:
12 Month Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Implanted with a Resolute Zotarolimus-eluting Stent: Initial Results from the RESOLUTE Global Clinical.
BRS Next Large Trials: What is on the Horizon?
Harmonized Assessment by Randomized Multicenter Study of OrbusNEich’s COMBO StEnt Japan-USA HARMONEE: Primary Report of A Randomized Trial of a Bioabsorbable.
July 17, 2018 IN.PACT SFA Randomized Trial of IN.PACT Admiral DCB vs. PTA for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Lesions in the SFA and/or PPA 1-year Primary.
9:00 AM-9:05 AM, Tuesday, Oct. 31; Room 201/203
ABSORB Japan: 3-year Clinical and Angiographic Results of a Randomized trial Evaluating the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs. Metallic Drug-eluting.
The Tryton Bifurcation Trial:
CoreValve Continued Access Study Shows Continued Improvement in 1-Year Outcomes With Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Steven J. Yakubov,
Eric J Dippel, MD FACC Davenport, Iowa, USA February 19, 2017
FAVOR II Europe-Japan FAVOR II E-J
Instent Restenosis and Occlusion: Time for Surgical Revision?
OCT-Guided PCI What needs to be done to establish criteria?
Insights from the IMPERIAL and MAJESTIC SFA Studies
Drug-Coated Balloons in Peripheral Artery Disease
MACE Trial Rationale, Study Design, and Current Status
PMA Analysis of the CREST Trial Approvability of the RX Acculink Carotid Stent System for Revascularization of Carotid Artery Stenosis in Standard Surgical.
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
Late Follow-Up from the PARTNER Aortic Valve-in-Valve Registry
Two-Year Extended Follow-up in Patients Receiving a Zotarolimus-eluting Stent in the E-Five Registry Martin T. Rothman, Ian T. Meredith, Keyur Parikh,
A Randomized, Prospective, Intercontinental Evaluation of a Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-eluting Stent: the CENTURY II Trial: an Update with 2 Years.
American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Stephan Windecker
FAIR Trial design: Patients with SFA in-stent restenosis (ISR) were randomized to either a paclitaxel-coated balloon (DCB) (dose 3.5 μg/mm2) or routine.
Drug-Coated Balloons:
3-Year Clinical Outcomes From the RESOLUTE US Study
ENDEAVOR IV: 5 Year Final Outcomes
Comparison of Everolimus- and Biolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds: 2-year Outcomes of the EVERBIO.
ILLUMENATE Trial design: Patients with superficial femoral artery (SFA) and/or popliteal arterial stenoses were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to either balloon.
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
Incidence and management of restenosis after treatment of unprotected left main disease with drug-eluting stents: 70 restenotic cases from a cohort of.
ENDEAVOR II Five-Year Clinical Follow-up
FOR DISTRIBUTION BY MEDTRONIC OFFICE OF MEDICAL AFFAIRS ONLY.
12-month clinical and 13-month angiographic outcomes from a randomized trial evaluating the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs. metallic drug-eluting.
Translation Pathway for Coronary Stent Development- Clinical Endpoints
Gregg W. Stone, MD Columbia University Medical Center
Division of Endovascular Interventions
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
ENDEAVOR III Multicenter Randomized Trial Clinical/MACE Angio/IVUS
Martin B. Leon, David R. Holmes, Dean J. Kereiakes, Jeffrey J
Long Term Clinical Results from the Endeavor Program: 5-Year Follow up
Maintenance of Long-Term Clinical Benefit with
Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: First Report of the Five-Year Clinical Outcomes from.
Atlantic Cardiovascular Patient Outcomes Research Team
Presentation transcript:

ILLUMENATE Pivotal Stellarex DCB IDE Study 12-Month Results Sean Lyden, MD On behalf of Co-PI Prakash Krishnan, MD and the ILLUMENATE Pivotal Investigators Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Ohio

Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest Within the past 12 months, I or my spouse/partner have had a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with the organization(s) listed below. Affiliation/Financial Relationship Company Grant/Research Support Consulting Fees/Honoraria Other Financial Benefit Cook, Cordis, Gore, Endologix, Bolton, Silkroad, Trivascular, Medtronic, Spectranetics, Bard Spectranetics, Biomet, Endologix, TVA Medical VIVA Physicians Board Member

Background SFA disease remains a challenge to manage Current PTA results from DCB trials are associated with improved outcomes over OPC goals 1,2,3 Drug-coated balloons have improved patency over PTA in randomized trials 1,2 Severe calcium, diabetes, CKD, women and small vessels remain a problem for current technologies4,5,6,7 1 N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):145-53 2 J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 1;66(21):2329-38 3 Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 May 1;69(6):910-9 4 J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Oct;23(5):731-7 5JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(8):923-33 6 J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Aug;27(8):1204-14 7 Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014 Aug;37(4):898-907

Study Device: StellarexTM DCB (Spectranetics) February 11, 2018 Study Device: StellarexTM DCB (Spectranetics) EnduraCoatTM technology: Low dose paclitaxel, 2 µg/mm2 Excipient: Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Proprietary open-folded coating technology Balloon catheter features: Catheter shaft designed for pushability Low 0.039” tip entry profile Flexible balloon and tip for tracking through tortuous anatomy CAUTION: Investigational device. Not for sale or distribution in the United States. Copyright UPM-Kymmene Group

Stellarex Program: Sites & Investigators ILLUMENATE Pivotal IDE 300 subjects enrolled 43 US & EU sites ILLUMENATE FIH 80 subjects enrolled 3 EU sites P. Faries, NY, USA C. Bosarge, FL, USA K. Niazi, GA, USA O. Rosales, TX, USA A. Jain, CA, USA M. Shishehbor, OH, USA R. Sachar, NC, USA G. Al-Khoury, PA, USA W. Bachinsky, PA, USA M. Goodwin, IL, USA J. Cardenas, AZ, USA J. Angle, VA, USA M. Werner, Vienna, Austria J. Park, TX, USA M. Brodmann, Graz, Austria M. Mewissen, WI, USA C. Mena-Hurtado, CT, USA E. Korngold, OR, USA J. Mustapha, MI, USA P. Desai, NC, USA J. Ricci, MI, USA M. Ghani, OK, USA M. Khuddus, FL, USA W. Miller, CO, USA W. Crowder, MS, USA C. Pollock, TN, USA M. Laiq Raja, TX, USA D. Paolini, OH, USA G. Ansel, OH, USA D. Fry, IA, USA C. Joels, TN, USA T. Gensler, VA, USA J. Sandhu, PA, USA R. Kovach, NJ, USA L. Lopez, IN, USA G. Schultz, SD, USA N. Farhat, OH, USA G. Mayeda, CA, USA E. Kang, GA, USA B. Katzen, FL, USA C. Metzger, TN, USA A. Nanjundappa, WV, USA J. Henretta, NC, USA ILLUMENATE PK 25 subjects enrolled 2 NZ sites ILLUMENATE EU RCT 328 subjects enrolled 18 EU sites ILLUMENATE Global 371 subjects enrolled 37 EU & AUS/NZ sites

Trial Objective and Design Objective: Demonstrate safety and effectiveness of the Stellarex DCB vs. standard PTA for treatment of arterial disease in the SFA and/or popliteal arteries Stellarex DCB vs. PTA Multicenter prospective randomized trial Follow-up for 5 years Independent adjudication: Angiographic Core Laboratory1 Duplex Ultrasound Core Laboratory2 Clinical Events Committee Data Safety Monitoring Board Monitoring with 100% source data verification Rutherford 2-4 Clinical Selection Criteria Successful Pre-Dilatation Screen Failure Pre-screening Screening no Randomized 2:1 DCB Cohort (N=200) PTA Cohort (N=100) Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA VasCore, Boston, MA

Primary Endpoints Primary Safety Endpoint: Freedom from device- and procedure-related death through 30 days and freedom from target limb major amputation and clinically-driven TLR through 12 months Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: Primary patency at 12 months, defined as freedom from target lesion restenosis (determined by duplex ultrasound PSVR ≤ 2.5) and freedom from clinically-driven TLR at 12 months

Key Eligibility Criteria Key Inclusion Criteria Rutherford class 2, 3 or 4 Lesion located in the SFA and/or popliteal Has at least one patent run-off vessel below-the-knee Lesion length 3-18 cm Key Exclusion Criteria Acute or sub-acute thrombus in target vessel Significant inflow disease In-stent restenosis Concentric calcification that precluded PTA pre-dilatation Use of adjunctive therapies (i.e. atherectomy or cutting/scoring balloons)

Baseline Characteristics ITT Data Set Stellarex PTA p Age (years) 68.3 ± 10.3 (200) 69.8 ± 9.8 (100) 0.225 Rutherford Clinical Category 0.735 2 31.5% (63/200) 35.0% (35/100)   3 64.5% (129/200) 60.0% (60/100) 4 4.0% (8/200) 5.0% (5/100) ABI 0.75±0.21 (193) 0.76± 0.2 (100) 0.508 Hypertension 93.5% (187/200) 94.0% (94/100) 0.867 Hyperlipidemia 88.0% (176/200) 90.0% (90/100) 0.606 Prior Coronary Revasc. 45.0% (90/200) 48.0% (48/100) 0.623

Baseline Characteristics ITT Data Set Stellarex PTA p Female 44% (88/200) 36% (36/100) 0.185 Diabetes 49.5% (99/200) 52.0% (52/100) 0.683 Renal Insufficiency 18.0% (36/200) 16.0% (16/100) 0.666 BMI ≥ 30 39.5% ( 79 /200) 30.0% (30/100) 0.107 Previous or Current Smoker 84.0% (168/200) 75.0% (75/100)  0.061 Particularly high rate of females enrolled and patients with co-morbidities that are challenging to treat (should say this, but not put on the slide Highest rates DM and Renal insufficiency compared to any other randomized DCB

Baseline Core Lab Angiographic Data ITT Data Set Stellarex PTA p Lesion Length (cm) 8.0 ± 4.5 (199) 8.9 ± 4.6 (100) 0.105 Restenotic1 9.5% (19/200) 18.0% (18/100) 0.035 Total Occlusion 19.0% (38/200) 0.834 Severe Calcification 43.9% (87/198) 43.0% (43/100)  0.877 Diameter Stenosis (%) 73.9 ± 16.9 (200) 74.8 ± 17.0 (100) 0.673 Reference Vessel Diameter (mm) 4.86 ± 0.92 (200) 5.15 ± 1.05 (100) 0.017 0-1 Patent Run-off Vessels 32.5% (54/166) 30.5% (25/82) 0.745 trial explain the highest ever rate observed rate of severe ca++. Severe ca++ as defined by the angiographic core lab. Jeff Popma’s lab 1. Site reported data

Procedural Characteristics Stellarex PTA p Pre-dilatation Performed1 100% (200/200) 100% (100/100) N/A Study Device Inflation Time1 (min/lesion) 3.9 ± 2.0 (200) 3.7 ± 2.3 (100) 0.557 Post-DCB/PTA Dissection2 Grade D Grade E/F (Flow-limiting) 20.0% (40/200) 0.0% (0/193) 12.0% (12/100) 0.0% (0/98) 0.084 Bail-out Stent Placement1 6.0% (12/200) 6.0% (6/100) 1.000 Post-procedure Diameter Stenosis (%)2 25.2 ± 11.7 (199) 27.4 ± 10.1 (100) 0.107 Site-reported data Per Angiographic Core Lab

Primary Safety Endpoint ITT Data Set Superiority Endpoint Achieved Composite of freedom from device & procedure-related death through 30 days post-procedure and freedom from target limb major amputation and CD-TLR through 12 months post-procedure (410 days) Stellarex1: 92.1% (174/189) PTA1: 83.2% (79/95) Difference: [95%CI]2 8.3% [0.03%, 16.57%] P=0.0013 This makes slide too busy 1 Primary safety endpoint was defined as the composite of freedom from device and procedure-related death through 30 days post-procedure and freedom from target limb major amputation and CD-TLR through 12 months post-procedure (410 days). 2 Data are based on complete data without multiple imputation and presented as % (n/N). 3 Estimate of the difference (DCB-PTA) and 95% CI are based on the model based estimates resulting from multiple-imputation of missing data. p-value is 1-sided for a non-inferiority margin of 5% (for DCB-PTA) and based on the model based estimates resulting from multiple-imputation of missing data. 4. Since non-inferiority of safety was met and additionally the lower bound of the 95% CI of the difference was greater than 0%, testing for superiority was conducted. The p-value for the superiority comparison was 0.0246, demonstrating superiority of the DCB group against the PTA group. 1 Data are based on complete data without multiple imputation and presented as % (n/N). 2 Estimate of the difference (DCB-PTA) and 95% CI are based on the model based estimates resulting from multiple-imputation of missing data. p-value is 1-sided for a non-inferiority margin of 5% (for DCB-PTA) and based on the model based estimates resulting from multiple-imputation of missing data. 3 Since non-inferiority of safety was met and additionally the lower bound of the 95% CI of the difference was greater than 0%, testing for superiority was conducted. The p-value for the superiority comparison was 0.0246, demonstrating superiority of the DCB group against the PTA group

Key Safety Outcomes ITT Data Set Stellarex PTA Difference [95% CI]2 12-Month MAEs1 9.4% (18/191) [18] 17.7% (17/96) [18] -8.3% [-17.0%, 0.4%] CV Death 1.6% (3/191) [3] 2.1% (2/96) [2] -0.5% [-3.9%, 2.8%] Target Limb Amputation 0.0% (0/189) [0] 0.0% (0/95) [0] N/A Clinically- Driven TLR 7.9% (15/189) [15] 16.8% (16/95) [16] -8.9% [-17.4%, -0.5%] 12-Month All- Cause Mortality 2.6% (5/192) 2.1% (2/96) 0.5% [-3.1%, 4.2%] DCB: 5 deaths- none device or procedure related 3 CV deaths: 1 CHF, 1 cardiac arrest, 1 sudden cardiac death 2 others: intestinal ischemia and lymphoma Numbers are % (n/N) [Events]- Denominator includes subjects with an event or those without an event having follow-up on or past the opening of the visit window. Confidence interval of the difference is exact when the smallest expected cell count was less than 5. Otherwise the confidence interval of the difference is asymptotic. PTA: Two deaths in the PTA cohort were classified as CV deaths by the CEC. Exact cause of deaths uknown. Both adjudicated as not device or procedure-related. Numbers are % (n/N) [Events]- Denominator includes subjects with an event or those without an event having follow-up on or past the opening of the visit window. Confidence interval of the difference is exact when the smallest expected cell count was less than 5. Otherwise the confidence interval of the difference is asymptotic.

CD-TLR1 Free at 12 Months: 93.6% ITT Data Set * 91.0% @ day 410 80.0% @ day 410 DCB 93.6% @ day 365 PTA 87.3% @ day 365 1. Clinically-driven TLR defined as reintervention due to PSVR≥2.5 (or >50% stenosis via angio) with an increase in the RCC >1 category or deterioration in the ABI by >0.15 compared to maximum early post-procedural level. Per subject analysis.

12 Month Primary Effectiveness Endpoint ITT Data Set Absence of restenosis (Duplex PSVR ≤ 2.5) & freedom from CD-TLR through 12 months (410 days) Stellarex1: 76.3% (135/177) PTA1: 57.6% (53/92) Difference: [95% CI]2 16.9% [5.1%, 28.7%] P=0.003 Superiority Endpoint Achieved 1 Data are based on complete data without multiple imputation and presented as % (n/N) 2 Estimate of the difference (DCB-PTA) and 95% CI are based on the model based estimates resulting from multiple-imputation of missing data. p-value is 1-sided and based on the model based estimates resulting from multiple-imputation of missing data

Key Secondary Endpoints ITT Data Set Similar outcomes at 12 months, with ~ 50% fewer re-interventions in the DCB arm.1 Percent of Subjects with Improvements at 12 Months vs. Baseline CD-TLR rate in the Stellarex arm = 7.9% vs. 16.8% in the PTA arm

Primary Patency at 12 Months ITT Data Set * 73.7% @ day 410 Δ23.3% DCB 82.3% @ day 365 PTA 70.9% @ day 365 50.4% @ day 410 Early failures not caused by thrombosis- they are “failures carried forward” If 12M is not available due to either missing DUS, in window non-diagnostic DUS or a month 12 DUS obtained outside the follow-up window and there is no later success to carry backwards, the earliest DUS failure is carried forward (should one exist). All of these subjects did not have a valid 12 month DUS and did not have a later DUS success eligible to be carried backwards. Primary patency is defined as freedom from restenosis (determined by duplex ultrasound PSVR threshold of 2.5) and freedom from clinically-driven TLR at 12 months. Assessed per lesion. KM estimates reported at day 410 to capture all patients and events within the full 320-410 follow-up window.  Rates from the middle of the protocol visit window (365 days) reported for consistency and comparative purposes with other trials.

Data in Context with Core Lab* Adjudicated 12-Month Patency Rates Top-tier data Complex data Rigorous trial 1 2 3 *VasCore (Boston, MA); PSVR: 2.5, KM estimates at day 365 (360 for IN.PACT SFA) 1. Brodmann M. Oral presentation. AMP Symposium, Chicago, IL, Aug 10, 2016 2. Laird JR et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66:2329-38, P.Krishnan Oral Presentation. VIVA 2016 3. Rosenfield K, Jaff MR, White CJ, et al. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;373(2):145-153.  

Conclusions Stellarex is a low-dose (2 µg/mm2) DCB One of the most complex patient groups studied in DCB IDE trials Severe calcium 43.9%, diabetes 49.5%, 0-1 runoff 32.5% 12-Month DCB Primary Patency: 82.3% 12-Month DCB Freedom from CD-TLR: 93.6% Both primary safety and effectiveness endpoints demonstrated superiority of Stellarex over PTA Results reaffirm prior data ILLUMENATE FIH and EU Randomized Trial