Oleksiy Dolinskyy 1st December, 2014

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The FAIR Antiproton Target B. Franzke, V. Gostishchev, K. Knie, U. Kopf, P. Sievers, M. Steck Production Target Magnetic Horn (Collector Lens) CR and RESR.
Advertisements

SESAME – TAC 2012: M. Attal Maher Attal SESAME Booster Characterization.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
BINP for FAIR Yu.Shatunov Moscow May Research and Development Contract between GSI and BINP 1. Kickers for synchrotrons and storage rings.
March A. Chancé, J. Payet DAPNIA/SACM / Beta-beam ECFA/BENE Workshop The Decay Ring -First Design- A. Chancé, J.Payet CEA/DSM/DAPNIA/SACM.
ILC RTML Lattice Design A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
Neutrino Factory,  ± Decay Rings C Johnstone, FNAL, F Meot, CEA, & G H Rees, RAL.
FFAG-ERIT Accelerator (NEDO project) 17/04/07 Kota Okabe (Fukui Univ.) for FFAG-DDS group.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Simulation of Positron Production and Capturing. W. Gai, W. Liu, H. Wang and K. Kim Working with SLAC & DESY.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Lattice simulation of lattice errors and optics corrections. November 1, 2007 Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
Study of Slow Extraction Relevant to the FAIR Project Markus Kirk Fair-Synchrotrons Group GSI mbH Blockseminar, Riezlern, 8 th March 2007.
S2E optics design and particles tracking for the ILC undulator based e+ source Feng Zhou SLAC ILC e+ source meeting, Beijing, Jan. 31 – Feb. 2, 2007.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Status of the FAIR pbar Source K. Knie May 3, 2011.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
REQUIREMENTS FOR FCC DILUTION KICKERS AND BEAM DUMP LINE GEOMETRY F. Burkart, W. Bartmann, M. Fraser, B. Goddard, T. Kramer FCC dump meeting 18 th June.
Neutrino Factory,  ± Decay Rings C Johnstone, FNAL, F Meot, CNRS, & G H Rees, RAL.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
Beam Loss Simulation in the Main Injector at Slip-Stacking Injection A.I. Drozhdin, B.C. Brown, D.E. Johnson, I. Kourbanis, K. Seiya June 30, 2006 A.Drozhdin.
Design of the Turnaround Loops for the Drive Beam Decelerators R. Apsimon, J. Esberg CERN, Switzerland.
Nonlinear Dynamic Study of FCC-ee Pavel Piminov, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Beam collimation in the transfer line from 8 GeV linac to the Main Injector A. Drozhdin The beam transfer line from 8 GeV Linac to the Main Injector is.
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
Beam Optics of the TTF2 Nina Golubeva DESY. Beam optics from the BC2 up to the undulators General introduction to linear optics: – constraints for different.
Accumulator & Compressor Rings with Flexible Momentum Compaction arccells MAP 2014 Spring Meeting, Fermilab, May 27-31, 2014 Y. Alexahin (FNAL APC)
CR: status and activities at BINP I.Koop, BINP, Novosibirsk O.Dolinskyy, GSI,Darmstadt , MAC, GSI, Darmstadt.
Oleksiy Dolinskyy 23 rd October, FAIR layout of accelerators Collector Ring.
Numerical Simulations for IOTA Dmitry Shatilov BINP & FNAL IOTA Meeting, FNAL, 23 February 2012.
C. Biscari, D. Alesini, A. Ghigo, F. Marcellini, LNF-INFN, Frascati, Italy B. Jeanneret, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland CLIC DRIVE BEAM FREQUENCY MULTIPLICATION.
CLIC Frequency Multiplication System aka Combiner Rings Piotr Skowronski Caterina Biscari Javier Barranco 21 Oct IWLC 2010.
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Status of the FAIR Antiproton Target K. Knie.
Beam test of slow extraction from the ESR
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
Oleksiy Dolinskyy December 1st, 2014
Schedule for the FAIR Antiproton Target
Status of HESR 18th March Gießen Dieter Prasuhn.
Collimation Concept for Beam Halo Losses in SIS 100
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
LINAC4 ADVISORY COMMITTEE
A.Lachaize CNRS/IN2P3 IPN Orsay
Beam Collector Ring Dmitry Shwartz BINP, Novosibirsk 6th BINP-GSI-FAIR workshop
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Proposal for a Transparent Off-Axis Injection Scheme for BESSY II
Elena Wildner CERN CA15139 Meeting, Sofia 15/
Sabrina Appel, GSI, Beam physics Space charge workshop 2013, CERN
NuSTORM - μ Storage Ring with Injection
Beam Injection and Extraction Scheme
Cui Xiaohao, Bian Tianjian, Zhang Chuang 2017/11/07
CNGS Proton beam line: news since NBI2002 OUTLINE 1. Overview
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
ICFA Mini-Workshop, IHEP, 2017
Pulsed Sextupole Injection for Beijing Advanced Photon Source
Simulation of Multiturn Injection into SIS-18
HESR for SPARC 25th November FAIR MAC Dieter Prasuhn.
Sawtooth effect in CEPC PDR/APDR
Compensation of Detector Solenoids
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
Possibility of MEIC Arc Cell Using PEP-II Dipole
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Presentation transcript:

Oleksiy Dolinskyy 1st December, 2014 Antiproton yield in chain of the “target +separator + ring Oleksiy Dolinskyy 1st December, 2014

Antiproton yield, r 𝑟= 𝑁 𝑝𝑏𝑎𝑟 𝑁 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠 the goul value: r=1 x 10-5 𝑟= 𝑁 𝑝𝑏𝑎𝑟 𝑁 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠 Nproton is the number of protons coming from SIS100 : (1-2)x1013 Npbar is the required number of antiprotons, which can be cooled at CR: 108 the goul value: r=1 x 10-5 What is the predicted value r ? (having the designed antiproton target station, separator and CR ring)

Considered chain Particle tracking by 3 steps: 1. separator 2. injection line 3. CR ring (1000 turs)

pbar distribution after horn lenz The particle distribution after horn lens was calculated by K.Knie considering the target system: Ti window inside: Ni rod (r = 15 mm, L = 10 cm) within graphite cylinder (r = 1 cm) target 20 mrad < q < 80 mrad can be collected I = 400 kA Distance target center - lens: 220 mm more simple and reliable, less expensive Protons from SIS100 antiprotons First quadrupole horn

After Horn Klaus Knie simulations: 109 number of protons before the target 2.95x105 number of anti-protons after the horn-lens acceptance of the antiproton separator 240 mm mrad 1.98x104 inside acceptance with dp/p=+-3%

1 st step of Particle tracking p-bar separator The particle tracking from the horn-lens to the end of the CR septum Hor. collimators Mom. collimator CR septum horizontal plane Number of p-bars N=1.6 x 104 (BINP) N=1.7 x 104 (GSI) Chromatic effect is on Sextupole is on vertical plane Horizontal and vertical emittances: 240 mm mrad Ver. collimators

2nd step of particle tracking Injection line GSI and BINP optics are analyzed Q04 Injection line

Particle tracking in injection line end of septum magnet 3D Field map of kicker magnets Q04 - 3D field map of Kicker magnets are included in simulations. chromatic effect is on - The real aperture of all quadrupoles and other elements are included as given in TDR (the first two quads as well) The super-elliptical shape of vacuum chambers are considered.

Magnet Field of the 3 modules The magnet field over the length of 2.135 m, 3 modules 𝑥 ′ = 0 𝐿 𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝐵 𝑦 𝑑𝑙 𝐵𝑅 = 𝐵𝐿 𝑒𝑓𝑓 𝐵𝑅 Lmax=2.135 m BR=13 Tm By from 3D field map (Marc Petryk calculations) The required kick angle x‘ is 5 mrad for all three modules, which means (BL)eff=65 mTm Presently (see figure) we have (BL)eff=92 mTm, which gives x‘=7.07 mrad.

2nd step of particle tracking Injection line phase space at the middle of Q04 GSI optics Number of particles N=1.7 x 104 (no losses) BINP optics Number of particles N=1.6 x 104 (no losses)

Particle distribution, which are injected into CR

Particle tracking at ring 1000 turns is calculated (time needed for bunch rotation) real apertures of all CR systems and magnets are included taking into account their shape of vacuum champers. The RF cavities and CCC are ‚bottleneck‘, where the aperture is 70 mm of radius.

Particle tracking in the CR Particle tracking at CR73 (1000 turns) - BINP optics 18 % of losses Npbar = 1.328 x 104

Particle tracking in the CR73 Particle tracking at CR73 (1000 turns) - GSI optics 25 % of losses Npbar =1.224 x 104 BINP optics saves 8 % particles

Antiproton production rate in the chain target + separator + ring 𝑟= 𝑁 𝑝𝑏𝑎𝑟 𝑁 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑟 𝐵𝐼𝑁𝑃 = 1.328× 10 4 10 9 =1.328× 10 −5 𝑟 𝐺𝑆𝐼 = 1.224× 10 4 10 9 =1.224× 10 −5

Antiproton yield in the chain „target + separator + ring“ BINP optics GSI optics 1 x 1013 protons 2 x 1013 protons depends on the p-linac and SIS100 In the ideal case one can expect 1.2 -1.3 x 108 antiprotons if Np=1013 N=108 antiprotons can be cooled by CR SC system.

CERN Antiproton Collector measured FAIR Collector Ring Simulated CERN Antiproton Collector measured

Antiproton yield (conclusion) CERN Antiproton Collector 6 x 10-6 FAIR Collector Ring (1.2 – 1.3) x 10-5 Next steps In the beam dynamic simulations one has to include: Closed orbit distortions RF gymnastic SC cooling performance Real field quality of magnets Afterwards the real pbar yield can be predicted. One can see that we have about 20 – 30 % pbar for safe margin.