Multi-Sensor Hydrographic LiDAR Operations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aberdeen Institute for Coastal Science and Management, University of Aberdeen Team (alphabetical order): Alastair Dawson Cristina Gomez David Green William.
Advertisements

High Accuracy Helicopter Lidar & Mapping Jeffrey B. Stroub, CP,RLS,PPS,SP Vice President Business Development September 9, 2014 Jeff Stroub CP, RLS, PPS,
NVC0901 Maritime Alliance Symposium San Diego, August 2011 By: Michael Broadbent Fugro Pelagos Inc. Seafloor Mapping Technologies.
VORF: Vertical Offshore Reference Frame
Bathymetry, Gravity and Magnetic Images of the Mediterranean water of the Nile Delta, Egypt, using GIS Technique, Part IV Interpretation of Gravity Data.
Key factors determining the extent of tsunami inundation – Investigations using ANUGA Biljana Lukovic and William Power GNS Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand.
Brian S. Keiling Program Head – Forest Management Dabney S.Lancaster Community College.
ICIT Mapping maerl habitats using autonomous sensors Malcolm Thomson International Centre for Island Technology (ICIT) Heriot Watt University Old Academy.
1 Malcolm Thomson International Centre for Island Technology Heriot Watt University(Orkney Campus) Old Academy Stromness Orkney Scotland, UK SUMARE Workshop:
Geographic Datums Y X Z The National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) and the Defense Mapping School Reviewed by:____________ Date:_________ Objective:
Lineage February 13, 2006 Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors.
Anatomy of Anomalies Total Field Magnetics and Ground Penetrating Radar at a Potential Archaeological Site.
Model Simulation Studies of Hurricane Isabel in Chesapeake Bay Jian Shen Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences College of William and Mary.
GPS for NOAA Hydrographic Surveying CDR Gerd F. Glang & Jack L. Riley National Ocean Service, NOAA NOAA GNSS Workshop 2007.
UNDERSTANDING LIDAR LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING LIDAR is a remote sensing technique that can measure the distance to objects on and above the ground surface.
Relating Data to a Seamless Vertical Reference Surface
VDATUM: the Vertical Datum Transformation Tool
Please note: this presentation has not received Director’s approval and is subject to revision.
Positioning with LiDAR Lucia Scimone, 31 st May 2011 GMAT9205 – Fundamentals of Geo-Positioning School of Surveying and Spatial Information Systems The.
LiDAR Data Collection Status Northwest Florida Water Management District.
David Webb- VWCC. LIDAR, LiDAR, LIDaR, lidar and LADAR(laser altimetry). Light detection and ranging Laser Imaging, Detection and Ranging Combining the.
New IHO Manual on Hydography
AON Data Questionnaire Results 21 Respondents Last Updated 27 March 2007 First AON PI Meeting Scot Loehrer, Jim Moore.
ARSF Data Processing Consequences of the Airborne Processing Library Mark Warren Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK RSPSoc 2012 – Greenwich, London.
Welcome How to Use a Chart Presented by United States Power Squadrons®
30 July 2004USM 2004 Upper Pearl Survey1 Vertical Uncertainty Total Propagated Error –Error budget using Excel spreadsheets created for NAVOCEANO by Rob.
Lidar Bathymetry – Technology and applications Oct 24rd, Netanya, Israel Anders Ekelund Managing Director Airborne Hydrography AB.
Terra Remote Sensing. Terra Remote Sensing Inc. is an internationally based Canadian remote sensing company with a background of 40.
U.S. HYDRO 2007 TIDES WORKSHOP May 17, 2006 UNCERTAINTY WORKSHOP SKGILL SLIDES.
ASIRAS Pre Report ● Part 1: ASIRAS campaigns 2004 ● System characteristics ● Data acquisition ● Part2: preliminary data processing report ● GPS processing.
The Integration of Bathymetry, Topography, and Shoreline and the Vertical Datum Transformations Behind it Charting and Mapping the Land-Sea Interface.
SWFWMD LiDAR Specifications – 18 April 2008 LiDAR Specifications at the SWFWMD Ekaterina Fitos & Al Karlin.
Unit 7 Chapter 23 The Ocean Basin.
State Agency Needs for Remote Sensing Data Related to Water Quality By Bob Van Dolah Marine Resources Research Institute South Carolina Department of Natural.
Department of the Interior uses NOAA Hydrographic Services data, products and services Susan Russell-Robinson Acting Program Coordinator, USGS Coastal.
NAUTICAL CHARTS Can anyone explain the purpose of a Nautical Chart?
RTK TIDES.
Field Drainage Technology LiDAR John Nowatzki Extension Ag Machine Systems Specialist.
3 Digital Terrain Model (DTM) products: Issues Enhanced DTM & 10m DTM are created as part of the orthophotography creation process New 50m DTM to be created.
Supporting the “Solving Business Problems with Environmental Data” Competition 24 th October 2013 Vlad Stoiljkovic.
NOAA’s Perspective On A National Lidar Initiative Dr. Kirk Waters NOAA Ocean Service February 15, 2007.
Integrated spatial data LIDAR Mapping for Coastal Monitoring Dr Alison Matthews Geomatics Manager Environment Agency Geomatics Group.
Airborne and Satellite Imaging for Shallow-Water Habitats Survey Methods for Shallow-Water Habitat Mapping in New England Dept. of Interior Holdings and.
Best Practices for Managing and Serving Lidar and Elevation Data Cody Benkelman.
UAV LiDAR.
Ontario’s Current LiDAR Acquisition Initiative
HYDROGEOLOGY OF THE ZACATÓN CAVE SYSTEM
“Mind the rudder, or meet the rock”
Development and Assessment of Airborne Lidar Bathymetry Products for Shoreline Mapping Shachak Pe’eri Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping, University.
Mapping Technology Overview
VORF, Bringing Land and Sea Together
Land-Sea Data Interoperability?
Developments in Seabed Mapping
Results of an Airborne LiDAR survey between Teignmouth and Sidmouth
Mapping the Seafloor.
Evaluating High-Density Swath Bathymetry Sonars Against IHO-S44 Specifications: Ping DSP 3D Sidescan, a case study David Dodd, IIC Technologies and University.
Section 11: Select Application
Mapping the Seafloor.
Capability For Hydrographic Capacity Building: Industry Partnering
Maps Base maps Coordinate Systems, Datums, Projections
Coastal Zones.
Use of Kongsberg Extra Detections to Support Pipeline Inspection Surveys Bart-Jan Tijmes Hydro November 2017.
Lecture 4 Geographic Coordinate System
REPORT BY THE HYDROGRAPHIC AND GEODETIC SERVICE
INTRODUCTION OF GEOMATIC
Experiences from the post processing of typical Finnish bathymetric data Jarmo Ahonen Shallow Survey 2008 Portsmouth, NH.
Fiji Hydrographic Services
Subzones.
IHO-MSDIWG10 Busan, Republic of Korea (4-5 March 2019)
Moving from Data Aggregation to Decision-as-a-Service | US Hydro Conference | Wetherbee Dorshow & Guy Noll.
Presentation transcript:

Multi-Sensor Hydrographic LiDAR Operations Mark Sinclair – Tenix LADS Dushan Arumugam – BLOM Aerofilms (Carl-Johan Stigermark BLOM Aerofilms) Sean Cullen – Geological Survey of Ireland (Fergal McGrath – Marine Institute)

INtegrated Mapping FOr the sustainable development of Ireland’s MArine Resource (INFOMAR) Program Successor to Continental Shelf Delineation project 1995 – 1996 and Irish National Seabed Survey (INSS) 1999 – 2005 which mapped all Irish designated waters > 200 m deep and collected bathymetric, magnetic, gravity and ancillary datasets to support a range of activities and research INSS also included ground truthing to acquire seabed samples, video transects and photographic evidence In 2002, INSS included an initial trial airborne laser survey in Clew Bay

INFOMAR Program INFOMAR program commenced in 2006 priority to inshore areas Joint management by Irish Marine Institute and Geological Survey of Ireland (GSI) Program to collect, integrate and supply data to support a number of value added products and projects, including nautical charting, habitat mapping, infrastructure support and research 20 year initiative, with first 10 years to map 26 priority bays and 3 offshore areas In the initial 3 years a multi-platform mapping strategy has been adopted using vessels offshore and lidar in inshore areas and over the shoreline

INFOMAR 2008 LiDAR project Areas surveyed included Donegal, N side Galway Bay, NW coast Aran Islands, Tralee Bay, Sligo Bays, Blacksod Bay and Lough Foyle Nature of areas: Donegal and Sligo bays, shallow and mostly intertidal Galway bay, shallow sandy inter-tidal bay with moderate turbidity & west of Galway, steep-to rocky coastal area with kelp Aran I and Blacksod Bay, sand and rock Tralee Bay, sandy inter-tidal bay with extensive high ground close south Lough Foyle, highly turbid bay on international border between Northern Ireland (UK) and Republic of Ireland

Strategy for LiDAR survey Multi-sensor approach using 2 complementary LiDAR systems In general, areas were allocated to each sensor as follows: Hawk Eye 2 (BLOM Aerofilms) to survey shallow inter-tidal areas and small rocky bays LADS Mk II (Tenix LADS) to survey larger coastal areas where the water was deeper and areas in vicinity of high ground. Shallow inter-tidal bays with turbidity were also surveyed.

General GSI Requirements IHO order 1 position and depth accuracy Depths to 20 meters (minimum of 10 meters) 5x5 meters laser spot spacing Caris readable data Data to Malin Head datum in ASCII format (CZM) and to LAT datum in CARIS readable format (navigation / charting) Data to ellipsoidal datum for checking new separation models Seabed reflectivity data for interpretation of bottom-type

Hawk Eye – survey areas Data capture in 3 areas Donegal Bay Sligo Bays Greatmans & Cashla Bays (west of Galway) Data captured from coastline down to the 10m contour

Hawk Eye – system description

Hawk Eye – calibrations Factory Calibrations Laser alignment Pixel range calibration Absolute range calibration Hydro Laser Pixels Topo Laser Pixels

Hawk Eye – calibrations Field Calibrations Pitch, Roll and Heading Absolute range in water and on land Terramatch Identify Heading, Roll and Pitch misalignments Apply corrections to point cloud

Hawk Eye – verification Sea Control Areas (SCA) 2 SCAs at each area Singlebeam echo-sounder survey 30mx30m area Ground Control Areas (GCA) 2 GCAs at each area PPK Survey 10mx10m area

Hawk Eye – data collection

Hawk Eye – data processing Applanix POSPac Process trajectories AHAB Coastal Survey Studio (CSS) Bottom detection algorithm processing Export point clouds to TerraScan cleaning software run on Microstation TerraSolid (extension for MicroStation) Data cleaning and output CARIS Orthophoto production CARIS Creation of final data products

Hawk Eye – datums Data was initially processed on the ellipsoid and then transformed to Malin Head datum and LAT Ellipsoid to orthometric height using OSGM02 geoid model Orthometric height to Malin head using a static offset at each bay (0.13m – 0.17m) Orthometric height to LAT using a static offset at each bay (2.09m – 2.68m) The static offsets were determined for each bay using tidal benchmarks and tide gauge data

Hawk Eye – Donegal coverage

Hawk Eye – Sligo coverage

Hawk Eye – Greatmans coverage

LADS – survey areas Data capture in 3 areas: Galway Bay (N side) including Aran Islands Tralee Bay – operations near high ground Blacksod Bay Data was captured from coastline down to the 10 - 20m contour (depending on water clarity in respective areas)

LADS – additional survey area INFOMAR also engaged other stakeholders for a potential survey of Lough Foyle. GSI, Marine Institute, Loughs Agency, Port of Londonderry, Environment NI and AFBI (Department of Agriculture) are relevant agencies Lough Foyle is an environmentally sensitive marine habitat in a cross border region Survey was extended to include this area Turbidity management in this area was crucial

LADS – data collection Data collected relative to the instantaneous mean sea surface Data reduced to LAT and Malin Head datums through tide models using observed tides Variable height capability important in managing low cloud and high ground, particularly on the south side of Tralee Bay Flexibility to move between areas significantly separated

LADS – calibrations Static and dynamic position checks and checks over known features were conducted Benchmarks used for depth checking – common SCAs used in areas where both systems operated Cross line comparisons Analysis of overlapping data in common survey areas

LADS – operations Operations based primarily on managing water clarity in the most turbid areas When conditions unsuitable, diverted to alternative areas Management of water clarity significantly impacted by flood / ebb and spring / neap tides Wind strength and direction also significantly impacted selection of survey area Cloud height and the vicinity of high terrain also had to be considered

LADS – survey life cycle including data processing Data processing during field operations to keep up to date Pre-validation to progressively appraise quality of data collected and identify where additional data is needed Detailed validation and checking in depot following field operations Approval of data by IHO cat A surveyor following quality control

LADS – coverage Galway Bay and N coast

LADS – coverage Aran Islands – west of Galway Bay

LADS – coverage Tralee Bay

LADS – coverage Blacksod Bay

LADS – coverage Lough Foyle

Integration - datums Typically Malin Head datum is determined at tide gauge sites. LAT values are defined by software PolPred for each survey area relative to Malin Head datum An important challenge for this survey has been the integration of data from an both an ellipsoidal datum (ETRF89 / GRS80) and geoidal datums (Malin Head / LAT) This has been complicated by weaknesses in geoid / ellipsoid separation models in the survey areas on the west coast of Ireland New software provides a model for this (VORF), but it has not been extensively verified

Integration – datums / formats Malin Head datum in ASCII format LAT datum in Caris readable format Ellipsoidal datum – customer requested fields for ETRF89 / GRS80 to be added to ASCII format records Hawk Eye 2 ASCII Data Format One file for each survey run One record per sounding Space separated fields for: Latitude Longitude Depth Easting Northing

Integration - formats LADS in CARIS Export Format (CAF), readable by CARIS and Fledermaus: One ASCII file for each area containing: Survey summary data Area Bounds Spheroid UTM zone etc For each sounding Sounding ID (run, frame, scan, sounding numbers) Latitude Longitude Depth Easting Northing Possible contending depth and positions

Integration - formats ASPRS (The American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing) LAS Version 1.1 One binary file for each line containing: Public header block System Information Total number of records Min / max values Variable length records Developer defined (Project Info etc) Point data XYZi Return number Number of returns Scan information Classification (e.g. Ground, Low / Medium / High Vegetation, Buildings, Water)

Integration - checks Comparisons between datasets Datasets available for each area: Seabed and Ground Control Areas (SCAs & GCAs) Hawk Eye 2 Lidar data LADS MKII Lidar data A “mean” 1m grid was created for all datasets Artefacts excluded (eg cars over GCA) Compared using CARIS Base Editor – Surface Difference functionality

Example of Hawk Eye 2 data against SCAs and GCAs in Sligo Bay Integration - datums Integration is still in progress and results are preliminary only Example of Hawk Eye 2 data against SCAs and GCAs in Sligo Bay

Integrating data and products Preliminary results from Greatmans / Cashla between LADS and SCAs and Hawk Eye 2 data

Integrating data and products QC Area based reviews of each survey area conducted on ASCII data for both systems Emphasis on: Datums Excessive noise spread due to artefacts e.g. turbidity Data coverage Anomalous soundings (large depth difference with respect to surroundings) Primary tool used was QCTools (LADS proprietary software)

Integrating data and products QC (Cont) Key functions: Depth difference grids Profiles Tinned 3-D images Tinned contours 3-D Editor in Fledermaus and CARIS also used Queries logged and forwarded to respective survey teams for comment / action

Integrating data and products Combined image of vicinity of Greatmans / Cashla (Hawk Eye) and Galway / Aran Islands (LADS)

Comments on management of turbidity

Overall comments on multi-sensor approach