Future Opinion Leaders of America

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Other tests.  More than one dependent variable/ outcome ◦ Often variables are related ◦ Need a procedure to estimate simultaneously.
Advertisements

Who Attends Private Schools? Enrollment rates by ethnicity in California Magali Barbieri, Shelley Lapkoff, Jeanne Gobalet Lapkoff & Gobalet Demographic.
Research & Statistics Looking for Conclusions. Statistics Mathematics is used to organize, summarize, and interpret mathematical data 2 types of statistics.
Nicotine Dependence: Comparing Menthol and Non-Menthol Cigarette Smokers Qiang Li, MS Andrew Hyland, PhD Gary Giovino, MS, PhD Joseph Bauer, PhD Michael.
Factors Affecting Youth Awareness of Anti-Tobacco Media Messages Komal Kochhar, M.B.B.S., M.H.A. Terrell W. Zollinger, Dr.P.H. Robert M. Saywell, Jr.,
Will Public Health’s Response to Bioterrorism be Fair? AcademyHealth 2004 Annual Research Meeting David P. Eisenman, M.D., M.S.H.S. Assistant Professor,
Optimizing Undergraduate Student Study Time based on Future Income Perry Baptista Senior Honors Project April 26, 2014.
THE ROLE OF PARENTS IN SEXUAL RISK-TAKING DURING ADOLESCENCE Zac Snow Adolescent Risk Taking (PSY 4900) Weber State University.
Study Population In , 1,154 Mexican origin youth (aged years) indicated which of 50 movies (randomly selected from a pool of 250 popular movies.
Method Introduction Discussion Participants: Data came from Waves I and II of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health). The analysis.
Deep Dyadic Friendships vs. Broad Peer Preference During Adolescence as Predictors of Adolescent and Adult Internalizing Symptoms Rachel K. Narr & Joseph.
Methods of Presenting and Interpreting Information Class 9.
APHA 140th Annual Meeting & Expo, October 27-31, 2012, San Francisco, CA Body weight control and tobacco smoking among adolescents: a prospective study.
Choosing to Be Tobacco Free
Parents in Prevention FCD Prevention Works 2017 Corinne Brisbois
Neleen Leslie Florida State University
Use of Academic Resources Among Different Socioeconomic Classes
Statistics 200 Lecture #9 Tuesday, September 20, 2016
Maria Cabrera Escobar Nkosinathi Ngcobo & Timothy Quinlan
Music Selectivity & Sexual Risk
Childfree? Or happy family?.
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
Mesfin S. Mulatu, Ph.D., M.P.H. The MayaTech Corporation
Lesson by Ryan Benson, M.A.
Waterpipes Use among High School Students in Jakarta
Texas Pediatric Society Electronic Poster Contest
Rabia Khalaila, RN, MPH, PHD Director, Department of Nursing
Intent of Video Chat Room Users among Different Ages and Genders Kailee Culver, Melanie Bauer, & Blaine Peden (Faculty Advisor) University of Wisconsin-
Video Games and Adolescent Behavior Lindsay LaRoche University of Cincinnati, (CECH/Secondary Education Social Studies) Introduction.
Elizabeth Guillot April 10th,2012 3rd block
Adolescents’ Discussions about Health-Promoting and Health-Risk Behaviors: Does It Matter Who They’re Talking To? Laura A. Curry, PhD Lise M. Youngblade,
Social Development from One - Three
Definitely! Maybe??? No Way !!!
Sociological Research Methods
University of Michigan
H azardous Drinking, Drinking Expectancies And Risky Sexual Behaviors In A Community Sample Of Adult Sexual Minority Women 33rd Annual Research.
Self Esteem A Key to Good Decision Making
Healthy Relationships
Socioemotional Development in Adolescence
Friendship Quality as a Moderator
Introduction to social development LO: to explore how social development changes through the life stages.
Gender Gender refers to the socially constructed characteristics of women and men – such as norms, roles and relationships of and between groups of women.
Introduction Results Hypotheses Discussion Method
Definitely! Maybe??? No Way !!!
Safe and Healthy Friendships
Descriptive e-cigarette norms on tobacco attitudes and smoking behavior: The importance of close friends and peers Michael Coleman & William D. Crano.
Examining the Utility of the Theory of Planned Behavior
Research Methods Tutorial
Bell Ringer #4 Textbook page 232
Jeremiah Coldsmith University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown
Bell Ringer Open your student workbook and turn to page 65.
Being Prepared, Getting in Trouble and Other Student Misbehaviors: A Comparison of Immigrants and the Native-Born Stephanie Ewert Department of Sociology.
Introduction Results Methods Conclusions
Introduction Results Methods Conclusions
Definitely! Maybe??? No Way !!! Is it for you?
THE FUTURE OF AMERICA AND GLOBALIZATION
Introduction Results Conclusions Method
2University of Virginia
Does Adolescent Attachment Security Have Long-term Implications for Functioning in Adulthood? Leah Grande, Joseph S. Tan, Joseph P. Allen, & Alison Nagel.
Introduction Results Conclusions Hypotheses Method
Health Status by Income
Turn in your student workbook to page 21.
BMTRY 738: The Study Population
Why Can’t We Be Friends? Life experiences expose us to a variety of people that we can choose to be our friends. We can choose to develop positive, supportive.
Credit What is credit? How do we get it? Is it good or bad?
How Have Social Norms Towards Smoking Changed Over Time
Korey F. Beckwith & David E. Szwedo James Madison University
Definitely! Maybe??? No Way !!!
Unit 2 – Methods Objective 1 Describe quantitative and qualitative  methods such as surveys, polls, and statistics used in sociological research.  Objective.
In LAC, from 2006 through 2014, fewer people ages 12 and over perceived smoking marijuana once a month harmful (decreased from 40% in to 29%
Presentation transcript:

Future Opinion Leaders of America Future Opinion Leaders of America? The Influence of Popularity on Smoking Behavior in Middle Schools Public Health 259

Article Summary Smoking behaviors formed in adolescence Adolescents subject to peer influence Popular kids and opinion leaders may have more peer influence and influence smoking Measured effect of popularity on smoking among 1486 middle school kids in LA County Surveys: baseline and at 1 year follow-up Found significant increase smoking and susceptibility associated with popularity (OR 5.09 and 5.64, respectively) Kids with fewer friends also more likely to smoke

Introduction 80-90% of adult smokers start before age 18 Opinion leaders: initiate widespread change Are popular kids opinion leaders? Popular kids conform to norms Is this actually true? Depends on community’s smoking norms Isolates Race and gender Influence of best friends vs. boyfriends/girlfriends Discuss: what are opinion leaders? How are norms part of the equation (opinion leaders in a way anticipate likely norms and spread them) While smoking norms may vary across communities, this study used only schools with high smoking prevalence, so weren’t able to measure whether popular kids smoke less when the norm is less smoking

Research Questions Is popularity associated with smoking behavior? Do race and gender influence the relationship? Are isolates more likely to smoke or become susceptible to smoking? Discuss: how do race/gender influence; boys more influenced by best friends? Why isolates might be more likely to smoke……marginalized/outside interests? Lead into how would isolates be defined (can measure it by # friends, but what’s the cut-off? 1 friend or fewer?)

Hypotheses Stance on 1st and 3rd questions not very clear Acknowledge controversy in literature over popular kids vs. isolates and smoking May not have to mutually exclusive Theorize that gender and race likely contributors Relationships usually matched gender/race at this age Smoking also thought to vary by race and gender

Measures Smoking: Susceptibility to smoking: Popularity: Taking a puff or finishing a cigarette Susceptibility to smoking: Refusing to commit not to smoke in future Popularity: # kids naming the index as a friend # kids naming the index as a leader Is popularity the same as having many friends? Are popular kids always leaders? Are they really measuring opinion leaders? Is it important to know if the smoking becomes a habit or just if one cigarette is tried? Can’t differentiate with this measure Maybe popular kids don’t uphold norms…….more likely to smoke/drink/etc regardless of norms?

Methods 1486 sixth and seventh graders in LA County Nested within smoking intervention study Only used intervention schools (not controls) Surveys Baseline survey: demographics, smoking behavior Social network survey: 5 closest friends 5 best leaders in class 1 year follow-up survey: smoking behavior Discussion: why “5 closest friends” may not be the best measure of popularity….measure of # contacts? Best leaders good measure of opinion leaders

Methods Multivariate logistic regression Clustered by school Independent variable: popularity (by # kids choosing them as a friend) Control variables: age, gender, race, college-educated parent, foreign-born parent, parent who smokes, expectations for high academic performance, number of rooms in house Dependent variables: Smoking (puff or full cigarette) Susceptibility to smoking (refusing to commit to not smoking in future) Clustering is to control for intra-school variability; # rooms is substitute for household income, but some of these variables not well explained

Results Popularity associated with increased susceptibility to smoking: OR=5.64, p<0.001 And to smoking: OR=5.09, p<0.05 Association was not stronger in schools with higher smoking prevalence No significant interaction between popularity and gender or race Association between smoking and naming fewer friends in the social network survey This may explain the increased smoking seen with isolates Do they have more influences outside of school? But no good measure of isolates!!

Limitations Surveys: social desirability bias Sample limited to Los Angeles Schools with high numbers of Latinos/Hispanics and Asian Americans Known to have higher smoking prevalence Weren’t able to show that popular kids smoke more at schools with higher prevalence May be because all schools have high prevalence