Leading and Observing for Instructional Shifts in Literacy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables. The tables contain the Reading, Writing and Vocabulary Major claims and the evidences to be measured on.
Advertisements

Addressing Common Core Standards Using
Welcome to College and Career Ready Standards Quarterly Meeting # 1.
Digging Deeper Into the K-5 ELA Standards College and Career Ready Standards Implementation Team Quarterly – Session 2.
Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
Marshal Hurst LDC/MDC Coordinator Professional Development (501)
Understanding the Common Core Standards and Planning Lessons to Address The Standards.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Integration: LDC/MDC Strategies & the Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) SREB August 26, 2013 KDE Effectiveness Coaches, Rebecca.
Annie Michaelian Jill Okurowski Stephen Toto. Tri-State Quality Review Rubric.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
The Importance of Technology in High School Science Amy Roediger.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Research Simulation Task in CTE Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous.
Foreign language and English as a Second Language: Getting to the Common Core of Communication. Are we there yet? Marisol Marcin
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Introduction to digiCOACH Empowering Instructional Leaders Common Core Edition.
The Framework for Teaching and the Student-Led Classroom
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
How do we evaluate the quality of existing and newly created text-based lessons and units of study???? Please refer to the Tri-State Review Rubric for.
A Framework for Inquiry-Based Instruction through
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
2014 TCTW State Leaders’ Forum Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 29, 2014 CTE Teacher Preparation Project SREB.
INSTRUCTIONAL SHIFTS FOR THE COMMON CORE BECOMING AGENTS OF REFORM IN OUR OWN CLASSROOMS.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Summer 2012 Day 2, Session 6 10/13/2015R/ELA.EEA.2012.©MSDE1 Educator Effectiveness Academy English Language Arts And the journey continues… “Transitioning.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/ Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects.
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
English Language Arts/Literacy Louisiana Textbook Adoption Publisher’s Orientation March 1, 2012.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
The Alabama College and Career Ready Standards Unpacking Presented by: Jennifer Dunnagan and Cara Whitehead, NBCT Rainbow Middle School, Rainbow City,
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Understanding the Common Core Standards and Planning Lessons to Address The Standards.
S.P.S. - HMS May 19, New 2011 ELA & Literacy and Math Curriculum Frameworks  comprised primarily of the Common Core State Standards  written explicitly.
New Beginnings 2015 Florida Standards: Secondary ELA Anjanette McGregor August 11, 2015 Tavares Middle School.
Citywide Expectations for
NEW JERSEY COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS INSTRUCTIONAL SHIFTS KEY IDEAS.
D 4 Understanding the Common Core State Standards & Assessment Katie McKnight, Ph.D.
Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool Making the Shifts in Classroom Instruction Ignite 2015 San Diego, CA February 20, 2015 Sandra
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
Equity and Deeper Learning:
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
The Importance of Technology in High School Science
“Unpacking” our modules-building modules that meet LDC criteria
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Texts Worth Reading Problems Worth Solving Tests Worth Taking
CCRS Implementation
Icebreaker Question What is the intention of the Publishers’ Criteria? Who is it intended for? How can it support these different audiences?
COMPETENCIES & STANDARDS
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores!
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
  Bridging the Common Core Standards and Gifted Education: Instructional Resources Project NAGC - November 2013 Presenters Caroline C. Eidson and Sneha.
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Bellwork: Student Engagement Chart
Jeanie Behrend, FAST Coordinator Janine Quisenberry, FAST Assistant
By Barb Baltrinic and Angela Smith
Effective After-School Programs Presented by
Presentation transcript:

Leading and Observing for Instructional Shifts in Literacy George Johnson, Southern Regional Education Board george.johnson@sreb.org Dr. Gail Dugger, Assistant Principal St Marys Middle School, Camden County, Georgia gdugger@camden.k12.ga.us

Goals of LDC To engage students in reading, comprehending, analyzing, interpreting, and responding to complex texts To align assignments to the College and Career Readiness Standards and to promote collaboration To help teachers personalize learning so that every student can master the CCRS To ensure that all students can be college and career ready To improve literacy instruction in all classes

St. Marys Middle School Camden County , Georgia

The SREB and SMMS Collaborative partnership Creation of School Improvement Focus Teams LDC MDC Problem-Based Learning STEM curriculum: Seeking State STEM Certification Presentation Title / Presenter First Name Last Name

SMMS Before GSE/LDC in ELA Teachers: Focused on a single text with a focus on literary Assigned mostly shorter response writings Required persuasive rather than argumentative writing Based writing on prompts rather than a response to reading Students: Viewed writing as a Language Arts only activity Read few informational texts Wrote mostly about literary elements Presentation Title / Presenter First Name Last Name

SMMS Before LDC science/Social studies Teachers: Wrote lesson plans as a series of activities based on a single text Assigned a limited number of short writing tasks Delivered predominantly whole-class instruction, lecture, note taking, testing Conducted whole-group discussion that focused on Q&A around knowledge and recall of facts Students: Sat in rows and completed individual seatwork Engaged in learning activities based on text questions and responding to teacher questions Became passive learners Responded only to the teacher’s questions Completed few, if any written work in content area classes Participated in limited classroom discussions Presentation Title / Presenter First Name Last Name

LDC: Literacy Design Collaborative Training and Coach-embedded classroom visits: Year 1: ELA Teachers Year 2: Science, Social Studies Teachers, Sp. Ed. Teachers Year 3: LDC embedded in PBL and STEM units Presentation Title / Presenter First Name Last Name

SMMS After GSE/LDC: ELA Teachers: Design scaffolded learning modules based on writing as a response to reading Generate writing prompts that address paired and multiple texts Build activities that foster independent learning Create structured paired or group activities allowing more time to focus on individual student needs Develop lessons required meaningful questioning and discussion (such as Socratic seminar) Students: Work in collaborative teams Engage in active learning activities Respond to informational texts in both argumentative and expository formats Engage in independent learning Create authentic written work in response to authentic texts Engage in meaningful discussions about their work Presentation Title / Presenter First Name Last Name

SMMS After LDC: Science/Social Studies Teachers: Design scaffolded learning modules to build on students’ understanding of reading Generate writing prompts that are authentic to the content area Build in activities that foster independent learning and exploration of content Assign more complex informational texts and are less reliant on course textbooks Create structured paired or group activities, allowing more time to focus on individual student needs Students: Work in collaborative teams Engage in active learning activities Become independent learners Take greater responsibility for their learning Create authentic written work in the subject area Engage in meaningful discussions about content centered around student work Presentation Title / Presenter First Name Last Name

Grade/Subject 2015 2016 Gain Year-Year Gain Cohort ELA 6 39 44 +5 -- 7   6 39 44 +5 -- 7 38 40 +2 +1 8 43 48 +10 Science 47 +3 +8 34 -6 -10 Social Studies 50 +6 +11 28 37 +9 -7 Georgia Milestones EOG Comparisons: Percentage Students Proficient and Distinguished 2015 to 2016 Presentation Title / Presenter First Name Last Name

How do you know it’s working? (Regularly and Continuously) Pre- and Post-assessments in writing? Standardized Testing? Teacher Surveys? Observe Student and Teacher Behaviors in the classroom to identify the shifts in literacy instruction?

3 Questions you expect teachers to answer when they teach a lesson: What do you want the students to____? learn 2. What are the students doing to show that they are _____? learning 3. How do you know that the students have__? learned

How do teachers move… From: The teacher: Provides written questions from teacher/text to demonstrate understanding.   To: The teacher: Allows students the opportunity to apply the appropriate literacy strategies to learn content and successfully complete the assignment.

How do students move… From: The students: Respond to teacher’s questioning; memorize facts; copy notes.   To: The students: Generate higher-order questions as part of the collaborative learning process leading towards completion of the assignment.

Essential Behaviors When Using LDC Essential Planning for Literacy-Based Instruction Preparing for the Task: Launching the Assignment The Reading Process Transition to Writing The Writing Process Using Rubrics as Instructional Tools Using Rubrics for PLC Collaboration Around Student Work (page 2)

Powerful Practices: A Primer for School Leaders Planning is an essential component in the design of all literacy instruction, especially for LDC. (page 3) Essential Classroom Behavior #1: Planning LDC Performance Indicator (left column) Document* Teachers Criteria for Quality Assignments Artifacts* Details (page 4)

Critical Focus Question: Prompt: Standards for Literacy and Content: Topic: Critical Focus Question: Prompt: Standards for Literacy and Content:   Reading Pacing Instruction (prompt) Student Work (product) Assessment (scoring guide) Writing  Page 12

Powerful Practices: A Primer for School Leaders Essential Classroom Behaviors #2-7 Organization of the Behaviors(pages 6-11) LDC Performance Indicator “What does it look like?” Components (page 6, The Reading Process): Document* Teachers Students Artifacts * Details/Explanation

Rubric for LDC Powerful Practices The rubric must: Reflect the most important components of effective implementation of the LDC Framework Represent a continuum of performance that identifies the instructional shifts for literacy in the classroom Be a practical tool for teachers, trainers, coaches and school leaders Mirror elements of traditional observation tools Be a growth indicator, not an evaluation tool Be user friendly

Rubric Indicators page 13 Planning: A literacy-based assignment which includes an authentic written product reflecting evidence from reading complex texts that are challenging and appropriate to course content. Descriptors: Grade level text(s) are appropriate to the content standards and provide credible evidence to produce the authentic writing. The assignment is designed to engage students in the reading of complex texts leading to a clear, authentic writing product that allows for multiple responses supported by evidence.

Rubric Indicators page 13 Planning: A lesson sequence that supports/scaffolds the learning of literacy and content standards with explicit instruction that leads students through every part of the learning process. Descriptor: Instructional activities are sequenced and tightly aligned to content and literacy standards Presentation Title / Presenter First Name Last Name

Rubric Indicators page 13 Instruction: Objectives and learning targets have a clear and coherent purpose for students. Descriptors: The teacher: Provides students opportunities to reflect on their level of understanding of the learning target/objective. The students: Articulate the learning target/ objective and its connection to the short-term or long-term literacy-based assignment.

Rubric Indicators page 14 Instruction: Literacy strategies (reading, writing, speaking and/or listening) that are integrated into content-based instruction. Descriptors: Independent application of literacy strategies in new situations to synthesize, analyze and evaluate complex texts to create authentic responses. The teacher: Allows students the opportunity to apply the appropriate literacy strategies to learn content and successfully complete the assignment. The students: Engage in self-selected strategies for reading, writing, listening, and/or speaking that lead to the completion of an authentic writing assignment. 

Rubric Indicators page 14 Instruction: A classroom environment of student discourse that supports ownership of learning and a deeper understanding of important concepts. Descriptors: The teacher: Facilitates and monitors student discussions to gain deeper knowledge of disciplinary text and the development of an authentic written product. The students: Generate higher-order questions as part of the collaborative learning process leading towards completion of the assignment.  

Rubric Indicators page 15 Assessment: Use of assessments in all aspects of the teaching and learning process. Descriptors: Formative assessments are clearly aligned to identified standards and cognitive demands. Summative assessments require students to use multiple strategies to demonstrate their understanding of the learning targets and concepts. The teacher: Adjusts instruction based on regular checks for understanding that monitor progress. The students: Demonstrate understanding through the application of multiple literacy-based strategies to create a sustained writing product.

What’s Next? Rubric Development Process Field Testing Experiences Final Revisions Implications for LDC Training Training for Administrators Questions?