Swing State Clean Energy Survey

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Battleground Survey 2010 #12676 September 7-9, 2010.
Advertisements

Conservation Funding Campaign Strategies Andy Tuck Senior Campaign Advisor The Nature Conservancy Twitter: AndrewTuck2 Vote4Nature.
Voter Attitudes Toward Energy Issues in Ohio Key Findings from a Statewide Voter Survey August 2014.
2008 Latino Voter Survey in Key Battleground States Produced by The NALEO Educational Fund and Latino Decisions, Sponsored by AARP October 23, 2008.
& Conducted June 6 - 8, 1999 N=1,002 Registered “Likely” Voters Nationwide, With A +3.1% Margin Of Error.
Voters with Disabilities and the 2014 Elections November 10, 2014.
League of Conservation Voters Key findings from survey among likely voters in 11 Senate swing states October 2013 HART RESEARCH ASSOTESCIA Voters’ Attitudes.
NATIONAL POLL: VETERANS AFFAIRS, May 16-18, 2014 N=1,723 Likely 2014 Voters Margin of Error: +/- 2.4% #
HART RESEARCH ASSOTESCIA Key findings from a telephone survey among 1,009 voters nationwide (including 201 cell-phone only voters), conducted Nov. 7 –
October 27-31, 2013/ N=1,000 Registered “likely” voters / ±3.1% M.O.E. THE GEORGE WASHINGTON BATTLEGROUND POLL A national survey of 1,000 Registered “Likely”
Views on Health Reform Remain Divided As you may know, a new health reform bill was signed into law earlier this year. Given what you know about the new.
NATIONAL POLL National Public Opinion Poll April 3-5, 2014 N = 1,804 Likely 2014 Voters #
New Hanover County Capitol Communications Restricted 1 Survey of New Hanover County Voters February 2, 2010.
April 22-24, 2001 / N=1,000 Registered Voters / ±3.1% M.O.E. A Survey Of Voter Attitudes Nationwide for the #8633.
BATTLEGROUND Presidential Tracking Fall 2004 Tracking/ N=1,000 Registered “Likely” Voters/±3.1% M.O.E. If the election for President were held today,
Survey of 49 Swing Congressional Districts Regarding Environmental Issues August 26 - September 2, 2007 Ayres, McHenry & Associates, Inc. 112 North Alfred.
America’s Voice: Immigration 2008 Presented by Benenson Strategy Group and Lake Research Partners November 13, 2008.
National January 2009 McLaughlin & Associates 1 Methodology: This poll of 1,000 likely general election voters in the United States.
Prepared by: Lake Research Partners 1000 BROADWAY SUITE 294 OAKLAND, CA PHONE: FAX: M St., NW.
& Conducted August 23-25, 1998 N=1,000 “Likely” Registered Voters Nationwide, With A +3.1% Margin Of Error.
Protestant Pastors Approval of the President and Views on Endorsements Survey of 1,000 Protestant Pastors.
& Conducted August 23-25, 1998 N=1,000 “Likely” Registered Voters Nationwide, With A +3.1% Margin Of Error.
ECONOMIC TRACKING POLL March 9-11, 2014 N=1,932 Likely Voters #
Conducted January 3-5, 2000 N = 1,000 Registered “Likely” Voters Nationwide, and n = 250 Hispanic Voters Nationwide With A +3.1% Margin Of Error.
August , 2000 / N=500 registered “likely” voters daily A rolling sample of N=1,000 Margin of Error +3.1% A Tracking Survey of National Voter Attitudes.
National survey-1,328 voters, Three focus groups-swing voters September 2007 HART RESEARCH P e t e r D ASSOTESCIA Winning The Battle Of Budget: Framing.
Conducted January 3-5, 2000 N = 1,000 Registered “Likely” Voters Nationwide, and n = 250 Hispanic Voters Nationwide With A +3.1% Margin Of Error.
By: Orange Group. Democratic Democratic Served 3 terms representing the 13 th District in the Illinois senate from 1997 to 2004 Served 3 terms representing.
& Conducted January 3-5, 2000 N = 1,000 Registered “Likely” Voters Nationwide.
& Conducted June 6 - 8, 1999 N=1,002 Registered “Likely” Voters Nationwide, With A +3.1% Margin Of Error.
Support for Budget, Tax and Social Welfare Programs The Political Environment.
July 30 - August 3, 2000 / N=500 registered “likely” voters daily A Tracking Survey of National Voter Attitudes for the Democratic National Convention.
VOTING IN CONGRESS: It’s More Than Just “Yea” or “Nay”
THE POLL May 1-3, 2000 / N=1,000 Registered “Likely”Voters / ±3.1% M.O.E. #8263 THE POLL.
National Update May 2016 Bill McInturff SLIDE 1. SLIDE 2 Public Opinion Strategies—May 2016 SLIDE 2 Heading into the Election Year.
1 Political Update: The National Elections of 2010 David F. Damore University of Nevada, Las Vegas Department of Political Science Prepared for 2010 ALA.
Chapter 8 Campaigns and Elections. Elections Local – ISDs, County, and City State – Governor (executive branch), Legislative, and Judges National – Pres.
2014 Midterm Election Results Doug Sosnik November 6, 2014.
Political Socialization
Medicare, Social Security, and the 2016 Election
BATTLEGROUND XXVII.
How The Mountain West States Voted in 2016:
Key findings from a statewide survey of 600 registered voters in Ohio conducted July 28th - August 1st, LORI WEIGEL JAY CAMPBELL
BATTLEGROUND XXIX.
Understanding the 2008 Elections
A DIVIDED ELECTORATE IS UNITED ON EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION
HART RESEARCH ASSOCIATES AFL-CIO 2014 Election Night Survey.
Influencing Congress Who has the greatest influence on Congress: Voters, Parties, or Lobbyists?
BATTLEGROUND Presidential Tracking 2004
A Survey Of National Voter Attitudes for the
Modest Increase In Support For Single-Payer Health Care In 2017
APPALACHIAN STORAGE HUB CONFERENCE
Political party-organized group which seeks to win elections in order to influence the activities of government Democrat-federalist party, symbol is the.
Disability Community Determined to
June 2018 Results 66.2% Yes 50.9% Yes 76.7% Yes 67.5% Yes.
October National Survey
Election Fundamentals
PA Partnerships for Children Survey Highlights
Modest Increase In Support For Single-Payer Health Care In 2017
Established. Informed. Engaged.
PA Partnerships for Children Survey Highlights
Democrats Win The Tax Issue
Polarization Time 1 33 Liberals 34 Moderates 33 Conservatives Time 2 50 Liberals 0 Moderates 50 Conservatives Time 1 33 Democrats 34 Independents 33 Republicans.
POS 2041: American Politics Today
No Labels: “Break the Gridlock” Congressional Poll
Election Fundamentals
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®
Puerto Rican Diaspora Findings and Recommendations from two statewide surveys in Florida and New York May 2019.
The Electoral College Process
888 16th Street, Suite 305 Washington, D.C Phone: (202)
Presentation transcript:

Swing State Clean Energy Survey 3,200 Target Voters in Target Areas June 1-8, 2017 #17195 Gene Ulm Partner

Methodology Public Opinion Strategies presents the key findings from a select survey of 3,200 voters in 8 states. This survey does not include Democratic base voters in districts in CA, IL, NY, PA, and TX. The survey was conducted June 1-8, 2017 and has a margin of error of ±1.73%. Gene Ulm was the pollster and primary researcher on the project. Caitlin Reed was the project director.

Independents approve of Trump on economy and national security, but not on clean energy Now, thinking about specific issues that have been in the news lately, please let me know if you approve or disapprove of the job President Donald Trump is doing on each specific issue. Trump Issue Ind Undecided Soft Dem Soft GOP Strong GOP +16 +23 -32 +58 +91 +7 +15 -42 +48 +88 -33 -28 -70 +4 +66 -26 -24 -63 +0 +63 -30 -31 -81 +8 +71 -29 -66 -4 +65 +31 The Economy & Jobs +24 National Security and Terrorism -8 Health Care Education -5 The Environment^ -7 Clean Energy^^ -6 ^Split Sample A, N =1,608 ^^Split Sample B, N=1,592

Accelerating clean energy is supported by 86% of Independents and 77% of Trump Voters Do you support or oppose taking action to accelerate the development and use of clean energy in the United States? Clean Energy Total Support Total Oppose 85% 11% Strgly Supp Supp Opp GOP 40% 80% 16% Dem 85% 98% 2% Ind 64% 86% 10% Undecided 63% 89% 7% Moderate 67% 91% 6% Trump Voter 39% 77% 18% Clinton Voter 97%

Voters are more likely to vote for a candidate who believes we should invest in clean energy to reduce dependency on foreign oil. Ranked by % Much More Likely to vote for a Republican candidate for Congress who: Believes we should do more to invest in clean energy here in America and reduce our county’s dependence on foreign oil from hostile states in the Middle East. Our ability to avoid future wars will depend on our ability to be energy dominant. Worked across the aisle with Democrats to pass clean energy legislation that will lead to more affordable energy bills and cleaner energy for the average American family. Supports accelerating the clean energy industry to bring more jobs into their district; stimulating the economy, boosting manufacturing, and expanding middle‐class job opportunities at home. Is a different kind of Republican who is willing to stand up to the special interest groups when it comes to making sure we have clean energy, clean air, and clean water. What to talk to your Independents about Win the middle keep the right Talk about clean enery in terms of nat security and ecnoomy, shows your different, differentiates Is willing to stand up to their own party in support of clean energy, putting the needs of their community first. Voted for legislation that will reduce the cost of clean energy right here in America, lowering your monthly energy bills.

Generic ballot preference before and after the GOP clean energy messaging moved +25% to GOP. Initial Generic Ballot Generic Ballot After Republican Clean Energy Messaging Net +25 +22

Where did this ballot movement come from? 24% Party ID Republican (4%) Independent (15%) Democrat (5%) Total Movers Away from Dem and Und Dem > GOP Dem > Undecided Undecided > GOP 5% 8% 11% Party ID Republican (<1%) Independent (3%) Democrat (2%) Party ID Republican (<1%) Independent (5%) Democrat (3%) Party ID Republican (4%) Independent (7%) Democrat (<1%)

Voters in NV, MI, and AZ moved over 30 points towards a Republican who supports clean energy Initial Generic Ballot by Region Generic Ballot After Republican Clean Energy Messaging Net +30 +33 +25 +31 +32 +44

Swing and GOP voters (no hard Dems) in CA and TX moved 10-39 points for a clean energy Republican Initial Generic Ballot by Congressional District Generic Ballot After Republican Clean Energy Messaging Net +24 +27 +39 +22 +10 +30

Swing and GOP voters (no hard Dems) in NY moved 19-24 points towards a clean energy Republican Initial Generic Ballot by Congressional District Generic Ballot After Republican Clean Energy Messaging Net +22 +24 +19 +20 +25 +34

Swing and GOP voters (no hard Ds) in IL & PA moved 23-37 points towards a clean energy Republican Initial Generic Ballot by Congressional District Generic Ballot After Republican Clean Energy Messaging Net +26 +33 +23 +37 +24 +36

Survey Breakdown Party ID Ideology 40%