ICCA GPS Risk Assessment and Guidance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COSHH ASSESSMENT TRAINING Essential Elements of a COSHH Form.
Advertisements

Responsible Care and its relation to Global Product Strategy.
Overview on the GHS REINER ARNDT, GERMANY Implementation of the GHS Stockholm Convention Side Event 3 May 2005.
WCAM GHS Training December Introduction  The federal Hazard Communication Standard says that you have a “Right-To-Know” what hazards you face on.
GHS Globally Harmonized System
Interactions between IED and REACH Exploring the opportunities for cooperation Valletta, Malta October 2013 Geert Dancet Executive Director Conference.
1 High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Diane Sheridan Chief, Existing Chemicals Branch, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention.
Background – Scope and Development of the GHS as an International System Hazard Classification – Physical Hazards – Health Hazards – Environmental Hazards.
Information requirements for reproductive toxicity under REACH EU-OSHA Workshop Ulrike REUTER Senior Scientific Officer European Chemicals Agency 15. January.
1 REACh Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals and Restriction! Ohio Valley SOT Wednesday, August 26, 2009 REACh: The New Toxicology Frontier.
Development of a Worldwide System for Hazard Communication
Dropping the M: From MSDS to SDS (Safety Data Sheet)
Characterizing Chemical in Commerce: Using Data on High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals December 12, 2006 L. Twerdok, Ph.D, DABT NPPTAC Member Report.
Nanotechnology Summary. Potential Worker Exposures.
SSSG 2007 Global Harmonization System. What is GHS ? GHS is an international system designed to standardize the communication of hazardous substances.
HERA at CED XXXI C.Lally 1 Human & Environmental Risk Assessment Human Health Risk Assessment under HERA: Challenges and Solutions Christeine Lally Co-Chair.
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts Lowell.
U.S. High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Diane Sheridan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency October 25, 2005 Region 2 Emerging Chemicals Workshop.
ICCA Initiatives to SAICM
Introduction to the GHS: An overview for Comprehensibility Testing UNITAR-CWM Date: Location:
Volker J. Soballa, Evonik Industries AG Introduction and Overview of ICCA GPS Risk Assessment Guidance Copyright© 2012 ICCA All Rights Reserved Responsible.
GHS: Understanding Safety Data Sheets © 2012 Grainger Safety Services, Inc.
Research & Science Advancing Risk Assessment Presentation March Association of Chemical Industry of the Czech Republic Monique Marrec Fairley.
Translating HPV Information into Plain Language Characterizing Chemicals in Commerce Austin, TX December, 12-14, 2006.
WHMIS.
The Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) Richard Pont, adapted for 2003 North American Pesticide Applicator Certification.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
Malaysia Update on “draft” proposal for the Environmentally Hazardous Substance (“EHS”) Notification and Registration Scheme.
December 2006Characterizing Chemicals in Commerce 1 Using the EPA HPVIS to Form Chemical Categories for Hazard Assessment Sandra Reiss Murphy, PhD Arkema.
Volker J. Soballa, Evonik Industries AG Assessing and Managing the Chemical Risk Responsible Care Metrics and GPS Workshop Dubai 24 and 25 September 2012.
GHS Hazard Communication
HERA European Stakeholders Workshop: Brussels, Oct European Stakeholders Workshop ( October 11, 2001) Human Health Risk Assessment - Progress and.
An Overview of the Objectives, Approach, and Components of ComET™ Mr. Paul Price The LifeLine Group All slides and material Copyright protected.
Prioritization Process and Development of the Hazard Characterization Documents Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics U.S. Environmental Protection.
Strategies for Sustainable Chemical Management Responsible Care Global Charter (RCGC) and the Global Product Strategy (GPS) Martin Kayser ICCA Chemical.
HERA Second European Stakeholder Workshop July Human & Environmental Risk Assessment An A.I.S.E and CEFIC initiative on targeted risk assessment.
1 State of Play Prioritisation of Substances By modelling Hazard & Exposure Klaus Daginnus Institute for Health & Consumer Protection Joint Research Centre,
Dr. E.Kunz Head of Global Registration and Evaluation of Chemicals Corporate Product Stewardship GPS Safety Summary and Safety Data Sheets OBJECTIVES.
Purpose, Scope and Application of the GHS 1. The Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) is a rational and comprehensive.
Supply chain communication, GPS safety summaries, (e)SDS and use of harmonised IT tools Leo Heezen INT MARKT 24 – 25 Sep Cairo, Egypt.
Volker J. Soballa Evonik Degussa GmbH Essen, Germany
Chemicals Policy and Health (CP&H) Introduction to Ecetoc TRA GPS Risk Assessment and REACH/GHS implementation in practice Leo Heezen Cefic 30 – 31 May.
Supply chain communication, GPS safety summaries, (e)SDS and use of harmonised IT tools Workshop on Implementation of REACH and CLP INT MARKT
Leo Heezen Cefic 30 – 31 May 2011, KIEV UKRAINE
Industry Voluntary Initiative on Chemicals Management: Global Product Strategy GPS Leo Heezen INT MARKT 12 – 13 Nov Cairo, Egypt.
GHS Hazard Communication Revised: 01/26/2016. What is GHS? GHS stands for the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals.
Classification. Hazard Classification The GHS is designed to identify and classify the “hazards” of the substances or mixtures, and to communicate those.
Herman Jett Area Manager Cal/OSHA Consultation Services for Los Angeles and Orange Counties 1 Centerpointe Drive Suite 150 La Palma, CA
Cefic template to convert REACH dossier
WHMIS Awareness Training
ดูแลด้วยความรับผิดชอบ
Communication: Safety Summary
Hazard Communications Standard HS-105 (R)
Mangan Inc. Hazard Communication 11/15/2012
Globally Harmonized System (GHS) Employee Required Training By December 1, 2013 Train Employees on the new label elements and the Safety Data Sheet (SDS)
Hazard Communication Update
Decision Contexts in a Changing Toxicology Paradigm
HAZARD COMMUNICATION (HAZCOM)
The Consortium for Environmental Risk Management, LLC
ECETOC TRA tool Proposed application to estimate PEC/PNEC ratio for substances with risk score = 1 ECETOC has developed a tiered approach for calculating.
InfoCards – making informaiton on chemicals more accessible
WG-E(1) Meeting, CCAB, Brussels, 06/03/2007
HAZARD COMMUNICATION.
This presentation document has been prepared by Vault Intelligence Limited (“Vault") and is intended for off line demonstration, presentation and educational.
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program
Hazard Communication Update
WG E on Priority Substances
EFSA’s Chemical Hazards Database
EAF (9) Meeting, CCAB, Brussels, 02/10/2006
This presentation document has been prepared by Vault Intelligence Limited (“Vault") and is intended for off line demonstration, presentation and educational.
Presentation transcript:

ICCA GPS Risk Assessment and Guidance GPS / REACH workshop 04 Oct Athens, Greece By: L. Heezen

Improve the availability Global Product Strategy - Contribution to SAICM Training Workshops Guidance materials GPS Network of experts Promote knowledge and skills transfer Base Set of information GPS Safety Summary Web-based IT-Portal Improve the availability of information ICCA Principles for Chemical Management Systems Increase awareness on chemical management Research on existing and emerging issues ICCA Long Range Research Initiative (LRI)

Improve performance – Risk Assessment Guidance The target audience are emerging economies and small and medium sized companies (SMEs) with no or very limited experience in risk assessment and related methodologies. Our goal was to come up with an easy to use step wise process as a first step to bridge gaps in current performance. The guidance has its limitations, it will be a living document to be updated / improved in the years to come. The guidance has proven to be of help for semi-technicians to understand the RA process in general The ICCA RA process is not applied in REACH countries, because here REACH is in the lead

Improve performance – Risk Assessment Guidance OECD / REACH Guidance “PhD Level” Expert knowledge ICCA GPS Guidance “Bachelor Level” Advanced knowledge The GPS guidance is intended to be simple and pragmatic: a first step for beginners in risk assessment. More detailed guidance can be obtained from other sources “College Level” Little to no experience

GPS Guidance on Risk Assessment Section One: Preparation Step 1: Select chemicals for assessment Step 2: Gather information Step 3: Prioritize chemicals into Tiers Step 4: Develop Tier-relevant information (“Base Set of Information”) Section 2: Implementation Step 5: Characterize Hazard Step 6: Assess Exposure Step 7: Conduct Risk Characterization Step 8: Document outcome (GPS Safety Summary) Addendum 1: Assessing toxicity of mixtures Addendum 2: Workplace risk assessment

STEP 1: Select Substances for Risk Assessment STEP 2: Gather information STEP 3: Allocate Substances into Tiers STEP 4: Complete Tier-relevant Information STEP 5: Characterise Hazard STEP 6: Assess Exposure STEP 7: Conduct Risk Characterization STEP 8: Document outcome and Communicate to the public

Step 1: Select substances for assessment GPS risk assessments should be performed for industrial chemicals: Sold (“in commerce”) or transported world-wide in quantities of more than 1 metric ton per year by company and those that Pose a major threat to human health and/or the environment (e.g. known carcinogens, etc.) even if they are sold or transported in smaller amounts than 1 metric ton per year The inventory should be kept strictly company internal due to antitrust / competition law compliance

Step 2: Gather information How to obtain the information: sources to access information on GHS information, Phys/Chem, Hazard and Exposure Information Evaluate the quality of the Information: Reliability, Relevance and Adequacy of data for assessment Close data gaps: As long as the information is considered reliable, alternative sources are accepted e.g Route-to-route extrapolation / Read-across from related substances In vitro methods / (Quantitative) Structure Activity Relationships Animal tests should always be the "last resort"

Step 3: Prioritize substances into Tiers Under GPS the prioritization of chemicals into “Tiers” is based on an initial evaluation of their hazard and / or exposure potential. Identify if your chemical has intrinsic hazard. Identify use, dissemination and exposure control of chemical Allocate chemicals into Tiers Each Tier is associated with a specific set of information. Chemicals with higher hazard and / or exposure potential require more information and are assessed first. Just because a chemical is identified as high priority for RA does not mean that the RA outcome will show the chemical is of highest risk. Even a hazardous substance can be safely used in accepted applications.

Step 3: Prioritize substances into Tiers

Step 4: Base Set – Standard Parameters (for all) Substance Identity CAS Number(s) Name(s) Structural Formula Composition being assessed Use Pattern (categories types) Sources of Exposure Phys / Chem Physical state Melting Point Boiling Point Relative Density Vapour Pressure Partition Co-efficient Water Solubility Ignition temperature Explosiveness Tox / Ecotox Acute toxicity data (relevant route of exposure e.g. oral, dermal, inhalation) Acute Toxicity (most sensitive species: fish, daphnia or algae) Biodegradability

Step 4: Base Set – Tiered Information Increased priority for RA = Higher information requirement Tier 1 Irritation Mutagenicity Sensitization Repeated Dose Repro / Develop Tier 2 Irritation Mutagenicity Sensitization Repeated Dose Tier 3 Irritation Mutagenicity Sensitization Tier 4 Irritation 3rd Priority for RA 2nd Priority for RA Top Priority for RA

Step 5: Characterize Hazard

Step 6: Assess Exposure Step-wise process Collect information on chemical properties Collect information on the uses and the typical operating conditions and risk management (exposure control) measures applied Set up an Exposure Scenario for each use Estimate exposure for each scenario, using estimating tools (e.g. ECETOC TRA) or measured data Perform the respective assessment for: Human Exposure - Workplace and Consumer scenarios Environmental Exposure Assessment

Simplified flow diagram for Exposure Assessment process Identification of Uses Description of Uses Estimation of Exposures Characterisation of Risks Hazard Assessment Communication of Risks

Life Cycle stages of a substance

Tiering tools on Exposure estimates Workers Consumers Environment TIER 1 Ecetoc TRA COSHH BAuA ConsExpo EUSES PetroRisk “TIER 1.5” GES UseR SPERCs TIER 2 and higher Stoffenmanager ART HERA GEXframe BAMA GE-eater GEMCO AS-treat Measurement

Step 7: Conduct Risk Characterization Risk Characterization Ratio (RCR) Threshold or non-threshold effect RCR = EXPOSURE / DNEL RCR = EXPOSURE / DMEL Environmental RCR = PEC / PNEC Margin of Exposure (MoE) MOE = NOAEL or NOAEC Exposure If MOS > Overall Assessment Factor → No concern If MOS < Overall Assessment Factor → Concern RCR ≥ 1 Risk is high Detailed assessment and RMMs required RCR < 1 Risk is controlled No further action required MOE > 100 No concerns MOE < 100 Concern Refine analysis or control exposures MOE < 1 Cause for high concern Direct measures needed

Step 8: Document outcome (Safety Summary) After the RA it is important to check the efficiency of the safety measures adopted, document the outcomes of the assessment and reviewing the assessment regularly to keep it updated. As this documentation will contain data of proprietary nature it will stay company internal and does not have to be shared with co-producers or the public (no mandatory exchange of dossiers). ICCA has develop a GPS specific format that can be used to communicate the essential information in a transparent way with interested stakeholders (GPS Safety Summary). To provide the general public with a short easy to understand overview of relevant information for the chemical Does not replace technical materials such as the (M)SDS

Step 8: GPS Safety Summary - Template Chemical identity Uses and Benefits Physical/chemical properties Health Effects Environmental Effects Exposure Risk Management Recommendations Handling and storage Disposal consideration State Agency Review Classification and Labeling Conclusion Contact Information within company Date of finalization of the Safety Summary Disclaimer

Thank you! lhe@cefic.be