Implementing QM towards Program Certification

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Education Assessment AAC&U GE and Assessment Conference March 1, 2007.
Advertisements

A Quality Matters “Quickie”
A Practical Guide. The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how.
Getting Started with Quality Matters TM ©MarylandOnline, Inc All rights reserved.
Institutional Policy & Quality Matters Standards: The impact of policy on course quality Deb Adair, QM Director Sloan-C Conference November 9-11, 2011.
Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
Quality Matters TM : Introduction to QM and to the Rubric The Quality Matters™ Rubric 2008 – 2010 Edition Updated July 08.
Supporting Quality of Student Learning Online: Using Quality Matters to Strengthen Online Teaching and Learning Valencia College - Orlando, Florida Charles.
Introducing the Quality Matters Continuing Education Rubric
Quality Matters TM Professional Development and Certifications ©MarylandOnline, Inc All rights reserved.
WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.
Graduate Program Review Prof. Emad Ali. Major Review Steps Self-study Report External evaluation Apply actions for improvement.
Quality Matters : Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning Teaching with New Technologies May 2007.
PCTIA Accreditation WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE APPLYING FOR ACCREDITATION.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Applying the Principles of Prior Learning Assessment Debra A. Dagavarian Diane Holtzman Dennis Fotia.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
August 3,  Review “Guiding Principles for SLO Assessment” (ASCCC, 2010)  Review Assessment Pulse Roundtable results  Discuss and formulate our.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Quality Matters TM Course Reviews ©MarylandOnline, Inc All rights reserved.
Getting Started with Quality Matters TM © 2014 MarylandOnline, Inc. All rights reserved.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Getting Started with Quality Matters TM © 2014 MarylandOnline, Inc. All rights reserved.
Quality Matters TM K-12 QM Coordinator Training: QM Communication ©2014 MarylandOnline, Inc. All rights reserved.
Quality Matters TM Institution Representative Training: QM Communication ©MarylandOnline, Inc All rights reserved.
Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chairperson of the National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee. Former Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo university.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
Preliminary Legislative Recommendations to the 85th Texas Legislature October 2015.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, & Students 1. Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, and Students Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, and Students (#82) INTENT STATEMENTS 4.1.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Anna Parkman New Faculty Orientation ◦ ACCOUNTABILITY in Higher Education ◦ ASSESSMENT as validation of learning ◦ ASSESSMENT & ACCREDITATION ◦
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Advanced Writing Requirement Proposal
Online Quality Course Design vs. Quality Teaching:
Outline of Quality assurance and accreditation
Colorado Community Colleges Online
Competency-Based Assessments & Course Development with QM as Guide
Introducing QM Program Certification
Assessment Basics PNAIRP Conference Thursday October 6, 2011
Harvesting the Benefits of QM Culture for Institutional Accreditation
Program Review For School Counseling Programs
Achieving the Dream Mark A. Smith.
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
Why is My College on warning? Understanding the Accreditation Process.
New Program Director Workshop:
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Atta Girl/Boy: Acing your Accreditation Review
Curriculum and Accreditation
(c) 2011 MarylandOnline, Inc.
D Adapted from: Kaplan & Norton The YCCD District Mission, Vision, Values & Goals are Foundational to College Planning. All College EMP work aligns.
MCCVLC – Providing Educational Access, Anytime, Anywhere
AGC October 11, 2016 Sheila jones
How We Got Here. How We Got Here Summit Participants’ Views on How CTE in the Future.
Introduction to the NSU Write from the Start QEP
لقاء تعريفي بنظام تقييم مخرجات تعلم البرنامج
Melissa Zantello, Executive Director of Program Development
Tools for Infusing QM Standards into the Course Development Process
Measuring Course Quality: Development of a Micro-Analysis Tool
Providing Customized Training on Quality Online Design and Delivery
kctcs action plan.
Accrediting Commission for Law and Justice Education
Plan your journey.
Katherine M. Hitchcock, Ph.D. Michelle Franz
Quality Matters How USFSP leads the way in online course excellence Nelson Poynter Library.
Quality Matters Overview
Presentation transcript:

Implementing QM towards Program Certification

Melissa Poole Director of Quality Assurance Quality Matters Yaping Gao Senior Academic Director Programs & Services Quality Matters ©2016 MarylandOnline, Inc.

Continuous Improvement Non-Profit Academic Peer-Based QM is a non-profit organization with a peer-based approach to serving the education community. From K-12, to Higher Education, and Continuing and Professional Education, our underlying principle is continuous improvement, in all aspects of the education process, to improve student learning outcomes. ©2016 MarylandOnline, Inc.

Enables Quality Assurance QM enables and facilitates the quality assurance process through its Rubric Standards. The three primary components in QM are research supported Rubrics, professional development for faculty and staff, and peer reviews of courses and programs. Rubric Standards Professional Development Course/Program Reviews ©2016 MarylandOnline, Inc.

QM for Every Member Institution What use to make of QM? What to achieve in 1 year? In 2 years? In 3 years? How to maximize the value of investment? How to measure success?

Commitment to Implement QM Reasons and Benefits: Become familiar with QM standards and procedures for quality assurance Introduce QM to a skeptical community Start an internal discussion on what constitutes quality in online education Build support for wider adoption of QM standards and practices Adapt to institutional goals and resources

Pathway to Quality Assurance 4. Program Review & Certifications 3. Collect Required Data 2. Apply for Candidacy QM guides institutions and facilitates a pathway to quality assurance. Starting with commitment and a plan to implement QM, then apply for Candidacy, engage in QM activities and collect that can lead to Program Review and Certifications. 1. Commit to implement QM ©2016 MarylandOnline, Inc.

Program Certifications Program Design Teaching Support Learner Support Learner Success ©2016 MarylandOnline, Inc.

Candidacy as Pathway Candidacy for Program Review & Program Certification QM member or not Maximum of 3 years/phases Choice of program review scope & type 3 check-in points with QM staff Reasonable fee structure Review ready at end of candidacy ©2016 MarylandOnline, Inc.

Principles of Program Certification Definition of Program 3 Years of Activities 85% Rule Data-Driven Explain 1) the definition of a “Program,” 2) why years of activities must precede application for Program Certification, 3) why 3 years of data are needed to establish trend lines and consistency, and 4) how the 85% principle works. General Considerations; A “Program” can be a single online degree program, all the online degree programs in a single academic unit, or all the online degree programs in an institution Program Certification is a long-term goal – QM recommends at least 3 years of experience with QM before applying Program Certification is data driven – QM asks for 3 years of data in support of applications for Program Review resulting in certification Program Certification criteria are demanding, but the 85% principle is invoked to recognize the difficulty of full compliance, which remains a goal

Program Design Certification Measurable LOOCs Measurable at Course & Program Levels Aligned between Courses and Program 5 Programs Individual Programs or All Programs Data from Maximum of 5 Programs Compliance by All Compliance by All Programs QM for All Courses and Instructors Explain data limitation to five online programs, but the pledge that all programs included in the application reflect the same standards and practices. If this is not the case, the application should be confined to those programs that do comply fully with the Program Certification criteria. Alignment is important at the program level, not just at the course level Each program has measurable learning objectives, outcomes, or competencies (LOOC’s) Course LOOC’s reflect program LOOC’s and sum up to program LOOC’s If more than five programs are included in one application (e.g., all online program at an institution, data is only submitted for five representative programs But all programs included in the application are expect to comply with the certification criteria All new and revised courses in all included programs are designed consistently with the relevant QM Rubrics and input from QM trained faculty and staff

Teaching Support Certification Exemplary Online Teaching Teaching Online Training PD Opportunities & Ongoing Support Data Collection Learner Feedback Improved Policies & Teaching Skills Explain importance of including support for part-time and adjunct faculty as essential to provide learners with consistent course quality. The program supports all online instructors, both full-time and part-time All online instructors receive training in online course delivery All online instructors have access to ongoing support in their teaching roles All online instructors are afforded professional development opportunities in their teaching roles Learner feedback on online instructors’ teaching effectiveness is systematically collected and fed back into improvement efforts for online teaching policy and individual instructor improvement.

Learner Support Certification Academic Library Bookstore Advising Tutoring Grades Support Registration Billing Financial Aid Accessibility HelpDesk Emphasize that there may be other services the program provides to online learners, e.g., student organizations. These should be reported too. The program provides online learners with online technical, academic, and student support services including, but not limited to Orientation to online study Technical support Academic advising Tutoring Grade appeals Library resources Accessibility services Records and Registration services Financial Aid services Billing services Access to Institutional and student policies Learner feedback on online services effectiveness is systematically collected and fed back into improvement efforts

Learner Success Certification Completion Retention Satisfaction (Students, Faculty, Employers) Data Collection Definition of Success Program Competitiveness Institutional Mission & Goals Explain QM’s willingness to let programs define learner success based on mission, resources, and the characteristics of their learner population. How does your program define learner success? Course retention, completion, grades, & graduation rates? Capstone projects, standardized summative testing? Transcript reviews and data collection rubrics based on published LOOK’s Alumni surveys Employer surveys Civic engagement measures Other Are your program’s mission and goals factored into your definition of learner success? Have you thought about what sets your program apart from competing programs? Are you collecting data to document that your learner success is better than average for programs of your type?

Exemplary Program Recognition Program Design Teaching Support Learner Support Learner Success

Benefits of QM to Learners Success Completion Retention Satisfaction (Instructor & Learner) QM certifications for faculty, staff, courses, and programs benefit the institution and students. Faculty satisfaction increases with well-designed courses. This gives instructors more time to interact with students and provide personalized instruction and facilitation. Learner satisfaction with course design and interaction with instructors increases, which improves retention, completion and student success. Facilitate Learner Success ©2016 MarylandOnline, Inc.

Benefits of QM to Institutions Accreditation Funding Stakeholders Accountability With improved student success, the administration has positive and encouraging data to report to stakeholders which can include the state legislature, potential donors, and the accreditation bodies. This in turn generates more resources that can be invested back into teaching and learning. ©2016 MarylandOnline, Inc.

Contact QM Today! Membership Marijane Hakun - 401.497.8001 mhakun@qualitymatters.org Professional Development Brenda Boyd - 401.497.8027 brenda.boyd@qualitymatters.org Course Reviews Melissa Poole - 401.497.8031 mpoole@qualitymatters.org K-12 Membership & Services Chris Voelker - 401.497.8037 christine.voelker@qualitymatters.org Please contact any of the QM staff listed here. We look forward to welcoming you to the QM community and working with you soon! Join the QM Community today. Thank you!

Thank You!