Cavity BPM for CALIFES C. Simon, M. Luong, D. Bogard, W. Farabolini, J

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam-based Measurements of HOMs in the HTC Adam Bartnik for ERL Team, Daniel Hall, John Dobbins, Mike Billing, Matthias Liepe, Ivan Bazarov.
Advertisements

1 KEK Cavity BPM Hitoshi Hayano Development of Cavity BPM for Q-magnet attachment, Aiming; compact design, 0.2µm resolution, BPM center error (between.
Bob Lill Undulator Systems – Cavity BPM October 12, 2006 Undulator Cavity BPM Status.
PEDM Review 12/7/091 Beam Position Monitors William Morse.
Bob Lill Undulator Cavity BPM System April 16, 2007 Undulator Cavity BPM Status.
Tesla Meeting Frascati 27/05/03 C. Magne Cold BPM for TTF2 Tesla prototype - low beam impedance - cooling to 2K without strain - Low beam coupling impedance:
BPMs and HOM-BPMs for the XFEL Linac N. Baboi for the BPM and the HOM teams (DESY, CEA-Saclay, SLAC, FNAL, Cockroft/Daresbury) XFEL Linac Review Meeting,
Bob Lill Undulator Systems – BPM January 31, 2006 Undulator Cavity BPM Design and Status.
Experience on design, prototyping and testing of cavity BPM for the European-XFEL > Motivation > Introduction > Principle of CBPMs > Mechanical properties.
CLIC Drive Beam Beam Position Monitors International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010 Geneva Steve Smith SLAC / CERN
Status of the Fermilab Cold BPM R&D Manfred Wendt Fermilab 10/1/20091LCWA09 Main Linac WG.
RF Cavity Simulation for SPL Simulink Model for HP-SPL Extension to LINAC4 at CERN from RF Point of View Acknowledgement: CEA team, in particular O. Piquet.
1 C. Simon CLIC Instrumentation workshop BPM C. Simon on behalf of the Saclay’s group CLIC Instrumentation workshop 2 nd - 3 rd June.
The Cavity Beam Position Monitor (BPM) Massimo Dal Forno Paolo Craievich, Raffaele De Monte, Thomas Borden, Andrea Borga, Mauro Predonzani, Mario Ferianis,
Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.
Cavity Beam Position Monitor (BPM) for future linear colliders such as CLIC. N Joshi, S Boogert, A Lyapin, et al. Royal.
Status of the ILC Main Linac BPM R&D Thibaut Lefevre CERN Claire Simon CEA Sacley Sebastien Vilalte LAPP Manfred Wendt Fermilab 11/19/20081ILC08 Main Linac.
The beam-based alignment and feedback systems, essential operations of the future colliders, use high resolution Beam Position Monitors (BPM). In the framework.
University of Kansas 2004 ITTC Summer Lecture Series Network Analyzer Operation John Paden.
Summary of Booster Dampers Systems Dave McGinnis December 7, 2010.
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
Collimator BPM electronics – Results from the lab, SPS and LHC
High resolution RF cavity BPM design for Linear Collider Andrei Lunin 8th DITANET Topical Workshop on Beam Position Monitors.
Production and Installation Policy of IP-BPM ATF2 Project Meeting, 2006/12/18 Y. Honda, Y. Inoue, T. Hino, T. Nakamura.
CLIC09 Workshop October 2009Drive beam BPM’sLars Søby 1 Drive Beam BPM’s CLIC 09 work shop, CERN, of October 2009, Lars Søby.
Vertical Emittance Tuning at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Presented by Eugene Tan.
Status of the Cold BPM Developments at CEA Saclay and Fermilab L-Band Cavity BPM: Nathan Eddy, Andrei Lunin, Eric Pirtle, Gennady Romanov, Nikolay Solyak,
Beam Test status and Plans of the ILC Main LINAC BPM
R.SREEDHARAN  SOLEIL main parameters  Booster and storage ring low level RF system  New digital Booster LLRF system under development  Digital LLRF.
An Inductive Pick-Up (IPU) for Beam Position and Current Measurement
17th July 2008#4-CTF3 Committee1 CA.BHB 0400CA.SNH 0110CA.SNI 0120 CA.VVS 0100 CA.DHG/DVG 0130 CA.VVS 0200 CA.MTV 0215 CA.BPM 0220 CA.DHG/DVG 0225CA.SNG.
SLAC ESA T-474 ILC BPM energy spectrometer prototype Bino Maiheu University College London on behalf of T-474 Vancouver Linear Collider.
BPM stripline acquisition in CLEX Sébastien Vilalte.
DaMon: a resonator to observe bunch charge/length and dark current. > Principle of detecting weakly charged bunches > Setup of resonator and electronics.
Cavity BPM: Multi-bunch analysis N Joshi, S Boogert, A Lyapin, F. Cullinan, et al. Royal Holloway University of London,
Cold BPM development in KEK H. Hayano, March 2011 Jung Keun Ahn (PNU), Sun young Ryu (PNU), Eun San Kim (KNU), Young Im Kim (KNU), Jin yeong Ryu (KNU),
Cavity BPM Simulations A. Liapine. Analysis of the Existing BPMs BINP KEK.
Low-Q IP BPM Y. I. Kim *, A. Heo, E-S. Kim (KNU) S. T. Boogert (JAI) D. M. McCormick, J. May, J. Nelson, T. Smith, G. R. White (SLAC) Y. Honda, N. Terunuma,
Development of a High Resolution Cavity BPM for the CLIC Main Beam
16/01/12DITANET Topical Workshop on Beam Position Monitors Reentrant Beam Position Monitors DITANET Topical Workshop on Beam Position Monitors 16 th –
F. Peauger19th June #3-CTF3 Committee1 CALIFES STATUS CA.BHB 0400CA.SNH 0110CA.SNI 0120 CA.VVS 0100 CA.DHG/DVG 0130 CA.VVS 0200 CA.MTV 0215 CA.BPM.
MLI Update Chris Adolphsen SLAC. CAVITY VESSEL T4CM QUAD T4CM BPM QUADS LEADS 80K BLOCK 4K BLOCK Quadrupole Package.
CLIC Beam instrumentation work shop, CERN, 2 nd & 3 rd of June 2009, Lars Søby BPM overview CLIC instrumentation work shop 2-3 June BPM overview.
1CEA/ Saclay/ SACM CARE/SRF/WP11 Development of a new Beam Position Monitor for FLASH, XFEL and ILC Cryomodules Claire Simon, Michel Luong, Stéphane Chel,
CLIC Workshop 18 th -22 nd January 2016, CERN 1 Alfonso Benot Morell Manfred Wendt.
F. Peauger - CEA DSM IRFU SACM 18 May 2008 CA.BHB 0400CA.SNH 0110CA.SNI 0120 CA.VVS 0100 CA.DHG/DVG 0130 CA.VVS 0200 CA.MTV 0215 CA.BPM 0220 CA.DHG/DVG.
11th February th CTF3 Committee - Wilfrid Farabolini1 Status and progress of the CTF3 probe beam 1.
CTF3 PROBE BEAM LINAC COMMISSIONG AND OPERATIONS
Re-entrant BPM R&D for ILC Main Linac
Visit for more Learning Resources
CAVITY BPM FOR CALIFES Claire Simon, Michel Luong, D. Bogard, P
Franck Peauger, Riccardo Zennaro
Wakefield & Cavity based Monitors: Fermilab BPM Development Plans
NanoBPM Progress January 12, 2005 Steve Smith.
CLIC Main Linac Cavity BPM Snapshot of the work in progress
CLIC Workshop 2016: Main Beam Cavity BPM
12.4: SRF HOM Diagnostics: Experimental Results and Future Plans
F.Marcellini, D.Alesini, A.Ghigo
9/10/2018 News on operation Second commissioning phase from 30th of March to 9th of April Aline Curtoni, Claire Simon, Franck Peauger, Wilfrid Farabolini.
    BEAM POSITION MONITORS USING A RE-ENTRANT CAVITY C. Simon1, S. Chel1, M. Luong1, P. Contrepois1, P. Girardot1, N. Baboi2 and N. Rouvière3.
Electric Field Amplitude (MV/m)
Bunch Tiltmeter Steve Smith SLAC Snowmass July 16, 2001 Update date
Low Level RF Status Outline LLRF controls system overview
The New Readout Electronics for the SLAC Focusing DIRC Prototype (SLAC experiment T-492 ) L. L. Ruckman, G. S. Varner Instrumentation Development Laboratory.
Beam Position Measurements in TTF Cavities
ICFA Mini-Workshop, IHEP, 2017
Low Level RF Status Outline LLRF controls system overview
High Precision SC Cavity Alignment Diagnostics with HOM Measurements
Undulator Cavity BPM Status
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
Presentation transcript:

Cavity BPM for CALIFES C. Simon, M. Luong, D. Bogard, W. Farabolini, J Cavity BPM for CALIFES C. Simon, M. Luong, D. Bogard, W. Farabolini, J. Novo CTF3 Meeting – 27-29 January 2009

CALIFES linac 6 BPMs are installed on the CALIFES linac CA.MTV 0215 CA.FCU 0430 CA.MTV 0125 (virtual cathode) CA.MTV 0390 CA.BPR 0370 CA.ICT 0210 ACS 0230 ACS 0250 ACS 0270 DUM 0450 TBTS ITL CA.BPM 0220 CA.BPM 0240 CA.BPM 0260 CA.BPM 0310 CA.SDH 0340 CA.BPM 0380 CA.BPM 0410 CA.DHG/DVG 0130 CA.DHG/DVG 0225 CA.DHB/DVB 0230 CA.DHG/DVG 0245 CA.DHB/DVB 0250 CA.DHG/DVG 0265 CA.DHB/DVB 0270 CA.DHG/DVG 0320 CA.DHG/DVG 0385 CA.SNH 0110 CA.SNG 0230 CA.SNI 0120 CA.SNG 0250 CA.QFD 0350 CA.QDD 0355 CA.QFD 0360 CA.BHB 0400 CA.VVS 0100 CA.VVS 0200 CA.VVS 0300 CA.VVS 0500 6 BPMs are installed on the CALIFES linac

Reentrant Cavity BPM for CALIFES It is operated in single and multi-bunches modes The cavity is fabricated with titanium and is as compact as possible : ~125 mm length and 18 mm aperture 4 mm gap Reentrant Part Bent coaxial cylinder designed to have: - a large frequency separation between monopole and dipole modes - a low loop exposure to the electric fields

RF characteristics RF characteristics of the cavity: frequency, coupling and R/Q Monopole and dipole transmission measured by the network analyzer Eigen modes F (MHz) Ql (R/Q) (Ω) Calculated with HFSS in eigen mode Measured in the CLEX Measured in the CLEX Offset 5 mm Offset 10 mm Monopole mode 3991 3988 24 26.76 22.3 22.2 Dipole mode 5985 5983 43 50.21 1.1 7 Monopole and dipole reflection measured by the network analyzer Similar results from one BPM to another, and in-situ results are comparable to Saclay in-lab measurements BPM Due to tolerances in machining, welding and mounting, some small distortions of the cavity symmetry are generated. This asymmetry is called cross talk and the isolation is evaluated > 26 dB.

Signal Processing Hybrids installed close to BPMs in the CLEX Multiport switches used to have one signal processing electronics to control six BPMs. Analog electronics with several steps to reject the monopole mode Hybrid couplers RF electronics used synchronous detection with an I/Q demodulator.

Control Command of BPMs 1/Sampling with acqiris boards and readout signals on OASIS 3/Results sent on graphic windows under JAVA and in a file to be used with Matlab 6 BPMs implemented 2/Signal processing: Digital Down Conversion - raw waveform multiplied by a local oscillator of the same frequency to yield a zero intermediate frequency - real and imaginary parts of each IF are then multiplied by a 60 coefficient, symmetric, finite impulse response (FIR), low pass filter with 40MHz 3dB bandwidth Beam position

Simulations (1) Signal voltage determined by the beam’s energy loss to the dipole mode. Dipole mode signal depends on frequency fi and external coupling Qi of this mode single bunch Φ(t) = heaviside function, q = bunch charge, R0 = 50 Ω, (R/Q)i = coupling to the beam and ζi = 2 (dipole mode) 32 bunches Sd(n) Dipole mode signal in single bunch mode Dipole mode signal in 32 bunches mode ~ 30 ns Signal in single bunch mode behind RF electronics Signal in 32 bunches mode behind RF electronics ~10 ns

Simulations (2) Noise is determined by : Thermal Noise : kb = Boltzmann constant, BW (Hz) = Bandwidth, T (K) = Room Temperature. Noise from signal processing channel : with Pth = Thermal noise, NF=Total noise figure of the signal processing, Fi and Gi respectively the noise factor and the gain of component i. Re-entrant Cavity at CALIFES Environment Noise RMS: 66 µV (measured at FLASH) Δ signal (gain adjusted to get an RF signal ~ 0 dBm, simulated in single bunch) with 5 mm offset : 590 mV (simulated), Noise: 0.5 mV (calculated) Resolution : 3.2 µm (simulated) with 0.1 mm offset : 555 mV (simulated), Noise: 0.1 mV (calculated) Resolution : 100 nm (simulated)

BPM calibration (1) CA.ICT 0210 CA.BPM 0220 All BPMs have same electronics and same losses  coefficients should be the same Charge calibrated with charge calculated by ICT

Beam studies (1) ICT channels τ too long on S channel (green)  problem with diode Impedance problem? -> Move lowpass filter ICT channels Amplitude of signals corresponds to 6 nC with 150 bunches determined thanks to ICT

 beam offset minimized Beam studies (2) Dy I and Q channels Signals minimized  beam offset minimized S channels Charge ~ 6 nC read by the first and second BPM. ~ 100 % transmission behind 1st section

Beam studies (3) S Channel Dy I and Q channels Signal frequency: 100 MHz Shape of Dy shows in the pulse train : - charge not constant or beam position not constant S Channel Dy I and Q channels Simulation of I and Q signals

BPM calibration (2) R = transfer matrix from steerer to BPM CA.DHG/DVG 0320 CA.BPM 0380 R = transfer matrix from steerer to BPM Magnets switched off between steerers and studied BPM to reduce errors and simplify calculation. Move beam with one steerer in horizontal and vertical frame. Average of 500 points for each steerer setting. Calculate for each steerer setting, the relative beam position in using a transfer matrix between steerer and BPM : Dx = R12*Dx’(angle at steerer)

Summary Reentrant cavity BPM features for CALIFES: Operated in single and multi-bunches Single bunch resolution potential < 1 µm Charge of beam measured Software under development. First beam seen by BPMs  Dec. 2008 New beam tests  end of March 2009

Acknowledgements Thanks to CERN and CEA teams Thanks to Pascal Contrepois Aline Curtoni Stéphane Deghaye Mick Draper Patrick Girardot Francis Harrrault Pierre-Alain Leroy Fabienne Orsini Franck Peauger Anastasiya Radeva Lars Soby Thank you for your attention